Well "mate" not a fan of NASCAR but at least it's more interesting and REAL than yet another Bigfoot movie. How many does that make now about 500? But of course you will joyously embrace each and every one no matter how stupid they are because you somehow perceive that it supports your moronic belief in Bigfoot. The same way you support every trace in the dust as a Bigfoot footprint, every fallen branch as Bigfoot habitat, every blurry image in the shadows as Bigfoot and every testimony by a witness as rock solid truth. Yes, go ahead and watch yet another - it's probably a step up from those cartoons that is your usual fare. On second thought keep watching those cartoons - much more believable.
I’m sorry Stuey... but you’re confusing pop culture with science. Probably because your understanding of science is about as vast as your social circle.
But I seem to pick up on an angry attempt at the subject matter. You see, “traces in dust” falls way short of the mark unless you’re accustomed to special pleading away valuable data. Data such as repeatably identifiable anatomy that biologists with many, many years of experience under their belts are able to identify due to tracking mammals in wilderness areas. Features in things like trackways, things like dermal ridges... things like splayed toes in different footfalls that indicate a genuine biological bipedal foot coming into contact with the ground. You see, your narcissism may expect everyone else on the planet to be as useless as you are, but there are experts in field biology who know what they’re doing. So much so, that people faaaaaaar cleverer than you struggle to find excuses for the type of evidence that is now being published. And if you’ve got that, then some level of oral histories and contemporary anecdotes have to be rock solid. Oh... and not every image of “Bigfoot” is blurry. Remember the pioneering plastic surgeon that I referenced to give you a meltdown about? Remember the analysis on the PGF he offered, identifying biological features that only a select few of experts in the US would be able to point out, let alone think of to add to a costume?
Let me know if your memory needs a kickstart, I’d be happy to help.
When you write a "book" as a comment, no one is going to read it. Ridiculous....the trailer is awful. Obviously very low budget,low talent and no imagination.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Just what the world needs - another Bigfoot movie.
ReplyDeleteHello mate
ReplyDeleteif you don't like it you can always go back to watching reruns of last weekends nascar races
Cheers
Joe
Well "mate" not a fan of NASCAR but at least it's more interesting and REAL than yet another Bigfoot movie. How many does that make now about 500? But of course you will joyously embrace each and every one no matter how stupid they are because you somehow perceive that it supports your moronic belief in Bigfoot. The same way you support every trace in the dust as a Bigfoot footprint, every fallen branch as Bigfoot habitat, every blurry image in the shadows as Bigfoot and every testimony by a witness as rock solid truth. Yes, go ahead and watch yet another - it's probably a step up from those cartoons that is your usual fare. On second thought keep watching those cartoons - much more believable.
DeleteI’m sorry Stuey... but you’re confusing pop culture with science. Probably because your understanding of science is about as vast as your social circle.
DeleteBut I seem to pick up on an angry attempt at the subject matter. You see, “traces in dust” falls way short of the mark unless you’re accustomed to special pleading away valuable data. Data such as repeatably identifiable anatomy that biologists with many, many years of experience under their belts are able to identify due to tracking mammals in wilderness areas. Features in things like trackways, things like dermal ridges... things like splayed toes in different footfalls that indicate a genuine biological bipedal foot coming into contact with the ground. You see, your narcissism may expect everyone else on the planet to be as useless as you are, but there are experts in field biology who know what they’re doing. So much so, that people faaaaaaar cleverer than you struggle to find excuses for the type of evidence that is now being published. And if you’ve got that, then some level of oral histories and contemporary anecdotes have to be rock solid. Oh... and not every image of “Bigfoot” is blurry. Remember the pioneering plastic surgeon that I referenced to give you a meltdown about? Remember the analysis on the PGF he offered, identifying biological features that only a select few of experts in the US would be able to point out, let alone think of to add to a costume?
Let me know if your memory needs a kickstart, I’d be happy to help.
Stuey's memory always needs a kickstart. He forgets which side of his bed he gets up on all the time
DeleteJoe
When you write a "book" as a comment, no one is going to read it. Ridiculous....the trailer is awful. Obviously very low budget,low talent and no imagination.
ReplyDelete