tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post5754315627006107616..comments2024-03-29T01:11:45.309-07:00Comments on Bigfoot Evidence: Radio Host Shares His Bigfoot Encounter StoryShawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12059275107499275007noreply@blogger.comBlogger185125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-7220917416600988372019-01-02T03:40:03.392-08:002019-01-02T03:40:03.392-08:00Thank you for the sharing good knowledge and infor...Thank you for the sharing good knowledge and information its very helpful and understanding.. <br />as we are looking for this information since long time.bulk anabolic steroidshttps://www.massroids.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-32015274174968772202016-08-17T12:22:30.090-07:002016-08-17T12:22:30.090-07:00Yes TK you win. You indeed have the most unintelli...Yes TK you win. You indeed have the most unintelligent, babbling, idiotic posts of anyone here and that's saying a lot. Congratulations!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-59722670369884431322016-08-17T11:56:22.525-07:002016-08-17T11:56:22.525-07:00I SEE NONE OF YOU CONTERED MY POSITION--------AT A...I SEE NONE OF YOU CONTERED MY POSITION--------AT ALL.<br /><br />I GUESS I WIN! NEPH!TKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-41657664954950096852016-08-16T08:43:47.549-07:002016-08-16T08:43:47.549-07:00Sorry Sporto, the data I'm using was written b...Sorry Sporto, the data I'm using was written by anthropologists, not anyone concerned with cryptoblogs. But you would have actually have to of checked the sources you're blithering about for once to know that. <br /><br />Also, I don't subsribe to conspiracy theories, you might however want to ask a PhD who sits on the other side of the fence as to where the same skeletons he's aware of have disappeared to. What amuses me about folk like you, is that you will condemn one "conspiracy" for your own... In that apparently a couple of generations of archeologists were somehow peddling a biblical myth for the their gain. <br /><br />"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."<br />- Bertrand RussellIktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-16876033050081488952016-08-16T08:41:38.131-07:002016-08-16T08:41:38.131-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-41676675754318314432016-08-16T08:38:50.328-07:002016-08-16T08:38:50.328-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-3662309201922344362016-08-16T08:20:07.545-07:002016-08-16T08:20:07.545-07:00Gotta admire Iktomi - the kid's got spunk. An...Gotta admire Iktomi - the kid's got spunk. Andy White keeps smacking down each of Iktomi's bigfoot blog links with COLD HARD SCIENTIFIC RIGOR, but Iktomi, who has combed every through each and every one of the internet's most bizarre cryptid blogs, just keeps coming back for more.<br /><br />Your conspiracy theories about skulls has been PWND by Nikolai Valuev, Iktomi. Oh, I forgot, until someone definitely proves that Nikolai Valuev is NOT bigfoot, why, that Russian fighter MUST BE BIGFOOT!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-29492854055273246822016-08-16T08:19:59.413-07:002016-08-16T08:19:59.413-07:00Anyway Andy!
It's here that I must thank you...Anyway Andy! <br /><br />It's here that I must thank you for a vey stimulating discussion, and bid you farewell. Every time we chat I learn something new. <br /><br />Also, there are two trolls around here who bait me into this immediate topic on what seems like nearly every single comment section... Please know that I am not being disrespectful to you when addressing these trolls, but merely standing by my opinion, however disagreeable someone as educated as yourself may find that opinion. <br /><br />No doubt we'll speak soon and take care!!Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-19532514023470997752016-08-16T07:59:46.561-07:002016-08-16T07:59:46.561-07:00Sorry Andy, I had to repost the comment as there w...Sorry Andy, I had to repost the comment as there were too many grammatical errors. <br /><br />The skull might indeed correspond nicely in the sense that a robust model might fit well via 2D with what is essentially the skull of a very robust human. <br /><br />No, the forensic sketch is of what an eyewitness saw. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-24419221987288565662016-08-16T07:54:26.890-07:002016-08-16T07:54:26.890-07:00Andy, I stand corrected with regards to using &quo...Andy, I stand corrected with regards to using "paleolithic" to describe a certain skulls archaic morphology, but I think a PhD would excuse that considering this is a very readily noticeable mistake by any one of a million sources on the Internet that describe such skulls. <br /><br />As I have stated before, using a mere photographic comparison of someone like Lesner as a model for that skull can never be accurate. Even forensic facial reconstruction by a mix of artistry, forensic science, anthropology, osteology and anatomy, it is still easily the most subjective as well as one of the most controversial techniques in the field of forensic anthropology. Someone as qualified as yourself would no doubt know this. <br /><br />Aside from Valuev's apparent brow ridge, I'm sure that if we were to strip back his flesh and muscles and analyse his skull, he wouldn't have the collective traits that the skull in question has. The simple fact remains that some singular elements of that archaic morphology do indeed exist in contemporary examples, but not to the highly pronounced and collective frequency as we see in the Humboldt skull.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-70290675641494967252016-08-16T07:51:23.339-07:002016-08-16T07:51:23.339-07:00As far as the terminology, I'm not trying to b...As far as the terminology, I'm not trying to be nit-picky or pedantic. Words mean different things, though, and "Paleolithic" and "Archaic" are not inter-changeable. It's honestly difficult for me to know what you're getting it if you conflate those two terms.<br /><br />No, a photographic comparison isn't the end of the argument. But it does show that, when aligned consistently, the Humboldt skull corresponds nicely to the head shape of someone who we can be quite sure isn't a Bigfoot (or Archaic human). <br /><br />Is that link you posted a sketch supposedly based on the Humboldt skull?Andy Whitenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-87712457229998533002016-08-16T07:44:11.699-07:002016-08-16T07:44:11.699-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-90710509114227223662016-08-16T06:48:33.289-07:002016-08-16T06:48:33.289-07:00Joe,
Again, I think you are saying "Paleolit...Joe,<br /><br />Again, I think you are saying "Paleolithic" when you really mean "Archaic." <br /><br />The Humboldt skull is that of an anatomically modern human. It is robust, but it is a human skull that has features that are found in many other anatomically modern human skulls (including living individuals -- I used Brock Lesnar as an example). It is a large and robust skull that probably belonged to a large and robust male human. Why in the world the skull of a large human has to be "Bigfoot" I have no idea.<br /><br />Do a Google Image search for "Nikolai Valuev." Is that guy also a "bigfoot" or a "Paleolithic" human?Andy Whitenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-89422437124077201492016-08-16T06:36:57.911-07:002016-08-16T06:36:57.911-07:00Hello again. Andy.
It appears what you strongly d...Hello again. Andy.<br /><br />It appears what you strongly disagree with me about, is what you would expect to see from a "Bigfoot" skull. Just checking, but are you aware that a lot of reports describe exactly what we would expect from a paleolithic homo Sapien, and not a gorilla? I've already posted it a couple of times, but below is a forensic sketch by one of the very best (if not THE best) forensic artist in the US; <br /><br /> http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_qXcRUWD1NVc/S4_nagDRvzI/AAAAAAAABhE/FumSBJu8WpM/s1600-h/Bigfoot-Sketch-III.jpg<br /><br />... The majority of his work on this was consistent to this exact description. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-39001966385417488442016-08-16T06:10:27.755-07:002016-08-16T06:10:27.755-07:00Blah blah blah Nephilim demons blah blah blah . . ...Blah blah blah Nephilim demons blah blah blah . . . Assertions based on the Bible are interesting for what they say about the fascination with giants, Nephilim, etc., but they get pretty boring pretty quickly when they're not attached to any actual physical evidence. Double boring points for using ALL CAPS.<br /><br />I strongly disagree with Joe about the interpretation of the Humboldt skull, but at least the discussion is about an actual thing that exists. I'll be happy to discuss whether a skull belongs to a horse or unicorn, but we actually have to have a skull to look at to make that happen.Andy Whitenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-34018548656445900742016-08-15T23:54:11.613-07:002016-08-15T23:54:11.613-07:00Sorry sporto, I'm just a guy posting on a blog...Sorry sporto, I'm just a guy posting on a blog, and I would really rather relict hominins be left alone. There are reasons as to why I post the evidence for relict hominins, and that's because people are either;<br />1. Widely ignorant of the evidence. <br />2. Widely lie about the evidence. <br /><br />If the evidence exists, then people who are enthusiastic are warranted to be just that. <br />"There is a prominent view in epistemology (the study of knowledge) that “belief” and “evidence” go hand-in-hand. They say that evidence provides the support for belief, and that without evidence, there is no good reason to have a belief. In philosophy, this perspective is called “evidentialism”; the view that a belief is only rational if it is well-supported by evidence."Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-36735936211839786592016-08-15T17:16:30.297-07:002016-08-15T17:16:30.297-07:00I don't know how much longer Andy White will b...I don't know how much longer Andy White will bother posting here when moronic footers flood with comments with nonsense about Bigfoots being Nephilim with biblical mind-powers.<br /><br /><br />Iktomi, you seem to have an incredible amount of faith in your evidence. Have you ever considered writing up all the sources that you readily cite into some kind of survey paper? If you wrote it up and submitted to a journal, laying out all the evidence and where it is available in such a direct format, it would be an enormous benefit to science, no? I'm sure anthropology journals would be fascinated by all this irrefutable evidence that has just totally escaped their notice for decades. It would really be of benefit to researchers.<br /><br />Of course, this would completely fail to do anything if the evidence you present is all bunk...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-72633734186774269442016-08-15T15:43:06.682-07:002016-08-15T15:43:06.682-07:00I was looking forward to reading the continuing co...I was looking forward to reading the continuing conversation between Andy White and lktomi concerning the Humboldt skull but it seemed to go a little off-track and now has devolved to this. Oh well - it started out so promising.<br /><br />I am pleasantly surprised to see Andy White posting here . . . this place could use a little of his expertise.Curiousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-54272061387060957742016-08-15T15:32:43.707-07:002016-08-15T15:32:43.707-07:00Oh and Andy, There are also Significant difference...Oh and Andy, There are also Significant differences in the EAR canal.<br /><br />THESE SKULLS ARE NOT STRAIT HUMAN, THEY ARE DIFFERNT IN WAY TO MANY SEGMENTS TO BE A SIMPLE RELIC OFFSHOOT OR SELF-MODIFIED.<br /><br />THE EVEDENCE IS COMPLETELY VISIBLE AND UN-DENIABLE ------------------------------------------------- IT IS SOMETHING DIFFERENT!<br /><br />Asking people to except that is the equivelant of Hillary------------------------------------------------- I told the truth, ha ha ha<br /><br /><br />Hey Andy, while I got you around, Maybe you can take a crack. What do you make of your supreme "evolutionist" leader (Dawkins idiot) admitting----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have know idea what set off the spark of life, perhaps it was a being from a planet far, far away.....blah blah blah.<br /><br />Panspermiah, ha ha ha ha ha ha<br /><br />Bro, science needs to quit acting like they know what went on with mankind, cause they DON'T.<br /><br />NO REAL MONKEY MAN BONES ALLFAKED!!!<br />ALL BEEN EXPOSED!<br /><br />OOOEY, GOOEY DRAGON FLESH----- OUT OF MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD DINO BONES, HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA<br /><br />yOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING.<br /><br />Chinese DINO RECIPIES BY THE HUNDREDS, EM, EM GOOD!TKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-459673593710833262016-08-15T15:23:25.253-07:002016-08-15T15:23:25.253-07:00What a stupid theory from an obvious lunatic, are ...What a stupid theory from an obvious lunatic, are you drinking and doing heroin with Zaskey? Holy crap people this stuff is making my squirrel pictures look damn nearight competent,thank noodle head for making me look sane, praise Allah #1 In Bigfoot Crapturd research-(Not really a Dr )Squatchnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-60717771708532786442016-08-15T15:14:58.285-07:002016-08-15T15:14:58.285-07:00Correction, those elongated where down there befor...Correction, those elongated where down there before Moses, before the flood. The red haired giants seen down in south America and here in the U.S. after are what ran from the Israelites. A much washed down version of the original, and a second attempt.<br /><br />I think that what came before the flood, and after is different based on a change in DNA. I think that missing pair of DNA is why Neph before the flood were so much bigger than the ones that came after.<br /><br />Often we see a COUNT problem when it comes to Giants/neph. Teeth , fingers, toes and overall size is off. A distortion and a corruption. I think God leveled the playing field on them, and reduced our lifespan in the same process!<br /><br />Just a theory!<br /><br />Count is often off on the Bigfoot too, definitely related in origin.TKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-78590596989797907442016-08-15T15:08:23.019-07:002016-08-15T15:08:23.019-07:00You fairy tail reading fool, squirrels don't c...You fairy tail reading fool, squirrels don't come from Egypt #1 In Bigfoot Crapturd research-(Not really a Dr )Squatchnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-55320581329280528082016-08-15T14:57:25.645-07:002016-08-15T14:57:25.645-07:00All these things came from the "Crescent of l...All these things came from the "Crescent of life" area in the middle east, because that's were Humanity re-launched after the flood.<br /><br />Heard the story of the 12 foot Giant killed in Afghanistan?????TKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-56035790415832488922016-08-15T14:51:49.252-07:002016-08-15T14:51:49.252-07:00when YOU HOLD ONE OF THOSE OLD SKULLS, YOU ARE HOL...when YOU HOLD ONE OF THOSE OLD SKULLS, YOU ARE HOLDING THE DEAD EMBODMENT OF A DEMON. THOSE THINGS WERE UN-REDEMABLE IN GODS SITE.<br />tHESE ARE THE ONES THAT GOD SAID WIPE THEM OUT COMPLETELY, ------------ MEN, WOMAN, CHILDREN, EVERYTHING -------- AND WE DON'T SEE THEM!!!!!!!!<br /><br />We do see bigfoot ----- huh?<br /><br />The Israelites whoop-in ass is what caused them to migrate out of the middle east.<br /><br />Remember when Melba told you that the female contributor of her bigfoot DNA was middle eastern in origin!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br /><br />Less theoretical science and more study of History----------------------------------------------------- Old Data, ha ha haTROLL KILLERnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-53686489844971860902016-08-15T14:42:56.815-07:002016-08-15T14:42:56.815-07:00There IS ONE PARRACUSS THAT MAY BE A BIGFOOT AS YO...There IS ONE PARRACUSS THAT MAY BE A BIGFOOT AS YOU PERCIEEVE<br />From whats been shown in vids. It's the one that is huge, less elongated, and still has the redish brown hair all over it. The rest would have looked far more human. We don't see anything that looks like a bigfoot in the Glyphs from those areas where found ----- we see people with long heads.<br /><br />But they are ALL neph.<br /><br />But the rest of them, no. There was a lot of strange shit walking around at that time.<br /><br />The "historical" Data is drawn all over the rocks, ha ha haTKnoreply@blogger.com