The only source of evidence that Freeman presented that was later shown to be bunk, was a hair fibre that turned out to be fibre glass (I believe) and the circumstances as to how he attained this fibre are not clear (was possibly given it). Apart from that, Freeman had sourced some of the most profound evidence this field has to reference. The hair fibres that were accumulated via a sighting by two other government employees, that were verified by Fahrenbach to be consistent with twelve other samples (all linked to their own sightings and activity), and the footprint casts that were verified to be genuine by 30 police fingerprint workers, 6 physical anthropologists and 4 pathologists and 2 zoologists.
"... of all North American mammals, only humans have fully developed friction skin on the soles of their feet." http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints
bullshit .chimps dont have the same dermal patterns as a gorilla . but then again your far to stupid to realise that river otters & beavers and what the hell even wood rats have developed friction (dermal patterns) skin on the soles
Iktomi wins in a landslide! He has given the links to back his side of the argument. Loser AC. Collins has given not a thing (except childish remarks) to this round by round debate. The skeptic takes it in the behind. Now ain't that a pissa!
But there aren't any chimps and gorillas living in North America? And if even if your drivel was correct (which it's not) why list animals like beavers and otters when the dermals were found to exist in human-like tracks?
Oops!
"A U.S. Border Patrol tracker who was called in by the Forest Service to help in the Walla Walla investigation declared the tracks to be fakes because of the presence of these dermal ridges (among other things). He pointed out that, of all North American mammals, only humans have fully developed friction skin on the soles of their feet. He did not allow for the possibility of the track maker being another higher primate — all of which have the same kind of friction skin with virtually identical dermal ridges."
Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Circular reasoning - Wikipedia
Idiotomi nice fantasy world your living in....let us know when you get your meds straight and come back to reality LOL! Are you into any other imaginary creatures, have you discussed this issue with your doctor? Make sure you talk with your doctor about your imaginary creature delusions and your internet compulsion as well. Good luck!!
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Nobody know if it's real or not? LOL. I can tell you it's hoaxed BS. Freeman was a bigfoot BS hoaxer pure and simple.
ReplyDelete"PEDOTOMI" Say's, If its NOT a Homo Sapien Sapien,
Deleteit's Not a Sasquatch!!!
AC collins :-P
The only source of evidence that Freeman presented that was later shown to be bunk, was a hair fibre that turned out to be fibre glass (I believe) and the circumstances as to how he attained this fibre are not clear (was possibly given it). Apart from that, Freeman had sourced some of the most profound evidence this field has to reference. The hair fibres that were accumulated via a sighting by two other government employees, that were verified by Fahrenbach to be consistent with twelve other samples (all linked to their own sightings and activity), and the footprint casts that were verified to be genuine by 30 police fingerprint workers, 6 physical anthropologists and 4 pathologists and 2 zoologists.
Delete^ prove it!! YOU WONT, BECAUSE
DeleteYou can't! So. STFU !!
Actually... I can;
Deletehttp://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints
http://www.bfro.net/REF/THEORIES/WHF/dnatests.htm
sorry chimp The dermals are "NON HSS"! Haa haa haa u lose sucka!
DeleteLol
AC collins
"... of all North American mammals, only humans have fully developed friction skin on the soles of their feet."
Deletehttp://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints
Unlucky.
bullshit .chimps dont have the same dermal patterns as a gorilla . but then again your far to stupid to realise that river otters & beavers and what the hell even wood rats have developed friction (dermal patterns) skin on the soles
DeleteCHERRY PICK THE NATIONAL ENQUIRE MUCH LOOSER?
AC collins
Iktomi wins in a landslide!
DeleteHe has given the links to back his side of the argument.
Loser AC. Collins has given not a thing (except childish remarks) to this round by round debate. The skeptic takes it in the behind. Now ain't that a pissa!
But there aren't any chimps and gorillas living in North America? And if even if your drivel was correct (which it's not) why list animals like beavers and otters when the dermals were found to exist in human-like tracks?
DeleteOops!
"A U.S. Border Patrol tracker who was called in by the Forest Service to help in the Walla Walla investigation declared the tracks to be fakes because of the presence of these dermal ridges (among other things). He pointed out that, of all North American mammals, only humans have fully developed friction skin on the soles of their feet. He did not allow for the possibility of the track maker being another higher primate — all of which have the same kind of friction skin with virtually identical dermal ridges."
Total meltdown in 5... 4... 3... 2...
Hello Zabo!
DeleteAc is correct wood rats have dermals..google it
Deletego to a zoo , moron
DeleteWho gives a rats ass... It's an irrelevance. The friction ridges are consistent with primate skin.
DeleteIdiotomi regurgitating the usual nonsense.....but since there's no such thing as Bigfoot, yes another fat guy in a suit.
ReplyDeleteCircular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.
DeleteCircular reasoning - Wikipedia
Freeman was a hoaxer.
ReplyDeleteHis famous footage shows a "bigfoot" that obviously has fake fur on it. It's laughable that people are fooled by this.
It's too pixelated to make any definitive conclusions... Howveer, his physical evidence lends credence to the footage he had.
DeleteIdiotomi nice fantasy world your living in....let us know when you get your meds straight and come back to reality LOL!
ReplyDeleteAre you into any other imaginary creatures, have you discussed this issue with your doctor?
Make sure you talk with your doctor about your imaginary creature delusions and your internet compulsion as well.
Good luck!!