Friday, June 23, 2017

Bigfoot Video Breakdown


Bigfoot Tony looks at a video of Robert Dodson's where viewers said they saw what they believe is a bigfoot creature. Is that what they saw?

37 comments:

  1. You'll never catch a bigfoot


    they have photographic memory

    unlike chimps who maintain mental images in their short term memories

    bigfoot retain everything they ever see in their LONG term memories which is

    unprecedented

    magical

    fantasy

    completely untrue

    for obvious reasons
    but more importantly because


    they don't exist in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ AWWWWWW ,NOW YOU`VE GONE AND SPOILED IT FOR EVERYBODY.

      Delete
    2. Me and his mum is sorry. We failed humanity.

      Delete
  2. "Chimpanzees have a faster working memory than humans according to a remarkable study showing that it takes them a fraction of a second to remember something that it would take several seconds for humans to memorise."
    https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/science/video-chimpanzees-have-faster-working-memory-than-humans-according-to-study-8496034.html%3Famp

    Even if Native Americans, many researchers & I are totally wrong about how well "Bigfoot" evade, meaning we can't theorise as to how they evade trail cameras... "Bigfoot" STILL exists based on the repeatable evidence it leaves across continents. If they don't have serious sensory attributes, it means there must be a more extraordinary reason outside of any known ability that both non-human and human-primates have for them evading trail cameras, which delves into the realm of the preternatural and far less logical. The theory that they evade trails cameras so well is warranted due to the evidence for their existence not being a question. It is therefore logical to draw from attributes that we know both non-human and human-primates have, to explain how this might be achieved. If someone makes passage through dense brush in the process of erecting trail cameras, this would be like an oil slick in the ocean to something evolved in such places. If these hominins enjoy the added sentience of a humans, then they naturally acquire the intelligence to avoid us at all cost. Furthermore, if the Native Americans were right all along about "Bigfoot", it's also highly likely they're on the ball about how well they track & evade.

    It's the burden point of the evidence that you need to preoccupy yourself with, Disco Stue. Give it a go... You never know, you might finally get some satisfaction and get a good night's rest instead of being up all night raging & worrying about "non-existent creatures" on the internet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is Robert Dribbleson Ikky`s Dad ?

      Delete
    2. working memory IS short term memory ikdummy and your premise that they exist in the first place is false

      LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL


      NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    3. Utterly irrelevant, it's still processing infornation far quicker than we can. And let's not pretend you've ever even begun to demonstrate how m premise is false.

      Have the repeated banning stated taking its toll? You're extra kooky last few days.

      Delete
    4. 10,000 bigfoot according to your leader, Jeff Meldrum

      produce 1 and then discuss how it "processes information" LOL

      NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    5. 12:49

      When, OH PLEASE, WHEN, will you be "processing i n f o r n a t i o n" Ikky ?

      "Infornation" ? ... really ?

      Pardon me ?

      Delete
    6. If your drunken memory serves you well enough to fixate on me every minute of the day, from one day to the next, then it's good enough for you to remember why. The first million times I've rubbed evidence in your face that can't be explained away, was good enough for me. Maybe you should start bookmarking things?

      A creature with the exact same anatomy that's being reported in "Bigfoot", is leaving its physical sign on the environment of North America and China.

      Delete
    7. produce what you're talking about

      not plaster or celluloid

      or video

      or paper

      produce a bigfoot you...


      FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL! FOOL!

      Delete
    8. (Shudder)

      I'll produce a link to a paper that shows irrefutable proof that a creature, with the same widely reported anatomy as "Bigfoot", is leaving its physical evidence over two different continents.

      Delete
    9. What do links, papers, reports, plaster, videos, costumes, stories etc... all have in common?

      Not a bigfoot.

      Delete
    10. And here in lies your burden.

      : )

      It must have sucked to have used that pseudosceptical mantra for years, only for me to come along with actual scientific theory and ruin your life.

      Delete

    11. The burden is on you to produce a bigfoot.

      Psuedoscience is not a bigfoot.

      Delete
    12. My burden is to reference anything that justifies investing enthusiasm in the existence of extant hominins.

      Your burden, since you are here all day, every day of your life telling people what to think... Is to provide substance when asserting that the evidence doesn't stand up. This is your burden. If it's mere pseudoscience, then what's the hold up?

      You're quite correct Stuart, it's actually a legitimate scientific question facing biologists today.

      Delete
    13. """ (SHUDDER)"""" ??? WTF??

      Classic, HAA HAAA HAA LOL!!

      a.c.collins. :-))

      Delete



    14. Ikdummy quote:

      "If it's mere pseudoscience, then what's the hold up?"


      Psuedoscience IS your holdup. That's all you have when you're looking for something that never was.


      There's no holdup on our end. Bigfoot never was a species and never will be. We just like making fun of you, if you haven't noticed.



      Delete
    15. If it's Bigfoot has always been, and always will be pseudoscience, then why do you struggle to address the evidence? Surely you should have wrapped this subject up in the first week you trolled here?

      What's the hold up?

      Delete
    16. the hold up has been 50 years of "evidence" LOL

      Delete
    17. And here in lies your burden. Quotation makes don't debunk anything. Man up and try it... It should be easy with the time you put in.

      Delete
  3. Robert Dribbleson is Ikky`s Dad - same lost in the woods mentality...(silly khunt).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aaaaaaarrrrggggg!!!!!! I mean Naaaaaaaaaaarggggg!!!!!! Oops, I mean Aaaaarrrrrgggggg!!! Wait, its Naaaaaaaaarrrrrggggg!!!!

      Delete
    2. ^ hahahaha hahahah hahahahaaaaaaaa

      Delete
  4. You should take your own advice Iktomi. You claim my evidence is pseudoscience. Surely you should have wrapped this subject up the first week i put the challenge out for you to get a bush pic that matches my evidence right?
    What's the hold up, Troll?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is only you who see's these Pokemon in your photographs. There is nothing to wrap up, because there is nothing to start with. Let me guess, "only people who research understand what's in your photos"? Ok, so where are these people offering a consensus? I've asked you time and time again to just show me one person who agrees with you. There is only you who asserts that your images are of actual creatures. To compare blurry photographs of foliage and images of tree bark to actual footprint casts, is embarrassing. Yet you wanna chase me around like I'm a disinformationist, or the devil?

      "That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."
      - Hitchen's Razor

      Delete
    2. You can fake a print ikdummy, but you can't fake pics, not my pics that is!

      You've asked me time and time for one person who believes my evidence??? Pick ANY PERSON WHO ACTUALLY FIELD RESEARCHES IKDUMMY, AND HAS PICS...THEY WILL CONFIRM 100%!
      You don't field research, and that's embarrassing to act like you have a clue about anything. You can't dismiss anything you don't physically research....not without being honest about it.

      Delete
    3. Argh right...

      So is this why you go around slagging everyone, calling out their integrity as researchers? So you can exclude the opinions of sane people who would naturally think you're nuts, because in your eyes they'd be unworthy of an opinion as they "don't field research"? By excluding even more researchers who don't claim to have photographs, you're left with even less people who would naturally think you're nuts. All this self-righteous exclusion on your part based on what, DS? What sets you apart from everyone else and puts you on a pedestal? Photographs that need drawings? So how about I answer you with a question, since you don't allow for much in your crazy Pokemon world...

      Who do you consider a credible researcher, and do they agree with your photographs?

      Second question... Why don't you ever present your photos to people without the drawings and ask them if they can see the same thing you're seeing? Wouldn't that be proof positive that you're not imagining things?

      Third question... How were the three casts in the paper here faked?
      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf
      ... You can fake images of foliage, by finding a blurry part of the image that could be anything, and drawing a shape on it. I'm going for a snooze, I'll call back later to see if at least one of my questions is answered...

      Delete
    4. Unlike you, I answer every question. I've only asked you ONE question, that you fail to answer every time. WHY HAVEN'T YOU TAKEN A PIC IN 5 MINUTES, THAT MATCHES MY POKEMON PICS? OR ANYONE ELSE?

      1) Credible researcher? That's HILARIOUS! I've already talked to every one that has any credibility.

      2) I generally put 2 DOTS WHERE THE EYES ARE IKDUMMY, IS THAT REALLY SO AWFUL?? THIS IS A STRAW-MAN ARGUMENT, COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT TO THE EVIDENCE BEHIND THE DOTS!
      There are tons of my pics that don't have drawings on them, so does that somehow make those pics real?
      No drawing on this one, with Blood Vessels in his eyes, and scars/pores on his face.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LedtIJiFY5o

      3) You said, "You can fake images of foliage, by finding a blurry part of the image that could be anything, and drawing a shape on it."
      Nothing BLURS my camera IKTOMI, PLUS I'M USING MANUAL FOCUS FOR THE CLEAREST POSSIBLE SHOT, YOU CAN SEE IN EVERY SINGLE VIDEO THAT I'M MANUALLY ADJUSTING THE FOCUS, YOU HAVE NO ARGUMENT WHATSOEVER, THE PROOF IS RIGHT THERE IN EVERY VIDEO!
      ALMOST AT 5,000 VIDEOS, AND YOU CAN'T PROVE ANY OF THEM FAKE, NOT ONE! GAVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVE ME WRONG, JUST TAKE A PIC IN 5 MINUTES IKTOMI!

      Did Meldrum obtain these prints himself? Anyone could easily fake a print, put their own dermals in there, and Meldrum would not know the difference! If he actually field researched, has a video of him finding the print, casting it, and then analyzing it, well that would be a Legit finding, but we don't see any of that!

      Delete
    5. DS, I've answered your question a million times. I answered it the very comment that preceded yours. There is nothing in your photos that anyone sees other than yourself. I have given you a least ten examples of the same method, of tree, foliage and tree bark, and told you what's in them.

      1. You didn't answer my question. Who do you consider a credible researcher, and do they agree with your photographs?
      2. But the "eyes" behind the dots are not something anyone would agree are there prior to you having to use dots, DS. Why can't you show your photos to people, and in confidence, allow them to tell you what's in them first?
      3. You're using video, which causes the images to blur. This is painfully simple. But conveniently, "because the images are blurred, it's your Pokemon causing the images to blur as an evasion method", correct? This would be the most audacious thing I've ever heard, if it weren't for the fact that you want people to believe you're capturing real images of creatures nobody has ever seen.

      And lastly DS, not that it matters if Meldrum sourced the impressions himself (chain of custody coming from you is rich considering you've never even seen half of the creatures you claim to capture), but the source isn't even about dermals. Did you even read it? I'll also you again... How do you fake the three impression in his paper? Meldrum's entire premise on "Bigfoot" existing started with him analysing actual tracks in the Earth.

      Delete
    6. I've played this game with him before, and it's always the same response. He knows he has nothing, he's a troll. His entire existence are people like ourselves responding to him.

      Also, good to see you Iktomi.

      Delete
    7. Hey Vegas.

      Yes my friend, as I've said before... It's a troll playing "role reversal" to try and agitate people.

      Delete
    8. All i do is present the Truth, you are the troll(s.)

      You sure are the cement head you call other people. I'm at the top of the food chain when it comes to BF research, this is a fact. There might be a dozen credible researchers on the Planet, as far as i'm concerned.
      You know it's so funny to watch you comment on "Blurry pics" You simply don't research. Why don't you say anything about other people's blurry pics? How bout the leaf above that Dodson said was a Bigfoot??? You can't make out ANYTHING in that pic, and mine all have facial features present.
      You don't comment on the "Non evidence" but have everything to say about the REAL evidence...that means you're a Troll, plain and simple.....I have almost 3,000 pics, and you're going to tell me that all 3,000 are Bushes?? That's hilarious! One thing that separates me from ALL researches is that I don't have a single video or pic that has been proven anything other than what i claim it is. You can say it's a bush all day long, but PROVE IT! Just about every single researcher has been busted for a hoax. I could name a Dozen, right off the bat!
      I researched for about 7 years Iktomi, without a camera. I just scouted, and started seeing repeatable evidence hundreds of miles away. I kept seeing it over and over. Once i started documenting everything, i went and got the best camera, and computer. Now i know where to find them, and have the equipment to get the clearest pics possible. You can't fight the Truth Iktomi, an the fact you are in the first place, means you're either a Troll, or you don't field research. You fall into both categories.

      Delete
    9. DS, you can't keep claiming that people are unworthy of an opinion because "they don't research". There is nothing in your evidence that warrants you to pass such judgment, or sets you apart from the likes of me. You're not the Steve Irwin of Pokemon characters. You don't have anything that sets you apart from the likes of Dodson, who I don't comment on because I am not inspired to. Unlike you DS, I don't have to run around slagging everyone to make my stance seem more sincere. If I'm not convinced about something, more often than not, I won't comment. The only person who claims your images are "real evidence", is you DS... Nobody agrees with you. There is nothing to debunk about a photo that is clearer foliage or tree bark. I don't need to partake in field research in your country to know foliage when I see it.

      How can you claim to capture images of "lionmen", and then call anyone else a troll, DS? And as usual, you didn't answer my questions.

      Delete
    10. And you must have me confused with someone DS. I have never called anyone a "cement head". You're so obsessed with me, that you appear to see me everywhere.

      Kind of like the blog's obsessive loony-troll.

      Delete
    11. If i don't answer a question, then email me, i'm not here checking this site everyday.

      You do need to field research, Iktomi, that's what it's all about. You can't claim knowledge if you don't participate in it. The fact you don't go out, is why you question my evidence, you simply don't have a clue what's in the woods. You're one of the only people who don't see my evidence as real creatures, you are in the minority!

      Some creatures look just like Lions Iktomi. Surely you can get a bush pic in 5 minutes that looks like a Lion, Right?
      EPIC FAILURE, AND VERY POOR RESEARCH ON YOUR PART!

      Delete