tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post6064907661245639902..comments2024-03-29T01:11:45.309-07:00Comments on Bigfoot Evidence: Bigfoot Perched in TreeShawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12059275107499275007noreply@blogger.comBlogger83125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-54760043071799448222018-03-23T06:39:43.281-07:002018-03-23T06:39:43.281-07:00You can peer review hard data... that’s why it’s h...You can peer review hard data... that’s why it’s happened. Don’t like it? <br /><br />Work on that burden.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-82253574233126127022018-03-23T05:58:11.356-07:002018-03-23T05:58:11.356-07:00Premise, stupid. You can't peer review imagina...Premise, stupid. You can't peer review imaginary creatures into existence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-63071142616008341852018-03-23T05:48:32.597-07:002018-03-23T05:48:32.597-07:00What a meltdown.
I have peer reviewed science for...What a meltdown.<br /><br />I have peer reviewed science for my theories.<br /><br />What you’re feeling now, will be the emotions of realising you really aren’t as clever as you thought you were. Don’t like it... go get a reference, or shut up and sit down. <br /><br />Chump. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-11601062329936152632018-03-23T05:26:59.016-07:002018-03-23T05:26:59.016-07:00ikdummÿ, you might have bigfoot in your flat. If e...ikdummÿ, you might have bigfoot in your flat. If evidence were provided of bigfoot hand prints, you would have to accept it as proof that you have bigfoot in your flat. Premise be damned, it's manufactured evidence that makes your world go round.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-81633964291371495142018-03-23T05:12:22.164-07:002018-03-23T05:12:22.164-07:00According to your think, ikdummÿ, your saviour Daw...According to your think, ikdummÿ, your saviour Dawkins is eminently more qualified to understand hominids than blog boy ikdummy.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-42127653849022692932018-03-23T04:59:54.768-07:002018-03-23T04:59:54.768-07:00Your hero Dawkins says the world is too explored t...Your hero Dawkins says the world is too explored to overlook your fantasy monster men.<br /><br />I guess he understands premise. <br /><br />Caerphilly? Cardiff?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-16251542519702482632018-03-23T04:47:23.653-07:002018-03-23T04:47:23.653-07:00So, south Wales, chap?So, south Wales, chap?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-38829932835156741062018-03-23T01:52:20.972-07:002018-03-23T01:52:20.972-07:00And since Dawkins has made such a comment... one c...And since Dawkins has made such a comment... one can very easily assume he’s not looked at the matter adequately. So thanks for debunking your own drivel for me. <br /><br />: pIktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-7748047383756709452018-03-23T01:51:04.518-07:002018-03-23T01:51:04.518-07:00Also... How ever qualified, if someone throws some...Also... How ever qualified, if someone throws something out because it doesn't fit their expectations of a hominin/hominid whose existence they don’t find credible, isn't very good logic, and certainly isn’t scientific. It means that nothing that person claims can be taken as a logical, because not only might their original idea be inadvertently moving the goal posts, but such an idea might be skewered due to lacking fundamental information. For example, referring to a “savannah-dwelling primate” for what is largely reported and physical evidence found in mountainous alpine/jungle rain forests... Is a little bit silly. <br /><br />"Although not firmly announcing the yeti's definite existence, Sir David (Attenborough) stated that as there is no doubt that a giant ape did exist in the area at some point and that it is therefore not impossible that it may have been able to avoid human contact within the vast open space of the Himalayas."<br />http://eden.uktv.co.uk/blog/article/attenborough-yeti-mystery/<br />"I actually believe that there is a real possibility that there might be something in the abominable snowman mystery."Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-44243583620423573882018-03-23T00:17:44.260-07:002018-03-23T00:17:44.260-07:00AGAIN!
I’ll take that as you not having a quote ...AGAIN! <br /><br />I’ll take that as you not having a quote or a reference to Dawkins actually commenting on any level of EVIDENCE and subsequently dismissing the notion of “Bigfoot” off the back of that. If you’re going to keep up with the demands of adult debate, you have to read the comments and the points of other people PROPERLY. The whole basis of my argument, is that next to no scientist has drawn such a conclusion once they’ve actually looked at the level evidence, and dismissed this subject outright. Because it’s impossible and unscientific to do so <br /><br />And pareidolia in a tree, and Matt’s article finding for the sake of new material daily... doesn’t make 60 years of physicals evidence go away. And there is your burden. Stop deflecting and sidestepping... man up <br /><br />How’s that, mate? Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-12428277795063467032018-03-22T19:55:01.148-07:002018-03-22T19:55:01.148-07:00Do ye hailest fromst the southern parts of the wal...Do ye hailest fromst the southern parts of the wales, mate? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-12552083516644512732018-03-22T19:25:43.741-07:002018-03-22T19:25:43.741-07:00CaerfulCaerfulAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-41237835602409553882018-03-22T16:02:37.467-07:002018-03-22T16:02:37.467-07:00Look at the bottom of the barrel "evidence&qu...Look at the bottom of the barrel "evidence" this thread is presenting, a bigfoot in a tree", when supposaedly there are 10000 blah, blah, blah....would a thread this silly even exist if bigfoot were real?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-76799449814873416572018-03-22T15:54:32.255-07:002018-03-22T15:54:32.255-07:00Richard Dawkins relating to no more archaic specie...Richard Dawkins relating to no more archaic species left to mix with:<br /><br /><br />"The discovery of relict populations of extinct hominins such Homo erectus and Australopithecus. Yeti enthusiasts notwithstanding, I don't think this is going to happen. The world is now too well explored for us to have overlooked a large, savannah-dwelling primate. Even Homo floresiensis has been extinct 17,000 years. But if it did happen, it would change everything."<br /><br />Sucker. LOLAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-47874424892535387832018-03-22T15:42:26.885-07:002018-03-22T15:42:26.885-07:00Oh dear... scrambling a bit, are we Stuey? Don’t w...Oh dear... scrambling a bit, are we Stuey? Don’t worry about whatvit we originally used for in antiquity (creased), I’ll take that as you not having a quote or a reference to Dawkins commenting on any level of evidence and subsequently dismissing the notion of “Bigfoot” off the back of that. <br /><br />Got it. <br /><br />Night sucker. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-1040405525371161272018-03-22T15:37:56.056-07:002018-03-22T15:37:56.056-07:00Enthusiast: fan, devotee, aficionado, lover, admir...Enthusiast: fan, devotee, aficionado, lover, admirer, follower <br /><br />"Enthusiast" was originally used to refer to a person possessed by a god, or someone who exhibited intense piety. enthusiast c.1600, pejorative, one who believes himself possessed of divine revelations or special communication from God<br /><br />So Dawkins would know what the word "enthusiast" means, right? Especially someone with his views on religion?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-34922615085034493052018-03-22T15:34:17.087-07:002018-03-22T15:34:17.087-07:00Do you know what an enthusiast is, ikdummy? Do you know what an enthusiast is, ikdummy? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-39999901353673804322018-03-22T15:30:25.013-07:002018-03-22T15:30:25.013-07:00Find what quote specifically? Richard Dawkins sayi...Find what quote specifically? Richard Dawkins saying what exactly?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-22401253272941925242018-03-22T15:21:52.288-07:002018-03-22T15:21:52.288-07:00Nargh! Peer reviewed data’s where I’m at. And I ta...Nargh! Peer reviewed data’s where I’m at. And I take it you didn’t find a quote from Dawkins the second time around? It baffles me why you’d bring a failure up again like it’s some secret weapon. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-58499182976849748992018-03-22T15:13:47.827-07:002018-03-22T15:13:47.827-07:00Common sense? Is that like a premise? Only a premi...Common sense? Is that like a premise? Only a premise can be determined scientifically through probability.<br /><br />For you, common sense and studies are interchangeable if you can't be bothered.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-52735402726828604472018-03-22T15:00:09.821-07:002018-03-22T15:00:09.821-07:00You need to do a better job of your sockpuppeting,...You need to do a better job of your sockpuppeting, Stuey. For all those alleged anonymous persons, they all seem to disappear from other threads when you’re preoccupied with learning a thing or two with me.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-37191282649711029522018-03-22T14:57:36.469-07:002018-03-22T14:57:36.469-07:00Yes, we did this little dance here;
http://bigfoot...Yes, we did this little dance here;<br />http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/more-amazing-sasquatch-stories-from-bc.html?m=0<br /><br />You do know that by simply bringing up the same destroyed argument a week or two later doesn’t make it any more valid, right? Though the first round of DNA Yeti testing is the only thing to do with “Bigfoot” on Dawkins’ sites, I found no evidence of Dawkins commenting on any level of evidence and subsequently dismissing the notion of “Bigfoot” off the back of that. If you assert that to be the case, reference it. <br /><br />I don’t really need a study for that, it’s common sense. Not even enough enthusiasts are aware of the evidence. You on the other hand have had it rubbed in your fat face for years, but you’re too stupid to realise that it made you look foolish the first time around. 1000 times later... Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-30856876210340597842018-03-22T14:55:49.753-07:002018-03-22T14:55:49.753-07:00BTW, ikbraindead, Dawkins is your god, not mine.BTW, ikbraindead, Dawkins is your god, not mine.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-179597857554921972018-03-22T14:06:28.588-07:002018-03-22T14:06:28.588-07:00Dawkins is aware of the evidence for bigfoot and r...Dawkins is aware of the evidence for bigfoot and rejects it. <br /><br />Where is your study finding that "The same amount of people not aware of the evidence as don't believe in bigfoot" or is that another thing you made up?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-21189254582454453442018-03-22T14:01:51.094-07:002018-03-22T14:01:51.094-07:00^What on earth are you going on about? You do real...^What on earth are you going on about? You do realize that most of what you're saying is only going on in your own head, right? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com