Tuesday, January 2, 2018

Three Scary and True Stories


Check out these three scary and reportedly true stories. As always, coming from the Swamp Dweller youtube channel, this time with a little help from his buddy Southern Cannibal. Yikes!

48 comments:

  1. First !

    hey, I`m FIRST, you assholes !!!

    I`m a total SUCCESS in LIFE.

    You ASSHOLES.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Has he done it yet? You know I like to check?!

      Delete
    2. ^ sick as a parrot at not being "first"

      Delete
    3. Oh, how will I cope?

      Not as badly as you when confronted with evidence for 10,000 10 foot tall apemen, at least.

      Delete
    4. Joe F_tzgeraldTuesday, February 9, 2015 at 8:01:00 AM PST
      There may be zero probability that "Bigfoot" exist if you are talking mathematics probability but I am strictly speaking from a possibility perspective and I believe that anything is possible.

      ^ikdummy = moron

      Delete
    5. funny how the trolls will keep going on about how bigfoot can't possibly exist but they are devouted followers of a site named bigfoot evidence
      Strange and weird lads

      Joe

      Delete
    6. funny how the trolls will keep going on about how bigfoot exist and are "devouted" followers of a site named bigfoot evidence but provide 0 bigfoot evidence accepted by mainstream science
      Strange and weird lads

      Joe

      Delete
    7. ^ Fake Joe from the bellenders strikes again !

      Joe

      Delete
    8. Stuey’s into fake probability scales now! I wonder what the probability of him debunking something in 8 years of obsession is?

      Delete
    9. Ok, ikdummy, provide the real probability data for there never being a clear photo or video of one of 10000, ten foot tall 800 lb ape men in the USA in the 21st century, if they really existed in over 20 states as repeatedly reported by fantasy role players like yourself.

      Delete
    10. Never?

      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg

      Maybe you can fanstast role play away that link for the next time you rhetorically demand a clear photo. I don’t deal out probability data, Stuey, that’s why I took the Mickey out of you You prized prat.

      Delete
    11. ^
      "This site can’t be reached"

      Plus, if it's the P/G like you regularly post, you'd better re-read my post. I thought you understood numbers, ik***dummy***?

      Delete
    12. Not sure if I have the faintest idea what the quote is meant to mean... but here we go Stuey;

      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
      http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
      http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
      http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
      http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
      http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
      http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI
      https://youtu.be/31iMxiZUqVc

      ... there’s a few more instances of Bigfoot being around the same time as cameras. Since you have such a sudden fascination with probability scales... What’s the odds in there being an actual thousands year old, culture hopping hoaxing conspiracy who guess up the exact same archaic foot morphology?

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    13. The quote means that www.texasbigfoot.net is down, unfunctional, ikdummy, like you.

      ***Clear**** photo or video, idiot. The very first video you show is a tiny black spot in the background. The second one is indiscernible and 1994, understand 21th century, ikdummy? 3rd is blocked for copyright reasons. 4th is another indiscernible, 5th indiscernible, 6th indiscernible, 7th video "unavailable", 8th indiscernible, 9th indiscernible, 10th indiscernible. 3 broken links and 8 indiscernibles including texasbigfoot.net. You're a dum-dum, ikdummy. LOL

      Delete
    14. No written language, ikdummy, were you there to hear the tales 1000 years ago?

      Still waiting on you providing the real probability data for there never being a clear photo or video of one of 10000, ten foot tall 800 lb ape men in the USA in the 21st century, if they really existed in over 20 states as repeatedly reported by fantasy role players like yourself.

      Delete
    15. Actually... dear Stuart, most of those pieces of footage either document subjects with impossible mass, or impossible motion (much of which bipedal). All but one that has a copyright issue work just fine... and the one that doesn’t is the one source that made you harass people 24/7 for seven years as a coping mechanism. If you like, we can go through each piece of footage one by one and see just why they can’t be regular humans... So much for that new word you learned, eh?

      Here we go Stuey, a comment section where you were educated about the consistency of Native reports over thousands of years;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/the-infamous-michigan-dogman.html

      And another about how well Natives documented their oral histories about “Bigfoot”;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/bigfoot-spotted-during-bonfire.html?m=0

      And probability data on there never being a clever photograph is hypothetical drivel, since there’s been clear photos since 1967. Maybe since you’ve never substantiated anything with respect to this impossible hoaxing conspiracy of yours, maybe the burden is with you (just a little bit)?

      7 years of nothing.

      Delete
    16. Projecting to the max. You're the one that needs the fantasy to be declared real to function. You're just lucky the occasional sane person enjoys making fun of you enough to give you attention.

      impossible mass, or impossible motion...okay, ikdummy, whatever... Show me the study that proves that on the 1st(top) YT video. Regarding the P/G... wasn't clear, very grainy, costumed man. Just taking your religious centerpiece(P/G) out of the equation by specifying 21st century. There never has been a clear bigfoot photo/video. You're a mental case.

      Delete
    17. Stuey... I’m able to reference repeatable scientific evidence that’s now published, to go along with that many centuries’ worth of cultural and contemporary anecdotes. I don’t need anything to be real, it already exists, I just reference the stuff that counts. What I need is an idiot’s perspective on it for educating others, and you’re here begging for it daily.

      A study? Stuey, have you seen your average reaction to studies regarding evidence? It’s a freak show when you get upset, and you want more? Rhetorically demanding a study on the Leaping Yeti, doesn’t even begin to explain its motion, the manner in which it leaps feet in the air and lands on its hands and bolts into a quadrupedal sprint. You don’t need a study for that. You just need eyes. A matching specimen for Patty with “diaper butt”, I might add... Ouch!

      Page 12...
      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      ... you’ll notice so, so, so much detail in the PGF that we are able to compare it to biological tissue, and specifically the skinfolds of obese people. Do I need to remind you of what Hollywood could accomplish ten years after the PGF was filmed? Aaaaaaargh moving the goalposts, 21st century now? And what would you do if there was a “clear piece of footage”, would you claim it’s impossible SFX, and then ignore actual SFX experts that reel off the most impossible and expensive of SFX methods again?

      Ring any bells, dear Stuey?

      Delete
    18. I’ll be back tomorrow Stuart... whatever’s left here better be good!

      Delete
    19. Oh and here we are, ****head... here’s a video right on cue about your little probability scales;

      https://youtu.be/1JPjsmn3P9U

      I would say go learn something... but we all know how that goes, so see ya tomorrow Stuey!

      Delete
    20. You miss the whole point, ikdumms. The probability data for there never being a clear photo or video of one of 10000, ten foot tall 800 lb ape men in the USA in the 21st century, if they really existed in over 20 states as repeatedly reported by fantasy role players like yourself.

      Not the probability that a primate could exist or survive, I'm talking 10,000 apes evading clear video/photo in the 21st century USA. For your walnut brain, 21st century began January 1, 2001 and will end on December 31, 2100. Your video is applying real science to a fantasy narrative. Yes, chimps have superior memory in some regards, yes, gorillas can live in mountains, etc.... that doesn't prove your fantasy men...

      Delete
    21. No, Stuey... I got your attempt at a point, alright. Unfortunately your “point” is hypothetical & special pleads away what you’re rhetorically demanding. As was put to you up top, clear photos have been circulating since 1967. If that is such an issue for you, you need to find a magic monkey suit. That is your burden. If the evidence I post is significant enough to be brought up after any serious length of time, however old it is, then that's your problem not mine. It merely suggests that it's lasted the special pleading of innumerable lazy pseudosceptics who haven't found a way around it. Same goes for other evidence... if there is forensic evidence from 20-30 years ago, then it merely shows that there is a steady flow of good evidence over a duration from which amateur research began, generally encompassing the last 60 years. There is nothing in scientific theory that states that scientific evidence lessens the more it's substantiated over time. That is embarrassing logic. And now you want 21st century, with all the advances in SFX?? You don’t want a photo in the 21st century Stuey, that’s the last thing you want. And whilst there’s actual amateur footage during that time period of the same subjects you’re rhetorically demanding in HD, then this will continue to be rubbed in your fat little face;

      http://www.oregonbigfoot.com/photo/apattfullclr.gif

      By the very fact that measurements and estimates on Sasquatch dimensions, collected via physical evidence over the last 40 years in the Western U.S and Canada, have been subjected to statistical analysis and extrapolation by scaling laws appropriate to primates and mammals... the sheer probably of that data being down to a fantasy is impossible. Again, if you’re critical of that data, it is your burden to try and apply substance against it. Forget probability... Such studies have even yielded average population values for foot length and width, scaling factors of foot length to height, values for weight, plantar pressure, walking and running gait, speed, and a tentative growth curve as a function of time for the female of the species. These results, which wouldn’t be apparent if a genuine population of giant bipedal primates didn’t exist, suggest a substantial population with traits different from those of other higher primates and humans. So if it’s probability you want, you got it. And we never got a probability on that hoaxing conspiracy. What a professional flunker you are.

      Be back tomorrow!

      Delete
    22. Emphasis on...

      “You don’t want a photo in the 21st century Stuey, that’s the last thing you want. And whilst there’s actual amateur footage during that time period of the same subjects you’re rhetorically demanding in HD, then this will continue to be rubbed in your fat little face;

      http://www.oregonbigfoot.com/photo/apattfullclr.gif

      Delete
    23. ikdummy, there are hypothetical probability questions and hypothetical outcomes. You don't get off that easy. Chop! Chop!

      Not one of those videos is clear. Yes, I do want a clear photo taken in the 21st century. Chop! Chop!

      Delete
    24. Sorry Stuey. You are not remotely qualified enough in presenting enough substance to be demanding such rhetorical junk. I’m the one referencing evidence... you are not. If you think the footage is void of quality, there is your burden.

      Perspective... The fact that for 60 years there is so much footprint evidence, footage, hair samples, audio evidence, thermal, not to mention the transition of THOUSANDS OF YEARS of cultural & contemporary anecdotes, is somehow void because you don’t have a HD photo that satisfies your denial in the last 18 years?

      7 years of nothing.

      Delete
    25. HAHA! You're right, ikdummy, you've got 60 years of nothing. Bear hair, faked footprints, lies, faked film, fake video, fake photos. Zero plus zero plus zero plus zero plus zero... equals zero...and our pal ikdummy, the welch punching bag. Love you, man. You always deliver the laughs.

      Delete
    26. “Bear hair, faked footprints, lies, faked film, fake video, fake photos...”

      All this is your burden, dear Stuey. 7 years and there has been nothing except excuses, conspiracy theories and special leading instead of substance.

      Just think how mad you’ll be by the end of year 8??

      Delete
    27. ikdummy, the whole point is to make fun of people who believe in bigfoot. No burden. No timeline. No anger. Humor. Humor. Humor. Humor. Humor. Humor. When will ikdummy ever learn?

      Delete
    28. Except excuses, conspiracy theories and special pleading....

      Sounds like bigfooters... What is this, take everything bigfooters do and throw it back at the sane people? I see your numbskull brain has added "special pleading" to your pea-brained debate tactics. ikdummy, remember when you were on the case and wanted to know more about how landscapers were hiding bigfoot evidence? No conspiracy theory there. Eh, Cousteau? LOL

      Delete
    29. Pro tip... if you want to make fun out of a group of people, try and not look like a blithering fool on the subject matter. Learn something about it first. It kind of helps... Especially when there’s so many psychologists stating that the likes of you suffer from depression, self esteem and anger issues. Try and get your ducks in order, dear boy. No Stuey... the truth is far more detrimental to your self esteem. I’ve got a whole dossier on your attempts to try and feel important, trying and feel clever, trying to feel some sense of cyber community by pushing the myth that “Bigfoot” started with the PGF. Oh how it all came crashing down when you got a little common sense and a little scientific theory. Anybody could have done it, I just could be bothered. Now that’s all gone, this blog simply serves as a means of luring people into negativity so you can have some sense of control over your own desperate existence.

      Special Pleading
      noun
      Argument in which the speaker deliberately ignores aspects that are unfavourable to their point of view.
      "he has produced a piece of special pleading that does not wholly stand up"

      ... One of too many logical fallacies to count. 7 years of pushing hoaxing conspiracy theories, and what do you have to show for it?

      Delete
    30. So, a pro-tip from someone used to looking like a blithering fool on the subject matter? Thanks, pro!

      ikdummy has to provide a cut-n-paste special pleading definition. LOL

      Delete
    31. Here we go Stuey... watch it properly this time & apply it to your little probability scales;

      https://youtu.be/1JPjsmn3P9U

      Loser.

      Delete
    32. "I ADMIT THAT I'M A COMPLETE FAILURE" - iKTOMI(jOE flTZGERALD),,,, :( !!

      Delete
    33. ikdummy, you idiot, you already posted that link. Off topic as before. Get your head right, fool.

      Delete
    34. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    35. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    36. Stuey... of the JREF special pleading that the Bigfoot legend began with the PGF, which is a lie, and that there is no other evidence to substantiate this legend, which is another lie. You think that if you use all the most readily accessible misinformation about the PGF, you debunk the subject and can rest being assured that you’ve done something with your isolated existence on the internet. Until people like me came along and took away your cyber playground. To make things even worse... If footage of a creature that cannot be hoaxed (PGF) has a subject in it that leaves physical evidence behind that is not only found in another place in the States many years later... But is also found in another continent decades later, with different foot falls and impressions attesting to an actual biological foot, then you'd have to be in a perverse state of denial to suggest otherwise. The only thing that is holding this subject back is the requirement of extraordinary evidence for an extraordinary idea. There just needs to be the extraordinary effort to use that evidence.

      Let’s see what you have to offer over seven years...

      Your two biggest fantasies of your life; "Bigfoot Millionaires" and "Bigfoot role-play", have in fact proven to be far more impossible cases to substantiate than anyone being enthusiastic about a creature seen by tens of thousands of people, and who can point to physical evidence sourced for the past 60 years. These "Bigfoot Millionaires & Role-Players" appear even more elusive than "Bigfoot".

      What a joke. But please stick around Stuey... I’ve got something really nice in store for you.

      ; )

      Delete
    37. Don’t be frightened Stuey... I’m here to help you learn, just as much as to use you for educating others. How many “P” words used? A little homework for you... let’s see if you actually watch it.

      : )

      https://youtu.be/1JPjsmn3P9U

      Delete
    38. Profit = million to ikdummy, who told ikdummy's brain million? Meldrum is profiting. ikdummy thinks Meldrum must be millionaire. ikdummy has child's mind.

      Blah, blah, blah...special pleading. Uneducated ikdummy at 35 starts self-education a bigfoot and debate curriculum. ikdummy can't piece together either. You EARNED ikdummy, little buddy.

      Delete
    39. If "Bigfoot" exists by evidence then it isn't "role-play", meaning any financial gains by people who are researching the subject is needed for further research. All the most well known proponents of this subject cannot give up their day jobs. So if they don’t believe what they’re doing may lead to an anthropological breakthrough... Why give their time?

      For someone who thinks he knows all the hoaxing money making methods of becoming a self-made Bigfoot celebrity millionaire... You sure do deliver typical bum splashes of failed logic, Stuey. And to think you harped on about this for YEARS until someone could be bothered to make you look like an idiot.

      : )

      You’re special pleading away your little cyber existence.

      Delete
    40. OH AND STUEY?? Don’t be frightened... How many “P” words used?

      https://youtu.be/1JPjsmn3P9U

      Let’s see you actually watch something properly now... Prove to your world audience you’re not a total twit.

      Delete
    41. No probability, no peace. Deliver on probability, bitter old man. 1982 called, they want their Welsh weasel back. Ha!

      Delete
    42. What you afraid of Stuey? Nobody is here to see you look like an idiot... Or are you that threatened in our company?

      How many “P” words used?

      https://youtu.be/1JPjsmn3P9U

      Delete
  2. YAY!!! More scary stories and they are TRUE (reportedly). I love scary stories but only TRUE scary stories. I don't believe scary stories unless they say they are true. These are TRUE scary stories.

    Thanks Swamp Dweller!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People tried the next level up from “stories” with you (actual physical evidence), and it ended up with you driving everyone away as a sadistic coping mechanism.

      Stick to more stories Stuey... It doesn’t end pretty otherwise.

      Delete
    2. ^ in my bummy,yum yum,

      Joe

      Delete