Sunday, January 1, 2017

A Small Town Is Plagued By An Unknown Creature


From Swamp Dweller on youtube:

Time to time small towns have their share of unspeakable crimes. But, sometimes those crimes are being commited by an unknown creature lurking and preying on their homes citizens. Here is a 6 part series detailing a scary creature attack.

27 comments:

  1. Theres something out there!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course there is! Why do you think this subject attracts so many obsessive denialists?

      : )

      Delete
    2. Clearly this Itkomi guy has no life and is obsessed with trolling this site. Does anybody think that 2017 will be the year that somebody gets proof? That question isn't for you Itkomi. I don't care about your opinion.

      Dazz

      Delete
    3. "Dazz"?! Another sockpuppet?? I don't know what's more embarrassing, the fact that you think you might fool someone, or that you have "duuuuuh bigfeets don't exist" as your best argument for years obsessed with this subject.

      You see, for people who are not in denial about the evidence, for which wouldn't be there if "bigfeets" didn't exist, there is no more proof required.

      Sockpuppet.

      Delete
    4. Just couldn't help yourself. Such a loser!!!! This question is not for Itkomi. I repeat that the question is not for Itkomi. I would like an intelligent person to answer. Is it true that all Bigfoot footprints are faked? Is it also true that the PGF is just a guy in a suit?

      Dazz

      Delete
    5. Why don't you just respond to your own comment, as in typical sockpuppet fashion?

      Nutter.

      Delete
    6. To answer your questions Dazz, it is true that the PGF is fake and that all footprints are fakes too. Bigfoot has become a real moneymaker these days and people just fake this stuff for 15 mins of fame or a bit of cash. Don't worry about Itkomi. He's just the local nut job. He loves to cut n paste and make up facts so it looks like he's smart. If you write something he will always answer. He has nothing better to do. It's really sad if you think about it.

      Delete
    7. HAAAAAAAA!!!!! It comes down to three points regarding track impressions, troll...

      1. Hoaxers would have to have guessed a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot, encompassing total accuracy regarding bipedal evolution that only very few educated people understand.

      2. Hoaxers would have to place such fakes in places where some people might not trek for many decades, hoping that someone some day would stumble across them out of miles and miles of wilderness.

      3. To hoax convincing biological dermatoglyphics that are primate in origin, one would have to have a knowledge of all human primate and non-human primate dermals (that not many people on the planet do), THEN fool multiple forensic experts.

      4. And allow me to educate you some more... For example, when a genuine foot makes contact with the earth, it makes what is called a sequential print. The foot has dozens of bones, tendons and ligaments that flow in a segmented fashion and a fluid motion creates compression lines in the inner perimeter of the track, and can only be made by a living fleshy foot. Now... fake tracks are identified by what are called impact ridges that appear on the outer perimeter of the track. What creates this is the simultaneous pushing out from the pressing down of a solid, non-flexible structure like wood or fake plaster cast. You find out his data by testing the source in question. You don't have to be pessimistic of the source to do this, in fact it's expected by 99.9% of intelligent thinkers, not to mention mainstream scientists.

      Delete
    8. WELL,WELL,WELL! IT'S THE DUMCLUCK ITOMI(vd,joe f,ect)!

      How's patty being a Homo sapien sapien working out for you?

      AC collins

      Delete
    9. 11:29 is the real sockpuppet Joto mi,,,fact!

      AC collins

      Delete
    10. Listen Dazz/ jazz or whatever haints is calling himself lately- it is impossible to say bigfoot is not real with the hundreds or credible sightings and footprints that have been found for hundreds of years . go wash your mouth out with soap for saying something as insane as that chum

      Joe

      Delete
    11. yes, tiddly doo for 2017 lads !

      Joe

      Delete
    12. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  2. Hey ellow believers......Happy New Year! And someone call up Mr. Shawn"No" Evidence to wake up he has a top notch( debatable anymore) blog post to run about Sasquatch. Not Aliens and stupid mulder's world b.s. But you know the subject of Bigfoot! Christ sometimes I think Timbo FATsano runs this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey everyone. Haven't been here in a while but wanted to wish you all a happy new year. We all know 2016 was a complete failure as far as bigfoot evidence. Let's hope 2017 is better!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your parents are the one who failed

      Delete
    2. I know you're disappointed but insults won't help to prove bigfoot. Let's make it happen in 2017!

      Delete
    3. ^ wanna bet? I have been insulting bigfoot into existance (between my ears)for approx 3yrs now,
      wankers!

      joe f

      Delete
  4. No one can prove absolutely either way. So really there is no argument.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bigfoot is a personal discovery. You can go into the forest and easily find them. You can capture footage and discover the truth for yourself and that alone is powerful. If, however, you decide to try to convince others you will likely become frustrated by the stupidity of the general public as many a researcher has before you. Find the truth for yourself, modify your outdoor activites as necessary and forgo all thoughts of sharing with others.

    ReplyDelete