Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Gamecam Footage From Bigfoot Sighting Location


The RMSO presents the fall footage from a game cam set up in a location of a bigfoot sighting. Check out what they captured.

29 comments:

  1. R M S O

    You know you know you know

    KEEPIN' UP THE GOOD WORK!

    ReplyDelete
  2. What's this? Some kind of game cam videos of deer...and deer...and deer by the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization? Isn't that Kelly Shaw's group? He sure likes showing videos of deer.

    Not interested. Done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ Head corn hole at Coalition of Turd Bangers. Trolling as usual. Too much snow for Steven Stupidfart to leave his bookstore and plant fake bigfoot evidence so he resorts to the next best thing. Online trolling and turd banging Dr Squat

      Delete
    2. What is this? Some blog about some creature called bigfoot? And some anonymous comment that is filled with homophobic phrases and juvenile scatological "humor" resulting in a post that is incomprehensible? I'm not interested. Done.

      Delete
    3. What's this? Some kind of accusing comment from some butthurt Kelly Shaw groupie or Kelly Shaw himself because he thinks it's from Steven S. making fun of a video which shows nothing but deer on a Bigfoot blog followed by a comment from someone who gets the joke and realizes how stupid this whole Bigfoot thing is and......

      Not interested. Done.

      Delete
    4. I never read anything you post here because I'm not interested.

      Delete
    5. what's this ? some trolls who belong at the ISF looney bin coming on here and wasting their time by talking about a subject they have little interest in
      Go away, not interested and done with you twonks

      Joe

      Delete
  3. Personally enjoy getting to see the wildlife in a place so many claim to see Bigfoot. Perhaps bigfoot doesn't exist and one of these animals is the mistaken side identity?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some hunters can go decades without seeing recognised creatures, maybe you should try and at least speak to someone who spends ten minutes of the day outside of their bedroom?

      Delete
    2. Maybe you should take ^ your own advice tosser.

      Joe

      Delete
    3. Sorry fake Joe, I know people who'd take you places that would make you cry!

      Delete
    4. Fake Joe actually didn't talk about blokes....weird.
      Haha, there are many places fake joe would cry is taken to.
      Imagine all the thousands of reports of bigfoot being three legged bears ? of course that would be ridiculous since most of the hunters who have sightings are experienced and could tell what a bear from many feet away and they all claim it was no bear

      Joe

      Delete
    5. 5:44 = GETTING TO SEE WILDLIFE?? YOU TOTAL IDIOT, THIS IS BIGFOOT EVIDENCE, NOT WILDLIFE EVIDENCE!
      Kelly Shaw's lack of evidence would certainly have you believe that Bigfoot doesn't exist!

      Delete
  4. No images of bigfoot.

    Not even an extinct mustelid.

    I have to wonder why Kelly Shaw is so eager to document his failures. Could it be that in his cargo cult concept of bigfooting he somehow interprets his failures as success?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Damn you've got a short memeory! Maybe it's so short, that you forget that you answer your own comments? http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
      http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
      http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
      http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
      http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
      http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
      http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI
      https://youtu.be/31iMxiZUqVc
      ... Enjoy pretending this never happened!

      Delete
  5. Hey Ikky, I was specifically referring to Kelly Shaw's latest video, you twit. You know, the one this whole thread is based on? The one that contains no images of bigfoot or martens. Surely the not-so-extinct marten reference should have been a further clue to that.

    On second thought, it probably just confused you. I've noticed you have a tendency to gloss over and misinterpret things you don't understand. Like what mustelid means. Then you jump straight to the wrong conclusion. Like you just did.

    Please try harder to keep up next time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That an easy mistake give your usual jig... And maybe you need to articulate yourself a little better?

      Delete
    2. Yes, Iktomi, your comments should be directed toward Kelly Shaw, for wasting everyone's time with ZERO EVIDENCE!

      EVIDENCE EVERYDAY ON MY CHANNEL!!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMlurxLmGH0

      Delete
  6. My usual jig?

    First of all, and on the topic or articulating better, the idiom is "gig", not jig. And my gig is to stay on topic. You are the one who consistently attempts to sidetrack when you are losing an argument.

    Second of all, it can't be that easy to mistake when everyone else got it. I'm thinking even Kelly Shaw himself got it. So why couldn't you?

    Thirdly, "usual"?

    That's another thing you are consistently wrong about. For some daft reason or other you think everyone who posts anonymously is the same person. Usually you accuse them of being "hants". Now I'm not sure if that's someone's name, or if it's some misspelled adjective (Though for the life of me I can't tell just what word you are trying to spell - possibly pants?), but in both cases you are, per usual, quite wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope! I meant JIG, as in dance?

      (Sigh)

      Losing an argument? I've never lost an argument against someone who's best method is to "forget" that the previous 100 exchanges have never occurred. And I know too well who I'm addressing, every time I address you.

      : )

      Delete
    2. And the ironic thing is, you misspelled the name "Haints".

      (Creased)

      Delete
  7. Sorry Ikky, but no, you do not get to weasel (or even coastal marten) your way out of this.

    The idiom is "your usual gig" not "your usual jig". Go ahead and look it up. Your grasp of English is not nearly as good as you smugly believe. Just like your grasp of everything else. And yet your ego won't let you admit your error in even that. You must lead a very empty life if you have this compulsion to prove yourself correct when you are so consistently wrong.

    As an example of this, your "hundreds of arguments" claim, where you once again demonstrate your tendency to think everyone posting anonymously is the same person. Instead of refuting my point, you only prove it.

    As to the correct spelling of Haints, why should I care about, or even know, the correct spelling of this person's name, especially when you, yourself, seem to have multiple ways of spelling it? Despite your repeated attempts to claim I and other anonymous posters are this Haints person, I have no clue who he is. Or possibly she, I really don't know. Nor do I particularly care. I wouldn't know of that name at all if you didn't repeatedly and incorrectly accuse others of being him.

    This may come as a surprise to you, but the small things and people who loom large in your petty little life are inconsequential to the rest of us. I could continue in this vein, but I have to give a lecture now and then prep students for the term finals.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. jig
      dʒɪɡ/
      noun
      1. a lively dance with leaping movements.
      2. a device that holds a piece of work and guides the tool operating on it.
      verb
      1. dance a jig.
      "he stood up and jigged in the cockpit"
      synonyms: bob up and down, leap up and down, jump up and down, spring up and down, skip, hop; More
      2. equip (a factory or workshop) with a jig or jigs.
      "the floor space was jigged and tooled to produce six fuselages a month"

      Something about a grasp of the English language? And nargh! I know your usual jig, and it's to rhetorically pretend like you haven't had physical evidence rubbed in your face a hundred times before, only to claim that no such thing exists. It's like you're attempting Jedi Mind Tricks or something, it really is fascinating to read every time. And before you start thinking you're all that important, whether you're this Haints chap or Mickey Mouse, NOBODY cares, let alone me. To me, you're all the same pseudosceptical anon that cannot think for himself, using the same pseudosceptical mantras when you're not simply flat out lying.

      There's a reason why you're so mad... And I can pretend to be a lecturer, astronaut, fireman, even Haints.

      Delete
    2. You know he will make up a sick joke involving #1, the verb. Which will likely lead to some tragically hilarious misspellings.

      Delete