Talking to yourself Stuey is one thing. Answering back is quite another. Having a conversation with a mess of fictious people is a whole new level of Kra Kra.
MMC... That's Stuey as "Matt" trying to get you to post a comment on YouTube so he can try and get your identity.
"Many cyberstalkers are obsessed, unstable, or otherwise mentally ill. Still, others are simply angry or hurt and have crossed the line into criminal activity when expressing these emotions. While they can exhibit charm and eloquence, they are generally isolated and desperate, have very low self-esteem, and are especially sensitive to rejection." https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-lies-trauma/201503/cyberstalking-the-fastest-growing-crime
Talk about projecting, remember last year when ikdummy popped a massive boner and creamed his knickers when he thought that MMC had found out the troll was Barret Sanders?? They even harassed the poor guy on YouTube and he had no idea what the imbeciles were on about! Ha ha ha!
Doc, ikdummy has accused at least 30 different people of being Stuey and yet at the same time he insists that they're all one person. Only from the scrambled brain of ikdummy! Ha ha ha!
ikdummy was sure Stuart(this 1 man army) was from the UK because he used Britishisms when mockingly posting as Joe.
ikdummy's down fall is that his mind is made up and u cant confuse him with the facts. That, and he'll post a study that agrees with him while ignoring credible contrary studies and even common sense. Paper and plaster dictate reality for ikdummy.
Yep, I'm a rookie. I haven't been continuously posting on this crappy blog for five straight years and perfected the fraudulent art of sock puppeting -- ikdummy is the true master of that! Ha ha ha!
Hey Stuey... The problem is, you can't find at least one contrary study, rookie. And I've never once commented on anyone's YouTube channel, especially anyone if the name of "Barret Sanders". There is one troll. This comment section is one of many that proves it.
DS... I've never claimed Stuey is Steven S. I've only ever exposed Stuey for trolling both Kelly Shaw and Steven S, with the same kooky sockpuppeting that he's done here.
Give it up IKWUSSY, we all know your game.The piss poor fact of the matter is that you are never going to be anything other than A total LOOSER! Face facts CHUMP! HAAA HAAA HAAA LOL!!!
I can expose you a million times over for the two writing styles you like to use... As well as the three different insults you like to use to somehow pretend to be three different people. You've been doing it for so long, I think you actually might believe you're an army.
In my mind all these sighting reports works as much against Bigfoot's existence as for it. IF every sighting report was true (and I very much doubt that) then it strains all logic on how it could possibly escape detection. According to this Reo, these are just a tiny fraction of the sightings reported. He also claims he has personally received thousands of reports (which I also very much doubt). How can the BFRO possibly verify that all these reports are true when most are just a story recounted from many years previously? Can one have a lot of faith in this map when (glitch or not) it shows reports from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? How can any of it be trusted?
Reo is quite the talker but I had to laugh when he said his very first Bigfoot experience was in the Tillamook State Forest in Oregon but he didn't know how to find it on the map (it covers over 500 square miles). He use the giant squid as an example of an animal reported but not discovered until recently and used 2013 as a discover date but we have known officially of their existence since the middle of the 1800's.
He is now off to Vancouver Island to do "Bigfoot stuff" and I betting the house that his next report will be of all the amazing findings and evidence he finds there. Coming back from going all that way and reporting he found nothing would be no fun at all don't you see.
Curious... If you actually read your comments back. And then go and read your last comments, and then the comments before that... Do you realise they're the same comments over and over and over again? If something exists, it is seen, and no high frequency of sightings reports that are accompanied by physical evidence (detection) can hurt the credibility of such an existence. That's just a seriously audacious effort at twisting evidence against said creature, when you should be trying to refute it instead. "Curiously", this map mirrors not only the maps of missing people in the US, but also the maps of buried 7-8 skeletons that have been documented in the US also.
Stuey... It does actually appear that "Bigfoot" is everywhere, as the map attests to. As does the physical evidence that's been sourced for the past 60 years. I tell you what fits your little "version" though; all these "contrary studies" about "plaster". Now there's an elusive creature, if ever I've heard of one.
• We have the same scientific documentation of relict hominids and giant squid reports & remains being found in the 1800 century. • The next time we hear of a stranding of giant squid was in the 1960's when guess what? We have the Patterson Gimlin footage! • We then have to wait until 2004 until a living example of giant squid is documented, to which time we have 60 years of physical, video and audio evidence pointing to the existence of a bipedal primate that is twice the size of normal human primates; a far greater frequency of evidence than the giant squid enjoyed to that point.
Give it up ikdummy. People are fascinated by how someone as dimwitted as yourself can delve into such farcical minutia about non-existent folklore. They won't waste their time examining inconsequential evidence anymore than mainstream scientists do. You are the entertainment, ikdummy.
D'you know, if I had spent 24/7 for the past six years of my life, struggling to disprove what I had aserted in all that time... Was resorted to racial attacks, rape threats, cyber-stalking and intimidation, I'd feel like a big fat failure plus I'd be thankful I'm too much of a coward to have my name to such behaviour.
Maybe one day you'll step up from rookie status, substantiate your "farcical minutia about non-existent folklore" (non-existent folklore being a contradiction), and make one of your pseudosceptical heroes proud.
ikdummy, you're a sad creature with multiple sock puppets projecting everything you complain about onto others. Your life revolves around fantasy and you reject the rare individuals that reach out to you by introducing reality.
Hmmm... Still no substance. How many would have to be involved in your thousands year old, culture hopping hoaxing conspiracy theory? Something about "fantasy"?
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Read,,, "Hunt for the Skinwalker"
ReplyDeleteThe truth will set you free!!
FOLKS!!
AC Collins
"Hunt for the SkinFlute" is another 'must-read'
ReplyDeleteWhat is wrong with you stu ?
Delete^ insane ikdummy sock puppet
DeleteTalking to yourself Stuey is one thing. Answering back is quite another. Having a conversation with a mess of fictious people is a whole new level of Kra Kra.
DeleteWhat the hell is wrong with you Suzy Stu ?
^ insane ikdummy sock puppet projecting
DeleteMatt K.
ReplyDeleteCould you find out how Fasano is doing and let us know ?
MMC
Hi, MMC. I don't personally know Tim, nor do I have contact information on him. Have you posed the question on his Youtube channel?
DeleteMMC... That's Stuey as "Matt" trying to get you to post a comment on YouTube so he can try and get your identity.
Delete"Many cyberstalkers are obsessed, unstable, or otherwise mentally ill. Still, others are simply angry or hurt and have crossed the line into criminal activity when expressing these emotions. While they can exhibit charm and eloquence, they are generally isolated and desperate, have very low self-esteem, and are especially sensitive to rejection."
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-lies-trauma/201503/cyberstalking-the-fastest-growing-crime
^insane ikdummy projecting his proclivities while displaying his paranoid delusions.
DeleteAnd who'd have guessed it? Stuey responds.
Delete^ STFU IKDUMMY "MKB" dox'ed all you jive turkey's Years ago!!
DeleteHAAAA HAAAA HAAAA LOL!
WE ALL KNOW ;)))))!
Talk about projecting, remember last year when ikdummy popped a massive boner and creamed his knickers when he thought that MMC had found out the troll was Barret Sanders?? They even harassed the poor guy on YouTube and he had no idea what the imbeciles were on about! Ha ha ha!
Deleteiktomi, did you say Steuy was Stufert?
DeleteDoc, ikdummy has accused at least 30 different people of being Stuey and yet at the same time he insists that they're all one person. Only from the scrambled brain of ikdummy! Ha ha ha!
DeleteThey don't call him "LOWIQMI" for nothing!
Deleteikdummy was sure Stuart(this 1 man army) was from the UK because he used Britishisms when mockingly posting as Joe.
Deleteikdummy's down fall is that his mind is made up and u cant confuse him with the facts. That, and he'll post a study that agrees with him while ignoring credible contrary studies and even common sense. Paper and plaster dictate reality for ikdummy.
Thanks Iki
DeleteStuey is a rookie
MMC
Yep, I'm a rookie. I haven't been continuously posting on this crappy blog for five straight years and perfected the fraudulent art of sock puppeting -- ikdummy is the true master of that! Ha ha ha!
Delete2:36 are you attempting to insinuate that ikdingbat is not "MALE" ??
DeleteHey Stuey... The problem is, you can't find at least one contrary study, rookie. And I've never once commented on anyone's YouTube channel, especially anyone if the name of "Barret Sanders". There is one troll. This comment section is one of many that proves it.
DeleteDS... I've never claimed Stuey is Steven S. I've only ever exposed Stuey for trolling both Kelly Shaw and Steven S, with the same kooky sockpuppeting that he's done here.
Give it up IKWUSSY, we all know your game.The piss poor fact of the matter is that you are never going to be anything other than A total LOOSER!
DeleteFace facts CHUMP!
HAAA HAAA HAAA LOL!!!
AC Collins
I can expose you a million times over for the two writing styles you like to use... As well as the three different insults you like to use to somehow pretend to be three different people. You've been doing it for so long, I think you actually might believe you're an army.
Delete8:40 I remember when I was 16 yrs old too,
DeleteNow do somthing with your life young man!!
Stu = amateur hour
DeleteIn my mind all these sighting reports works as much against Bigfoot's existence as for it. IF every sighting report was true (and I very much doubt that) then it strains all logic on how it could possibly escape detection. According to this Reo, these are just a tiny fraction of the sightings reported. He also claims he has personally received thousands of reports (which I also very much doubt). How can the BFRO possibly verify that all these reports are true when most are just a story recounted from many years previously? Can one have a lot of faith in this map when (glitch or not) it shows reports from the middle of the Pacific Ocean? How can any of it be trusted?
ReplyDeleteReo is quite the talker but I had to laugh when he said his very first Bigfoot experience was in the Tillamook State Forest in Oregon but he didn't know how to find it on the map (it covers over 500 square miles). He use the giant squid as an example of an animal reported but not discovered until recently and used 2013 as a discover date but we have known officially of their existence since the middle of the 1800's.
He is now off to Vancouver Island to do "Bigfoot stuff" and I betting the house that his next report will be of all the amazing findings and evidence he finds there. Coming back from going all that way and reporting he found nothing would be no fun at all don't you see.
Bigfoot is everywhere and no where.
DeleteREO is another KOOK,,Fact!
DeleteCurious... If you actually read your comments back. And then go and read your last comments, and then the comments before that... Do you realise they're the same comments over and over and over again? If something exists, it is seen, and no high frequency of sightings reports that are accompanied by physical evidence (detection) can hurt the credibility of such an existence. That's just a seriously audacious effort at twisting evidence against said creature, when you should be trying to refute it instead. "Curiously", this map mirrors not only the maps of missing people in the US, but also the maps of buried 7-8 skeletons that have been documented in the US also.
DeleteStuey... It does actually appear that "Bigfoot" is everywhere, as the map attests to. As does the physical evidence that's been sourced for the past 60 years. I tell you what fits your little "version" though; all these "contrary studies" about "plaster". Now there's an elusive creature, if ever I've heard of one.
Oh, and Mr Curious? Comparatively...
Delete• We have the same scientific documentation of relict hominids and giant squid reports & remains being found in the 1800 century.
• The next time we hear of a stranding of giant squid was in the 1960's when guess what? We have the Patterson Gimlin footage!
• We then have to wait until 2004 until a living example of giant squid is documented, to which time we have 60 years of physical, video and audio evidence pointing to the existence of a bipedal primate that is twice the size of normal human primates; a far greater frequency of evidence than the giant squid enjoyed to that point.
I'll be back later.
Delete*19th century (1800's)
DeleteGive it up ikdummy. People are fascinated by how someone as dimwitted as yourself can delve into such farcical minutia about non-existent folklore. They won't waste their time examining inconsequential evidence anymore than mainstream scientists do. You are the entertainment, ikdummy.
ReplyDeleteD'you know, if I had spent 24/7 for the past six years of my life, struggling to disprove what I had aserted in all that time... Was resorted to racial attacks, rape threats, cyber-stalking and intimidation, I'd feel like a big fat failure plus I'd be thankful I'm too much of a coward to have my name to such behaviour.
DeleteMaybe one day you'll step up from rookie status, substantiate your "farcical minutia about non-existent folklore" (non-existent folklore being a contradiction), and make one of your pseudosceptical heroes proud.
Until then, you're a failure.
ikdummy, you're a sad creature with multiple sock puppets projecting everything you complain about onto others. Your life revolves around fantasy and you reject the rare individuals that reach out to you by introducing reality.
DeleteHmmm... Still no substance. How many would have to be involved in your thousands year old, culture hopping hoaxing conspiracy theory? Something about "fantasy"?
DeleteFailure.
See ya later Stuey!
stuey is a huge failure in life and this is the only way to prove his manhood. What a pathetic lonely creature . even his mum could not love him now
DeleteJoe
Post more than Great , Kindly Thanks
DeleteSykes proved that bigfoot does not exist.
ReplyDeleteYet here you are, daily.
DeleteSykes proved nothing, and does not research.
Delete^ WHAT???
Delete