Friday, January 6, 2017

Maine's Cryptid Snake Has Disappeared


Westbrook Wessie, Maine's very own cryptid snake has vanished. Which is pretty common for cryptids.
Mainers have likely seen the last of a big snake that created a media sensation when it was spotted eating a beaver along a riverbank.

The Portland Press Herald reports a state biologist says the snake dubbed ‘‘Wessie’’ by Westbrook, Maine, residents likely didn’t make it past October due to the cold.

Reptiles are coldblooded, meaning they can’t control their own body temperature.

The 10-foot-long snake caused a stir in June when police saw it eat what appeared to be a beaver and then swim across the Presumpscot River and disappear. Biologists said the snake, likely a boa or a python, is probably an escaped pet.

For more, click here.

82 comments:

  1. There are some very interesting breakdowns of the latest bigfoot video. MK Davis just put this one out, and its very fascinating.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgiB_paogxA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. haintsThursday, January 5, 2017 at 4:40:00 PM PST
      You'll get nothing and like it.
      https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/bigfoot-hunter-investigates-high.html?showComment=1483692336884#c3659141555909181506

      Daniel CampbellSunday, January 12, 2014 at 9:07:00 PM PST
      You'll get nothing and like it!
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/top-5-incredible-photos-from-mulders_12.html?m=0

      Delete
    2. You care way to much about Haints and DC. It's really sad. Why are you so obsessed? Is it because you get bored with the zero bigfoot evidence and you need something to pass the time. Very sad!!!!!!

      Dazz

      Delete
    3. ^ Did ever wonder why "Haints" liked to name drop me from the very first moments he appeared around here?

      Delete
    4. Oh "Dazz", you were annahilated only yesterday about the current state of "Bigfoot" evidence? Don't pretend like it's all that important to you at all. Oh... And aren't you obsessed with your little trolling crusade because of me? I'm on your mind 24/7, relax man... You're going to flip.

      : p

      Delete
    5. It seems to me that Joe is still upset that he got tricked into looking at one of DC's testicles. LOL

      Donovan

      Delete
    6. Joe likes to post links to pictures of the patty butt diaper and then claim that he just destroyed someone. Its sad, pathetic, and cringe worthy all at the same time. Who is this Pedo Joe?

      Ricky

      Delete
    7. Actually 1:21... I was banned and prohibited from accessing the comment sections before Danny got all revealing.

      1:23... Actually, I like to post links to anatomical examples that prove thaf Patty's rear end is impossible to manufacture with non-biological materials. It's why you're so angry and obsessed with me all the time, remember?

      Delete
    8. Thanks for letting me know that I was annihilated yesterday. I didn't realise and either did anybody else that saw the posts. I know you are really good at believing things that aren't real but that is ridiculous. Please don't destroy me again Itkomi. Show mercy on me please. :)

      Dazz

      Delete
    9. That ok, I'll go easier on you today, it can't be easy. Just remember... The second you decide to attempt to lie and misinform again about the subject, I'll always be here to put you in your place.

      ; )

      Delete
    10. Hey everyone, the PGF is fake and Gimlin admitted it on camera. All footprints are faked by money hungry scam artists. Not one qualified scientist has backed any evidence of bigfoot. Bigfoot is just a mythical creature that people with very boring lives like to pretend is real. All this information is 100% true so I don't expect a reply from Itkomi. Unless he's a liar.


      Dazz

      Delete
    11. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    12. Your daily reminder...

      1. Hoaxers would have to have guessed a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot, encompassing total accuracy regarding bipedal evolution that only very few educated people understand.
      2. Hoaxers would have to place such fakes in places where some people might not trek for many decades, hoping that someone some day would stumble across them out of miles and miles of wilderness.
      3. To hoax convincing biological dermatoglyphics that are primate in origin, one would have to have a knowledge of all human primate and non-human primate dermals (that not many people on the planet do), THEN fool multiple forensic experts.

      Bob G has never done anything of the sort, and myths don't leave tracks. You DO have a very short memory though.

      Oh... And some of the scientists either enthusiastic about the evidence or are happy to entertain the idea of extant relict hominoids, are John Bindernagel PhD Courtenay BC Canada, Colin Groves PhD Australian National University Canberra Australia, Chris Loether PhD Idaho Sate University Pocatello ID, Jeffrey McNeely PhD Chief Scientist IUCN - World Conservation Union Gland Switzerland, Lyn Miles PhD University of Tennessee Chattanooga, John Mionczynski Wildlife Consultant Atlantic City WY, Anna Nekaris PhD Oxford Brooks University Oxford England, Ian Redmond OBE Conservation Consultant Manchester England, Esteban Sarmiento PhD Human Evolution Foundation East Brunswick NJ, Zhoua Guoxing PhD Beijing Museum of Natural History Beijing China... Jane Goodall, John Napier, George Schaller, Russell Mitterneier & Daris Swindler.

      Delete
    13. I'll be back later to see what drivel has been left here.

      Delete
    14. Oh look - Haints has gone full blown loony with numerous sock puppet appearances today . i can hardly keep track of them all.
      Hey haints/dazz/donovan/ Rickey/ moe/ larry and curly - has your blow up sex doll rejected you once again ? Is this the only way you can prove your manhood to others ?
      What a bloody mess you are mate

      Joe

      Delete
    15. 2;34

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjvPcpdu8mk

      Delete
    16. Dazs, donavan, ricky,Barret = all very gay names

      Delete
    17. ^ You have a problem with gay people ?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjvPcpdu8mk

      Delete
  2. Enthusiastic or happy to entertain they idea is not backing the evidence. Not one of those people would say that bigfoot 100% exists. That's the problem, even you have stated that there is no proof that bigfoot exists. You cut n paste so called evidence everyday and yet there is no proof. Even you admit that. Gimlin did admit to faking the video and I have seen it. The burden is on you now to prove he didn't say it. That's a heavy burden. :)

    Dazz

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ in case people wanna see how Dazz lives and why he has so much time to devout on here as haints and Dazz

      http://cdn.smosh.com/sites/default/files/ftpuploads/bloguploads/weight-loss-sodas.jpg

      Joe

      Delete
    2. "I am convinced that the Sasquatch exists, but whether it is all that it is cracked up to be is another matter altogether. There must be SOMETHING in north-west America that needs explaining, and that something leaves man-like footprints. The evidence I have adduced in favour of the reality of the Sasquatch is not hard evidence; few physicists, biologists or chemists would accept it, but nevertheless it IS evidence and cannot be ignored."
      John Napier MRCS, LRCP, DSC(Lond.) "Bigfoot- The Yeti and Sasquatch in Myth and Reality"- Sphere Books Ltd.

      And that's just one source that I could be bothered to look for a rhetorical twit like you. It is scientifically prudent for a scientist to not 100% commit to the existence of an extant hominid without a body, but the ever-increasing numbers of academics that tell are open to the idea, kind of puts your rhetorical drivel into context.

      No proof of "Bigfoot", meaning a body, but proof that something with the widely reported anatomy as "Bigfoot" is leaving its physical evidence on the environment of the US. I know you're trolling, but Gimlin has never once admitted to any such hoax. And if you didn't notice, you were presented three reasons as to why tracks can't be faked... The burden is now with you, troll.

      Delete
    3. ^ 3:38

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9t_KDGqOmE

      Delete
    4. Ever increasing? Please provide a chronological list of the increasing number of scientists interested in bigfoot.

      Delete
    5. Napier concluded the film was a clever hoax: "the scientific evidence taken collectively points to a hoax of some kind."

      wiki

      Delete
    6. Seems he did not buy into the diaper butt.

      Delete
    7. Only Joe would be dense enough to quote someone who believes the pgf to be fake in a post defending the pgf.

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    9. You'll get the list and like it, I'm not your dancing monkey.

      Napier concluded the PGF was a hoax (no different to a lot of enthusiasts really), and maintained the physical evidence for Sasquatch exists.

      Seems like you're buying into the blog's racist troll's nonsense again.

      And the topic of discussion was Bob G allegedly admitting the PGF was a hoax, not Napier's opinion on it. Learn to read.

      Delete
    10. What did anything I said have to do with racism?

      Delete
    11. Because the only other troll around here that maintains Patty has a diaper butt (especially after it's been shown that this is an anatomical trait a million times before), is the blog's racist.

      Way to go champ.

      Delete
    12. You're just trolling me now. Plenty of people use the term diaper butt when referring to Patty. It's a very common phrase.

      Delete
    13. There's one troll around here that's used it in the last four years, and that's the resident village idiot Stuey. And you just so happen to be using the same drivel, for the first time ever, in the same comment section as the troll you come to try and save regularly?

      Not that I'm calling you a racist... Just saying how it looks.

      Delete
    14. I'm pretty sure I've used diaper butt before. Every bigfoot site I read has numerous people who use that phrase. Are they all, somehow, supporting the troll you mentioned? I doubt it.

      Stop being an as s hat.

      Delete
    15. Just saying how it looks Don! Christ... You sure do spend a lot of time on a lot of "Bigfoot" forums for someone who doesn't believe?

      Delete
    16. A lot of skeptics really do spend a lot of time on forums even though they don't believe. My theory is that they are closet believers but are too afraid to admit it , either that or they are just plain psychos !

      Joe

      Delete
    17. It doesn't "look" like anything, Joe, other than you making a fool of yourself pretending otherwise.

      How would you know how much time I spend on any bigfoot forum? I haven't posted here for a couple of months, and I don't even have an account on the BFF anymore.

      Stop being so desperate in your grasping at anything to try to make me look bad. You're only hurting yourself.

      Delete
    18. You're jumping in to the aid of your racist fan boy again, and I'm the one that looks like the fool?

      If you were to spend any length of time on a number of other forums as a "non-believer", it's a strange amount of time nonetheless.

      Didn't you come around here earlier trolling to start with?

      Delete
    19. Iktomi shut your cum dumpster so we dont have to hear all the crying. You have way more knowledge of trolls than you do of the fictional monkey. Ill give you that. Being as internet trolls are real and your magic moneky man isn't. But you still lack the insight to realize that you are as much of a troll as any of the trolls. Calling Dmaker a racist because he used the phrase diaper butt or trying to link him to racists because hes basically destroyed you on every possible issue is so idiotic. Only your small support group is going to believe that, and that's because they believe everything you say. Your basically the exact same as the guy that calls you the pedo. You lack the intellectual firepower to argue with Dmaker so you have to call him a racist. Like even if he was that has anything to do with the arguements hes presented. Still its nice to constantly watch you make a fool of yourself by doing the exact same thing you criticize others for. Its pretty much the only reason to even visit this site anymore. To see that no matter what, through the years you have always been the same crybaby little bitchboy idiot. Way more entertaining than the "evidence" presented on this dumpster fire called bigfoot evidence.

      Delete
    20. Schooled by professor Iktomi !
      Welcome to 2017 !

      Joe

      Delete
    21. HAAA!!! Youre exceptionally angry today... Fan boy?

      : )

      Sorry troll! "Mythical monkey men" aren't supposed to leave tracks, and there's so much of that...
      "Measurements and estimates on Sasquatch dimensions, collected over the last 40 years in the Western U.S and Canada, were subjected to statistical analysis and extrapolation by scaling laws appropriate to primates and mammals. The study has yielded average population values for foot length and width, scaling factors of foot length to height, values for weight, plantar pressure, walking and running gait, speed, and a tentative growth curve as a function of time for the female of the species. The results suggest a substantial population with traits different from those of other higher primates and humans."
      http://www.bfro.net/ref/theories/whf/fahrenbacharticle.htm

      ... And you're so quick to come and help your hero that you let yourself down even more so than usual with your literacy. Nobody called "dmaker" a racist, I only suggested he's as daft for coming to the aid of the blog's racist in you, who is quite frankly one if the biggest intellectual throwbacks any decent human being will ever suffer on the internet. Oh... And did I miss something (me getting "destroyed"?)? Considering you think posting racist comments instead of a logical case against "Bigfoot" amounts to someone like me being "blown the **** out", I don think that's much of a compliment for your hero now, is it?

      Cool down fan boy, you're about to blow.

      : p

      Delete
    22. I have to agree with 10:30

      The only reason to come here is to watch Joe prance around like a fool spouting the same old nonsense. I don't have the energy or desire to engage him any topical discussion as we've done that many, many times and he has nothing to offer except the same lame arguments and decades old articles.

      Sometimes it's kind of fun to watch Dr.Squatch, but his crazy is kind of at an uncomfortable level. Joe is kind of like the dancing bear at a fair, while DS is the booger eating lunatic in a cage in the dark corner of the freak show.

      Delete
    23. It doesn't take you much to agree with your fan boy. And no "dmaker", self admittedly you have a strange obsession with a subject you allegedly find disagreeable... If you're gonna troll me, be prepared to take a couple on the chin pal.

      If the evidence I post is significant enough after any serious length of time, however old it is, then that's your problem not mine. It merely suggests that it's lasted the special pleading of innumerable lazy pseudosceptics who haven't found a way around it. If there is forensic evidence from 20-30 years ago, then it merely shows that there is a steady flow of good evidence over a duration from which amateur research began, generally encompassing the last 60 years. There is nothing in scientific theory that states that scientific evidence lessens the more it's substantiated over time. That is embarrassing logic... But logic I expect from someone who comes to the aid of the blog's racist village idiot, eh?

      Stick to your insults as opposed to the subject, "dmaker", you're at least keeping in sync with the cyber company you keep.

      Delete
    24. ^ Clinton supporter

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjvPcpdu8mk

      Delete
    25. Nobody clicks on your links after the great one ball debacle of 2014.

      Delete
  3. The evidence I have adduced in favour of the reality of the Sasquatch is not hard evidence; few physicists, biologists or chemists would accept it.

    You said it Itkomi. Couldn't have said it better. :)

    Dazz

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That would be because to most uninterested physicists and biologists, the only hard evidence consists of a type specimen... "Extraordinary ideas require extraordinary evidence". Up top is a promiment primatologist convinced that "Sasquatch" exists, based on the evidence he has looked at... Just like you rhetorically asked for.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    2. ^ "Stupid boy" said Captain Mainwaring.

      Delete
    3. ^ @ 4;51

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9t_KDGqOmE

      Delete
    4. ahahaha
      love it when utter nutters like Dazz get schooled by Iktomi !
      an olympic moment for sure

      Joe

      Delete
    5. ^

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9t_KDGqOmE

      Delete
    6. ^ limit of conversation..Chick (badger man)

      Delete
    7. "That would be because to most uninterested physicists and biologists, the only hard evidence consists of a type specimen... "Extraordinary ideas require extraordinary evidence". Up top is a promiment primatologist convinced that "Sasquatch" exists, based on the evidence he has looked at... Just like you rhetorically asked for. "

      That makes no sense, Joe. The person that described the lack of hard evidence was an interested scientist. Interested though he may be, he still correctly points out that there is no hard evidence.

      Your comment is a self contradiction as usual.

      Delete
    8. That's because to him, he acknowledges that "hard evidence" entails a body... Something that adheres to the extraordinary evidence idealism of people who aren't prepared to provide the extraordinary efforts to source it.

      My comment is in fact self explanatory... As usual; you struggle.

      Delete
    9. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjvPcpdu8mk

      Delete
    10. Iktomi is always struggling - his whole life has been a struggle - and now he struggles to feel he`s not a worthless piece of Taffy turd.

      You stupid boy.

      Delete
    11. JAIL AINT "JACK YO",!! AT LEAST I DONT TALK SHIT ABOUT GOOD FOLKS THAT HAVE ALWAYS BEEN COOL HUMAN (chick)BEINGS TO ALL THE GOOD FOLKS HERE @ The BFE!!

      Now watch as PEDO-JOE attempts to Whore the scene to his adavantage,,"BABY"!!,,,
      HAAA HAAA LOL ,,CHUMP!!

      UNO FOCKIN WHO !

      Delete
    12. ^lolzz,@ the real sockpuppet!


      uno who

      Delete
  4. Teamsquatchingusa -Dr JohnsonFriday, January 6, 2017 at 9:11:00 AM PST

    It's really real

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fasano's portly men's clothingFriday, January 6, 2017 at 9:12:00 AM PST

      Yes, snakes are real

      Delete
    2. ^ i`m watching you, buddy.

      Delete
  5. "Mainers have likely seen the last of a big snake that created a media sensation when it was spotted eating a beaver along a riverbank"......the snake and the beaver should get a room :) xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yeah,one in the basement of mom`s house

      Delete
    2. I love your Love,,PIB!


      AC

      Delete
  6. Yes PiB

    Eating beaver is good

    MMC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Except Chick`s which is more "weasel".

      Delete
    2. ^^ all This fool knows is a microwaved sock and the thought of Joe

      MMC

      Delete
    3. ^ all you`ve ever tasted is curried cock (curried due to the stench) so shut your pathetic gob you silly cunt

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9t_KDGqOmE

      Delete
    4. Go back to sucking on your filthy sock.^

      Delete
    5. Hey chick ,if you belive Pedo-joe,, I DONT BELIEVE IT!
      ,,no way,Now how!


      AC

      Delete
    6. ^ not shure about this one

      Delete