Thursday, March 23, 2017

Bigfoot Encounters In Montana


From Bigfoot Eyewitness Radio:

Tonight’s guests are Robin and Aaron. Robin and Aaron grew up in rural Washington State. While living there, they never had any experiences with Sasquatch. That all changed, though, when they moved to Montana and started spending time on a property there, their family has owned since the 1940‘s. Robin owns the property now and lives there. She says Sasquatch activity is almost non-stop there. Because of that, she’s had a lot of encounters with them.

Click here to listen

123 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. UFOs Are From Another Dimension - UFO Documentary


      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsi_BFANAcE&t=409s

      Delete
  2. "It looks like a dude in a sh*tty monkey costume" - Joe Rogan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Visitors to the blog are advised to remember the following -

      Iktomi ,Joe ,IktomiJoe, autisticJoe and variants of ,are all one and the same individual...bear in mind his autism when responding.

      Delete
    2. I`ll wager bigfoot to an kilo of ape-droippings one of the following ailments are attributable to the behaviour exhibited by "autisticIktomijo"...

      At least eight disorders are part of or closely related to the Autism spectrum including Angelman Syndrome, Asperger's Syndrome, Fragile X Syndrome, Lanau-Kleffner Syndrome, Prader-Willi Syndrome, Rett Syndrome, Tardive Dyskinesia, and Williams Syndrome.

      Delete
  3. Watching the bigfoot community getting torn apart with that 45 minute segment with joe rogan and bobcat was superb. Absolutely buried it. Lots of laughs at the expense of dumb footers and what makes it brilliant is that joe actually went out into the woods with many of the top bigfooters so his opinion is justified and this is a guy that wants bigfoot to be real. Lovely stuff. His obliteration of the pgf was fsntastic, calling it out for what it is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Got monkey suits you foolish fool?

      Delete
    2. 3:50, try to imagine what your life would look like without the hate you carry around, daily. Whatever hurt you, hurt you bad, because you wear it around your neck like gold chain. Do you think anyone cares that you make fun of Bigfoot? It's a fringe subject that is regularly ridiculed, you aren't doing anything that hasn't been done before. Find value in your life, because this isn't it.

      Delete
    3. You dont get it, vegasthedog. People here arent mean. Its just that his whole bigfoot thing is made up. Its an industry based on lies. When someone tries to get into the industry with their own made up stuff they are shot down by the Meldrum etc gatekeepers and the fans like you, the lemmings, the sheep. Sure, DS is a phony but he's as much of a phony as Binderngel or Meldrum. There are no hidden tribes of 10 foot all hairymen in the USA. Its all a lie.

      Delete
    4. Vegas can forget his multiple flaws lecturing others, one finger points forward while 3 point back, ignore him, he's just looking for attention and a fight

      Delete
    5. 7:20, you're a troll! Shut down by Meldrum, LOL, HOW?? HE'S TOTALLY CLUELESS ABOUT THESE CREATURES!

      You seriously lack research!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYXV8t8cfFQ

      Delete
    6. Stuart likes to think he's dictating the situation... When In fact he's the one chasing his tail (as Chick so wonderfully put it). He's quite simply mentally scarred for life. He's very angry. He likes to point out the "woo", and he likes to point out how much this subject is a "laughing stock"... But it's an angry smoke screen for his inability to deliver on what actually counts. When you brush aside all the sniggering and controversity of this subject, you're left with two simple facts.

      1. Reliable people are reporting large hairy bipeds in remote wild places.
      2. Reliable people are finding large foot impressions in remote wild places.

      Nothing that Stuey, or anyone ten times the academic integrity, has ever or will ever explain that away. You'll notice that Stuart will do everything and anything to try and sidestep these facts, even provide his own woo-like conspiracy theory (oh dear). Just remember when you're reading his comments, he will never have any bearing on the actual credibility of the subject and will do absolutely NOTHING to ever reinforce his stance. His type are essentially utterly powerless to stop people coming forward with their experiences and the physical evidence. Powerless people (and psychopaths) crave control, and he thinks he controls "Bigfoot" by insults, hate and intimidation on a comment section.

      Nuff said.

      Delete
    7. DS you're not in the inner circle at conferences etc. Loren Coleman wouldnt give you the time of day. These guys are making 10s of thousands at conferences, conventions, experts on tv shows,...you're not allowed because your "research" methods dont fall in line with the game that is played by "real" researchers.

      Delete
    8. LOL, Ikdummy. Taking time out from the pub? As-salamu alaykum!

      Delete
    9. I'm sorry, I just can't seem to brush aside the "sniggering and controversity"!

      Delete
    10. Loren Coleman will forever be know for his Bigfoot sex books, under a pseudo name. One reason he protects those that know the name and love his books. Lots of quivering thighs and heavy breathing. Google it, wayback.

      Delete
    11. Bigfoot is diversion, not science research. No one is into Bigfoot because they really believe in hidden hairy ape guys in the woods. It's fun. People just get annoyed by the idiots that really believe in this stuff and take it seriously. That's all.

      Delete
    12. Loren Coleman has a woman's voice. Hes not a good representative of rugged adventure.

      Delete
    13. What is the name of one or Moron Coleman's sex books?

      Delete
    14. It's funny, you see, for something so "unscientific"... something so "make-believe"... You shouldn't really have so much trouble trying to explain the two points above? I think your obsessive emotional investment, which is clear to see by everyone, stems from your inability to control these two very simple facts.

      : )

      Delete
    15. But there is so much "controversity" surrounding this subject!

      Delete
    16. Yes, the people that really believe in Bigfoot ruin it for everyone. Its like someone that can just like Star Wars, they have to believe that Wookies really exist. The world is worse off because of those jerks.

      Delete
    17. Hmmmmm... Why don't you tell us all about your conspiracy theory? You know... The alleged intent of an illogical amount of human beings, explained away by the alleged intent of an illogical amount of human beings, MINUS the actual physical data for the antithesis (conspiracy).

      Let's see how this fits in amongst all the "controversy".

      Delete
    18. Just because Ikdummy can't spell doesn't mean that he's a complete fool with an malfunctioning cranium!

      Delete
    19. Ikdummy is drunk......again.

      Delete
    20. He's good for giving me a hearty snigger!

      Delete
    21. Ikdummy is like DS, a troll. There is no way either are that stupid.

      Delete
    22. Ignore Iktomi, like Vegas he is just looking for attention or a fight. Strange how much like Vegas he is,very strange

      Delete
    23. 8:30 Good advice. People come here for fun but these stinking believers want to role play as researchers and annoy people.

      Delete
    24. Unfortunately if all you have to prove the existence of giant ape men is footprints and stories then you'll never be able to meet the burden of proof after how many hundreds of years?

      Delete
    25. Its really tragic how people from the UK think the US is some place where tribes of giants are hiding in Ohio, Penn, Georgia, Florida, etc... If they'd been to these places they'd realize how silly it is.

      Delete
    26. Hmmmm... Anyone would think you're a little embarrassed of your asserted conspiracy? Talk about silly. You appear to talk to yourself more the amount you stepside your illogical musings? I'm pretty sure the burden that comes with being critical of scientific evidence, like morphologically congruent track casts isn't shifted with a mere conspiracy theory. How many people would be needed to maintain all that hoaxing again?

      Delete
    27. It's a dogman who barks like crazy when someone knocks at the door.

      Delete
    28. Ikdummy likes big science words like morphologically. Now he's really really on the right track to finding bigfoot.

      Delete
    29. How many people would be needed to maintain all of your sock puppets?

      Delete
    30. Doesn't have to be explained away. It just has to be put into context.

      First of all, what makes these witnesses "reliable"? That's just a woo term for, I have nothing but anecdotal evidence.

      Secondly, even "reliable" witnesses are still human. Human perception is flawed. Humans make mistakes regularly. Humans are subject to bias.

      Nuff said.

      Delete
    31. Never mind Georgia, Penn, etc. JJ thinks bigfoots live on PEI. PEI is tiny. You can drive from one end to the other in half a day. I've been there many times.

      Joe sees one video on youtube and is convinced PEI has bigfoots. That takes a pretty special and willful denial of logic and reality to maintain that particular belief. There are exactly zero BFRO bigfoot reports for PEI. There is only that one video. But that is good enough for Joe. That should tell you something about his lack of objectivity.

      Delete
    32. Donald, the context is this...

      Indigenous cultures have had these creatures at their cultural core for thousands of years. In turn; substantiated by every credible pillar of modern day society, which encompasses doctors, policemen, teachers, biologists, forestry worker personnel, etc.

      Sometimes, these creatures are seen by multiple witnesses at the same time. If eyewitnesses make missidentifications regarding key information of an incident, they rarely make missidentifications of the actual incident. For example, multiple witnesses to a giant hairy human chasing after a deer, may make missidentifications regarding weight, height, whether it had hair on its face... But not that the giant hairy human chased a deer. That's an awful lot of people you're trying to pass off with bias, Don, and even more of a stretch in imagination. And I don't merely have all that cultural and modern anecdotal evidence to reference, I have the matter of track impressions too.

      Delete
    33. You speak of an alleged lack of objectivity on my part, and then you expect the idea of whole cultures making these "mistakes" to wash?

      Mammals can swim pretty decent distances, Don... sorry, does the idea ruin your idea of a pleasant fishing trip?

      Sorry.

      Delete
    34. This bigfoot site seems to think it was a hoax as well.

      http://www.bigfootencounters.com/stories/pei.htm

      Delete
    35. PEI as in Prince Edward Island??? BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      Ikdummy never fails to stun!

      Delete
    36. When I walk with bare feet I make tracks with dermal ridges, then the tracks are easily expanded in mud and sand and melting snow, there ARE BILLIONS of humans on Earth so now we're down to stories and legends

      Delete
    37. This is what I find interesting dMaKeR - those claiming to have seen Bigfoot. It's my belief that there are those who have a preconceived notion that it does exist and mistakenly interpret a fleeing animal such as a deer or bear in heavy undergrowth or dark conditions. Others such as the habituators who claim to see them on a regular basis I consider delusional or outright liars.

      Delete
    38. Dmaker, bigfoot obviously swam to PEI for the good hunting and swam back home after he killed all of the wildlife!

      Delete
    39. Anon 8:16 Ask Coalition on Facebook, the outrage will give you clues.

      Delete
    40. Yeah Don, again, even when addressing your link... Mammals are decent swimmers. Hope you still make those fishing trips.

      9:28...
      "Figure 41. Dermal ridge experimental cast. Dr. John Bodley made this cast, which included impressions of his own skin. It was shown to various fingerprint experts, along with one of those from the Blue Mts. All five authorities immediately picked Bodley's cast as showing anatomically incorrect ridge orientations, but could find nothing wrong with the other one."
      Krantz, Grover S. Bigfoot Sasquatch Evidence-The Anthropologist Speaks Out.
      Canada, Hancock House Publishers Ltd, 1999, Page 82.

      Curious, people make mistakes and even lie. But unfortunately, most are not looking for these creatures and are left pretty traumatised after an encounter... Let's try to not leave out such fundamental info now.

      Delete
    41. We should start making up sh1t about monsters in the UK and see how those a$sh0les feel about it. What arrogance to think that they know this area better when we live here!

      Delete
    42. "Although biologically classified as carnivores (meat eaters) coyotes are omniv orous in their eating habits. They will kill and eat live prey, consume dead animals (carrion) and dine on fruit, berries, seeds and grass. A partial list of food items found in coyote stomachs includes – mice, voles, shrews, squirrels, hares, deer, rabbits, skunks, raccoons, muskrats, beavers, grouse, small birds, domestic livestock (often as carrion), poultry, grass, seeds, apples, blueberries and bayberries.
      Coyotes are opportunistic feeders and eat whatever is available. Nowhere has it been shown that coyotes control populations of small prey species such as snowshoe hare or ruffed grouse. In fact it has been shown that the opposite is true. When the population of a particular prey species is high, predators feed on them. When the prey population is low predators turn to alternate sources of food and, for the coyote, these alternatives are many and varied. If alternatives are unavailable, then the predator population will decline."

      http://www.gov.pe.ca/photos/original/coyotePOL2003.pdf

      Delete
    43. "In turn; substantiated by every credible pillar of modern day society, which encompasses doctors, policemen, teachers, biologists, forestry worker personnel, etc."

      It's easy to make statements like that but not so easy to provide background information for all these witnesses. First of all we are talking about a very small percentage of people in those professions. Every "pillar of society" has it's crazies (look at Melba Ketchum). In order for that statement to have validity we would have to know case by case all the background and circumstances of these witnesses. In looking deeper I would be willing to bet those "pillars of society" may not be as stable as you might think.

      Delete
    44. Here's "NickB" using the same "$$$" a few years ago getting owned and just as angry. Worth a read... Really funny;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/richard-stubstad-is-now-part-of-azcro.html

      Delete
    45. Ikstupid, dont you ever reveal that I'm Nick B! Nooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!

      Delete
    46. Curious... You're basically calling all these people with professional careers liars. It's a leap of faith, and no different to the troll that shouts conspiracy theory. The alleged intent of an illogical amount of human beings, explained away by the alleged intent of an illogical amount of human beings, MINUS the actual physical data for the antithesis. You want backgrounds when someone could quite as easily have a predisposition to suggest your background needs to be looked at for being in such gross denial of those overwhelming numbers.

      Delete
    47. ???? Ikdummy are u retarded? I used $ instead of an S so that the post wouldn't get greyed out. Then u remember that someone posted 3 dollar signs a couple of years ago?? Is this the logic you use to find bigfoot?

      BWAHAHHHAHAHA!!!!!!

      Delete
    48. I think anyone can read your comments boio.

      Unlucky Nick.

      Delete
    49. No - not all are liars. Some can be very earnest and still be mistaken but I see your point. It seems we all make leaps of faith in supporting our views and as I have alluded to before, some are inclined to see what they want to see. I do believe there are those who honestly believe they have seen a Bigfoot. That does not absolutely conclude that they are correct no matter what their profession. People in all professions see ghosts, angels, lake monsters and such. We are human, we make mistakes, but there is NO denying biological evidence. Bring in a Bigfoot body and this debate is over.

      Delete
    50. ^ seriously - a psychiatrist's dream

      Delete
    51. How dare you figure out that I type dollar signs, you master detective! Now, I'm ruined.
      Sherlock Holmes of the Bigfoot world strikes again. Is there no puzzle this sleuth cannot solve?


      Ikdummy to head Scotland Yard!

      Delete
    52. April 17, 2016- During the evening, a woman was driving on a rural road near West Newton when she noticed ahead of her, a tall dark figure emerge from the right side and move up on the road just as she was approaching the area. She slowed down and looked at a 7 foot tall creature covered with long brownish-red hair. The witness noticed that the arms were very long and skinny, and that the creature had large red eyes that were glowing in the dark. The witness, who had no interest or belief in Bigfoot, became very frightened and left the area very quickly.

      http://www.stangordon.info/wp/news-events/

      Delete
    53. May 10, 2016- Two men were riding on a rural road in Fayette County outside of Fairchance. It was a foggy, and rainy evening when this incident took place. Suddenly, an upright 7 feet tall hair covered creature emerged from the bank on the left side of the road and stopped in the path of the car 20 feet away. The driver slammed on the brakes, while the creature stared at the car with its glowing red eyes.
      After a short time of staring at the creature, the driver slowly moved the car forward, and both men felt the car make slight contact with the hairy being. At that point the creature placed its hands on the front of the vehicle, with the bumper against its legs. Soon after, the creature removed its hands from the car and walked into the woods below the road and was not seen again. This area has had a history of other Bigfoot encounters. Researcher Jim Brown investigated this incident.

      http://www.stangordon.info/wp/news-events/

      Delete
    54. People with professional careers don't lie? Look into Stolen Valor. The number of professionals, clergymen even, that lie is notable. Heck, even the President of the United States lies.

      Delete
    55. Concerning the two reports copied above:

      I'm betting I could very easily make up a report and send it to that address or any Bigfoot site. Do you thing anyone would make a trip to verify it? I am well versed in Bigfoot lore and I think I could make a pretty convincing story. I also think I could add some interesting photos of evidence.

      Mmmmm - might be fun to try . . . . .

      Delete
    56. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    57. It would be child's play to create a bigfoot report that passed the sniff test. Add a few noteworthy, or even new things, and you might be responsible for a unique addition to bigfoot cannon.

      Delete
    58. "Dr Squatch , never heard of him. Sorry, can't help you sir" Loren Coleman
      ahahaha. Dr Squatch is only a legend in his own mind but no big time researcher has ever heard of him.

      Delete
    59. Argh yes! For thousands of years, there have been culture hopping mistakes made by people who have lived their entire lives in the wilderness of North America. It's been that simple all along. These people, though finding each others customs undesirable, and spanning from a time when they didn't even know what a non-human primate looked like, have in fact managed to be mistaken about the exact same anatomical and behavioural traits, as well as in the end cheat experts with fake morphological traits too!!

      A person's profession is very important to the situation. Why would someone face imminent ridicule and potentially have their careers tarnished because of it? You see, in the mind of a pseudosceptic, "everyone is out to gain from their experience", yet everyone at the same time is "ridiculed by the mainstream". It's contradictions and conjecture such as this, as well as innumerable other leaps, that you expect people to find more believable than what the actual evidence points to. There is also no physical evidence for ghosts, angels, lake monsters & such, but for the past 50 years, morphologically congruent track impressions have been found all over North America, that are retrieved in locations where civilisation doesn't encroach. Here are the biological impressions of a biological entity.

      Delete
    60. I saw a Bigfoot February 16th of this year on Prince Edward Island. I was coming back from the fish market around 10 in the morning which is my bi-weekly routine. The market is within walking distance and I always hoof it but this time I decided to cut across a nearby field because the dark skies portended a downpour and I didn't want to get drenched. The weeds were waist high on average and in certain areas they went all the way up to my neck. Suddenly, I felt a stream of water hitting me on my back. "A weird place for a rainstorm", I mused.

      Stay tuned, Ikdummy.

      Delete
    61. Woman Robbed, Raped & Pistol Whipped At Gun Point By Two Teens! Guess Their Race

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_q13wO8ujgo

      Delete
    62. I don't consider track impressions biological proof of a creature. They are impressions nothing more. No matter where they are found they are still merely impressions. You can certainly assume or hypothesize what made them however until you have the actual foot that made them it is all conjecture.

      Well, back to work. You can have the last word . . . for now.

      Delete
    63. 10-Year Old BRUTALLY RAPED, Injected With METH, STRANGLED, DISMEMBERED, and SET ON FIRE By Mother!! Guess this race.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSSwIBf_BmQ

      Delete
    64. Trayvon rapes his grandma & other joys of diversity.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVyx3JSnqg8

      Delete
    65. ^ Above video includes "father rapes his 8 DAY old daughter" - all the fun of the fair.

      Delete
    66. It doesn't really matter what you consider biological or not. If the anatomy in said casts repeatably shows morphology that can only be the result of a genuine foot fall, then it can only point to a biological entity leaving it. When a genuine foot makes contact with the earth, it makes what is called a sequential print. The foot has dozens of bones, tendons and ligaments that flow in a segmented fashion and a fluid motion creates compression lines in the inner perimeter of the track, and can only be made by a living fleshy foot. Now... fake tracks are identified by what are called impact ridges that appear on the outer perimeter of the track. What creates this is the simultaneous pushing out from the pressing down of a solid, non-flexible structure like wood or fake plaster cast. You find out his data by testing the source in question.

      Delete
    67. Shut up, Iktomi. No one cares about fake prints.

      Delete
    68. I don't even read Nick's comments. He's like a little Jack Russell barking away in the background of a phone call.

      Delete
    69. Fight for us Iktomi. He's making us look dumm. Bigfoot is still going to be found, right?

      Delete
    70. Why do you constantly plagiarize, Joe? You're doing it again in this thread. It's always obvious. You cannot write in a normal style. It becomes very obvious when you are plagiarizing.

      http://sasquatchresearch.net/ichnology.html

      Delete
    71. Hmmmm, I think you'll find I used information from said source and put it in my own words. Maybe if you spent a little more time trying to refute that source, you'd have some satisfaction and wouldn't be resorted to spending your time trying to attack my integrity.

      Delete
    72. You did not paraphrase. You directly copied those words. Word for word.

      You don't have any integrity.

      Delete
    73. No, I didn't. I'm the "worst person you've ever known on the internet".

      Delete
    74. You plagiarized, Joe. Adding your own word here or there that does not change anything. You basically lifted phrases from that source and did not quote them. This is plagiarism.

      Not sure I said you are the worst person on the Internet was what I said. I believe I said you are the saddest and most unlikable.

      Delete
    75. This is your comment:

      "It doesn't really matter what you consider biological or not. If the anatomy in said casts repeatably shows morphology that can only be the result of a genuine foot fall, then it can only point to a biological entity leaving it. When a genuine foot makes contact with the earth, it makes what is called a sequential print. The foot has dozens of bones, tendons and ligaments that flow in a segmented fashion and a fluid motion creates compression lines in the inner perimeter of the track, and can only be made by a living fleshy foot. Now... fake tracks are identified by what are called impact ridges that appear on the outer perimeter of the track. What creates this is the simultaneous pushing out from the pressing down of a solid, non-flexible structure like wood or fake plaster cast. You find out his data by testing the source in question."

      This is the source you stole it from:

      " Real tracks, like the one on the left, can only be made by a
      living fleshy foot. When it presses down into the medium, it
      makes a sequential print. What that means is is that the foot
      has dozens of bones, tendons and ligaments that flow in a
      segmented fashion. This fluid motion creates what is called
      compression lines in the inner perimeter of the track.

      Fake tracks, like the one on the right, are identified by what
      is called impact ridges that appear on the outer perimeter of
      the track. What creates this is the simultaneous pushing out
      from the pressing down of a solid, non-flexible structure like
      wood or fake plaster cast."



      That is plagiarizing, Joe. No way around that one.

      Delete
    76. You've plagiarized this exact content a few times:

      https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwir4NP6uu3SAhUl8IMKHYB4CbUQFggxMAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbigfootevidence.blogspot.com%2F2017%2F02%2Fbigfoot-sightings-of-2017-february.html&usg=AFQjCNH5dr93s4jHtm9lINv9y0n1dYG7_g&sig2=dVBpCzIvX7LiNWfPJ9pLWQ

      https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwir4NP6uu3SAhUl8IMKHYB4CbUQFgg4MAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbigfootevidence.blogspot.com%2F2015%2F12%2Fare-wild-men-tales-of-1904-oregon-true.html&usg=AFQjCNHG24uUBd7l5XYYW7dE2spoFKScLg&sig2=MbXgcUuXvs6BSs0LIwmkzg


      Do you ever have any original thoughts? Oh yeah, those are the ones that are poorly written and illogical.

      Delete
    77. Oh god... It must mean that Bigfoot tracks are fake. Well done, you've solved the whole mystery.

      Delete
    78. Of course not, but it does mean you are a dishonest person who never own his own mistakes.

      Delete
    79. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    80. Yes, I'm the "worst person you've ever known on the internet". If I was dishonest, I'd have lied. I changed the words maybe got a little lazy towards the end. Do you think anyone other than your little fan boy is gonna care? Do you think your little JREF prayers that I've read 100 times before you ever came along are any more original or sincere?

      Like I said dMaKeR, get some satisfaction. Because when you're preoccupied with stuff like that, it makes you look like you have too much of a score to settle.

      Delete
    81. Actually... I'm cringing myself out by trying to explain away something so trivial.

      Adios!

      Delete
    82. donny has been extra prickly today. Must be cabin fever

      Joe

      Delete
    83. Why do you keep quoting yourself misquoting me, especially after I corrected you? Do you revel in dishonesty, or do you just enjoy being wrong?

      " I changed the words maybe got a little lazy towards the end."

      No. You outright plagiarized and got caught.

      I have plenty of satisfaction with the subject matter, Joe. Discussing it with you is a waste of time. You say the same things, I say the same things, no one budges an inch. What is the point?

      Until some solid, new evidence appears or one of your beloved phds is brave enough to publish a peer reviewed paper supporting the existence of bigfoot, then there is nothing subject related for us to discuss.

      Delete
    84. Just to let you know, I'm likely to publish the exact same comment another time times down the line. You'd better continue to scour through all my comments for plagiarism... I'm such an evil soul. Easier than scouring my comments for things you can refute after all.

      Delete
    85. You've been "refuted" time and time again. You just choose to disagree or ignore it.

      Besides, you plagiarize so frequently, how is one to know if they are dealing with your thoughts or things you stole off the others?

      Delete
    86. I'm bored now Donald. You take care now. Watch out for all those nasty plagiarisms, you're fighting for freedom remember.

      Delete
  4. The Strange Tale of the Defiance Werewolf

    http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2017/03/the-strange-tale-of-the-defiance-werewolf/


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. More High-Strangeness in Defiance, Ohio

      http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2017/03/more-high-strangeness-in-defiance-ohio/

      Delete
  5. For the Trolls here, this is very satisfying and will help control your urges. Trump is upset and threatening to sue the 17 year old. He hasn't a paw to stand on. www.kittenfeed.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol that's the best game ever.You have to give him as many scratches as possible :) xx

      Delete
  6. Ah yes, the Forever War (as I like to call it) continues on. Many stories back I had an exchange with lktomi in which we both put forth reasons for belief and disbelief. I was going to continue however I realized the futility of it. Nothing I could ever write would change his mind and I'm sure that is true of many others. I seen countless arguments made here against the existence of Bigfoot and they are brushed aside with explanations of it's "special abilities" to avoid detection. Just like politics and religion there are those who believe what they wish and nothing is going to change that. However there is an exception for Bigfoot deniers and that is the presentation of a body (or any physical part). Their doubt would be immediately proven wrong - end of story.

    Over the years I have gone from believer, to doubter, to skeptic and now to complete disbelief. I have seen many breathless announcements of proof only to see those claims fade away. We have all seen the Ketchum and Sykes DNA study come to naught and everyday here we see more stories of witnesses without anything to back it up. Has there been ANYONE here who has changed their mind pro or con by what they have read here? I come here for three main reasons - people who claim to have a Bigfoot experience intrigue me. Many obviously think they have seen something unusual and others are flat out lying. Another reason is just to keep abreast of the latest news in the Bigfoot community. Anything of significance usually appears here first. Finally it's just plain fun - it's like a Bigfoot soap opera with warring camps of believers, crazy theories and arguments of who is the best researcher. Sometimes the comments are the best part.

    All I know is old, outdated evidence is not going to change anyone's mind. Fuzzy indistinct photographs and videos is not going to change anyone's mind. Someone's personal experience is not going to change anyone's mind. Videos of driving in a supposed Bigfoot locality (although beautiful) is not going to change anyone's mind. What is needed is fresh NEW evidence that is immediately examined by non-partial professionals and followed up on. I think if some major newspapers would give such attention to what some would consider irrefutable evidence then these professionals would have to at least examine it.

    In any case arguments will fall on deaf ears, the insults will continue and all will feel they have the answers. The fun continues . . . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But what about these persuasive arguments?

      1. Crazy people are lying about seeing large hairy bipeds in "remote wild places" where they can park their cars 100 yards away.

      2. Fraudulent people are hoaxing large foot impressions in "remote wild places," but in their videos they are out of breath after talking for 30 seconds.

      Delete
    2. Unless you personally go out, without the pay-to-play bigfoot guides, you will never know. Truth is, it doesn't matter, one way or the other.

      Delete
    3. Curious, it appears that you've simply rehashed the same comment that got addressed by me here;
      https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/top-5-incredible-stories-from-mulders_16.html

      ... So I'll just rehash the link to that comment section for the sake of not spamming the place up. Everything I would say in response is in that link over two comments.

      1. Argh yes!! For thousands of years, there has been a culture hopping secret society of gorilla suit wearing crazy people all out to lie. These people, though finding each others customs undesirable, and spanning from a time when they didn't even know what a non-human primate looked like, have in fact managed to lie the exact same anatomical and behavioural traits, as well as cheat experts with fake morphological traits too!!

      2. Hoaxers would have to have guessed a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot, encompassing total accuracy regarding bipedal evolution that only very few educated people understand. They would have to place such fakes in places where some people might not trek for many decades, hoping that someone some day would stumble across them out of miles and miles of wilderness.

      Are you into woo-like conspiracies by any chance?

      Delete
    4. Iktomi = Psychiatrist's dream study

      Delete
    5. Footprints are one thing, but to claim you know anything of Bigfoot locomotion is ridiculous!

      Gigantopithecus's method of locomotion is uncertain, as no pelvic or leg bones have been found. The dominant view is that it walked on all fours like modern gorillas and chimpanzees; however, a minority opinion favors bipedal locomotion.

      Delete
    6. "Fuzzy indistinct photographs and videos is not going to change anyone's mind."

      LOL....Everyone I know that jacked me, is now a BELIEVER, after seeing my evidence! The only person who isn't is my dad, but he refuses to look at anything.

      Delete
    7. I'm not claiming Bigfoot is giganto, you blithering oaf. Never have. Not even Meldrum does anymore.

      Delete
    8. ^ Here`s proof dIktomijo is an autistic imbecile .. never been into the woods himself ,he is reliant upon others abilities and interpretations of such .. yet he goes into bitter meltdown mode whenever a person may hold their own opinion..it`s his "special" trait and we`ve seen many times his inability to accept somebody may have a view counter to his own...note too the abuse begins each time with Iktomijo and is indicative of an autistic`s inability to deal with countering issues.

      Delete
    9. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists%3Famp

      Delete
    10. Iktomi to Doctor Squatch:

      "Personally, I think you have one or two decent images."

      https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2017/01/man-claims-to-have-witnessed-aliens.html?m=1#comment-form

      Not bad for a "blithering oaf"!

      Delete
    11. Agreed 11:11, except for the first sentence, i don't think he's Autistic.

      Delete
    12. I never said you said anything about Gianto. Since when did the thief change his position?

      Delete
    13. Don't worry i found one

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ro4UEOnBnl0

      Delete
    14. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noGipv6KnQY

      lol xx

      Delete
    15. Good find Dr Squatch. Why is Iktomi so gullible about Meldrum yet so resistant to your real science?

      Delete
    16. Because He/She has never been in the field!
      But its more than that, because every video of mine is posted for learning. There isn't any ambiguity. Iktomi follows the so called scientist, who've never been in the woods either. Iktomi will side with someone with Credentials over facts, and frankly in iktomi's ignorance He/She is actually totally clueless, just like the so called Scientists!

      Delete
  7. Check out these photo`s from various trips - the Machupichu pic`s are purty darn amazing.

    http://www.jimsdestinations.com/fotomain.htm#top

    ReplyDelete
  8. ALERT ALERT ALERT ALERT ALERT


    Frozen Sasquatch Foot Revealed in Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft7nBx9oRl4


    http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2017/01/frozen-sasquatch-foot-revealed-in-video/

    ReplyDelete