What's this? Some kind of video by the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization showing (yawn) yet another drive around the Mogollon Rim area? Isn't that Kelly Shaw's group? I think we are all getting carsick from these videos and it's making everyone.....
There are plenty of surprises left with regard to undiscovered animals but none will be the famed monsters of cryptozoology. In addition the bulk of new discoveries will be diminutive insects and reptiles. The oceans may hold out hope for some major surprises but every year that passes decreases the chance. Yes, I believe cryptozoology will have few success stories in it's future.
New primate "discovered" each year the last 12 years in a row. Bili Ape over 10 years ago, a 6 foot tall over 200 pound primate. Just recently a new orangutan species the Tapanuli. It is a species all its own. People will say, they aren't new. All of the locals say everyone in their neck of the woods knew these primates existed. Sorry not real, until science says its real hahaha.. When a "new" primate in North America is finally "discovered" by science, what ever species they deem it. People will say again. This isn't a new primate everyone knew they were there.
Buggyeyes is the cancer of cryptozoology. Aside from his favorite hobby of cultivating book mold. Steven also online stalks and trolls, he also plants fake bigfoot foot prints in bigfoot research areas. And then for extra fun he contacts news papers and television shows with fictional fake news about martens and bigfoot experiences.
I really like Kelly Shaw and enjoy watching his videos.
Over the years though it has been frustrating to realize that Kelly doesn't actually believe BF exists and cannot or will not analyze his own video, ever. He says he isn't a "face guy".
Ok fine. Ultimately his video is analyzed by others and there is a nice cottage industry making videos showing actually BF imagery captures in Kelly's footage. Its sort of a weird situation but it works. Kelly, in fact, captures AMAZING imagery of BF but.... it isn't shown found or shown by Kelly because he thinks BF will step out in front of his camera or cross the road in front of his truck.
The reason that is a boneheaded move is probability and stochastic processes. Kelly goes to locations of reported sightings raising his probability of an encounter. He films with good equipment and does quite a few deep static zooms into treelines further increasing his probability of capturing imagery. Then, because of his beliefs, he simply doesn't analyze the footage dropping his probability back down to nearly zero.
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
What's this? Some kind of video by the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization showing (yawn) yet another drive around the Mogollon Rim area? Isn't that Kelly Shaw's group? I think we are all getting carsick from these videos and it's making everyone.....
ReplyDeleteNot interested. Done.
Everyone is done it seems...Cryptozoology is on the respirator and bigfoot has been dead for 2 years now...
ReplyDeleteThere are plenty of surprises left with regard to undiscovered animals but none will be the famed monsters of cryptozoology. In addition the bulk of new discoveries will be diminutive insects and reptiles. The oceans may hold out hope for some major surprises but every year that passes decreases the chance. Yes, I believe cryptozoology will have few success stories in it's future.
DeleteNew primate "discovered" each year the last 12 years in a row. Bili Ape over 10 years ago, a 6 foot tall over 200 pound primate. Just recently a new orangutan species the Tapanuli. It is a species all its own. People will say, they aren't new. All of the locals say everyone in their neck of the woods knew these primates existed. Sorry not real, until science says its real hahaha.. When a "new" primate in North America is finally "discovered" by science, what ever species they deem it. People will say again. This isn't a new primate everyone knew they were there.
DeleteKeep up the good work Kelly Shaw!
ReplyDelete^ Reads comic books and acts out superhero fantasies...(it`s Joe)
DeleteBug Eyes tried to broker a deal with Buscardi to confront Gimlin? Shame on you buggy. Shame!
ReplyDeleteBuggyeyes is the cancer of cryptozoology. Aside from his favorite hobby of cultivating book mold. Steven also online stalks and trolls, he also plants fake bigfoot foot prints in bigfoot research areas. And then for extra fun he contacts news papers and television shows with fictional fake news about martens and bigfoot experiences.
DeleteThe Cash Deal with Bissqwik is his latest alledged caper.
DeleteI really like Kelly Shaw and enjoy watching his videos.
ReplyDeleteOver the years though it has been frustrating to realize that Kelly doesn't actually believe BF exists and cannot or will not analyze his own video, ever. He says he isn't a "face guy".
Ok fine. Ultimately his video is analyzed by others and there is a nice cottage industry making videos showing actually BF imagery captures in Kelly's footage. Its sort of a weird situation but it works. Kelly, in fact, captures AMAZING imagery of BF but.... it isn't shown found or shown by Kelly because he thinks BF will step out in front of his camera or cross the road in front of his truck.
The reason that is a boneheaded move is probability and stochastic processes. Kelly goes to locations of reported sightings raising his probability of an encounter. He films with good equipment and does quite a few deep static zooms into treelines further increasing his probability of capturing imagery. Then, because of his beliefs, he simply doesn't analyze the footage dropping his probability back down to nearly zero.
Dumb.
^ Agreed everyone should be more like Dr.Scamsquat. Get a good sharpie and draw faces on every stick and shadow that looks like bigfoot.
Delete1:05, He's being paid to make a mockery of Bigfoot, just like all the other yo-yo's featured here everyday without a single shed of proof!
Delete^ No worries nobody has ever take Dr Squatch seriously. All know from the beginning he is a petty serial hoaxer.
Delete