Thursday, March 22, 2018

Uinta Mountain Bigfoot Encounters


The Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization heads into the Uinta Mountain area where numerous bigfoot encounters have happened.

74 comments:

  1. Keep up the good work Kelly Shaw! The moldy willow creek book store troll's jealousy is making his eyes bug out. Is pure indication you are doing a good things.. The marten still isn't endangered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ Good effort Joe but all your hard work is in vain.Scientific opinion states bigfoot does not exist as there is no valid evidence for it..plus,Stephen hawking said so too.

      Delete
    2. For all that scientific opinion... surely it should be easy to debunk “Bigfoot”? Oh, and Hawkins was a theoretical physicist and cosmologist, probably not the best authority on matters of wildlife biology/primatology/anthropology (cringe).

      Delete
    3. ^ if bigfoot doesn`t exist why should anybody bother - you have NO scientific opinion on your side...not one valid scientist.

      Delete
    4. Because they’d be merely applying circular logic, or be expressing naivety/ignorance towards scientific data.

      Delete
    5. Funny how proportionately the same amount of bigfoot sightings in the UK as in the US were dismissed as misidentification by ikdummÿ based on the absurdity of a large unknown primate living in his own country but ikdummÿ has no issue believing bigfoot lives in other countries. Distance makes the make-believe more palatable for ikdumms...

      Delete
    6. Yeah... we did this again about 12 hours ago;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/shocking-bigfoot-sightings-in-uk.html?m=0

      One country has evidence that’s being peer reviewed; the other doesn’t. Simples. Don’t like it... shift the burden.

      Delete
    7. Well 2;46, if bigfoot doesn't exist as you say why are you wasting your bloody time on the blog other than the fact you have no social life because ergo you are an utter prized pillock wank puffin !
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    8. It’s because he’s saving us from the “real harm that fringe pseudoscience can inflict upon the world”!

      Ha ha ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
    9. Save us Obi Wan-ker ! Yup, he doesn't believe in bigfoot but is obsessive about following this blog.
      Makes perfect sense !
      Cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    10. Bigfoot isn`t being "peer reviewed" by anybody with any credibility - maybe by people of Todd Standing`s creed...that is about the stamp of the "peer review"...certainly not by reputable scientists.

      Why is there NO evidence in 50+ years of searching ?

      Delete
    11. You’re not remotely qualified enough to say who has or hasn’t any credibility. For example, you think theoretical physicists/cosmologists are within the boundaries of commenting about wildlife biology/primatology/anthropology. You have no clue about anything you’re trying to sound clever about. And whilst you think “Bigfoot doesn’t exist” 50 times a day some bearing on the subject... it’s just a therapy exercise pal.

      Better to role-play the evidence away ten times daily than looking stupid trying to explain it away.

      Delete
    12. ^ Bigfoot role-player meltdown

      Delete
    13. And you think that the deaths of hundreds of thousands of South Africans is funny. No wonder you’re such good friends with the “race realist” Zabo.

      “‘Denying the link between HIV and A*DS is scientific illiteracy,’ says Yusef Azad, director of policy and campaigns at the National Aids Trust, Britain's leading HIV/A*DS charity. ‘But worse than that, it is profoundly dangerous and has caused countless unnecessary deaths. Just because something is on the internet does not mean it is even remotely true. More than two decades of peer-reviewed scientific research demonstrates in some detail how HIV attacks the immune system and causes A*DS if left untreated.’”

      “But Duesberg – now an outcast to mainstream medical science – continues to push his ideas, winning credence among those who are, for their own reasons, unwilling to accept the truth. Prominent present-day denialists include Henry Bauer, a retired chemistry and life sciences professor at Virginia State University and Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, a medical biophysicist working at Royal Perth Hospital, at the University of Western Australia. All three have a strong following online.”

      https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/killer-syndrome-the-a*ds-denialists-1831610.html%3famp

      Delete
    14. The reason that’s whited out is because ikdummy thought it was clever to “insult” people by saying they have A*DS. Because of his frequent use of the term as an “insult,” the blog owner was finally forced to ban its use. Thanks ikdummy.

      Delete
    15. ikdummy ees been 'it in the noggin wit plastur

      Delete
    16. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    17. My word... what an episode.

      My response to that would be the same only half a day ago. A*DS is not funny. And a study about A*DS published in the same journal that published Meldrum’s paper, does not paint said journal in a poor light, because more mainstream journal are being criticised for publication biases, as well as being susceptible to hoaxes. Meaning the “holier than thou” attitude towards fringe journals is hypocritical. For example...

      “Academic corruption is an intractable issue plaguing journals, institutions, learned societies, and governments across the globe. While the volume of scientific publishing is increasing, the competitive pressure to get published is leading some researchers to indulge in misconduct. The enormity of this issue is evident from the increased volume of retractions. One of the major forms of misconduct is peer review manipulation, which is becoming increasingly and worryingly common. Every so often we encounter news of mass retractions by journals due to peer review manipulation. In 2015, more than 100 retractions were attributed to peer review scams. Recently, Springer Nature retracted 58 articles after discovering that the peer review process had been compromised. The incident brought back into limelight the loopholes in one of the pillars of academic publishing process: peer review.”
      http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/12/13/manipulating-the-peer-review-process-why-it-happens-and-how-it-might-be-prevented/

      Delete
    18. Your “journal” is a repository for rejected loony ideas and fraudulently attempts to provide an aura of credibility for those idiotic ideas. The leader of a large nation was influenced by such crackpot science and enacted a policy based upon one such inane idea — it directly led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.

      When this was pointed out to you, you not only made up ridiculous excuses, you openly laughed at hundreds of thousands of human deaths. Good job ikdummy, you should be proud.

      Delete
    19. I'm going to be at Wings having a pint. Laters

      Delete
    20. Nargh!

      It’s just a journal that doesn’t prejudice against fringe topics and puts them through scientific scrutiny and on the most part, debunks them. For such a terrible journal, you’re not doing a very good job at debunking Meldrum’s work, are you?

      “In November last year, BioMed Central uncovered evidence of repeated and inappropriate attempts to manipulate the peer review process of several journals. The apparent intention was to deceive Editors and positively influence the outcome of peer review by suggesting fabricated reviewers. Given the scale of the deception, we alerted COPE (the Committee on Publication Ethics) and a number of other publishers. COPE issued a statement providing further advice for publishers. PLOS also recently issued a statement here. Although we originally found only a handful of affected published articles, a subsequent extensive and systematic search of all of our journals identified 43 articles that were published on the basis of reviews from fabricated reviewers. After contacting the authors involved, and notifying their institutions, we have now begun retracting these articles. We have also contacted institutions about a much larger number of rejected articles where the names of fabricated reviewers had been supplied. Some of the manipulations appear to have been conducted by third-party agencies offering language-editing and submission assistance to authors. It is unclear whether the authors of the manuscripts involved were aware that the agencies were proposing fabricated reviewers on their behalf or whether authors proposed fabricated names directly themselves.”
      https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2015/03/26/manipulation-peer-review/

      You don’t have any gold standard of journal to abide by, since mainstream journal’s credibility is being taken apart. Did anyone tell you that you’re painfully pretentious you’re angry?

      Delete
    21. ^ troll who loves role playing as a human but fails miserably !
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    22. You’re finally right about something fake Joe!

      Delete
    23. You can tell when he’s proper angry, when he starts making fantastical, sanctimonious allegations. Role-playing away his behaviour for the past 8 years. It’s never nice to see a grown man break down... But he saving us from the “real harm that fringe pseudoscience can inflict upon the world”, after all.

      (Creased)

      Delete
    24. You around Caerphilly for a pint, mate?

      Delete
    25. No thanks... it’s a bit far and I don’t drink with strangers who obsess about me on the internet.

      Delete
    26. IktomiSunday, October 1, 2017 at 12:55:00 AM PDT


      I could be in Leeds in a couple of hours. Fancy a couple of beers Stuey?


      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2017/09/top-5-incredible-stories-from-mulders_30.html

      Delete
    27. And?

      Was the large amount of spacing meant to make it more “profound”?

      Delete
    28. i was talking about 11:31 not Iktomi obviously. 11:31 as the troll around here and we all wish he'd disappear in a puff of smoke
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    29. Joe F1tzgerald was stalking a guy named Stu Leeds in October.

      Delete
    30. IktomiFriday, March 23, 2018 at 12:30:00 PM PDT
      No thanks... it’s a bit far and I don’t drink with strangers who obsess about me on the internet.

      IktomiSunday, October 1, 2017 at 12:55:00 AM PDT
      I could be in Leeds in a couple of hours. Fancy a couple of beers Stuey?


      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2017/09/top-5-incredible-stories-from-mulders_30.html

      Delete
    31. Turns out Stuey chickened out.

      Are you suggesting you’re Stuey, “Mr Anon”?

      (Creased)

      Delete
    32. Using ikdummy logic, it turns out ikdummy chickened out.

      IktomiFriday, March 23, 2018 at 12:30:00 PM PDT
      No thanks... it’s a bit far and I'm afraid.

      Delete
    33. No I’m not, but aren’t you completely convinced that “there is only one troll and there’s only ever been one troll”? In your deranged mind, we’re the same person and yet we have those two statements. What kind of meds are you on?

      Delete
    34. Well since Stuey insists on crying for my attention all day, every day of his life... And having diagnosed all of his emotional & psychological issues, I feel like I know Stuey. Hence at the time I was happy to have a drink with him in Leeds...

      But you’re not Stuey, surely?! You’re an anonymous stranger, one of several that are all out to get me, right?! I thought there were loads of anons arguing with me here?!

      Just like my fringe journal doesn’t influence the scientific world one minute, and then has the influence to kill off thousands the next... Just like Patty is too blurry to make out any detail, but you can see hip waders & zippers the next... Just like Roger Paterson was a genius costume hoaxer, but couldn’t get a basic timeline accurate... And just like one minute it’s all down to 100 role-playing hoaxers all up and down the country, and then it’s all misidentification the next...

      It’s a struggle getting any coherency from you.

      Delete
    35. IktomiFriday, March 23, 2018 at 12:30:00 PM PDT
      No thanks... it’s a bit far and I don’t drink with strangers who obsess about me on the internet.

      IktomiSunday, October 1, 2017 at 12:55:00 AM PDT
      I could be in Leeds in a couple of hours. Fancy a couple of beers Stuey?


      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2017/09/top-5-incredible-stories-from-mulders_30.html

      Delete
    36. So you’re either confirming you’re from Leeds... Or admitting you’re the same anon. I’m not sure how this even begins to start debunking Bigfoot... But thanks for that!

      Delete
    37. I’m admitting that you think we are the same anon — as you maniacally proclaim about 100 times every day — and that you sometimes want to invite us to have a beer with you and other times you’re dead set against it. I suppose it must depend upon the stage of your bipolar disorder.

      All of the weird opinions of someone as mentally screwed up as you can be completely ignored. That’s how it relates to bigfoot.

      Delete
    38. You’re admitting FOR me? You’re not making much sense there Stuart. Haven’t the words “maniacal” and “bipolar” been used in comments about you the last couple of weeks? Nice to know you’re broadening your vocabulary... but how does this relate to debunking Bigfoot?

      Delete
    39. ktomiWednesday, February 21, 2018 at 11:55:00 AM PST
      Insane leaps are more like believing everyone here is attacking you from a psy-ops experiment airforce base in the US. When I read that, I knew that you were likely on medication for bipolar disorder, which I still believe is a real possibility. Which COULD be why you experience such extreme lows of depression and need to draw people into negativity here to help forget about your own emotional turmoil. The thing is Stu, is the more you troll, it’s more indicative of how cruddy you’re feeling. They kind of go hand in hand.

      IktomiMonday, March 19, 2018 at 10:38:00 PM PDT
      Argh yes... that for thousands of years, have led to a 100 role-playing strong secret society that contribute to the Bigfoot multi-million dollar empire. All manaiacally laughing & plotting taking the pop culture world over.

      https://youtu.be/MSXOIf1YHmo

      ... whose avoiding being reported.

      Delete
    40. Yeah... it’s driven you to do terrible things.

      Delete
    41. You misspelled “maniacally” you dolt and if you check your records, I used the word (and spelled it correctly) the previous day. You were trying to steal from me! Thanks for proving my point you illiterate moron! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    42. Hundreds of open access journals accept fake science paper

      Hundreds of open access journals, including those published by industry giants Sage, Elsevier and Wolters Kluwer, have accepted a fake scientific paper in a sting operation that reveals the "contours of an emerging wild west in academic publishing".

      The hoax, which was set up by John Bohannon, a science journalist at Harvard University, saw various versions of a bogus scientific paper being submitted to 304 open access journals worldwide over a period of 10 months.

      The paper, which described a simple test of whether cancer cells grow more slowly in a test tube when treated with increasing concentrations of a molecule, had "fatal flaws" and used fabricated authors and universities with African affiliated names, Bohannon revealed in Science magazine.

      https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2013/oct/04/open-access-journals-fake-paper

      Delete
    43. Stuey... You could quite easily have published a quote proving that... But you’re still reeling from the same request regarding Dawkins and Bigfoot.

      And I’m not trying to rub it in... honestly.

      Delete
    44. BOSS of JOEMonday, November 10, 2014 at 5:18:00 PM PST
      Every thing you said is COMPLETE BULLCRAP you slow Doltish stooge!!! HOW CAN YOU LIE WITHOUT ANY GUILT??
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/spectral-motion-just-released-some.html


      AC collinsThursday, October 1, 2015 at 11:28:00 PM PDT
      MMC, I TAKE EXCEPTION TO YOU'RE COMMENTS REGARDING TROLL KILLER,,GRANTED TK AIN'T THE
      SHARPEST TOOL IN THE SHED, HE JUST MIGHT HAVE A POINT CONCERNING THE BIGFOOT ENIGMA!
      ALL ONE CAN SAY IS WHAT THEY (sasquatch) ARE NOT!! AND THAT IS HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN ,..WHAT THEY ARE ,NO ONE KNOWS ,
      AC collins
      oh I forgot ....TK = DUM DULL DOLT !
      HAAA HAA LOL,,
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/why-doesnt-science-pay-attention-to.html

      Delete
    45. And there’s LOADS more “dolt” archived on this blog to show how long and how desperately fanatical you’ve been for Bigfoot to not exist... But you ARE safeguarding everyone against the “real harm that fringe pseudoscience can inflict upon the world”, after all.

      Delete
    46. Someone is showing how “manaiacally” obsessed he is! Maybe you can copy and paste everytime someone called you an “idiot,” “moron,” “buffoon,” “dingbat,” “dimwit,” “halfwit,” “nitwit,” “ignoramus,” “bonehead,” or “mooncalf”?

      And please, provide me another lesson as to how to use the word “manaiacally”? Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    47. Wait, I have a good idea!

      IktomiSunday, October 1, 2017 at 12:55:00 AM PDT
      I could be in Leeds in a couple of hours. Fancy a couple of beers Stuey?

      Oops, never mind! =~(

      IktomiFriday, March 23, 2018 at 12:30:00 PM PDT
      No thanks... it’s a bit far and I don’t drink with strangers who obsess about me on the internet.
      IktomiSunday, October 1, 2017 at 12:55:00 AM PDT

      Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    48. It takes two seconds to type in “dolt Bigfoot evidence” into google search. And it’s just one example of at least 20 I have now that you’re the same psycho who’s got a pathological issue with Bigfoot.

      It begs a very genuine question... why don’t you pick up a book? Why are you too lazy to go and try and make a real difference to your theory group? If I was as hopelessly obsessed as you, I would do everything I could to try and substantiate my stance.

      Are you too stupid? Are you too lazy? Why don’t you try and help yourself ge some satisfaction Stuey?

      Delete
    49. Well, I’m glad that you specified that it’s a “very genuine question” as opposed to just merely a “genuine question” — because if it were only a “genuine question,” then I couldn’t be bothered to answer! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    50. Iktomi, are you familiar with Llanbradach or Trethomas?

      Delete
    51. Well done crime-fighter Stu. You sure did show Bigfoot today!

      See ya tomorrow.

      Delete
    52. Nwah... I’ve not only got you to use British terminology for the last couple of years, but I’ve got you Googling welsh places now too.

      What a little sweetheart.

      Delete
    53. Wow, you can’t even capitalize the word “Welsh”? One might think that you’re ”manaiacally” typing on the keyboard with your sausage fingers! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    54. Dried up piece of dog poop^

      Delete
    55. Oh Stuey is lecturing on capitals in names & places now? The king of role-play seems to be able to forget about everything... not just the previous 72 hours when his own arguments embarrass him.

      He is saving the planet after all.

      Delete
    56. ^ The premiere bigfoot role-player deflecting her bigfoot role-play status like only the queen of bigfoot role-play can do.

      All hail ikdummy, the queen of bigfoot role-play. Hurray!

      Just kidding, iktomi. I like you Welsh bigfoot role-players. Does Caerphilly have bigfoot hiding near your flat, mate?

      Delete
    57. Actually there’s evidence in the last 72 hours that you’re rather at the ready to role-play the previous comment sections away, with respect to your embarrassing claims. In fact... there’s not only evidence of you pretending to be “AC Collins” the paranormal Bigfoot enthusiast... but evidence of you pretending to be every poster around here bar none, whilst role-playing away 8 years of logical Bigfoot face falls. I can guarantee that you’ll bring up the same drivel again today like this comment section never happened... And like a series of major journals didn’t bother to check on alleged studies about something as desperately serious as cancer, before publishing to the general public.

      As far as the role-play I allegedly partake in... I think we were back on 3 in total for the US last time? How are we getting on with that now? We have 100 to make up some time this year.

      Delete
    58. Wow! You just proved bigfoot exists!


      Not.

      Delete
    59. What a pathetic and utterly projection-ridden response from a genuine, THE only role-player around here. Are you able to think for yourself on any level?

      Delete
    60. No, I prove something with the same anatomy as “Bigfoot” is being published in journals... every time I reference it. You on the other hand need to start with ten minutes basic contemplation of your claims. So far, people have nothing but conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories from you.

      Delete
    61. ^angry bigfoot role-player

      Go for a hike. Get some fresh air. Bigfoot role-play can wait.

      Delete
    62. Rested, fresh, ready to go another day actually Stuey... Have you been refreshing these pages all night, yeah? How ae you going to be able to pull yourself away from this blog for a little kip?

      Delete
    63. Ssssssssshhhhhhh... that’s it’s Stuey... go to sleep. You can role-play away this latest failure in the morning... ssssshhhhhhhhh...

      Delete
    64. Published in Journals, WHERE? Is all of what you call "PROOF" coming from the fake Patty Ikdummy?

      Where's the last 60 years of evidence/proof that isn't PATTY!!
      LIST THE PROOF, AND THE RESEARCHERS!

      I will come back and read this reply.

      Delete
    65. And don't post a video of some monkey in the woods. I want to see BIGFOOT PROOF FROM A RESEARCHER, THAT HAS BEEN PEER REVIEWED.

      Delete
    66. funny i'nt it Bruce that you hound iktomi for proof while completely evading me so many times when i asked you a simple question to name one credible researcher who backs your evidence
      You sir, are a coward, a fraud of the highest degree and a horrible role player in the bigfoot world
      good luck in your retirement mate
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    67. Here we go Bruce, here’s Meldrum’s work that’s been peer reviewed;

      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf

      The paper published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 356–374, 2016.

      I found it particularly funny the other day when you tried making Patty’s leg extra blurry to claim there was a costume anomaly. It if ain’t blurry... Bruce can’t function! And you want me to post here ALL the track impressions that have been cast, plus all the researchers in the last 60 years? Nwah, are you secretly asking for a little lesson about real evidence? You don’t have to act all cross with me Bruce. Just ask bro!

      Delete
  2. What's this? Some kind of - OH GOD NO! Yet another video by the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization of them driving around and talking. Isn't that Kelly Shaw's group? Well, he's certainly got his format down tight and that's why I'm.......

    Not interested. Done.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's not Uinta Mountain. Kelly renamed it. It is now called Bloody Death Ape Mountain of No Return. Just look at any map. You'll see.

    ReplyDelete