Yeah, but there’s a fringe magazine that published a crappy bigfoot article and it was peer reviewed by a group of A*DS deniers, so take that you mean skeptic!
Whether Bigfoot, raccoons, bears or gravity are the reason for these stick structures... What’s a little more clear cut is the evidence for Bigfoot. This encompasses 60 years of every type of evidence just short of type specimen. Some of which has now been peer reviewed.
The only difference between “Bigfoot” and the aforementioned, is a lack of body. Should there actually a single expedition to find that body that comes up with nothing... then you’ll have something to celebrate. Until then, it’s just a negative proof fallacy.
And all the crying in the world doesn’t make peer reviewed evidence go away.
Not only would you never understand the peer review process even if it was spelled out for you, but you’d never recognise evidence even if it bit you on the bottom.
You've had six decades to produce one. The Bili Ape only took one, and that was in the middle of Africa, and there was a huge delay for a civil war in the middle of that search.
Six decades right in your own back yard without producing a single specimen. Are bigfoot "researchers" even trying? Or are they all incompetent? Or does bigfoot simply not exist?
"Real evidence, physical evidence, or material evidence is any material object that plays some role in the matter that gave rise to the litigation, introduced in a trial, intended to prove a fact in issue based on the object's demonstrable physical characteristics." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_evidence
If I knocked you over the head with a footprint cast, you'd no doubt feel the physical effects of it. By that track cast, we can tell things like weight, gait, height and morphology; all physical characteristics of the creature that left it. There is morphological data in it that can be tested, studied, and the scientific method be applied to it.
Whilst oral histories are anthropological data.
The Bili Ape had a consorted, funded effort put forward, with a team of primatologists that took a whole year to track it. There has not been a single equivalent for what is commonly known as “Bigfoot”. For six decades, amateur researchers can point to every source of evidence just short of type specimen, which at the comparative stage of research dwarfs what the Bili Ape had to turn the heads of scientists. When you have such an effort to find a specimen that comes up with nothing, then you can touch yourself. Until then, it means little considering the frequency of evidence, because we know even the most primitive of hominids had very efficient ways of maintaining their dead.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
What are "teeht marks"? xx
ReplyDeleteThat video has some of if not the best evidence i've seen xx
DeleteWould you fancy seeing the evidence of the sexy bloke who visited my flat last night ?
DeleteJoe
Things that could be attributed to bigfoot are more easily attributed to things like bears. Raccoons. Gravity.
ReplyDeleteBecause those things exist.
Yeah, but there’s a fringe magazine that published a crappy bigfoot article and it was peer reviewed by a group of A*DS deniers, so take that you mean skeptic!
DeleteHow...how DARE you 3:23 offering a logical explanation for things attributed to Bigfoot. We will have none of that here.
DeleteWhether Bigfoot, raccoons, bears or gravity are the reason for these stick structures... What’s a little more clear cut is the evidence for Bigfoot. This encompasses 60 years of every type of evidence just short of type specimen. Some of which has now been peer reviewed.
DeleteSee ya tomorrow champ!
There's evidence for raccoons, bears and gravity but bigfoot is a fictional creature.
DeleteThe only difference between “Bigfoot” and the aforementioned, is a lack of body. Should there actually a single expedition to find that body that comes up with nothing... then you’ll have something to celebrate. Until then, it’s just a negative proof fallacy.
DeleteAnd all the crying in the world doesn’t make peer reviewed evidence go away.
Wanna bet! Who's the non researching idiot, and where is this peer review joke!
DeleteRacoon's, bears, or Gravity?
DeleteNon researching special kind of stupid!
60 years of evidence....LOL, WHERE????
Not only would you never understand the peer review process even if it was spelled out for you, but you’d never recognise evidence even if it bit you on the bottom.
DeleteGo away you wannabe loon.
There's not evidence for peers to review.
DeleteAnecdotal evidence isn't. Track evidence isn't. Hoaxed evidence isn't.
Where's the specimen?
You've had six decades to produce one. The Bili Ape only took one, and that was in the middle of Africa, and there was a huge delay for a civil war in the middle of that search.
Six decades right in your own back yard without producing a single specimen. Are bigfoot "researchers" even trying? Or are they all incompetent? Or does bigfoot simply not exist?
"Real evidence, physical evidence, or material evidence is any material object that plays some role in the matter that gave rise to the litigation, introduced in a trial, intended to prove a fact in issue based on the object's demonstrable physical characteristics."
Deletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_evidence
If I knocked you over the head with a footprint cast, you'd no doubt feel the physical effects of it. By that track cast, we can tell things like weight, gait, height and morphology; all physical characteristics of the creature that left it. There is morphological data in it that can be tested, studied, and the scientific method be applied to it.
Whilst oral histories are anthropological data.
The Bili Ape had a consorted, funded effort put forward, with a team of primatologists that took a whole year to track it. There has not been a single equivalent for what is commonly known as “Bigfoot”. For six decades, amateur researchers can point to every source of evidence just short of type specimen, which at the comparative stage of research dwarfs what the Bili Ape had to turn the heads of scientists. When you have such an effort to find a specimen that comes up with nothing, then you can touch yourself. Until then, it means little considering the frequency of evidence, because we know even the most primitive of hominids had very efficient ways of maintaining their dead.
I remember a quote from a song. Be kind to the dull and the ignorant. They too.... Have their story.
ReplyDelete