Sunday, March 18, 2018

Scary Encounters With Cryptids


Check out this collection of scary and true encounters with cryptids from the Swamp Dweller youtube channel.

24 comments:

  1. YES - more TRUE and scary stories from Swamp Dweller! I don't believe most of what I read here but I do believe stuff from Swamp Dweller because he says it's TRUE. Swamp Dweller would never share these tales if they were not TRUE!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People tried the next level up from “stories” with you (actual physical evidence), and it ended up with you driving everyone away as a sadistic coping mechanism. Stick to more stories Stuey... It doesn’t end pretty otherwise.

      (Pssssst... I’ve gotta ask too, you ok now after your little “episode” yesterday?)

      Delete
    2. bigfoot "actual physical evidence" comes under the fiction and comic strip section

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Yet you’re reliant on conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories to explain it away. Saying that... these “role-players” who have impossibly low numbers to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round... MUST have super-human Marvel comic-esque capabilities, surely?

      Delete
    5. Yes, much like those who claim high numbers, activity and evidence of Bigfoot around the US in which they dodge discovery due to their super hearing, speed, strength, eyesight, camouflage abilities and high intelligence. Sound familiar?

      All this is known of course without examining a single body.

      Delete
    6. For 10,000 of creatures living in North America, there is 60 years of physical evidence, some of which is now peer reviewed. Though they have dodged classification (which a funded study would yield), they have hardly dodged being documented. Might I add... “speed, strength, eyesight, camouflage abilities and high intelligence” are all attributes of recognised primates (cringe).

      People who are enthusiastic about the existence of “Bigfoot” have a plethora of data for them to warrant such an enthusiasm, whilst it is pretty much essential as far as field biology goes, that a prediction on a viable breeding population is applied to such data.

      So! How many role-players to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, who are in cahoots with PhD’s, who nobody reports seeing, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round?

      Delete
    7. 10,000 Bigfoots living in North America
      60 years of physical evidence
      Peer reviewed

      ...and yet not ONE shred of undisputed physical evidence. A simple body or part would end this discussion...period. There's a difference between being enthusiastic about a subject and fanatical. You will never accept that Bigfoot might not exist even as the years roll by without proof. Your argument for it's existence grows weaker with EACH passing day while ours only grows stronger. Each day you look sillier while more and more regular people treat Bigfoot as a running joke. Actually I pity you. It must be hard to constantly defend something that you will never be able to prove. Go ahead and keep the faith...it's all you really have.

      Delete
    8. Forgive me for flagging the glaringly obvious, but not only have you never demonstrated that the 60 years of physical evidence isn’t worthy of consideration... but nobody ten times more qualified than you has ever done so either. And NOW, it’s peer reviewed. If nobody ten times the academic credibility could do so before that process, what makes you think your unqualified opinion achieves that now with simple circular logic? A simple body part would be the fruits of using the readily available physical evidence in a consorted and appropriately funded professional study. And that hasn’t happened yet. And the years that apparently roll by without “proof”, but ten times the evidence the Bili Ape had does, it simply means there’s no body YET. To draw the conclusion that Bigfoot does not exist, would be to ignore a plethora of credible data, that’s impossible to be the result of anything other than a real biological entity leaving it.

      And to that word, “fanatical”. Audaciously... Pseudosceptics like you never actually take the time to talk to people who know better. People who, though obviously in a minority simply due to seeing what is essentially a rare hominin, have many decades of experience under their belts. You self-reassure from behind your desktop in your cosey houses while obsessing about YouTube channels, blogs & forums catered for the subject, to express what essentially is fear and denial... After spending ALL of your time following something you “don't believe in”, of course.

      Time and time again, I keep reading comments from you, the most intellectually impaired, maintaining that the subject is pretty clear-cut, yet I keep reading the same efforts at giving yourself a massive head start which amounts to gross special pleading. Isn't it ironic that for someone who religiously hides behind the most dated Scientism stances, a quasi-religious-like mindset that (according to whoever use it) propels them to a pedestal where they (feel like) they don't have to abide by very basic scientific principles (ironic huh?).

      One of us has the scientific method... the other has conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories.

      Delete
    9. "One of us has the scientific method... the other has conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories."

      No body.

      "plethora of credible data"

      No body.

      "60 years of physical evidence"

      No body.

      "peer reviewed"

      No body.

      "decades of experience under their belts"

      No body.

      Those two simple words blows your argument out of the water no matter how much you write and link to.

      I come here simply because it amuses me to see how stupid you really are. You never disappoint.



      Delete
    10. No consorted study, adequate for wild primates = no body.

      Delete
    11. And you come here because you have emotional issues, ESPECIALLY about being wrong, and for a long time trolling people and drawing them into negatively gave you a sense of control over said issues.

      Delete
    12. The only true statement in your maniacal series of comments is that I control you. I am in your brain so deeply that you wake up at 4:00 AM and furiously respond to me. You obviously have nightmares about me! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    13. “Psychological projection is a defense mechanism people subconsciously employ in order to cope with difficult feelings or emotions. Psychological projection involves projecting undesirable feelings or emotions onto someone else, rather than admitting to or dealing with the unwanted feelings.”

      - Psychological Projection: Dealing With Undesirable Emotions

      Delete
    14. Isn’t this when you’re supposed to declare that you have some other reason for waking up in the dead of the night and it’s just a quirky coincidence that you come on here and comment dozens of times? Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    15. Plenty of people need to be up through the early hours for any number of reasons. You however don’t qualify as anyone who needs to know why when I’m concerned.

      Delete
    16. Yeah, isnt that about the time when the grease fryers have to be scrubbed out at KFC? Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    17. I wouldn’t know... you, on the other hand, appear to know the routine intimately.

      Delete
    18. I take it back, the idea of you working at KFC is a terrible insult to hard working people. I have no doubt that you’re some entitled, spoiled, overgrown kid who was too lazy to accomplish anything meaningful or even learn to write properly. People like you gravitate to fringe topics so you can role play a fantasy that you’re someone important.

      Delete
    19. Nwah.

      If only you had as much creativity in making your role-playing empire a little more plausible.

      Delete
    20. ... and we both know why people resort to conspiracy theories.

      Delete
    21. What I find the funniest is that ikdummy thinks he's always responding to ONE person. I know for a FACT there is at least 3 on here who mess with ikdummy regularly.

      Delete
    22. Suuuuuuuuure Stuey... Suuuuuuuuuure there is.

      (Nudge, nudge... wink, wink)

      Delete
    23. Nudge winker, nudge winker

      Delete