Monday, September 11, 2017

How Can You Argue Against All These Bigfoot Sightings?


Utah Sasquatch takes a look at the huge bigfoot sighting database of the BFRO.  He claims that this can be used as a tool to find bigfoot.

42 comments:

  1. Read,,, "Hunt for the Skinwalker"

    The truth will set you free!!
    FOLKS!!


    AC Collins

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Hunt for the SkinFlute" is another 'must-read'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is wrong with you stu ?

      Delete
    2. ^ insane ikdummy sock puppet

      Delete
    3. Talking to yourself Stuey is one thing. Answering back is quite another. Having a conversation with a mess of fictious people is a whole new level of Kra Kra.

      What the hell is wrong with you Suzy Stu ?

      Delete
    4. ^ insane ikdummy sock puppet projecting

      Delete
  3. Matt K.

    Could you find out how Fasano is doing and let us know ?

    MMC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, MMC. I don't personally know Tim, nor do I have contact information on him. Have you posed the question on his Youtube channel?

      Delete
    2. MMC... That's Stuey as "Matt" trying to get you to post a comment on YouTube so he can try and get your identity.

      "Many cyberstalkers are obsessed, unstable, or otherwise mentally ill. Still, others are simply angry or hurt and have crossed the line into criminal activity when expressing these emotions. While they can exhibit charm and eloquence, they are generally isolated and desperate, have very low self-esteem, and are especially sensitive to rejection."
      https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-lies-trauma/201503/cyberstalking-the-fastest-growing-crime

      Delete
    3. ^insane ikdummy projecting his proclivities while displaying his paranoid delusions.

      Delete
    4. And who'd have guessed it? Stuey responds.

      Delete
    5. ^ STFU IKDUMMY "MKB" dox'ed all you jive turkey's Years ago!!

      HAAAA HAAAA HAAAA LOL!

      WE ALL KNOW ;)))))!

      Delete
    6. Talk about projecting, remember last year when ikdummy popped a massive boner and creamed his knickers when he thought that MMC had found out the troll was Barret Sanders?? They even harassed the poor guy on YouTube and he had no idea what the imbeciles were on about! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    7. Doc, ikdummy has accused at least 30 different people of being Stuey and yet at the same time he insists that they're all one person. Only from the scrambled brain of ikdummy! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    8. They don't call him "LOWIQMI" for nothing!

      Delete
    9. ikdummy was sure Stuart(this 1 man army) was from the UK because he used Britishisms when mockingly posting as Joe.

      ikdummy's down fall is that his mind is made up and u cant confuse him with the facts. That, and he'll post a study that agrees with him while ignoring credible contrary studies and even common sense. Paper and plaster dictate reality for ikdummy.

      Delete
    10. Thanks Iki

      Stuey is a rookie

      MMC

      Delete
    11. Yep, I'm a rookie. I haven't been continuously posting on this crappy blog for five straight years and perfected the fraudulent art of sock puppeting -- ikdummy is the true master of that! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    12. 2:36 are you attempting to insinuate that ikdingbat is not "MALE" ??

      Delete
    13. Hey Stuey... The problem is, you can't find at least one contrary study, rookie. And I've never once commented on anyone's YouTube channel, especially anyone if the name of "Barret Sanders". There is one troll. This comment section is one of many that proves it.

      DS... I've never claimed Stuey is Steven S. I've only ever exposed Stuey for trolling both Kelly Shaw and Steven S, with the same kooky sockpuppeting that he's done here.

      Delete
    14. Give it up IKWUSSY, we all know your game.The piss poor fact of the matter is that you are never going to be anything other than A total LOOSER!
      Face facts CHUMP!
      HAAA HAAA HAAA LOL!!!

      AC Collins

      Delete
    15. I can expose you a million times over for the two writing styles you like to use... As well as the three different insults you like to use to somehow pretend to be three different people. You've been doing it for so long, I think you actually might believe you're an army.

      Delete
    16. 8:40 I remember when I was 16 yrs old too,
      Now do somthing with your life young man!!

      Delete
  4. In my mind all these sighting reports works as much against Bigfoot's existence as for it. IF every sighting report was true (and I very much doubt that) then it strains all logic on how it could possibly escape detection. According to this Reo, these are just a tiny fraction of the sightings reported. He also claims he has personally received thousands of reports (which I also very much doubt). How can the BFRO possibly verify that all these reports are true when most are just a story recounted from many years previously? Can one have a lot of faith in this map when (glitch or not) it shows reports from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? How can any of it be trusted?

    Reo is quite the talker but I had to laugh when he said his very first Bigfoot experience was in the Tillamook State Forest in Oregon but he didn't know how to find it on the map (it covers over 500 square miles). He use the giant squid as an example of an animal reported but not discovered until recently and used 2013 as a discover date but we have known officially of their existence since the middle of the 1800's.

    He is now off to Vancouver Island to do "Bigfoot stuff" and I betting the house that his next report will be of all the amazing findings and evidence he finds there. Coming back from going all that way and reporting he found nothing would be no fun at all don't you see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bigfoot is everywhere and no where.

      Delete
    2. REO is another KOOK,,Fact!

      Delete
    3. Curious... If you actually read your comments back. And then go and read your last comments, and then the comments before that... Do you realise they're the same comments over and over and over again? If something exists, it is seen, and no high frequency of sightings reports that are accompanied by physical evidence (detection) can hurt the credibility of such an existence. That's just a seriously audacious effort at twisting evidence against said creature, when you should be trying to refute it instead. "Curiously", this map mirrors not only the maps of missing people in the US, but also the maps of buried 7-8 skeletons that have been documented in the US also.

      Stuey... It does actually appear that "Bigfoot" is everywhere, as the map attests to. As does the physical evidence that's been sourced for the past 60 years. I tell you what fits your little "version" though; all these "contrary studies" about "plaster". Now there's an elusive creature, if ever I've heard of one.

      Delete
    4. Oh, and Mr Curious? Comparatively...

      • We have the same scientific documentation of relict hominids and giant squid reports & remains being found in the 1800 century.
      • The next time we hear of a stranding of giant squid was in the 1960's when guess what? We have the Patterson Gimlin footage!
      • We then have to wait until 2004 until a living example of giant squid is documented, to which time we have 60 years of physical, video and audio evidence pointing to the existence of a bipedal primate that is twice the size of normal human primates; a far greater frequency of evidence than the giant squid enjoyed to that point.

      Delete
  5. Give it up ikdummy. People are fascinated by how someone as dimwitted as yourself can delve into such farcical minutia about non-existent folklore. They won't waste their time examining inconsequential evidence anymore than mainstream scientists do. You are the entertainment, ikdummy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. D'you know, if I had spent 24/7 for the past six years of my life, struggling to disprove what I had aserted in all that time... Was resorted to racial attacks, rape threats, cyber-stalking and intimidation, I'd feel like a big fat failure plus I'd be thankful I'm too much of a coward to have my name to such behaviour.

      Maybe one day you'll step up from rookie status, substantiate your "farcical minutia about non-existent folklore" (non-existent folklore being a contradiction), and make one of your pseudosceptical heroes proud.

      Until then, you're a failure.

      Delete
    2. ikdummy, you're a sad creature with multiple sock puppets projecting everything you complain about onto others. Your life revolves around fantasy and you reject the rare individuals that reach out to you by introducing reality.

      Delete
    3. Hmmm... Still no substance. How many would have to be involved in your thousands year old, culture hopping hoaxing conspiracy theory? Something about "fantasy"?

      Failure.

      See ya later Stuey!

      Delete
    4. stuey is a huge failure in life and this is the only way to prove his manhood. What a pathetic lonely creature . even his mum could not love him now

      Joe

      Delete
    5. Post more than Great , Kindly Thanks

      Delete
  6. Sykes proved that bigfoot does not exist.

    ReplyDelete