tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post2571312842480458149..comments2024-03-28T05:42:11.199-07:00Comments on Bigfoot Evidence: Bigfoot Researchers Discover Sasquatch Fortress Of SolitudeShawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12059275107499275007noreply@blogger.comBlogger115125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-27694562539979968362015-12-12T17:11:35.653-08:002015-12-12T17:11:35.653-08:00Laughing my ass off, watching this video showing t...Laughing my ass off, watching this video showing two people who know nothing about forestry or how to look at evidence! Private Patrick is breaking all the rules about examining evidence, never assume and always keep a neutral position until the evidence is confirmed pro or con for said position. No wonder Matthew Johnson has Private Patrick on the team, a real investigator would see right through the bullshit and call Johnson out... Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-39245836840392716152015-12-12T12:52:45.250-08:002015-12-12T12:52:45.250-08:00This has got to be one of the most subjective (in ...This has got to be one of the most subjective (in terms of so called evidence) Bigfoot videos I've ever seen. You're right, not "coincidence"; it's called the natural consequence of storms. I've spent years in the woods and seen these kinds of "blow downs" including the X's. Conjecture is the best I can say for all of this....admire your passion though; and at least you're out there having fun and trying. Please just be a bit more objective in your analysis...it will garner much more respect, guaranteed!<br /><br />Good luck in the future,<br />GregGreghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15113369265026060978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-33310310011405870022015-12-12T00:55:22.847-08:002015-12-12T00:55:22.847-08:00Still no fake dermals fooling experts though???
:...Still no fake dermals fooling experts though???<br /><br />: (Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-91975024826032866892015-12-11T17:43:55.537-08:002015-12-11T17:43:55.537-08:00dmaker is cleaning house once again!dmaker is cleaning house once again!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-69657191309587460922015-12-11T16:52:41.149-08:002015-12-11T16:52:41.149-08:00Didn't fool him though, did it Donald? And in ...Didn't fool him though, did it Donald? And in a later interview, he blows the CSICOP wishful thinking away by explaining just why. Like I said... You'll get something that looks like dermals to the untrained and uneducated eye (Crowely and the other million pseudosceptics), but you won't get something that accurately mimics biological traits. <br /><br />Anyway!! Night night!!Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-7429625332434509062015-12-11T16:40:15.250-08:002015-12-11T16:40:15.250-08:00" I'm not sure of any source where Chilcu..." I'm not sure of any source where Chilcutt states that the casting process can accidentally accurately make what are considered convincing biological dermals."<br /><br />Well, allow me to help you with that:<br /><br />"Although Chilcutt admits Crowley’s work duplicated the friction ridges on the Onion Mountain cast, he maintains that the impression is of the foot of a real animal"<br /><br />http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/experiments_cast_doubt_on_bigfoot_evidence/<br /><br />He admits that Crowleys work duplicated the ridges on the Onion Mtn casts. <br />dMaKeRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16012894710920995978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-46384316046156468472015-12-11T16:38:15.471-08:002015-12-11T16:38:15.471-08:00You seem like you're trying to convince someon...You seem like you're trying to convince someone?<br /><br />Night Donald! Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-36967822699323203112015-12-11T16:26:05.004-08:002015-12-11T16:26:05.004-08:00joe just got humiliated by dmaker !joe just got humiliated by dmaker !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-41719919185537871862015-12-11T16:08:32.428-08:002015-12-11T16:08:32.428-08:00No... You have forensic experts that are exposed t...No... You have forensic experts that are exposed to fake tracks that have genuine biological dermals in them. You have yet to demonstrate where casting artefacts can be interpreted as genuine biological traits by forensic experts. It's really quite simple. <br /><br />No Donald... Chulcutt is very adamant about the prints that he has verified, and though they are from different locations, they still have the same texture and ridge flow pattern, like a humans however twice the size. Chilcutt stated as plain as day that even Crowley (who's far more enthusiastic than what psuedosceptics would prefer) has stated that even he feels that Walla Walla casts are genuine (25mins in the link below). "He's made me think of being more careful", is all that Chilcutt states, I'm not sure of any source where Chilcutt states that the casting process can accidentally accurately make what are considered convincing biological dermals. On the 36mins, Chilcutt explains that the faked dermals that Crowley sent him was covered in artificial ridge artefacts from the pouring process. The three casts in question that Chilcutt examined, they didn't have this... This is because when you are walking barefoot on the forest floor, the foot comes in contact with both fallen leaves and the soil in making an impression. Therefore, these artefacts would be present in consistency right across the different soil areas of the foot fall and they're not. The delta ridges on prints change directions over 45 degrees; they converge and deviate. This is a major indicator that the dermals are biological and as Chulcutt states, these do not appear on any of the artefacts. <br />http://www.skeptic.com/podcasts/monstertalk/10/02/03/<br /><br />... That's actually the reality of the situation, Donald. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-42544685832040180782015-12-11T15:11:11.536-08:002015-12-11T15:11:11.536-08:00Joe, do you have examples of forensic experts expo...Joe, do you have examples of forensic experts exposing faked dermals?<br /><br />Also, Chilcutt admitted that the dermal ridges in the Onion Mtn casts could be replicated. <br /><br />"Although Chilcutt admits Crowley’s work duplicated the friction ridges on the Onion Mountain cast, he maintains that the impression is of the foot of a real animal."<br /><br />So if he admits that what he thinks is authentic can, in fact, be replicated, then why would replicated dermals not fool him, or any other expert, in the future? How would we know if that did happen unless the track was conclusively proven to be a fake at some point? There are probably plenty of "authenticated" dermals in fake tracks out there. I ask again, do you have examples of forensic experts not being fooled by faked dermals? dMaKeRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16012894710920995978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-84369230031216720272015-12-11T13:46:36.468-08:002015-12-11T13:46:36.468-08:00Humour me? (My word, what a nut job)...
Um... No....Humour me? (My word, what a nut job)...<br /><br />Um... No... Sorry to p*ss on your parade, weirdo. The professionals verifying dermals in Krantz's study didn't have Sasquatch in mind. They're only verifying what's in front of their eyes. You put what is alleged to be dermal ridges in front of them, they're gonna tell you if they're genuine or not; simples. For one set of biological traits in one sample that are from a known human, does not mean the biological traits in others aren't... It just verifies them as all being biologically genuine and your argument is futile, and Sasquatch are human. Also... There is nothing "unique" about the dermals found in the Parker hoax. In fact, they were verified to be exactly that of a human. Try reading a source instead of simply hanging on the word of someone else, you silly twat. <br /><br />Again... This is not the case with Chulcutt's samples, to which your nonsense is even more futile. To hoax these biological dermals, one would have to have a knowledge of primate dermals (that not many on the planet do), have a lottery win's chance of faking the EXACT same biological idea, and then fool multiple forensic experts. These are unique enough to not be imitated by "stompers", which I might add there is also no known method of putting dermals on stompers, you insufferable loon. <br /><br />So... Pray tell... Where are the forensic experts that have been fooled by fake dermals, considering your best argument has actual biological dermals in them?Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-65302432773626674852015-12-11T13:25:09.052-08:002015-12-11T13:25:09.052-08:00Your not going to be able to backpeddle your way o...Your not going to be able to backpeddle your way out of this Joerg. It fooled the professionals, that is what your argument was based on, and it now has been blown out of the water. But it is funny watching you dig your hole deeper. But lets humor you. Someone take real dermals and put them on a fake track. That right there dismantles your entire dermal argument once again. For it proves that a knowledgeable person could make impressions of real dermals, mishmash them into a unique pattern, and put them on a set of wooden stompers. And there you go. You have a unique dermal pattern of hoaxed footprints. Or you could just copy a human set of dermals completely, stick them on the stompers and there you have it once more. Stupid footers, incompetent researchers, and publicity hounds would quickly deem it authentic, and simply state that it has human dermals because bigfoot is a human. I mean that is the argument you would have Joergtomi. But you know this, you are just trolling. You know there is no bigfoot. But thats straying away from your originial arguement that no experts have been fooled by fake dermals. And they were. They were put on fake tracks, and a FAKE impression was made. And it fooled the crazies. Dmaker thoroughly destroyed you today and you are sore over it. Dont worry, it wont get any better. Poor little Joergy<br /><br />:)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-56679588680969085462015-12-11T12:36:49.206-08:002015-12-11T12:36:49.206-08:00No... My arguments haven't even been addressed...No... My arguments haven't even been addressed, allow me to TRY and put these into perspective for you (I do realise I'm speaking to a sub-human with inferior mental capacity)... They were fake tracks that had genuine biological dermals in them. The whole focus is the dermals, regardless of whether they came from a Sasquatch or normal human. <br /><br />Still with me? Sure?? Ok... <br /><br />If dermals can be artificially manufactured to which in turn fools forensic experts, then it calls out the process and can't be relied upon. There are no manufactured dermal ridges that have fooled experts, only real ones... And you have to go to some lengths to show that the other examples were indeed hoaxed this way. The major snag that rules this out, is Chilcutt's casts that have species traits decades and States apart. Now go get Dmaker... You're in need of another cruddy argument. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-37797944410450763182015-12-11T12:26:32.067-08:002015-12-11T12:26:32.067-08:00Your arguments keep getting dismantled joketomi. T...Your arguments keep getting dismantled joketomi. They were hoaxed tracks that contain dermals. Dermals that fooled experts. As i said, evven the superfriends are laughing at you and the trouble your lies got you in.<br /><br />:)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-12749531994163605992015-12-11T12:12:21.624-08:002015-12-11T12:12:21.624-08:00"Forensic experts were produced that were foo..."Forensic experts were produced that were fooled by fake dermals."<br /><br />12:06... Again, where are here "fake dermals"? Would you like to point them out for me, ha ha ha ha!! It's pretty simple. The dermals verified were in fact genuine biological dermals of a hoaxer. This merely reinforces how difficult it is to fake biological traits; impossible via "fake dermals"; casting artefacts. <br /><br />: pIktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-24210623627987040302015-12-11T12:08:23.046-08:002015-12-11T12:08:23.046-08:00Also...
Regarding Krantz, all dermals are said t...Also... <br /><br />Regarding Krantz, all dermals are said to be authentic, the Parker track AND the others... Though you would have to prove that the other casts were faked by someone else using their own dermals, this merely confirms that all three are biological. Now... If all three of those casts had the same traits as the Parker casting, then we might be able to use this as a means of dismissing Chilcutt's casts (that have consistent traits across samples), but there is no mention of this. The experts merely state that all casts analysed are that of genuine biological tissue which they are, the hoaxed one included. <br /><br />The species traits I reference are what were uncovered by Jimmy Chilcutt, and these transcend decades and States. Chulcutt states that these are traits of a currently unclassified bipedal primate. So... Where is the example of fake dermals, for example casting artefacts, fooling forensic experts? <br /><br />Adios people!! Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-61631013210072784662015-12-11T12:06:25.234-08:002015-12-11T12:06:25.234-08:00Joe is trying desperately to gain back some shred ...Joe is trying desperately to gain back some shred of dignity after dmaker humiliated him and called him out on his forensic lies. Forensic experts were produced that were fooled by fake dermals. You now try and add qualifiers to your original blanket statement, and you are looking like a fool. Everyone is laughing at you Joerg. How does that make you feel?<br /><br />:)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-16439013827566145622015-12-11T12:04:01.075-08:002015-12-11T12:04:01.075-08:00FFS!!! MEOW!!!! MEOW LADY!!!! RACIST MONKEY POWER!...FFS!!! MEOW!!!! MEOW LADY!!!! RACIST MONKEY POWER!!!! FFS!!! HARRY BANDINI!!!! THE WIFE!!!!! MEOW!!!!.........DERP DERP DERP DERPAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-32165726113107744622015-12-11T12:01:36.065-08:002015-12-11T12:01:36.065-08:00Hows the wife and dildo collection Harry?Hows the wife and dildo collection Harry?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-39956817271806279632015-12-11T12:00:38.698-08:002015-12-11T12:00:38.698-08:00FFS and Eva are seriously racist. FFS!!! MEOW!!!FF...FFS and Eva are seriously racist. FFS!!! MEOW!!!FFFS!!!! MEOW!!!!<br /><br />DERP DERP HARRYS WIFE DERP DERP DERPAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-44896403556176953622015-12-11T11:54:54.613-08:002015-12-11T11:54:54.613-08:00IktomiFriday, December 11, 2015 at 6:28:00 AM PST
...<br />IktomiFriday, December 11, 2015 at 6:28:00 AM PST<br />Ok... Let's look at it like this, you've been asked his before, so here it goes. Name me one forensic expert that's been fooled by fake dermals? Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-66744044904864763372015-12-11T11:41:48.383-08:002015-12-11T11:41:48.383-08:00it bein that thar gummint fer shure it bein that thar gummint fer shure Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-80320015003451388142015-12-11T11:35:55.055-08:002015-12-11T11:35:55.055-08:00FFS! MEOW LADY EVA :) FFS! FFS! MEOW LADY EVA :) FFS! Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16886389764764624192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-79405765078272144002015-12-11T11:35:53.736-08:002015-12-11T11:35:53.736-08:00looks outs fer tham jihadist in da boosh shure is ...looks outs fer tham jihadist in da boosh shure is Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-9486611140107073182015-12-11T11:35:27.697-08:002015-12-11T11:35:27.697-08:00I'm gay.
-Turd GuyI'm gay.<br /><br />-Turd GuyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com