Friday, January 5, 2018

Bigfoot By Waterfall Spotted


In Pennsylvania a bigfoot is spotted up on a ridge by a waterfall. Luckily they had a video camera when they spotted it.

21 comments:

  1. Yup, HAS to be a bigfoot. No other explanation. There is absolutely no way it potentially be a human - so it has to be a bigfoot. Occam's Razor be damned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What the heck is up with all this "LOOSER" stuff?
      It Don't make any sence?

      Delete
    2. Argh, so Stuey think he understands what Occam’s Razor means now?

      It's a logic principle. Scientists use it as a heuristic that leans on the simplest explanation that is consistent with available data that points in the same direction...
      • Eyewitness reports of a large unclassified bipedal primate.
      • Track impressions of a large unclassified bipedal primate.
      • Footage of a large unclassified bipedal primate.
      • Hair samples of a large unclassified bipedal primate.
      • Audio recordings of a large unclassified bipedal primate.

      ... Occam's Razor when applied to that data would lean on the heuristic that there is currently a large unclassified bipedal primate leaving its evidence on the environment of North America.

      Dumbo.

      Delete
    3. Idiot and deceptive liar ikdumm├┐ Joe f1tzgerald, there were no tracks or hair samples associated with the bigfoot in the video. There was no scientific analysis of any kind.

      Delete
    4. Just applying a principle that you don’t understand to the subject in general, dumbo.

      Delete
    5. Yes, ikdummy, because science is about deceptive generalizations....

      Delete
    6. Again... this is your burden. If the science applied to the sources of evidence up top is being criticised, the burden is to provide substance to that.

      It’s why you’re a whipping boy, and not revered by he JREF.

      Delete
    7. There has been no "science" applied to the "evidence" sourced in the video. A guy is walking in the woods. There is no burden to prove or disprove anything. Really, ikdummy, how stupid are you? Someone makes a silly video of them self walking in the woods and puts "bigfoot" in the video title and now you pile this nonsense on your endless pile of nonsense supporting the existence of imaginary 10 foot tall hairy men...and say it's everyone else "burden" to dispprove? You have the mind of an infant.

      Delete
    8. “Just applying a principle that you don’t understand to the subject in general, dumbo.”

      I’m not talking about that video Stuey, there’s nothing in that video worth talking about. I do understand that this type of material is your low level IQ standard... and you’d LOVE for me to engage you on it... but I’m talking about applying scientific principles I real evidence for 10 foot tall hairy men. You know, the stuff I bait you into looking stupid about every day?

      Delete
    9. ikdummy is backtracking.

      2018 is your year, though. It will be the latest year that not one of 10,000, 10 foot tall giant hairy "bigfoot" has been captured.

      Delete
    10. You do know people can read, right? You, psycho narcissists, spend way too much time on your desktops in your own little cyber bubble. Could your amateur scrawny backside capture and keep hold of something in the height range of 7-10 feet, 500-1000 lbs, that has agility far exceeding anything modern Homo sapiens can achieve, and that also evades in social groups?

      What’s for sure is 2018 won’t be the year for you. But you keep praying away that physical evidence, Stuey. One day you might wake up and that pathological denial might just have reduced this subject to mere stories. Fingers crossed eh?

      Delete
    11. So, I'm fat and scrawny? I'm an amateur but you're a pro, a professional idiot?

      You'll go through every year for the rest of your scrawny/fat amateur/pro life without one of those 10,000, 10 foot tall giant hairy "bigfoot" being captured, ikdummy.

      Delete
    12. You’re an old scrawny man with a bloated red face from drinking too much. I agree I’ll never capture a “Bigfoot” due to aforementioned reasons. I’m down with that. But I have plenty of 10 foot tall giant hairy men in the 60 years of physical evidence.

      http://www2.isu.edu/~meldd/jpg/024.jpg

      I know how you hate cut & pastes Stuey. And everyone knows why.

      Delete
    13. I thought i was a kid with fat fingers? Am i stiff from Leeds?

      Delete
    14. No, you’re F-AC Collins, Stuey, Barret Sanders, Bill Jackson... I’ve literally lost count.

      Delete
  2. What a cheapass bigfoot costume.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not a bigfoot...never is or was...never will be.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Major red flag, why didn't you let the clip keep playing? I'm a believer and I call BS on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. what I find most incredible is the circular rock structure that the sasquatch constructed that looks just like what we humans use as a fire pit. Does this creature use fire? Also, what is both amazing, and enlightening is the loose overcoat that flags on the sasquatch at the very beginning of the "actual" footage that isn't replayed during the continues slow motion replay. This leads an educated person to ask the question: Do sasquatch make clothing? If not, do they barter at flea markets for their garmets? So many questions arise from this wonderful, authentic video.

    ReplyDelete