Surrounded By Bigfoot


Here's Vic Cundiff with another episode of Bigfoot Eyewitness Radio.

Imagine what it would be like to suddenly find yourself in the presence of 20 Sasquatch, with a 10 footer standing just feet away from you. Well, tonight’s guest, Brendan, doesn’t have to guess what that would be like because that happened to him. As if that wouldn’t be bad enough, when Brendan turned to leave, he felt a huge hand on his back.

Click here to listen

Comments

  1. The years keep ticking by. Zero bigfoots? No problem have another made up anecdote about a monster encounter.

    Pwned like iktomi at an anthropology convention.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Stuey! Where did you run off to earlier?

      We were in the middle of trying to establish if you could reference a logical reason to not consider “plaster”. You have eight years of archived comment sections here at BFE to draw upon. You must have one little example of debunking evidence in all that time? That’s unless you just want to special plead away 60 years of track impressions that have now been published?

      D’you know if you ever (cough, cough) end up in an anthropology convention... don’t let on to anyone that you didn’t know what the genus homo, or the word “paleo” meant, Stuey.

      (Creased)

      Delete
    2. Homo, not homo. The genus is always capitalized, unlike lower-case ikdummy. Poor ikdumms can't catch a break...

      Delete
    3. It's usually housewives like chick and uno and their pot-bellied husbands who are into bigfoot but welsh loner ikdummÿ always brings the dumb.

      Delete
    4. Oh Stuey... the shame if it. Won’t you give a man a break?

      (And then he proceeds to list two genuine human beings in the next comment, with no capitals)

      Eight years of nothing.

      (Incredibly drawn out yawn)

      Delete
    5. ikdummÿ doesn't understand the difference between a lower class individual's first and last name versus scientific classification. Just when we though ikdummy was dumb for the day, he keeps on dumbing.

      Delete
    6. 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(

      Delete
    7. You’re so clever Stuey... really, leagues ahead of anyone else around here.

      And pray tell, how does an isolated, misogynistic manic depressive who spends his days trying to intimidate people online with every revolting slur imaginable, get to call the shots as to people’s social status?

      No body, Stuey. But proof that the same creature that’s been widely reported for thousands of years is leaving its physical sign on the environment of US and China.

      Delete
    8. Why do you feel intimidated, ikdummy?

      People's social status? Like Nascar/trailer park jokes from Joe? Nessie and Dogman/Bigfoot, often reported, never recognized as real.

      Delete
    9. Stuey : 8 years of empty beer cans and not much else to show
      8 years of banging out bollocks on his keyboard with nothing to show
      8 years of eating junk food while trolling on here and 4 stone to show for it !
      Well at least now he can use this site as an excuse for his increased heft
      Tally ho !

      Joe

      Delete
    10. I’m sure you’d have liked me to feel intimidated when you threatened to publish my email everywhere and stalked me for my employer’s details, but sorry. You’re pretty much as weak as your need for control blatantly lets on. I don’t even know what nascar is, and I’ve only ever read people describe you for what you are; an isolated manic depressive desperate for self-esteem.

      It doesn’t matter how many ignorants aren’t aware of the evidence & subsequently don’t believe “Bigfoot” to be real. It doesn’t matter how many attempts at sensationalist comparisons you can think of... The footprint evidence is now shown in repeatable examples across continents.

      I just wanna read you blither, whine & dodge around that simple fact.

      : )

      Delete
    11. 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(

      Delete
    12. ikdummy published "his" own email and begged other men to privately email "him". Then "he" called real men cowards for NOT emailing "him"... in this very thread. Psycho.

      Delete
    13. Iktomi wants you to send him an email because he thinks that he can figure out your identity from the email codes. Iktomi desperately wants to know who you are so he can harass you and cause turmoil in your life. He has wet dreams about learning your identity and doing everything he can to screw with your real life. Last year he thought he figured out that a troll was someone named Barret Sanders and he stalked the poor guy on Facebook and even contacted his employer. Iktomi did this because his bigfoot fantasy was crushed and his feelings were hurt. You’re dealing with a internet psychopath so be careful.

      Delete
    14. Stuey, do you think that by suddenly using capitals, it somehow distances you from talking to yourself.

      Nargh! You’re just a little coward, too scared to face me even through an email. Tee-hee!!

      Delete
    15. ^ one day will befall to a fate of being crushed beneath all his empty beer cans

      Joe

      Delete
    16. "I abmit that I'm a complete failure"- Iktomi

      Delete
    17. ^ Now we All know why "it's" Real name is Ikdummy.

      Delete
    18. Poor Joe - he`s got nothing to show.

      You have nothing but dependency upon others - you`re a complete failure as a person.

      Delete
    19. Is it links you’re after Stuey? I’m happy to reference something if you’re struggling with that memory of yours. You know how I like to paste a link or two...

      Delete
    20. And How! Why dont you post a link to melba Ketchum with her saying Sasquatch is a giant Lemur & a homeless negro 15,000 yrs ago .
      Go ahead MAKE ME LAUGH ikstupid!!

      Schooled Chump!! :)

      Delete
    21. Nargh! I’ll just post links to what interests me... evidence that makes you cry like a little wimp.

      Delete
    22. ^ = weak & Debunked!

      Schooled Chump haa haa haaa lol!

      Delete
    23. I’m still waiting on that debunking. Insults don’t do it... None of us were educated by tramps, sorry.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Why do you feel tender when you read it, ikdummy?

      Delete
    2. I just find it audacious since you didn’t have the **** to email me with the same email address you threatened me with, and face your issues like a man.

      Delete
    3. 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(

      Delete
    4. Yes... the more you run around publishing it, it’s sure to stop me reminding you of the time length you’ve been harassing people to make up for debunking shortfalls.

      Not.

      Delete
    5. "I admit that I'm a complete failure" - iktomi !!

      Delete
    6. I admit I stoop low in engaging with you... it’s a guilty pleasure using you as the archetype idiot, and it’s just too tempting. You just keep coming back for more and more and more...

      Delete
  3. Ikliar sure is blubbering like a little baby today, wheres his great Bigfoot evidence, Bigfoot is a homeless negro

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL.joe f/iktomi musta soiled its diaper. Wha!

      Delete
  4. Plaster footprints prove the existence of feet, not Bigfoot, 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually Stuey... It proves that the exact same biped with the exact same foot morphology is leaving evidence across North America & China, essentially providing irrefutable proof that hoaxers from different continents would have to have guessed a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot. Encompassing total accuracy regarding bipedal evolution that only very few educated people understand.

      And guess what this means for your main meltdown, the PGF?

      Delete
    2. Heeeeeeeere Stuey, Stuey, Stuey, Stuey, Stuey!!

      Delete
    3. Im here, don't be scared,8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(,you'll get another 8 years of nothing and like it

      Delete
    4. Oops, forgot to mention that special morphology is also a human trait and doesn't exist in my giant skeletons where only I see archaic skulls and Andy White calls me out, oh and PGF, I wouldn't wipe my ass with Gimlins tongue, 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(

      Delete
    5. Im the only retard who buys my cut and paste proof, 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(

      Delete
    6. Schooled, laters, 8 years later and no proof of Bigfoot:( tee hee

      Delete
    7. Them Furry hip waders sure made us laugh at old Bob, Im a millionaire, prove I aint

      Delete
    8. Great! As I was saying...

      What it means for the PGF; for a subject that not only cannot be debunked with modern materials, but also leaves physical evidence behind that is not only found in another place in the States many years later... But is also found in another continent decades later. With different footfalls and impressions attesting to an actual biological foot... Then you'd have to be an isolated degenerate to deny its significance to field biology. Not that anyone’s trying to persuade you, or is ever expecting someone like you to be honest.

      The only thing that is holding this subject back is the requirement of extraordinary evidence for an extraordinary idea. There just needs to be the extraordinary effort to use that evidence. “No body” does not equate to “no proof”, because based on the level of evidence that’s readily available for further study, that’s just a big fat negative proof fallacy.

      One of many fallacies I just love pointing out.

      Delete
    9. Oh and Stuey? Remember when you couldn't tell the difference between a mid-tarsal break and a modern skeletal foot? Remember that not having one modern example of a comparative archaic skull doesn’t somehow make that archaic skull modern?

      Oh the memories.

      Delete
    10. That isn't evidence just my own crackpot theory, Ive never even seen the supposed plaster casts of Patterson so its only evidence that 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(

      Delete
    11. I know i can't tell mid tarsal from regular skeletal feet sowhy i try to present it as evidence is beyond me, its evidence that 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(, Im looking sad and desperate now, no one here buys my sweet Bigfoot bullshit and im killing off the site arguing with multiple people who know im a fool, acting superior to everyone because i cut and past Meldrum theory and stupidly present it as fact, 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:( I just wouldn't admit it

      Delete
    12. Oh the memory of the Arabs on my block beating on me and urinating on me , good times, good times, God bless my gracious Queen

      Delete
    13. Um... nope, Little Stuey. An expert, like an academic in bipedal evolution could spot a mid-tarsal break on a skeleton, and the track impression of a foot with mid-tarsal break will leave a particular print. But by the very examples of both normal and MTB skeletal feet that are provided below, you wouldn't know the difference between a MTB & normal foot when flesh and muscle are stripped;
      http://www2.isu.edu/~meldd/jpg/024.jpg
      ... the context of this; a response to your embarrassing drivel you pushed for about a week that mid-tarsal breaks would be listed as a standout anatomical feature during excavations of “giant” skeletons in the US, and that they would be spotted by anyone else looking at the various photos of such skeletons. You’re an idiot, ha ha ha!!

      Page 336 (photographs and all);
      “Photograph taken by Lyle Laverty at the Bluff Creek, California, site of the Patterson-Gimlin film of a 37-cm footprint displaying a pronounced midtarsal pressure ridge. Inset illustrates a series of stills of a 3D scan of a cast made by Bob Titmus of the accompanying footprint.“
      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf

      That’s the same anatomical features as a print found by a government employee in China. (Yawn) and there is just one troll. There has always been one troll, and there will only ever be one troll... You.

      Delete
  5. Yep, no matter what crap I try to spin the one truth out of my mouth, 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(, see how angry I get at myself for saying it, i totally go ballistic and throw up a whole bunch of nothing that no one accepts as proof, yep, thats why Im so mean, remember that beating i took that was so bad I just resorted to shamelessly attacking DS to save face, same way I look down on homeless negros by calling them Bigfoot, aren't i a turd? A sorry excuse for a human being? You bet, remember Stueys, 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(

    ReplyDelete
  6. Duh, You're great Iktomi, just like testicles

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Opps,I was huffing ball sack sweat, so I'm changing my bird brain..
      Testicals 10+,,,iktomi not so much. :(

      Delete
    2. Rhetorically projecting a demand for proof for YOUR insufferable existence here, is futile Stuey. Especially when the hominin you’re whining about is by reliable scientific means being shown to exist in the impressions it leaves on the environment of multiple continents.

      Let’s compare that to what you have for 8 years you’ve been dribbling around here; the PGF (put to bed), “Bigfoot role-players” and “Bigfoot money making millionaires”. If anyone else were stupid enough to even stoop to the level of using such an ignorantly impossible fantasy... They would know that there's an awful lot of evidence to explain away before expecting anyone to believe millions of people are simply role-playing their belief in "Bigfoot". Your two biggest fantasies for the past 8 years of your life have in fact proven to be far more impossible cases to substantiate than anyone being enthusiastic about a creature seen by tens of thousands of people, and who can point to physical evidence sourced for the past 60 years. These "Bigfoot Millionaires & Role-Players" appear even more elusive than "Bigfoot".

      Oh, and I was stomping on you way before Bruce Kiray demanded attention around here, and the only racist (who’s too cowardly to put his name to his comments) is you. All because your quest for self-esteem didn’t work. Eh muir?

      Delete
    3. Comes in a day late and a dollar short, the conversation ended yesterday retard^

      Delete
    4. Look at the time stamps, Einstein. Now go borrow another dollar of ya mama.

      Delete
    5. 7:20, ikdummy’s old standby is to come back to a dead thread after getting beat down to post one more rambling, nonsensical comment. Consider it his admission of defeat.

      Delete
    6. IktomiWednesday, January 17, 2018 at 3:49:00 PM PST
      Anyway Stuey... glad I could bait you into engaging on the subject matter again. It doesn’t take much, you can’t help yourself. Doesn’t matter how much you want to keep mere insults going to aggravate, you’ll always slip into attempting the subject because it’s the root of your life’s emotional meltdown. I’ll be back in the morning... Not that there’s likely to be anything left here to pose a challenge, but just because I’m happy to contribute to your anger issues and watch you run around trying to take ownership of the mockery aimed at you.

      Delete
    7. Bob Gimlin net worth 1.7 Million, guess that makes you an uninformed retard or more likely a liar^

      Delete
    8. “Gimlin pretty much dropped out of the Bigfoot field after that [footage of 1967], except for occasional appearances at conferences (the first one he ever attended was the 1978 Conference on Humanlike Monsters at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). In the early-'70s, Gimlin took part in lawsuits to get rights to the film. Eventually, Rene Dahinden got about 51% of the film rights (the still photos from the film) and Patricia Patterson, Roger Patterson's widow, got 49% (the actual film rights). Gimlin really didn't want a whole lot to do with the film itself, so he sold his portion of the rights to Dahinden for $26.00. For nearly 30 years, Gimlin stayed mostly out of the Bigfoot spotlight. A few years ago, he began to be invited to different conferences. He spoke briefly at the 2003 Willow Creek Bigfoot Symposium and was an honored guest there. He also spoke at the 2004 Crypto-Conference in Conroe, Texas. He appeared at the 2005 Bellingham conference and also the Seattle Museum of the Mysteries in June 2005..”
      - Information Courtesy of Southeast Sasquatch Association

      He has no rights to the film at all... And anyone with a ten year old’s knowledge of the subject is aware of that. And let’s say Bob was invited to a conference every couple of years after the last date in the above extract, still doesn’t really amount to making a living from “Bigfoot”. Also;
      https://networthpost.com/?s=Robert+Emory+Gimlin

      Still 8 years of nothing, sorry Stuey. Maybe the “role-players” spiel will take off sometimes soon?

      Delete
    9. Bob Gimlim 1.7 Million, You're proven a liar, ha ha

      Delete
    10. Confirmed... nowhere. You’re an angry loon.

      : p

      Delete
    11. ikdummÿ has been role playing on here for 8 years. At least hoaxers are making money. ikdummy has made nothing but enemies and role play won't bring monkey man to being. Sad.

      Delete
    12. Argh role players... Yes of course. For thousands of years, there has been a culture hopping secret society of gorilla suit wearing role players, all out to gain. These role players, spanning different cultures, and though finding each others customs undesirable, have managed to role-play up the same creature with non-human primate features, when they didn't even know what one looked like, and have in fact managed to cheat experts with fake morphological traits that span decades and continents!

      Tell me Stuey... with all these money making hoaxing methods you’re so accustomed to identifying, why are you such a bum?

      Delete
  7. I know Vegas, thats why I try to pass off crap as evidence that any scientists would kick my shameless ass for presenting, all i have is evidence of homeless negros foraging for malt liquor, 8 years and no proof of Bigfoot:(

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't exist, please just admit people made me up to make money, get a job and a girlfriend, or manfriend, just get a life, You're creeping out Meldrum

    ReplyDelete
  9. The troll can't tell the difference between her klitoriz and a squirrel penis

    A real greasy samsquanch

    Bubbles

    ReplyDelete
  10. The years keep ticking by. Zero bigfoots? No problem have another made up anecdote about a monster encounter. tungsten rings wholesale france , tungsten rings wholesale uk

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story