Sunday, March 18, 2018

A Bigfoot In Derbyshire, England


From the British Bigfoot Reports youtube channel

One of my favourite channels is the wonderful Fire Side Tales by D. L. Soucy and I was delighted years ago when he added an account of the capture of a wildman in Bakewell Derbyshire. The Video speaks for itself, as do all of his others, the perfect thing to watch on a bad weather day, curled up by the fire. This account I feel is very important in the history of the UK Wildman accounts, as the Wildman in question was seen by many witnesses and even police officers. I have contacted the police archives for any information available, and I would like to draw your attention to the "hut" that was found by the search party as you can see it is very similar to finds from all across the UK and America.

71 comments:

  1. The idea of a bigfoot in Britain is asinine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely the whole idea of bigfoot is stupidity itself ... ?

      Delete
    2. But surely not as stupid as this troll ^ who regularly frequents a site that discusses a subject he does not believe in
      ***CREASED***
      You are probably the biggest clown in existence sir !
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    3. So Joe, you’re not trying to argue that bigfoot is real, just that people who recognize it’s not real are ruining your role playing fun?

      Delete
    4. i'm exposing the banal stupidity of people like you who think bigfoot isn't real yet are obsessed with coming on this site to argue that . You care more about something that you don't believe in than your social life and that is just sad and pathetic
      ***CREASED***
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    5. Wow, people get pretty angry when their fantasy lives are shattered. I’m sorry that I ruined your day, please continue with your pretend life. Cheers matey!

      Delete
    6. Angry? i'm actually laughing at the notion that my belief in bigfoot could possibly be threatened by toddlers like you . Absolutely hilarious !
      keep up the good work slugger
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    7. Oy, mate I will, cringe crease narrg deary, bigfoot UK fake but bigfoot US real role-play, arrrgg matey ahoy!

      Delete
    8. yawn
      zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      Joe

      Delete
    9. Did Stuey debunk anything to do with Bigfoot to be able to draw a conclusion that Bigfoot is a fantasy and isn’t real?

      Did Stuey apply anything other than conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories, to arrive at this conclusion?

      “Role-players” who don’t appear to have a single bit of coherency in their alleged methods... who have impossibly low numbers to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, who are in cahoots with PhD’s, who nobody reports seeing, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round.

      Is this Stuey who pretends to be two different people arguing with themlesves for several hours, sometimes days, on every RMSO comment section?

      Did Stuey suggest anyone else is living in a fantasy?

      Delete
    10. Yes... in the 60 years of modern eyewitness reports and physical evidence.

      Got monkey role-playing conspiracy?

      Delete
    11. You haven't had anything ,no monkeys, no nothing

      Delete
    12. Keep praying... one day you might wake up and it’s aaaaaaaaall come true.

      Delete
    13. Don't worry, iktomi, you'll never wake up and realize bigfoot never existed.

      Delete
    14. How many Bigfoot YouTube channels have you followed today?

      Delete
    15. ^ bigfoot role-player ikdummy

      Delete
    16. ... of the mythical role-players of folklore and legend.

      Delete
    17. Bigfoot for the tourists equals big bucks

      Delete
    18. “Billionaire” type big bucks, apparently...

      (Eyes rolling)

      ... by just a 100 role-players, allegedly...

      (Eyes rolling)

      Delete
    19. I like big young "bucks"
      (Tongue rolling)

      Delete
    20. As a gay man like yourself Iktomi I can understand the pain and ridicule that you go through on a daily basis.

      Delete
  2. Aarrrrg naaarg cringe crease matey sasquets bindermeld morphadermal oral history.... blah blah

    Bigfoot don't exist, losers! But don't let that get in the way of your role play, fools. Laters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is more evidence for “Bigfoot”, than there is for “role-players” who don’t appear to have a single bit of coherency in their alleged methods... who have impossibly low numbers to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, who are in cahoots with PhD’s, who nobody reports seeing, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round.

      Conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories.

      Delete
    2. "Iktomi" is a Wal-Mart employee who lives 24/7 on a bigfoot website role playing her favorite monster into existence.

      Yawn.

      Delete
    3. Almost as much imagination applied to my employment as your impossible role-playing empire.

      Delete
    4. ^ 24/7 bigfoot role-player iktomi can't help herself.

      Delete
    5. ... Indeed. One of the elusive mythical “role-players” who don’t appear to have a single bit of coherency in their alleged methods... who have impossibly low numbers to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, who are in cahoots with PhD’s, who nobody reports seeing, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round.

      Beware the enigma.

      Delete
    6. iktomi is merely a bigfoot role-player but he's trying to lump himself in with scientists, hoaxers, profit-seekers and misidentifiers.


      ikdummy, you are just the right amount of stupid to be a bigfoot role-player. Quit trying to inflate your role, weasel.

      Delete
    7. Yes... quite a conspiracy is a foot with this 100 role-playing strong secret society profit seeking millionaires. They must earn big bucks to be able to jet around the country for every recorded occurrence. Super-human too... They’re as agile as a cat to avoid detection.

      Delete
    8. ikdummy, you are NOT a profit seeking millionaire.

      You are a poor welsh bigfoot role-player solely. Nice try though. LOL

      Delete
    9. Are all these references to my alleged financial status meant to offend me? Just checking...

      Delete
    10. ikdummy, you brought up money. You lumped yourself in with millionaires.

      Nice try though. Feel stupid? Just checking...

      Delete
    11. My alleged financial status has been your theme post mind-bending on subject matter for two consecutive threads.

      D’you wanna borrow a tenner?

      Delete
    12. Yeah, cuz anyone that disagrees with you is the same person. Yawn.

      BTW, unprompted, you lumped your sorry role-player azz in with profit seeking millionaires or is your memory THAT short?

      Delete
    13. AnonymousMonday, March 19, 2018 at 9:19:00 AM PDT
      Yeah, isnt that about the time when the grease fryers have to be scrubbed out at KFC? Ha ha ha!


      AnonymousMonday, March 19, 2018 at 9:42:00 AM PDT
      I take it back, the idea of you working at KFC is a terrible insult to hard working people. I have no doubt that you’re some entitled, spoiled, overgrown kid who was too lazy to accomplish anything meaningful or even learn to write properly.
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/scary-encounters-with-cryptids.html?m=0

      Anyone would think you’re getting a little personal there Stu? And there is one troll, there has only ever been one troll, and there will only ever be one troll.

      Delete
    14. Why, because you say so? Everyone knows that you're a proven liar

      Delete
    15. He’s been continuously commenting here for almost 24 hours straight, he must have finally passed out on his keyboard. I hope the Cheeto’s stain on his forehead comes off. Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    16. I hope to lick the Cheetos off his foreskin ha ha ha
      Joe

      Delete
    17. Odd, odd iktomi.

      ikdummy, you are no Rick Dyer. You are no Finding Bigfoot producer. You are no Meldrum. You are a bigfoot role-player. A consumer. A non-producer. A role-player.

      Delete
    18. ... Of the mythical folklore and legend. Since these role-players evade detection with super-human capabilities, I’ll take it as a compliment.

      Delete
    19. You evade nothing, ikdummy. You are not a hoaxer. You have never reported a bigfoot. You have created no profit from bigfoot. You have posted your real name and contact info, though.

      You a bigfoot role-player. You are not a producer. You watch the work of others and play like you are a part of it.

      Delete
    20. Argh yes... that for thousands of years, have led to a 100 role-playing strong secret society that contribute to the Bigfoot multi-million dollar empire. All manaiacally laughing & plotting taking the pop culture world over.

      https://youtu.be/MSXOIf1YHmo

      ... whose avoiding being reported.

      Delete
    21. Arrrg, yes, 450 people in the UK conspired to wear costumes to trick ikdummy into believing in the UK bigfoot.(sarcasm)

      No, ikdummy Wales doesn't have a history of giant humans(sarcasm). Gogmagog ahem!

      When will your role play extend to the UK? http://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends/giants-ancient-albion-legendary-founding-prehistoric-britain-009191



      Delete
    22. ... Not necessarily. 450 people in the UK might have actually seen something that exists. And I’d be jumped all over for claiming they do exist here, without so much as a piece of physical evidence to support that. I would need to claim that 450 people are role-players, liars and hoaxers before your comparisons would apply. Be responsible for your assertions, dear boy!

      In the meantime, you should probably try and deliver some coherency to your role-play. Maybe one example of role-play might get things rolling...

      ... This is usually about the time you claim that it’s all misidentification now as another sockpuppet.

      Delete
    23. Oh and Stuey? The key to where your comparison falls flat is in your link. “Myth”... In Native Americans have mythology outside of their oral histories.

      Delete
    24. You claim UK bigfoot as 100% misidentification, remember? But as soon as someone fakes prints, and PhDs sign off on it, you'll publicly UK bigfoot role play. That's all it takes for the underclass to fall for anything. The pretense of authority giving permission to believe. It goes from non-existent to existent with a paper. Never mind that it doesn't actually exist.

      Delete
    25. I’d stated that Bigfoot was likely misidentification prior to taking the time to conversing with eyewitnesses. That’s where research leads you at times, to make you self-evaluate, re-asses and evolve. But let’s say I still had that approach, and that was compared to the same frequency of misidentification in the US. Statistically I’d be wrong, since the equivalent sightings per land mass in the US have plenty of physical evidence that no theory of mass misidentification cannot explain away. Just like me you’d wrong and both comparisons cannot be simply attributed to misidentification. But then again, mass misidentification is only your stance when you chicken out of providing a moment’s worth of logic to your conspiracy theories.

      You do however need to start with the burden such assertions like “fake prints and PhD’s” bring on your head. Whilst hoaxes no doubt occur, you’ve never substantiated the peer reviewed prints with anything other than circular logic... clever people who have got their ducks in order explaining “myths” away, usually don’t need logical fallacies. If something exists, it leaves physical sign, and that sign is then scrutinised to the scientific standard and subsequently published via the scientific standard.

      Don’t like it? Do something about it champ!

      Delete
    26. What is this? The second time you admit you were wrong.

      Bring on your head, 're-asses' ... Welch expressions?

      You're the only one that came up with mass misidentification and you applied it to every UK sighting. I always leave room for hoaxes, lies, or other possibilities including misidentification. Don't like it? Do something about it chump!

      Delete
    27. I did... at 1:18am PDT.

      AnonymousTuesday, February 20, 2018 at 11:16:00 AM PST
      Misidentifications seem to be the overwhelming majority of bigfoot reports.
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/werewolves-dont-exist-but-dogmen-do.html?m=0

      Might I remind you, me being wrong about the UK misidentification does by no means make the evidence you’re struggling with for the US disappear. And I’ve got plenty of evidence to do something about it, and did.

      Delete
    28. I just wanted you to be consistent in your role play and you are now on track.

      Your evidence is on paper. You've suspended reason and give more weight to a handful of wishful PhD opinions and pen strokes than reality.

      Delete
    29. (Creased)

      I would be more concerned with getting your own ducks in order before audaciously pointing fingers. One minute it’s “all role-play”, the next it’s “all misidentification”... I really can’t keep up. Me “being on track” means that I’m happy to potentially add another continent to a body of geographical evidence that’s impossible to hoax. You “being on track” means there is no room for your minority of role-players to be able to hoax everything... and you inadvertently debunk your own drivel (not that it was hard).

      There is indeed role-play going on here, and it ain’t me.

      And the evidence “being on paper”, is how evidence is (cough, cough) verified? (serious drawn out cringe)... And if the evidence is down to academic wishful thinking, then you’ll have no problem debunking it. You do assert you know more than 100% of the world’s scientists, after all. Chop, chop!

      Delete
    30. ikdummÿ, you are a bigfoot role player. You have some strange need to call misidentifiers role players. You, Joe f1tzgerald, are a role player. So, is chick, although she plays a different way. So, is fasano, playing an explorer in the swamp with a monster nearby.

      You're over emotional, Joe, like a schoolgirl. Do two PhDs agreeing on something make it true by default? Did you know that scientific experts for hire in court will go on the side of who ever pays them? Research it.

      Delete
    31. ikdummÿ, you've never heard of a doctor giving the wrong diagnosis, prescribing the wrong medication, a judge sentencing an innocent man, a scientist misclassifying a fossil, world classes explorers thinking they are landing in India when it's the new world?

      Your ragtag peer review bigfoot frauds okaying fake prints is meaningless.

      Delete
    32. You can't keep up because you are too stupid to realize that you are communicating with more than 1 anon poster who disagrees with you and no amount of posting your "There is only one troll..." mantra or any links "proving" typing patterns or whatever will change that.

      You seem to think that you just publish something and it becomes real and it extends all the way to your ridiculous anon theory.

      You have been exchanging with me over the last several posts on this thread(but not the initial several posts here and a few others) but clearly, on another thread recently, you quoted me and attributed it to the other guy.

      Delete
    33. No Stuey... there is in fact no coherency at all in your theories, to which I’m merely trying to ascertain your latest ad hoc conspiracy-woo, whilst also exposing you for not giving your theories a moment’s worth of thought, of course. Might I add, that this episode of yours has lasted weeks since you were merely asked how many role-players it would take to amount to the entire community in the US. One minute it’s “all role-play”. The next when you’re asked to evidence a little logic behind such a claim... you’re into another sockpuppet claiming it’s “all misidentification”. (Warning, all caps due...) THIS IS WHY YOU CLING SO DESPERATELY TO YOUR SOCKPUPPET DEFENCE, BECAUSE YOU NEED IT TO SAFEGUARD FROM CONTRADICTING YOURSELF FOR THE SAKE OF APPEARING SANE DURING EXCHANGES, BELIEVING NOBODY WOULD NOTICE.

      Two PhD’s don’t make the world go around, but an editorial board with reviewers does. The entire scientific community rests on the research and boldness of a small knit or of scientists putting new ideas toward, to which is then used as output for the wider community to scrutinise. Doctors occasionally give the wrong diagnosis, prescribe the wrong medication, a judge might sentence an innocent man, or a scientist might misclassifying a fossil... but they seldom make such basic mistakes under the review of a journal process, therefore your comparison cannot apply. And I STILL haven’t read anything but ad hominem on the people who published it.

      F-AC Sockpuppet Style Proven -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/strange-cases-of-missing-people.html?m=0

      Rape Threat Boasts With Same “>>” As Quotations -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-glagg-saga.html

      And Your Twisted “Free Speech” Sentiment linked with the above “>>” Quotation Marks -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/bigfoot-truth-told.html

      AnonymousSunday, February 18, 2018 at 12:11:00 AM PST
      If this helps you in some way, fine, but bigfoot will never magically become real and the traffic here is very low.
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/footage-of-rare-ontario-dogman.html?m=0

      Delete
    34. “traffic here is very low“

      ... Which is as much of an admission as you could possibly have written. How would you know if traffic is low if you weren’t contributing to most of the comments? Nobody comes here anymore Stuey... it’s you, me and a couple of others.

      And there is one troll. There has only ever been one troll, and there will only ever be one troll.

      Delete
    35. Those are links alright. No validity pinning them on people who did not type them no matter what you believe.

      How would anyone know the traffic here is low? Uh, O, O, O, O, 3, 0.... comments unless you chime in and people make fun of you, maybe? You are ridiculous. This is the time when people wonder what on earth you do for a living with such skewed logic....

      Delete
    36. Those links prove you are the same psycho that’s harassed people here for years. And I’ve got so, so much more.

      I know the traffic here is low. I’m sure I could talk for the other three or four who still come here, in that they have the same opinion. Look at the comments compared to way they were... plus I’ve been smacking you around for so long, and people have come accustomed to watching me smack you around for so long, that it’s obvious there’s only a few of us left. Heck, you stood out like a sore sockpuppet thumb even when there were three times the amount of posters here... AND were called out on it by others then too.

      Conspiracy theorists usually have skewed logic.

      Delete
    37. No, your links don't prove what you claim. You are lying about me and threatening to lie more.

      If you know the traffic is low then "How would you know if traffic is low if you weren’t contributing to most of the comments?". With your logic that proves you are a sockpuppet generating fake comments.

      Now go throw your emotional hissy-fit cough cough cringe crease sissy welsh temper tantrum like you always do.

      Delete
    38. If I could be bothered, I would post extracts from the links above that would prove it’s you, even based on your comments used in this very comment section. But I’m feeling a little sorry for you and I don’t want to spam this place up. Plus, I’d be feeding your personality disorder and you’d merely get off on it.

      It doesn’t take a genius to work out nobody comes here anymore, and the very fact that you published that “traffic is low”, utterly contradicts your assertion that “two or three of you” (creased) are somehow arguing for the exact same illogical psuedoscientific drivel, responding to it and maintaining it over a period of weeks.

      And trust me... I’m cringing.

      (CRINGE)

      Delete
    39. You little weasel, Joe/ikdummy, "extracts"...Really, ikdummy, really??? Your bigfoot role-play requires you to be "official" and "scientific" sounding at every phrase?

      You clearly have ZERO science background and applying your scatterbrained logic to which anonymous poster posted what is an exercise in total nonsense that you go to when you're desperate, like in this thread where you've admitted you are wrong, again.

      No one cares about your schoolgirl welsh phraseology of cringe, crease, cough cough or whatever prissy terms you concoct.

      Delete
    40. Sorry if the words I use are coming across “official" and "scientific"... but to an adult, it’s pretty basic terminology for the subject matter. Comparatively, I don’t read you using any of the grossly dates pseudoscientific mantas anymore? Anyone would think someone around here ruined all that for you?

      I admitted that research progresses... like genuine scepticism in fact. And me being wrong in this instance only provides more substance to what I’m maintaining; a sure sign that you’re pretty much resorted to damage ANYTHING.

      Naaaaaargh! You care a lot. You’ve been obsessed with me for weeks. And all because of one little question, ha ha ha!!

      ; )

      Delete
    41. Mini-science boy ikdummy, go extract, per se and to wit, as it were, the data you need to extrapolate in order to validate your blarney bigfoot role-play balderdash.

      Yes, stupid, research "progressed" when I explained to you the relative sizes of the UK and US, fool.

      I have made you comply consistency-wise regarding UK and US bigfoot, and comply you did. That is all.

      Delete
    42. WOW!! What a pretentious little rant that was, ha ha ha!! If only you were so passionate about debunking Bigfoot than devising the most pretentious insult, you’d be dangerous!

      And your “relative size” backtrack ended up debunking your own drivel.

      Delete
    43. No, ikdummy, it started you role-playing in your own country, scatterbrain. Now, you can appreciate this blog's British threads as well as maintaining your fantasy US bigfoot role-play. You're welcome.

      Delete
    44. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/werewolves-dont-exist-but-dogmen-do.html?m=0

      One question... over a month of meltdowns. Beautiful.

      Delete
    45. Too bad I influenced you but maybe you'll meet more people in the UK as a result of your expanded role-play territory!

      Delete
    46. Maybe you’ll get around to answering the one question that’s caused this month long episode of yours... one little question.

      Delete