Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Video Commentary Bigfoot Crosses Path With Dog


There's a video that came out a long while back that shows what appears to be a bigfoot creature crossing a path in front of a dog that is affixed with a gopro camera. Parabreakdown takes a look with his own color commentary.

34 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Hello Stuart. How's proving "Bigfoot" doesn't exist going for ya?

      Delete
    2. Hello Stuart/Ikdummy. How's proving "Bigfoot" going for ya?

      Delete
    3. Well, you see, proving "Bigfoot" exists gets a little easier every time I reference things like morphologically congruent track impressions. Impressions that are retrieved in locations where civilisation doesn't encroach. That... And the fact that academics (people who have ten times more intelligence than you will EVER have), can't manage to explain that evidence away. It's the reason you're so angry all the time, remember?

      Delete
    4. Well, you see, proving "Bigfoot" doesn't exists gets a little easier every year that goes by that tribes of 9 foot tall hairy apeman stay hidden from mainstream scientists.


      Delete
    5. HAHA!! IKdummy not only believes that there are tribes of 10 foot tall hidden apemen but he believes they're living in the United States. The US is exotic and unknown to him because he is from Wales and has never been to the US but reads adventure pulps and videos telling him about this mysterious new land across the ocean.

      Delete
    6. Iktomi must be from the turn of the 19th century.

      Delete
    7. He relies on my great evidence to prove Bigfoot

      Delete
    8. Ooooooh, two comments in quick concession? Your blood is up already. You see, last time I checked, mainstream scientists aren't looking for these "9 foot tall hairy apemen". So to assert that it's ludicrous that such a hominin should evade such detection, when adequate efforts at countering that evasion haven't occurred, is a little bit silly. Also, these hominins aren't doing THAT well at staying hidden, because (cough, cough) for the past 50 years morphologically congruent track impressions have been found all over North America, that are retrieved in locations where civilisation doesn't encroach.

      Delete
    9. Ikdummy is the same fool who fell for someone that commented that landscapers in the US were covering up Bigfoot evidence. He's just a drunken w@nker from the UK that is landlocked.

      Delete
    10. Hominin, morphologically, congruent, encroach...I take it all back...you really ARE knowledgable, bigfoot MUST exist! HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

      Delete
    11. Lay off of Iktomi. He's not all that stupid.

      Delete
    12. 1:44 Don't worry, he's back at the pub, he'll be seeing bigfoot in no time.

      Delete
    13. So!!

      To demonstrate that "Bigfoot" doesn't exist, would require you to come up with a logical explanation for why these track impressions that have been sourced for that past 50 years, and are still being found in North America to this day, in line with reputable and experienced people witnessing large hairy bipeds in deep wilderness areas. You can't, because you are stupid.

      See you in a another week or so when you need winding up a little more. In the meantime, I'll leave you to get b-slapped around by Chick some more.

      : )

      Delete
    14. Prove that the tooth fairy doesn't exist. You can't, because you are stupid. Sure, some of the accounts may be false but that doesn't account for all the accounts and evidence.

      See you in a another week or so when you need winding up a little more. In the meantime, I'll leave you to get b-slapped around by Chunk some more.

      : )

      Delete
    15. If was critical & was asserting that there was evidence for disproof regarding the tooth fairy, I would be making a claim and therefore would bear a burden of proof. However, nobody is seeing the tooth fairy, to the point of three databases of reports. And nobody is finding physical evidence of the tooth fairy, that PhD's are endorsing as authentic... So my burden regarding the tooth fairy being a non-existent entity is pretty light.

      You take care now Stuart. Maybe you can bust out the fake Iktomi account as retaliation? That usually does it for you (for a little while).

      Delete
    16. Yes, people are claiming to see and experience the Tooth Fairy. There is extensive documentation as well as evidence in the form of a monetary trade for the teeth and a removal of the teeth from underneath the pillow.

      Furthermore, mainstream science recognizes the Tooth Fairy as much as they do Bigfoot.

      You take care now, Stuart/Ikdummy.

      Delete
    17. Oh dear... Nobody see's the tooth fairy, that's why it's such a surprise for children to see money under the pillow? Poor Stuey, you can't even get your children's traditions accurate, what hope do you have in trying to explain away something as adult level as anthropology?

      Oops!

      Delete
    18. You also failed to reference one PhD that endorses the evidence for the tooth fairy...

      Not a very good day at the trolling office.

      : (

      Delete
    19. There have not only been Tooth Fairy sightings but they've seen Santa Claus as well.

      Now, there are is 2 cryptids that mainstream science recognizes as much as Bigfoot.

      Oops!

      Delete
    20. Hmmm... And all the while that damned physical evidence just can't get explained away, eh?

      Delete
    21. Hmmm, so much physical evidence that mainstream science won't give it the time of day.

      Landscapers must be convincing mainstream scientists to ignore Bigfoot evidence.

      Delete
    22. If not one from that mainstream can explain away the evidence, then just like all groundbreaking studies before it, it falls into the bracket of pioneering which has always been in the minority.

      That damned evidence.

      Delete
    23. The Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus fall into the bracket of pioneering.

      That damned evidence.

      Delete
    24. Yeah, keep up the good work Stuart. The sceptics are flocking to your standard in their droves.

      Peace.

      Delete
    25. Yeah, keep up the good work Stuart/Ikdummy. The believers are flocking to your standard in their droves.

      Peace.

      Delete
    26. The Lame Teenager

      The Lame Teenager responds with clever sayings like, “I know you are, but what am I?” and “I’m rubber and you’re glue…” Warning: Sometimes the Lame Teenager is really a 40-year-old guy who can’t think of anything better to say.

      http://www.smosh.com/smosh-pit/articles/18-types-of-internet-trolls

      Delete
    27. The Lame Bigfoot Believer

      The Lame Bigfoot Believer responds with clever sayings like, “I quoted Smosh so I must be right” Warning: Sometimes the Bigfoot Believer is really a 40-year-old guy who can’t think of anything better to say.

      http://www.smosh.com/smosh-pit/articles/18-types-of-internet-trolls

      Delete
    28. 3:18 should be reported to the COALITION OF SPINCHTER ABUSE,For inflicting severe damage to iktomi's spinchter every time joe fitsgerald comments,
      its ALMOST AT H*TE CRIME LEVELS

      Delete
    29. 3:18 should be reported!!! FOR INFLICTING SEVERE DAMAGE TO IKTOMI'S SPINCHTER every time
      He comments, also 3:18 should be charged with a HATE CRIME against iktomi's spinchter!!

      OINK OINK

      Delete
    30. ^ Triggered & Outraged!

      Delete
    31. Ikdummy is at the pub discovering new species while his country is at war with domestic Islamic terror.

      Delete
    32. Ikdummy read a report that said Islamic colonization won't be that bad so he's glad that he can relax.

      Delete