tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post4660335479687492683..comments2024-03-29T01:11:45.309-07:00Comments on Bigfoot Evidence: Skunk Ape Sighting Leaves Behind Some Interesting EvidenceShawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12059275107499275007noreply@blogger.comBlogger66125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-10373631598896732632018-03-31T12:15:26.365-07:002018-03-31T12:15:26.365-07:00Go back to school you psycho.
And the “monkey” i...Go back to school you psycho. <br /><br />And the “monkey” is in the evidence... Debunk it.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-57201869997440831892018-03-31T11:55:49.504-07:002018-03-31T11:55:49.504-07:00Yeah that's right, I'm talking to myself. ...Yeah that's right, I'm talking to myself. After all we are all "stuey". Keep on waiting fools but that magic monkey is never going to materialize...except in your crazy minds of course.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-38150209875230961052018-03-31T10:51:28.238-07:002018-03-31T10:51:28.238-07:00Hahahahahahah.Hahahahahahah.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-76657658503867678942018-03-31T10:30:20.606-07:002018-03-31T10:30:20.606-07:00And he’s back talking to himself. Listen Stuey, go...And he’s back talking to himself. Listen Stuey, go back to school, open a textbook, go to the first chapter and read about the scientific method;<br />1. Ask a question.<br />2. Formulate a hypothesis. <br />3. Perform experiment.<br />4. Collect data. <br />5. Draw conclusions.<br /><br />Your idea of how science is conducted, point 5 before 2, is embarrassing. And I’m embarrassing myself stooping so low as to even engage with you. <br />“Psychologically, a fundamentalist is a person with an intense fear of being 'wrong'; that is, an intense fear of being judged to hold the wrong' view or to engage in the 'wrong' behaviour. This intense fear of being wrong develops during childhood when one or both parents, and probably teachers, dogmatically refuse to listen to the child, thus denying it the chance to develop its own views and moral code (based on its own experience), while also terrorising (by threatening and using violence) the child into believing/adopting a particular set of values and beliefs, and behaving in a particular manner. It is the intensity of their fear of being judged 'wrong', and the violence they will suffer if they are so judged, that makes the child hold, with phenomenal tenacity, to the 'approved doctrine' with which they are presented. It is this intense fear of being wrong that marks out the fundamentalist from the person who is open-minded and/or conscientious.”<br /><br />Psuedoscepticism is a fundamental, quasi-religion. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-86217440635939402952018-03-31T10:23:22.153-07:002018-03-31T10:23:22.153-07:00Your words fall on deaf ears 7:49. You can never c...Your words fall on deaf ears 7:49. You can never convince a fanatic. Their minds are made up that Bigfoot exists and nothing anyone says will change it. In the meantime they will continue to wait for verification and redemption and wait and wait and wait and wait and....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-79967013962155953022018-03-31T09:36:06.333-07:002018-03-31T09:36:06.333-07:00Iktomi scientifically destroys stu and his ilk on ...Iktomi scientifically destroys stu and his ilk on a daily basis ! They have no retort other than "bigfoot doesn't exist because Stephen Hawking said so " With all due respect to the great Hawking who probably never said that these skeptrolls and nothing but grade-A wankers who belong on the back pages of moonshine magazine .<br />They say we are out to lunch and laughable because we believe but the reality is they are worse than bloody pathetic wasting their lives coming on a site of a subject they consider fringe and DO NOT BELIEVE IN ! So who are the losers now eh ?<br />Check-mate !<br />cheers<br /><br />JoeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-55961139457598027832018-03-31T08:34:22.295-07:002018-03-31T08:34:22.295-07:00And just for a laugh again...
“The fur looks so f...And just for a laugh again...<br /><br />“The fur looks so fake and whats with those big round ******.”<br /><br />“If you didn't think they were round then why did you argue with me?“<br /><br />Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-84485051597203686972018-03-31T08:33:07.561-07:002018-03-31T08:33:07.561-07:00(Creased)
What a meltdown.
So tell me Mr Scienc...(Creased)<br /><br />What a meltdown. <br /><br />So tell me Mr Science... How does any scientific breakthrough or landmark research observation occur? It always starts with one scientists/expert, or a small study group of. Any scientific step forward is made by a fraction, thus pioneering. Stating that Bigfoot research needs more verification than the average field of study is pathetically trying to handicap a subject that apparently is so obviously bunk. Not the behaviour of someone too confident, is it? The world abides by the opinions of people who are experts in their respected fields. Don’t cry about it... Try and find an equivalent that contradicts it. Just like “research is apparently meant to start with a conclusion”, just like one expert needs the “backing of an entire profession” before his/her opinion is valid... Should a Bigfoot body be found people like you would simply demand another one. This is the opinion of someone who doesn’t have the first clue how research is undertaken. It’s pathological denial too. You’re stupid, you’ve clearly never picked up a textbook in your life, let alone studied anything. <br /><br />“The reason that this is not happening is that over the years everyone is realizing there is nothing substantial to support it.”<br />... Yet the subject is doing nothing but moving forward. Think of that, for a subject that is allegedly so void of any substance, it has world renowned geneticists asking questions, it has every major primatologist either enthusiastic or open to the idea, and has impartial PhD’s reviewing journal publications. And even if the experts I reference are either old (or dead), it’s because they’ve got to a stage in their careers where their credentials cannot be character assassinated. There are essentially three camps with respect to this subject;<br />• A minority who have looked at the evidence and find it credible. <br />• A majority who aren’t aware of the evidence but hold an incredulous approach. <br />• A group who are aware of the evidence but deny it for shortfalls in logic and scientific principles, because of issues.<br /><br />And you Stuey are in the last. The biggest joke is an idiot who’s obsessed with this subject 24/7, who’s too lazy to actually try and research the subject properly so believes that if he drives people away from commenting his opinion stands unchallenged and is “gospel”. When in fact he simply reiterates shortfalls in logic and scientific principles via conjecture, contradictions, circular logic and conspiracy theories. There are people out there who have ten times the patience you have Stuey... not to mention ten years younger than you. <br /><br />Stop crying because you got owned with references to qualified people; debunk the evidence. Klutz.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-8639768637066763642018-03-31T08:28:43.728-07:002018-03-31T08:28:43.728-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-51807569997059269682018-03-31T07:49:02.748-07:002018-03-31T07:49:02.748-07:00Nuttytomi will take the opinion of ONE person with...Nuttytomi will take the opinion of ONE person with credentials in any given area (such as a plastic surgeon) and if it supports the argument for Bigfoot's existence well then by God it's GOSPEL! Bigfoot believers are notorious for this despite the fact their "experts" are just a fraction of those who are knowledgeable in that area. If they had the support and backing of an entire profession of plastic surgeons then that would give more weight to their argument but it's always just a few that they can hold up as their credited experts. Same goes for their peer-reviewed journal. They have ONE so-called peer-reviewed fringe journal that entertains the idea of Bigfoot being real and all of a sudden they think they have legitimacy.<br /><br />If they really had any sort of evidence that could stand up to scrutiny they would have more backing that just a few with credentials considering everyone would welcome the fame and financial rewards that would come with such a discovery. The reason that this is not happening is that over the years everyone is realizing there is nothing substantial to support it. If you look close you will see that most of these professionals that nuttytomi quotes are old, retired or dead. These persons started believing years ago when it actually seemed feasible and now stubbornly cling to their belief/faith.<br /><br />With each passing year without discovery the subject of Bigfoot becomes more of a joke. With each passing day nuttytomi and his fellow believers become more of a joke. But thanks guys - you sure give us all something to laugh at. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-69410410419590464312018-03-31T07:34:37.537-07:002018-03-31T07:34:37.537-07:00it's so nice to see the lads hard at work trol...it's so nice to see the lads hard at work trolling this blog today. must mean they ran out of doritos and mountain dew and are too lazy to get off their couch to buy more. Oh my, what shall they do ? <br />You see, it's those types who seriously have no life you don't know whether to laugh at them or feel pity for them honestly<br />cheerio<br /><br />JoeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-40432818120862767852018-03-31T07:33:03.760-07:002018-03-31T07:33:03.760-07:00Might be time to get some glasses! Might be time to get some glasses! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-6682102574107583752018-03-31T07:32:43.039-07:002018-03-31T07:32:43.039-07:00“The fur looks so fake and whats with those big ro...“The fur looks so fake and whats with those big round ******.”<br /><br />“If you didn't think they were round then why did you argue with me?“<br /><br />Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-34790248810088789752018-03-31T07:28:16.112-07:002018-03-31T07:28:16.112-07:00They’re pendulous.
And I’m only still responding...They’re pendulous. <br /><br />And I’m only still responding to this, purely to see what bat **** crazy comments are next... Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-13885684750973366862018-03-31T07:25:02.454-07:002018-03-31T07:25:02.454-07:00In the pic you sent a link too. Does Pattys nugget...In the pic you sent a link too. Does Pattys nuggets look round? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-70742151606047322572018-03-31T07:22:23.170-07:002018-03-31T07:22:23.170-07:00You’re angry. You’re trying to prolong this as muc...You’re angry. You’re trying to prolong this as much as you can in an effort to aggravate. You are crazy. <br /><br />I argued they were round? <br /><br />PWAAAAAHH!!! Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-55530299121428739122018-03-31T07:19:37.606-07:002018-03-31T07:19:37.606-07:00Nice try but not gonna work. You argued they were ...Nice try but not gonna work. You argued they were round but it was normal for them to be like that. You said that middle aged moms have perfectly round nuggets and you got your plastic to back you up. After realising how stupid you are you changed argument and said they weren't round at all. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-70451244882273350592018-03-31T07:12:53.072-07:002018-03-31T07:12:53.072-07:00If I didn’t agree with you, why did I argue with y...If I didn’t agree with you, why did I argue with you? <br /><br />I know I’m being trolled... but are you serious? Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-53901066831863365232018-03-31T07:09:29.946-07:002018-03-31T07:09:29.946-07:00You just argued with me about her round nuggets an...You just argued with me about her round nuggets and now you are saying they aren't round. Are you seriously this stupid? If you didn't think they were round then why did you argue with me? A normal person would have said from the start that they didn't even think they were round. Which would be a lie but would've saved some time. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-52366427888268980182018-03-31T07:05:43.637-07:002018-03-31T07:05:43.637-07:00Once again avoiding the questions. You can't a...Once again avoiding the questions. You can't avoid the truth. Patty fake nuggets is a hoax! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-14869017378204234632018-03-31T07:04:21.579-07:002018-03-31T07:04:21.579-07:00Oh and Stuey... You’ll notice I published the same...Oh and Stuey... You’ll notice I published the same reference here at you;<br /><br />http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/group-of-teens-have-encounter-with-8-9.html?m=0<br /><br />... Indicating little doubt as to what I acknowledge the actual shape of her breasts to be. You’re a loon. Find an equivalent expert to counter mine, or go explore your body to Patty’s chest. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-42959907705840481772018-03-31T07:00:59.584-07:002018-03-31T07:00:59.584-07:00Because baiting me into reacting to obvious drivel...Because baiting me into reacting to obvious drivel is what you do. It doesn’t matter what, it’s all about the reaction. It’s why you’re still clinging to this now... the subject or her breasts aren’t important to you, it’s having another reason to put your hand down your shorts. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-45544129297207089912018-03-31T06:58:49.501-07:002018-03-31T06:58:49.501-07:00... ^ and there’s a fool if ever I’ve seen one. ... ^ and there’s a fool if ever I’ve seen one. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-25690427276274945082018-03-31T06:58:44.624-07:002018-03-31T06:58:44.624-07:00It's funny that you change your tune when you ...It's funny that you change your tune when you have no answers for simple questions. All of a sudden Patty doesn't have round nuggets. Why didn't you just say that at the start? You argued untill you couldn't win and then tried another approach. Good effort but you lose. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-34068721767551873362018-03-31T06:43:53.011-07:002018-03-31T06:43:53.011-07:00Not man enough to admit you're wrong. That'...Not man enough to admit you're wrong. That's fine, it's obvious to everybody that avoiding questions because they destroy your theory is as good as admitting defeat. Thanks for the laughs you really are fun to take the p_iss out of. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com