tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post6061968340164499657..comments2024-03-28T05:42:11.199-07:00Comments on Bigfoot Evidence: Bigfoot and Gigantopithecus - Are They the Same?Shawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12059275107499275007noreply@blogger.comBlogger162125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-5485854924124069312018-03-15T01:45:15.779-07:002018-03-15T01:45:15.779-07:00Here’s more perspective as to how pointless your l...Here’s more perspective as to how pointless your latest deflection technique is...<br /><br />I BELIEVE THAT ALL BIGFOOT REPORTS IN THE UK ARE MISIDENTIFICATION.<br /><br />There, I played your game for a minute. Ok, so now let’s apply your “UK maths” to the US. Statistically I’d be grossly wrong, since the equivalent sightings per land mass in the US is yielding plenty of physical evidence that no theory of mass misidentification cannot explain away. Suddenly, just like me, you’re wrong and both comparisons cannot be simply attributed to misidentification. <br /><br />And that leaves your role-players and hoaxers confounded to impossible numbers. <br /><br />: pIktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-47384616150894343522018-03-15T01:08:33.851-07:002018-03-15T01:08:33.851-07:00Me on the UK -
• There are mythologies, there are ...Me on the UK -<br />• There are mythologies, there are however no oral histories of Natives in the UK. <br />• I have spoken to some eyewitnesses, they are not misidentifying. <br />• When physical evidence turns up, those eyewitnesses are validated. <br />• That means some portion of the 450 are genuine sightings, once that occurs.<br /><br />Me on the US - <br />• There are thousands of years oral histories in the US from Natives.<br />• There are more eyewitnesses in the US in two years than have ever been in the UK. <br />• There is no needs for physical evidence to turn up, as there is 60 years of it. Some of which is now peer reviewed. <br />• This means regardless of the likelihood of some portion of the inummerable US sightings being hoaxed and misidentificaton... It is impossible for them all to be. <br /><br />You on both -<br />• It’s all role-play. <br /><br /><br />You’re flogging a dead horse. The key here is evidence... That’s fundamental. There is none for one country (to which I’m STILL not dismissing and maintaining an open mind), but there is for another. But let’s pretend you’re correct... Let’s say the words you’re trying to put in my mouth to try and distance yourself from answering one simple question was right, and I’m claiming all 450 UK sightings are misidentifying. How does this help your need to provide an estimated figure for your role-players? How does this sidestep scientific data? Again... You backtrack after referring to the subject as role-play numerous times just in the last three days, and claim that it’s mostly missidentification. But if all the reports are down to missidentification, where is the room to hoax & role-play evidence?<br /><br />There is none. <br /><br />Where is the room for all the hoaxing? Where is the room for your role-play?<br /><br />You’ve debunked yourself. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-430820910203876912018-03-15T01:03:53.866-07:002018-03-15T01:03:53.866-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-57554499174131231882018-03-14T18:12:00.617-07:002018-03-14T18:12:00.617-07:00* First paragraph above... 200 sightings a year.* First paragraph above... 200 sightings a year.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-72943788228985303992018-03-14T17:43:57.293-07:002018-03-14T17:43:57.293-07:00You say roughly 200 sightings in the US for 60 yea...You say roughly 200 sightings in the US for 60 years.<br /><br />That's roughly 12,000 US sightings in the last 60 years. Yet, 13,500 potential misidentifications possible in the US based on your UK logic of 450 out of 450 misidentifications in the UK(scaled for region square miles). There are wild man reports in Europe as well for 10-***60,000 plus*** years... What’s the math? Hell, they even tall ancient humans bones in Europe and actual archaic hominid fossils. <br /><br />Misidentifications are 100% in the UK, according to you, but that logic doesn't apply to the US because to deny the US sightings I would have to believe them mostly hoaxes, according to you, instead of overwhelmingly misidentifications, which is what I believe. You are the holder of the misidentification flame. I must believe 12,000 US sightings to be all hoaxes, according to you, not largely misidentifications(my actual belief), like you believe of 100% of the UK sightings. My belief is misidentification, wishful thinking, attention seekers, and some hoaxers but ZERO real bigfoot in the US and UK.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-41172314863105299302018-03-14T17:09:55.029-07:002018-03-14T17:09:55.029-07:00zzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZ!!! Huh? (Cough, snort, spla...zzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZ!!! Huh? (Cough, snort, splatter)<br /><br />For a Bigfoot report to be logged in a database, someone needs to actually report it. And people in the last god knows how many years haven’t done that due to fear of ridicule. Therefore databases, though extremely important (three regarding modern reports in total), are at the mercy of the courage of people witnessing these hominins. Anna Nekaris has done research into the amount of eyewitnesses that don’t come forward with their reports. However... if the reports average that of 200 a year, and have occurred for the past 10-14,000 years... What’s the math? <br /><br />Your drivel cannot apply... since the second someone can present a steady flow of physical evidence for Bigfoot in the UK, I’m happy to go along with it. I am therefore, unlike you, not denying Bigfoot in the UK outright. There is not one effort at comparison on your part, through this entire comment section, that actually works.<br /><br />And I’m still waiting on a reason why Bigfoot role-players in monkey costumes don’t turn up shot dead. <br /><br />: (<br /><br />Yaaaaaaaaaaawn... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-79732613849040304762018-03-14T16:40:28.850-07:002018-03-14T16:40:28.850-07:00How many bigfoot sightings does the BFRO Geographi...How many bigfoot sightings does the BFRO Geographical Database of Bigfoot Sightings & Reports have? Afraid?<br /><br />You really stepped in it when you denied the 450 UK sightings. Coming back to haunt you, eh? Sleep well. ;)<br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-66585881149758764732018-03-14T16:31:11.767-07:002018-03-14T16:31:11.767-07:00Too scared to answer?
Ok... I’ll bite.
Not onl...Too scared to answer? <br /><br />Ok... I’ll bite. <br /><br />Not only would you need a valid and effective comparison at the root of your drivel for me to even begin to be scared... but it’s pretty impossible to say. It’s not like I can make an estimate based on predictable data... like that of 60 years of track impressions for a breeding population in the present. Bigfoot have been at the cultural core of ingegenous peoples of North America for at least 14,000 years. That’s anthropological data that hasn’t been written down due to oral traditions, therefore difficult to predict. That’s a lot of sightings. And since civilisation has encroached more and more over time, it’s impossible to know at this point whether breeding populations have dwindled or even increased over many thousands of years. But you know all about these role-players. Surely they mirror every report and event since it’s all role-play and hoaxing? Have some responsibility for your own face falls... you child. <br /><br />I’ll be back tomorrow. <br /><br />Kiss, kiss. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-9544685088530126822018-03-14T16:17:19.285-07:002018-03-14T16:17:19.285-07:00How many documented bigfoot sightings TOTAL in the...How many documented bigfoot sightings TOTAL in the US?<br /><br />^ You're now too scared to answer that??? I'm THAT effective?????Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-17572631164565191352018-03-14T16:14:14.311-07:002018-03-14T16:14:14.311-07:00There is no physical evidence in the UK for what i...There is no physical evidence in the UK for what is commonly referred to as Bigfoot in the US. There is not one track impression. However... having spoken to eyewitnesses myself in recent times, I am happy that they are not misidentifying what they have seen. Contrary to what you think (cringe), there is no other wildlife in the UK for eyewitnesses to misidentify (cringe).<br /><br />In the US, there is 60 years of physical evidence, plus plenty of wildlife that likely attributes some number of reports to misidentification. Now genuinely... I know you thought you finally had an argument to try and forget about the role-players avoiding bullets... but I’ll see you tomorrow. <br /><br />Nighty night Einstein! Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-33375931129530279672018-03-14T15:53:41.427-07:002018-03-14T15:53:41.427-07:00There could be 13,500 possible misidentifications ...There could be 13,500 possible misidentifications in the US if there are 450 possible misidentifications in the UK. You agree that there are 450 possible misidentifications in the UK, which is 30 X smaller than the US.<br /><br />How many documented bigfoot sightings TOTAL in the US? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-79060956345872856712018-03-14T15:44:23.824-07:002018-03-14T15:44:23.824-07:00Comparative EVIDENCE... Very fundamental to the wh...Comparative EVIDENCE... Very fundamental to the whole picture. <br /><br />Try it some time... You might just like it. <br /><br />Ciao Bella!Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-37171486316715126792018-03-14T15:28:40.246-07:002018-03-14T15:28:40.246-07:00You missed the point. You have stated that in an a...You missed the point. You have stated that in an area the size of the UK there are 450 misidentifications.<br /><br />Using your own logic, in an area 30 times the size of the UK which is the US, there could be "450 misidentifications times 30" which equals 13,500... 13,500 possible misidentifications in the US using your own logic. Regardless of "evidence", using your own logic, there could be 13,500 misidentifications in the US.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-28606179611723375752018-03-14T15:17:35.142-07:002018-03-14T15:17:35.142-07:00 I’m sorry Stuey... But the peer review process sa... I’m sorry Stuey... But the peer review process safeguards against biases. Did you not read EEG’s comment up top? A great example! The plethora of cultural, anecdotal and anthropological data that just so happens to have peer reviewed evidence in the present... Is your burden. If it’s fake, crack on. But you need something more than your mere words, because they hold no worth against the scientific method.<br /><br />“There is as of yet, no physical evidence for the existence “Bigfoot” in the UK. More sightings of Bigfoot occur in two years in the US than have ever been reported in the UK. I have spoken to people in the UK at length about their sightings and they are clearly not making anything up and are not misunderstood about what they’ve allegedly seen. However, it is not scientifically prudent to endorse the existence of a large bipedal primate without so much as one single example of track impression to reference. If there was no physical evidence for the existence of such hominins in the US, then I wouldn’t be justified in asserting they are there.”<br />- Me<br /><br />I’ll be back tomorrow sweetheart. Please surprise me and leave some sort of challenge.<br /><br />(Yawn) Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-25220811797076855392018-03-14T14:53:51.293-07:002018-03-14T14:53:51.293-07:00Confirmation biased individuals suggest that faked...Confirmation biased individuals suggest that faked prints are real and that means there are 10,000 apemen hiding in US wooed areas?<br /><br />You said there were 450 misidentifications in the UK, an area 30 X smaller than the US, but 13,500 US misidentifications(450 times 30) is out of the question??? No one said all the bigfoot sightings are hoaxes. Strawman.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-7211361480019195102018-03-14T14:01:47.476-07:002018-03-14T14:01:47.476-07:00Two men?
Oh dear Special Plead-Boy. At this rate...Two men? <br /><br />Oh dear Special Plead-Boy. At this rate you’re busting out more fantasy than any of the woo-footers were ever accustomed to. Sorry, but there are far more than two people on the editorial board publishing the evidence, let alone the scientists recognising said evidence as authentic. People hoax... the type of hoaxing that would be needed for your hoaxing role-play empire is impossible. Not impossible? <br /><br />Extraordinary ideas require extraordinary evidence... Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-78889608783553126352018-03-14T13:39:39.050-07:002018-03-14T13:39:39.050-07:002 guys agreeing that faked prints are real does no...2 guys agreeing that faked prints are real does not mean that there are 10,0000 hairy men hiding in US woods. That's not how reality works.<br /><br />Yeah, ikdummy, no hoaxers exist. No shred of evidence that Rick Dyer or any hoaxers conspired to hoax. Blimey!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-61845630149965136642018-03-14T13:11:11.543-07:002018-03-14T13:11:11.543-07:00Let’s look at what’s non-existent...
Peer reviewe...Let’s look at what’s non-existent...<br /><br />Peer reviewed evidence for Bigfoot - we’ve got that. <br /><br />A shred of evidence for a hoaxing conspiracy - not so much.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-40784153654803667192018-03-14T13:01:57.403-07:002018-03-14T13:01:57.403-07:00You're the one who believes in the 10,000 non-...You're the one who believes in the 10,000 non-existent hairy apemen playing hide and seek in US forests.<br /><br />Have your psycho-ward nurse sedate you. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-80204553764315845122018-03-14T12:41:03.454-07:002018-03-14T12:41:03.454-07:00Nargh! Claiming a minority of the subject’s propon...Nargh! Claiming a minority of the subject’s proponents (after you backtracked on the majority not being dishonest), is down to role-play, liars and hoaxers is. <br /><br />Your conspiracy, man up and deliver.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-6584317204842972132018-03-14T12:30:48.408-07:002018-03-14T12:30:48.408-07:00Not believing in 100000 hairy apemen is a conspira...Not believing in 100000 hairy apemen is a conspiracy in iktomi/Joe-F1tzgerald-land. Sad.<br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-2605727378867777432018-03-14T08:43:09.321-07:002018-03-14T08:43:09.321-07:00Aaaaaaaargh, Andy White. A thoroughly enjoyable an...Aaaaaaaargh, Andy White. A thoroughly enjoyable and productive exchange that was too. <br /><br />But I wouldn’t worry about Andy... Unless you’re wondering what he’d have to say about your ridiculous conspiracy theories. I’d worry about answering one simple question... <br /><br />Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-62413001604816407222018-03-14T08:05:55.891-07:002018-03-14T08:05:55.891-07:00LOL "uneducated & grossly unqualified&qu...LOL "uneducated & grossly unqualified" sums up Joe. Seeing you effortlessly smacked around by Andy White and your obliviousness to your ordeal was priceless.<br /><br />Patiently waiting to be here when you snap out of it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-77502068314105239232018-03-14T07:37:46.696-07:002018-03-14T07:37:46.696-07:00It’s my responsibility to provide ample reason for...It’s my responsibility to provide ample reason for people to invest enthusiasm into the existence of Bigfoot. I can do that by referencing 60 years of physical evidence, some of which is now peer reviewed. <br /><br />All the uneducated & grossly unqualified trolls in the world can merely dismiss that evidence, it’s referencing reliable and logically solid scientific data against the idea of Bigfoot existing, that counts. <br /><br />Like I said... Grow up. Take some responsibility. Prove your points. The tooth fairy, just like you’re role-players, don’t leave evidence. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-56294083144039724182018-03-14T07:22:11.523-07:002018-03-14T07:22:11.523-07:00It is your responsibility to prove the tooth fairy...It is your responsibility to prove the tooth fairy is real. No matter how many Quarters and missing teeth under pillows you provide, I dismiss your silly premise and faked evidence. You are a mental patient and many of us are waiting for you to just "get it", not that any of us could convince you, but we want to be here when our patient just "gets" that his whole premise is absurd.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com