tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post6793875472537463143..comments2024-03-28T05:42:11.199-07:00Comments on Bigfoot Evidence: What Randy Brisson is known for (and it's not his hair)Shawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12059275107499275007noreply@blogger.comBlogger40125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-667334144447207912020-06-09T00:37:26.008-07:002020-06-09T00:37:26.008-07:00Maybe that's where Todd Standing got the idea ...Maybe that's where Todd Standing got the idea to just film the faces and also not filming them leaving.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08610775744616610888noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-19182760661308091522017-05-23T05:21:49.569-07:002017-05-23T05:21:49.569-07:00Honestly I've been studying Sasquatch for the ...Honestly I've been studying Sasquatch for the past 3 years and been looking at a lot of different footage but I never seen this this one I'm not really sure what to make of it but the creature in the picture looks like a juvenile the first thing that came to mind that it was small thigh looks about six feet tall but definitely a juvenileAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00104851358166134199noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-38281468886664034212015-01-11T10:03:16.722-08:002015-01-11T10:03:16.722-08:00The group who investigated the alleged Bigfoot sig...The group who investigated the alleged Bigfoot sighting location also found the forest floor rather thick and heavily padded in leafs debris which raised the question why Brisson left the hard road trail within 150 feet of the parking-lot, to which he alleges to have seen a track within 30 feet of the stump where he claimed a Sasquatch had been hiding behind. The group found in virtually impossible for Brisson to have known a track was 30 feet off the hard road and no reason for his going over to that particular spot so close to the parking-lot was ever given by him. The who affair had all the tell-tale signs of a hoax.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-86816085544529499332015-01-11T09:39:58.390-08:002015-01-11T09:39:58.390-08:00There were three photos in total that Brisson sent...There were three photos in total that Brisson sent to Thomas Steenburg. The third photo was said by Brisson to have been taken of the stump immediately after the alleged Bigfoot ducked down behind it. The alleged hiss the Bigfoot was said to make in Brisson's initial story is what was supposed to have caused him to immediately flee the area and why no further photos were taken. It should also be said that all three photos sent to Steenburg were said by Brisson to have been taken from the hip without the use of a view finder and it should be said that all three photos were remarkably centered on both the horizontal and vertical planes with one location change between pictures. This raised doubts that Brisson actually was bent over looking at a track at the time he heard a noise at the stump which caused him to take his photo(s) from the hip. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-4753650528683291132015-01-11T09:24:29.867-08:002015-01-11T09:24:29.867-08:00To better understand the photo and its origin - on...To better understand the photo and its origin - one should know Brissons story and the way it changed over time from him saying it duck behind the stump to which it allegedly hissed causing Brisson to run away - to later changing that part to Brisson seeing the 7 foot tall Bigfoot running away from the stump. A group of individuals went to the stump and found that a 5' 8" tall Thomas Steenburg may have been slightly larger than the reported 7' tall Bigfoot. In an apparent effort to do damage control - Brisson then went back to the stump and said that the creature's body was behind the tall part (right side of the stump when facing the subject) where the ground behind the stump drops about a foot in elevation compared to the tree side and added that the subject was leaning far to its right to have its head seen on the lower side in front of the tree seen directly behind the stump when Brisson took his photo(s). The group of investigators contended that the alleged Bigfoot is standing erect and that the head is on both the horizontal and vertical planes. It should also be noted that the head of the alleged 7' Bigfoot could fit its entire head (hair and all) inside the parameters of Steenburg's own head. The photo(s) were also taken not deep into the mountains around Pitt Lake as it had been stated, but a rocks throw from the parking-lot at Golden Ears Park. Not long after this investigation - a group of BFRO people, along with Thomas Steenburg, went on a hike with Brission where they caught Brisson throwing rocks when he thought no one was looking. The rocks were claimed by Brisson to be being thrown by Bigfoot. I might add that these images were discussed on Westcoat Sasquatch and can still be seen there. An enlargement of the two faces displayed what looked to be a skin tone area that was not present in the other photo of the face - as if the subject wiped its face, thus removing what ever was used to darken it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-2656486038719193402012-06-11T09:09:48.785-07:002012-06-11T09:09:48.785-07:00Wow, of course there's no body in the pic. Th...Wow, of course there's no body in the pic. That (showing the body) would prove it to be a hoax. Junk.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-10466590042080628482011-12-26T09:33:59.155-08:002011-12-26T09:33:59.155-08:00If one doesn't think there is enough evidence ...If one doesn't think there is enough evidence within the image of the head on the stump so to know that it is a hoax, then what about Brisson's ever changing story?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-49250049588430889112011-12-19T23:27:50.055-08:002011-12-19T23:27:50.055-08:00Let me rephrase, the pictures are supposed to be t...Let me rephrase, the pictures are supposed to be the same being,I don't think they are. That is only my opinion.Blondienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-4834189512924743962011-12-19T23:24:44.584-08:002011-12-19T23:24:44.584-08:00I have a question?
What if there are other videos...I have a question? <br />What if there are other videos out there by very different researchers in different parts of the nation and there appears to be very similar looking Bigfoot/forest people they've captured?<br /><br />By similar I mean as these two are similar, not identical but very similar. The two above are not identical. The one on the right reminds me of some Native Americans tribes.Blondienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-32249170753329107252011-12-19T22:25:42.026-08:002011-12-19T22:25:42.026-08:00Brisson is not a formally a member of the EP, but ...Brisson is not a formally a member of the EP, but his samples were part of the samples that the EP submitted to Ketchum. Brisson was also the EP's guy for the habituation site at Golden Ears Park, and he did get some real BF hairs. Brisson is under the control of Erickson, that's why Ketchum can't stop him from putting his samples online like that.Robert Lindsayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16213140951444357431noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-11112575390184796072011-12-19T21:03:08.346-08:002011-12-19T21:03:08.346-08:00Why isn't anyone asking the obvious question ?...Why isn't anyone asking the obvious question ???<br /><br />Where is it shown that Randy Brisson was a member of the Erickson Project ??<br /><br />He has never been mentioned on the EP websites nor in any other articles I have seen. <br /><br />Perhaps someone should pony up this information about where the BS comes from.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-61374481459192095532011-12-19T12:28:51.156-08:002011-12-19T12:28:51.156-08:00There's no need to discredit the photographer....There's no need to discredit the photographer. He did that to himself by taking a photo of a man's head, doctoring it up, and trying to pass it off as a bigfoot.<br /><br />The Erickson Project might as well pack it in now if this guy is one of their team members. Even if the rest of the team and their findings are on the up and up, this guy has entirely ruined their credibility. Any hypothetical legitimate finding(s) from this group will be dismissed by science/skeptics (and likely some believers as well) as the handywork of this hoaxer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-22557487030436774092011-12-19T10:46:15.386-08:002011-12-19T10:46:15.386-08:00Not sold 100% on the photo, but I know it's go...Not sold 100% on the photo, but I know it's good, because everyone seems to be having an easier time journalistically discrediting the photographer... If the photo was trash, we'd be tearing it apart forensically. Just an observation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-44343670569167624012011-12-19T10:10:06.643-08:002011-12-19T10:10:06.643-08:00Go to the article I linked to above. Thomas Steenb...Go to the article I linked to above. Thomas Steenberg and Bill Miller and some others go into deep detail about why they feel that Brisson hoaxed that photo. They also talk about him saying they were shot at Pitt Lake when Steenberg and Miller say they were shot 250 yards from the campground parking lot.Robert Lindsayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16213140951444357431noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-90847692592376735772011-12-19T09:24:35.410-08:002011-12-19T09:24:35.410-08:00The article says that this guy is "an Erickso...The article says that this guy is "an Erickson Project team member." I guess the credibility of the Erickson Project is down to zero if there's a hoaxer in its ranks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-66433304799662510432011-12-19T07:43:51.949-08:002011-12-19T07:43:51.949-08:00The title of the article reads: What Randy Brisson...The title of the article reads: What Randy Brisson is Known For...<br />Based on many of the comments here, apparently what he is known for is bigfoot hoaxing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-85204829942385756742011-12-18T20:40:32.057-08:002011-12-18T20:40:32.057-08:00Furthermore, just posting the picture showing the ...Furthermore, just posting the picture showing the individual pixels hardly says anything about it's authenticity. It would be great to have the "Photoshop expert" come forward and explain how they came to their conclusions. Great how in the Bigfoot world, you can post that something has been "proved authentic", but not give a shred of reasonable evidence of how the proof was derived.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-39520973602884821372011-12-18T20:37:32.597-08:002011-12-18T20:37:32.597-08:00Those "photos" are and always were a jok...Those "photos" are and always were a joke. They are a bad Photo-Shop or other software creation and don't remotely look authentic. <br />Randy Brisson is a shameless hoaxer and anyone on this blog that posts anything positive about his "work" is probably him!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-78370122200337715962011-12-18T20:22:40.046-08:002011-12-18T20:22:40.046-08:00Doesn't seem logical he would stick his entire...Doesn't seem logical he would stick his entire head up like that. He isn't peeking. Seems fakeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-14744830479762075052011-12-18T20:02:01.140-08:002011-12-18T20:02:01.140-08:00@Robert Lindsay
I'm just curious how close yo...@Robert Lindsay<br /><br />I'm just curious how close your sources are to the incidents you speak of. I'm fairly close to golden ears park. I would love for you to email me a map of the location from the parking lot, where he actually took these pictures. (250 yards is fairly close to find) I could go out there and find this stump, take some pics and send them back to Shawn. I'm sure the stump and trees are still there. <br /><br />At least by doing this we could put that part to rest. Also, maybe I'm just not that informed, but where did u read, that originally he said the pics were taken in pitt lake? I would like to read that.<br /><br />ThanksBeer-Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01072385573149380142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-25905505664626843742011-12-18T17:56:10.648-08:002011-12-18T17:56:10.648-08:00Also Brisson said the pic was taken at Pitt Lake w...Also Brisson said the pic was taken at Pitt Lake when in reality it was taken about 250 yards from the parking lot of the main campground at Golden Ears Park. Also, Randy originally said it was a large adult BF, but when it was pointed out that the head is SMALLER than the head of a human adult male, he changed his story and said it was an adolescent BF. He has also been caught hoaxing by throwing rocks when people were researching with him and saying a BF was doing it. He was caught doing this multiple times.Robert Lindsayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16213140951444357431noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-62263093761956763722011-12-18T17:24:09.323-08:002011-12-18T17:24:09.323-08:00Really? It looks like a picture of a human head t...Really? It looks like a picture of a human head that's been tweaked to darken the image to hide the detail. Fake as a $3 bill.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-36753357948960674922011-12-18T16:45:30.570-08:002011-12-18T16:45:30.570-08:00Bearded lady.Bearded lady.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-42492492932787107632011-12-18T16:25:19.426-08:002011-12-18T16:25:19.426-08:00Look how different people of different races appea...Look how different people of different races appear. Look at an Eastern Black bear and a kodiak bear, look at pit viper vs non venous snakes. Goriila vs Baboon.<br /><br />Also look at all the different native stories that talk of peaceful friendly Sasquatch and the others that claimed them man eaters.<br /><br />Compare a 10 year old black male to an 80 year old white female- drastic differences in appearance despite them both being human.<br /><br />No conclusion should be drawn from what other photos show.<br /><br />I do not believe what Robert Lindsey said- but I don't disbelieve it either.<br /><br />The question is what is shown in the photo. This is always the question but with many hoaxes you don't even get to that. He was in the area and you can't clearly say its a hoax by the picture alone. Those who do base it on other information and the source not the photo standing alone.<br /><br />This falls into the category of those where many people would be surprised it it were real. This is because of the source and not is what is shown standing alone. Unless he admits this is a hoax then nobody can ever say for sure.<br /><br />The lack of the other photos mean nothing. If these are real- then he released these to create a buzz and then when the report and documentary come out attempt to sell them to the winning bidder.<br /><br />Say the History channel produces "BigFoot: Definitive Proof" after the release of the report . Selling the other photos would be shown for the first time would be something the History Channel would pay for.<br /><br />My argument against these photos: look how that stump resembles a "hut" or shelter like structure. That is a nice spot for a hoax because the viewer can infer something and not know it leading them to give it more credibility. The stump could have been set up to look like that and it looked different when they returned. There should be casts and other evidence- that is a humid area with soft earth, softer trees leaving claw marks easier. <br /><br />That stump would be a prime spot for a raccoon den- a raccoon thats injured, has rabies or mange or all three could account for the face with the shadows and humidity in the area accounting for some of the features.<br /><br />This one probably wont go away for a long time.<br /><br />My personal opinion is that this is a hoax based on what I said about the stump resembled a hut. It was taken after the remake of the planet of the apes and when there was buzz about rise of Planet of the Apes. It could be a mask grabbed from a dollar store over a soccer ball. I believe he is sincere that he has seen a great deal of activity in that area and believes it will become a new "Bluff Creek"- this lets everyone know he was one of the first to know this and in the area so he does not have to prove that later on and can cash in fast and be one of the few who actually does over the long term as well.<br /><br />That is the argument nobody talks about but the real reason people doubt Patterson and Gimlin. Patterson's estate did make a great deal of money on it- as they should- they had something people would pay for and this would make their lives better. Nobody has seen the original on the original films- why- because one day it will be auctioned for a very large sum. People see them being logical and acting as anyone would as a sign of a hoax- when in reality Patterson could have never imagined it would become what it did. Those who want to be the next Roger Patterson often forget the first one really had no idea anything he did would have the impact it did.Fascinatednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-52265200413554943372011-12-18T15:54:06.579-08:002011-12-18T15:54:06.579-08:00Didnt realise this guy has been proved to be hoaxi...Didnt realise this guy has been proved to be hoaxing. Takes all credibility away from the photos to be honest.Irishmalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17371075552765607224noreply@blogger.com