Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Photograph of Bigfoot In Idaho January 2017


Bobo from Finding Bigfoot believes this photo is the real deal. Supposedly showing a bigfoot creature standing in the snow. Others say they see a person in pants and a black-hooded coat walking away from the camera. What do you think?

26 comments:

  1. Yes my friends, I have real evidence, number 1, of monsters that live in the woods, this is one of many,scary stuff, drop by and you will believe, light a candle

    ReplyDelete
  2. A person in pants and a black-hooded coat walking away from the camera.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a monster, it lives in the woods behind Shoprite and watches you and your family from the shadows

      Delete
    2. Person without pants on and wearing a coat ... notice the usual blurred pic.

      Delete
  3. Easy to cut: where are the footprints pictures ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. That photo actually doesn't look too bad. Without a backstory and a recreation though, it's useless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey mate, I've got a "backstory" I think you'll fancy !

      Joe

      Delete
    2. Never debate the subject matter with Joerg. Its what he craves, and today is evidence of that. Instead hit him with urine, feces, and perversion. Do this after everyone of his replies

      DO NOT go back and forth about bigfoot with him. Its what he loves.

      Delete
    3. 1:02, Saying Bigfoot isn't real, is not a debate, it's a lame excuse from people who don't do any research!

      Delete
    4. ^ People have been searching and "researching" for more than 60 years and have no verifiable evidence that would convince concerned bodies or groups - so perhaps it`s the researchers who have the lame excuse for not coming up with the goods.

      Delete
    5. boo boo said its a Moose look on facebook

      Delete
    6. Here we go 5:44... There's 252 comments from the previous comment section that shows otherwise;

      https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/paranormal-researchers-have-run-in-with.html

      Man, you have a short memory!

      : )

      Delete
  5. There are two-toned bigfoots now?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I believe with bob that it's legit . however i will also agree with Iktomi that we need a backstory to this photo.
    I do wish they would have gone to that area and got some print photos though

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ likes "bareback" stories the best of all...

      don`t you Joe ?

      Delete
    2. Hi Dazz / Haints !
      still no real GF ?
      such a sad state of affairs.

      Joe

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. lol - was there any doubt? Was there ever a time when you didn't agree with them?

      Delete
    2. unlike your multiple pictures and prints that only exist in your imagination doc fraud squat

      Delete
    3. go to boo boos facebook page he talks about the pic. it is not a bigfoot

      Delete
  8. Another blurfoot in a loooooong line of blurfoots.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The subject looks really large as compared to the small storage building. The Storage building is about seven feet tall. The problem I have is with the subjects lower legs; where are they? I don't see how they are covered in snow. It could be the silhouette of a moose walking away at an uphill angle. Who knows exactly what it is though. If the property owner took the picture, there would be prints, etc.

    ReplyDelete