The Trail to Bigfoot Team releases their big reveal. Something caused distortion on their trail cam! Is it a cloaking bigfoot? Check it out and judge for yourself.
or was the rogering you received so shsocking you`re struck dumb ?
remember the old adage = one up the bum,no harm done ... so just relax you sphincter muscles and ready yourself for the hot sploshing your chubby and juicy ass is about to feel..will you be giddy with a heady pleasure ?
What type of a straight man uses phrases like "juicy butt" when referring to a man. There are only 2 people who would post such creepyness. Either Joergy Poo, or MMC. Both are in the same basket.
But,to the point, you don`t like "juicy butt" on your men? You don`t like to fondle and especially finger your manfriends butt-hole? What joys to be had from the secret finger sniff when your man thinks you are in love with him but really all you want is sex with his juicy ass...mmmm,yummy eh?
I doubt you realise what effect or impression you create - maybe you think it`s all some kind of fun you`re having but real people are here and you seem to be treating it as some kind of strange personal scrapbook with odd thoughts - get help, seriously - or speak to your mom and pop and tell them you`re having trouble mixing with real people as you clearly need to get out MORE.
I suspect for them it's much easier to accept a cloaking Bigfoot then to acknowledge that it doesn't exist. Because of the time delay, could it possibly be a small animal moving under the leaves giving the impression of something invisible walking? The orbs in my opinion are insects flying. The distortion might possibly be a localized change in air density or temperature. When I have more time I will have to look into this. For the record I do NOT believe it is a cloaking Bigfoot.
...Curious, this year we are witnessing the beginning of the end: Bigfoot the sole purview of fans of the paranormal..One ridiculous story after another with zero attempt at verification; one childish paroidolia inducing image after another...Not a single scientist bothering to take the time to even refute it(let alone endorse it)...When Meldrum(who hangs out with a laughable hoaxer) and Bindernagle pass from the scene, there will be as many bigfoot professors as there are ghosts and dogmen professors: 0...Every "researcher" submitting evidence like this: pictures of orbs and invisible bigfoots or silly sound effects..Yup, that is what the end will look like, and we are getting a good sneak preview this year...EEG
I think with each passing year the belief lessens with the general population. Soon only the hardcore believers will be left and they will be forced to accept the most flimsiest of evidence to sustain their belief.
I think in the beginning Finding Bigfoot helped increase interest in Sasquatch but at the end has actually hurt it. All those seasons and being no closer than when they started has had to hurt the credibility of such a creature existing.
When I was young I thought it perfectly reasonable that such a thing could exist in the vast wilderness of the northwest now sadly I have to admit my hope and belief was in vain.
The researchers and those who still believe is my interest now and that is why I check in here when time provides.
Undeniable, thats it folks, this is what we've waited so long to see!! At last we have finally proved cloaking bigfoot is real! ...... What a fucking joke, they should retire though, obviously they dont know what the hell they are looking at.
You don't! Matt is to blame as well for posting crap like this.
This was supposed to change the way we view Bigfoot right Matt? All you guys need to wake up and see the deliberate attempt to undermine Bigfoot and Bigfoot research. BAD JOB MATT!
doc, you are the biggest reason why bigfoot research isn't taken seriously here. your use of sharpies and ms paint to draw bigfoot and dogmen where trees and leaves are is beyond ridiculous . c'mon, look in the mirror before casting the first stone loser !
Drawing two dots where there eyes are is all you can say about my evidence, lol, how bout proving the pics fake?? Why would you even comment toward me, when these idiots from Florida hyped this video up, and its a FREAKIN LEAF.......because you're jealous of me, plain and simple!
Bigfoot isn't taken seriously by Matt, how dumb are you?
Never sees a thing, must be "cloaking" instead of the logical thing; a bird looking for food, squirrel, other critter. Never watch videos from those guys, makes this site a joke even giving them the time of day.
Here it the final report from one of the most qualified experts on the planet, in regard to this subject matter.
1. The disturbance of the leaves along a continuous pathway, tends to indicate that a small creature with a short stride whose legs did not raise the presumed feet clear enough of the leaves, to leave distinctly separate locations for foot mark disturbances. So it was not likely a large Bigfoot that left that trackway of disturbed leaves. The perpetrator could have been either a 2 or 4 legged individual, with short legs. 2. The sudden appearance at the end of the trackway of some undetermined shape, coupled with the lack of any shape being photographed along the previously placed trackway, tends to indicate that a short, paranormal person, was the perpetrator. That paranormal person could control his degree of visibility in man's dimension. The undetermined shape appeared to indicate a partial body materialization, that then partially dematerialized back to a level of invisibility that distorted the shapes of the plants behind it. Which is similar to the "Predator Effect". 3. Consequently, this series of still photographed likely photographed a small paranormal forest person with short legs, that has yet to be classified by mainstream science. However, Yale Ecologist Dr. Robert Michael Pyle's 2nd printing of his book with an after chapter, entitled "Where Bigfoot Walks", may offer some additional perspective into the existence of paranormal forest people.
That's pretty good. You should write fictional novels as that comes across as authoritative and believable. Of course you pulled all that out of your ass so that's all the more impressive. Well played!
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
DUMB AND GAY.
ReplyDeleteGay because you`re dumb ?
Deleteor dumb because you`re a gay person ?
or was the rogering you received so shsocking you`re struck dumb ?
remember the old adage = one up the bum,no harm done ... so just relax you sphincter muscles and ready yourself for the hot sploshing your chubby and juicy ass is about to feel..will you be giddy with a heady pleasure ?
^ i think YOU need a good rogering yourself as desperation seems to be the key attribute you display
Deletei can be of service
Joe
What type of a straight man uses phrases like "juicy butt" when referring to a man. There are only 2 people who would post such creepyness. Either Joergy Poo, or MMC. Both are in the same basket.
Delete^ What makes you think the poster is straight?
DeleteBut,to the point, you don`t like "juicy butt" on your men? You don`t like to fondle and especially finger your manfriends butt-hole? What joys to be had from the secret finger sniff when your man thinks you are in love with him but really all you want is sex with his juicy ass...mmmm,yummy eh?
Get help 8:02 - please.
DeleteI doubt you realise what effect or impression you create - maybe you think it`s all some kind of fun you`re having but real people are here and you seem to be treating it as some kind of strange personal scrapbook with odd thoughts - get help, seriously - or speak to your mom and pop and tell them you`re having trouble mixing with real people as you clearly need to get out MORE.
I`ll pray for you.
weeell, dass extremely fackin crazeeeeeee !!!
ReplyDeleteSo i guess they can retire now ?
ReplyDeleteBig reveal huh?
This crap is right up there with doc squat's sharpie images as the biggest joke .
Stick a fork in in
Oh ,you`re not that impressed then?
DeleteThe bizarre thing here is that the guys who shot this actually seem to believe that there can be such a thing as a cloaking bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteI suspect for them it's much easier to accept a cloaking Bigfoot then to acknowledge that it doesn't exist. Because of the time delay, could it possibly be a small animal moving under the leaves giving the impression of something invisible walking? The orbs in my opinion are insects flying. The distortion might possibly be a localized change in air density or temperature. When I have more time I will have to look into this. For the record I do NOT believe it is a cloaking Bigfoot.
Delete...Curious, this year we are witnessing the beginning of the end: Bigfoot the sole purview of fans of the paranormal..One ridiculous story after another with zero attempt at verification; one childish paroidolia inducing image after another...Not a single scientist bothering to take the time to even refute it(let alone endorse it)...When Meldrum(who hangs out with a laughable hoaxer) and Bindernagle pass from the scene, there will be as many bigfoot professors as there are ghosts and dogmen professors: 0...Every "researcher" submitting evidence like this: pictures of orbs and invisible bigfoots or silly sound effects..Yup, that is what the end will look like, and we are getting a good sneak preview this year...EEG
DeleteI think with each passing year the belief lessens with the general population. Soon only the hardcore believers will be left and they will be forced to accept the most flimsiest of evidence to sustain their belief.
DeleteI think in the beginning Finding Bigfoot helped increase interest in Sasquatch but at the end has actually hurt it. All those seasons and being no closer than when they started has had to hurt the credibility of such a creature existing.
When I was young I thought it perfectly reasonable that such a thing could exist in the vast wilderness of the northwest now sadly I have to admit my hope and belief was in vain.
The researchers and those who still believe is my interest now and that is why I check in here when time provides.
There you have it, best raindrop on camera lens ghost ever, let's go get some Scooby-Doo snacks gang, it was old Mr witherspoon all along
ReplyDeleteWell it's still hard to explain tracks in the mud and sand and numerous stories about Bigfoot, but this made me look pretty bad,pretty bad
ReplyDeleteUndeniable, thats it folks, this is what we've waited so long to see!! At last we have finally proved cloaking bigfoot is real! ...... What a fucking joke, they should retire though, obviously they dont know what the hell they are looking at.
ReplyDeleteBeyond pathetic!
DeleteFireflies and a snake. How do you have any credibility after claiming this is bigfoot related?
ReplyDeleteYou don't!
DeleteMatt is to blame as well for posting crap like this.
This was supposed to change the way we view Bigfoot right Matt?
All you guys need to wake up and see the deliberate attempt to undermine Bigfoot and Bigfoot research.
BAD JOB MATT!
Exactly!
Deletedoc, you are the biggest reason why bigfoot research isn't taken seriously here. your use of sharpies and ms paint to draw bigfoot and dogmen where trees and leaves are is beyond ridiculous . c'mon, look in the mirror before casting the first stone loser !
DeleteDrawing two dots where there eyes are is all you can say about my evidence, lol, how bout proving the pics fake??
DeleteWhy would you even comment toward me, when these idiots from Florida hyped this video up, and its a FREAKIN LEAF.......because you're jealous of me, plain and simple!
Bigfoot isn't taken seriously by Matt, how dumb are you?
Never sees a thing, must be "cloaking" instead of the logical thing; a bird looking for food, squirrel, other critter. Never watch videos from those guys, makes this site a joke even giving them the time of day.
ReplyDelete1000% correct, and you can add EVERY researcher featured on this site too!
DeleteHere it the final report from one of the most qualified experts on the planet, in regard to this subject matter.
ReplyDelete1. The disturbance of the leaves along a continuous pathway, tends to indicate that a small creature with a short stride whose legs did not raise the presumed feet clear enough of the leaves, to leave distinctly separate locations for foot mark disturbances. So it was not likely a large Bigfoot that left that trackway of disturbed leaves. The perpetrator could have been either a 2 or 4 legged individual, with short legs.
2. The sudden appearance at the end of the trackway of some undetermined shape, coupled with the lack of any shape being photographed along the previously placed trackway, tends to indicate that a short, paranormal person, was the perpetrator. That paranormal person could control his degree of visibility in man's dimension. The undetermined shape appeared to indicate a partial body materialization, that then partially dematerialized back to a level of invisibility that distorted the shapes of the plants behind it. Which is similar to the "Predator Effect".
3. Consequently, this series of still photographed likely photographed a small paranormal forest person with short legs, that has yet to be classified by mainstream science. However, Yale Ecologist Dr. Robert Michael Pyle's 2nd printing of his book with an after chapter, entitled "Where Bigfoot Walks", may offer some additional perspective into the existence of paranormal forest people.
That's pretty good. You should write fictional novels as that comes across as authoritative and believable. Of course you pulled all that out of your ass so that's all the more impressive. Well played!
Delete