World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
You better believe bitches!
THAT,, German immigrants are emptying thier bowels in children pools and masterbating in the hot tub,!! https://youtu.be/nKIGXOCoOyc
DIRTY KRAUTS ^HAA HAA HAAA LOL!AC collins
This to me is the most flimsiest evidence presented. When you have that heavily a forested area and a high elevation buffeted by strong winds you are going to have limbs down. You are naturally going to have a percentage of them forming what you may interpret as patterns. Now think logically - why would such a large creature as Bigfoot is reported to be, waste precious energy constructing such worthless (to them) structures when it would be needed just to obtain food to keep them alive in such a harsh environment? If fallen trees forming patterns are evidence for Bigfoot then we indeed have them in every heavily treed area.
Bigfoot are known to mark off their territory with stick structures and such. It takes less energy than having savage and bloody fights with encroachers.
Well, if you say so . . . ;)
The answer is simple curious.sasquatch are modern homo sapien that run around in -40 below zero totaly naked at speeds in exess of 45mph,not only that they have eyeshine,and can grow to 12Ft tall an weigh in at up to 1400lbs,not to mention a homo sapien that commonly vocalize in infrasound and are psychic that dematerialize into portals,,,,ect..sorry but my next door neighbor is a homo sapien,,sasquatch IS NOT!!AC collins.excuses below..
Native tree structures explained; https://youtu.be/dfUGatmZRb0Giant version, 4mins 30seconds; https://youtu.be/lJHec5buJCkMeasurements and estimates on Sasquatch dimensions, collected over the last 40 years in the Western U.S and Canada, were subjected to statistical analysis and extrapolation by scaling laws appropriate to primates and mammals. The study has yielded average population values for foot length and width, scaling factors of foot length to height, values for weight, plantar pressure, walking and running gait, speed, and a tentative growth curve as a function of time for the female of the species. The results suggest a substantial population with traits different from those of other higher primates and humans. The maximal speed that a Sasquatch is capable of attaining has not been reliably tracked, although many casual reports refer to observers driving in a vehicle parallel to a running Sasquatch. Before rejecting unbelievable sounding speeds or step intervals, it is well worth keeping human records in mind. For example, the world record walking speed over 20 km is about 11 mph (18 kph), the top running burst speed about 27 mph (43 kph), the longest single jump near 30’ (9 in), and the longest triple jump—in effect, three running steps—about 60’ (18 in), all this with a physique of decidedly smaller scale than that of a Sasquatch. I would estimate the top running speed of the Sasquatch to be near 35 mph (56 kph), the speed of a galloping horse."http://www.bfro.net/ref/theories/whf/fahrenbacharticle.htm"The height average for the sampled population is 7’ 10", derived from a combination of eye witness estimates and scaling from footprints."http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_FAQ.asp?id=585There are plenty of homo sapien sapiens that are psychic (applying a preternatural human capability to something that you're trying to deny is human, isn't very clever), and we are yet to fully understand what a wild human potentially three times the size of us can achieve... For example, why couldn't very, very long vocal chords create infrasound? Is there a bigger excuse that calling something paranormal because it can't be classified? I mean, plenty of good people attribute paranormal abilities to these creatures, but they tend to be knowers. And Fake AC Collins... You don't know much. Oh... And we all know you're a slow learner, but ANCIENT homo sapien.
I'll be back later to respond to what's been left here.
The most ancient homo sapien's are pygmys.dated to 170,000 yrs . and andre the giant coundnt even run 15 mph let alone jog! I admit I don't know much .But you Iktomi you don't know anything!!Schooled Chump!! Haa haa haa lol.AC collins
Only mouth breathing, booger eaters would use Andre the Giant as an example. How dumb are you exactly? I take that back, you're ridiculously dumb, you spend a majority of your day trolling a site whose subject matter you don't "believe". PS. It's obvious you find the subject interesting.
How about Shack chump ! The fool couldn't even break 20mphDude go change back to faketomi,, SCHOOLED JIVE TURKEY!! Haa haa haaa lol!AC(fake)collins.
To be honest the physical parameters for homo sapien is very narrow.. anything i listed @4:37 is outside the physical parameters of Homo sapien .maybe one or two might overlapp the parameters but for all?? NOPE AIN'T HAPPENING.NOT TO MENTION THE BEHAVIOURAL DIFFERENCES..the simple fact is that even homo Neanderthal is way out of the parameter of sasquatch((in behavior,culture, and anatomy),,,at best sasquatch is some type of "HYBRED" of some type!!! BUT HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN??? HELL NO FOOL!!Ahaaaa haaa haaa lolYOU GOTTA TRY HARDER CHUMP!!!AC(fake) collins
Go to hell jeorg vega ^
http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-ethiopia-addis-ababa-the-national-museum-the-skull-of-homo-sapiens-23212723.htmlhttp://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-homo-sapiens-idaltu-skull-addis-ababa-national-museum-ethiopia-61560540.htmlThese fossils differ from those of chronologically later forms of early H. sapiens, such as Cro-Magnon found in Europe and other parts of the world, in that their morphology has features, that show resemblances to more primitive African fossils, such as huge and robust skulls, yet a globular shape of the brain-case and the facial features typical of H. sapiens.Anthropologist Chris Stringer argued in a 2003 article in the journal Nature that "the skulls may not be distinctive enough to warrant a new subspecies name".Despite the archaic features, these specimens were argued to represent the direct ancestors of modern Homo sapiens sapiens which, according to the "recent African origin (RAO)" or "out of Africa" model, developed shortly after this period (Khoisan mitochondrial divergence dated not later than 110,000 BCE) in Eastern Africa. "The many morphological features shared by the Herto crania and AMHS, to the exclusion of penecontemporaneous Neanderthals, provide additional fossil data excluding Neanderthals from a significant contribution to the ancestry of modern humans."A 2005 potassium-argon dating of volcanic tuff associated with the Omo remains showed them to date from about 195,000 years ago, making them older than the idaltu fossils and the earliest known remains of anatomically modern humans.
Notice the skull, F-AC-E? Notice the time frame, F-AC-E?In the following link, you'll notice a discussion about the origin of anatomically modern Homo sapiens;http://youtu.be/XdP-Wjd1qSY... Here, Chris Stringer explains on the 4mins mark that in the lineage of both Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, we see anatomical and morphological traits in their fossil and genetic data that are linked to their far, far, earlier emergence from Homo Heidelbergensis. These are modern scientists conducting research on the theory that same species hominids can and DID have varying anatomy and morphology, yet were the same species. Knowing the subject matter and the data is important, it's how you develop theories in the most scienific manner. It's ok F-AC-E, you're learning. Slowly, but you're learning. So what is "Bigfoot" again exactly, just for us to try and get our heads around your blithering drivel? Is it paranormal, or a hybrid? You don't make much sense at all when you're angry...: )
Oh, and before I forget, in the link below I draw on examples of humans that have in the past enjoyed immense tolerance to the cold, as well as highlighting the fact that animals that have higher volume to surface-area ratio, means they lose less body heat. I think that covers everything... http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/true-stories-of-strange-and-unknown-x.html?m=0
#1 your 195,000 is more like 160,000 yrs bp ,also idaltu had gracil jaws (chins) extreme usage of fire and sophisticated tool construction,(arrow heads,hide scrapers and hand axes ect.)plus the largest male skull indcated a hight of 5-8,,, ps khoisan is a latter version of modern hss whilest pygmy mito dna dates back to 185,000yrs bp ..the fact remains you just blew your hypothesis out of the water YOU DUMB CLUCK! THANKS MAKING A FOOL OUT OF YOURSELF AND PROVING ME RIGHT!!HAAA HAAA HAA LOL! SCHOOLED!!AC(fake)collins
in regards to the artic fox and artic hare! YEPPERS THAT ABOUT SUMS IT UP!! ha ha ha.AC(fake)collins
How's d dovers native american skull dna test going??dont tell me the results are mongoloid,,(masai&3%neanderthal)as is all beringian ameracoidal'sas always !!ITS YOUR PLEASURE!AC(fake)collins
No, no, no, no, no, numtpy. You're not listening to facts. Here's another source;"It was originally though that this transitional species was to disappear within 10,000 years as full-blown Homo sapiens emerged in Africa, but it is known known that Homo sapiens appeared much earlier, by 195,000, so Homo sapiens idaltu must have been one of several contemporary variations which existed for a time.http://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesAfrica/HominidChronology6.htm#Homo%20sapiens%20idaltuSorry F-AC-E, I know you like to make up facts when your back's against the wall, but not only do we not know the average height of Idaltu, but nobody is outrightly suggesting that they are what's running around the PNW either. Just blowing your silly, embarrassingly dated ideas right out of the water, and showing you that as time goes on, we're unraveling more and more about our family tree. In Idaltu, we have an example of far more prehistoric morphological traits in a skull at the dawn of Homo sapiens. Also... Pick up a book for once in your pitiful attention seeking life, one particularly written by David Claerr called Sasquatch Tool Use. Most of the research done for it was from Mike Brookreson'a research area. And the only reason Sasquatch don't use fire, is because it kind of goes against the whole evasions thing? (Cringe) Natives have recognised this for a very long time. It's ok chump. You're learning. : )
STOP CHERRY PICKING CHUMP!HAAAA HAA HAA LOL!NOT VEGAS THE DOG.
HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! And now to Dover??? You really are a pathetic little man, aren't you? Deflecting like a desperate weed. If you've take the time to actually read the anthropologists take on the Humboldt skull..."Unusual features of the Humboldt Sink cranium, aside from the prominent brow ridge and glabellar development and the notably strong nuchal crest, are the low retreating forehead with post-orbital construction, and the true os inca, divided occipital, or interparietal bone, accompanied by by generally high sutural complexity with several Wormian bones in the lambdoid suture."To elaborate on this, the anthropologists studying the skull in 1967 drew upon many other unusual features, as well as the nuchel crest, that according to them is not found in anatomically modern humans. The brain case lacks frontal lobe capacity and the manner in which the skull narrows behind the eye sockets and sloped forehead are examples of these. Also, you'll notice that the anthropologists states that; “... Eastern Asiatic subdivision of the general Upper Paleolithic Homo sapiens.” ... That's profound. You'll notice that the ideas posed about the unusual features of the skull have been consistent with the things that anthropologists DO know about palaeolithic specimens (the evidence). This totally eradicates the lie and special pleading that these traits are culturally motivated cranial deformations.And nobody knows where the Humboldt skull is for DNA testing... Let me guess, they've done that now too? (Creased)
Jeez, when you're embarrassing yourself with paranormal claims, you don't seem to get a break, eh F-AC-E? No wonder you're so angry all the time.
Well i always thought the EXACT SAME THING ABOUT YOU "BRU"ha ha maybe. Tommarrow i will humiliate you in regards to chromosome biased pair count to prove to the good folks here at the bfe of the impossibility of bigfoot being hss due to physical performance parameters and the genetic reasons why!!UDIGG?
Oh no, the humiliation... You do realise that I've just taken apart, point for point, everything that you've dribbled on to this comment section, right? You've posted that nonsense before now and I've taken it apart. Would you like me to post it? Give me two minutes, I'll find the comment section...
He we go! Here's where you got your backside handed to you about it!http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/spectral-motion-just-released-some.html... Jeez! Please don't humiliate me! Tee-hee!!
bifoots are for kids you silly wabbit
some of the best stuff out there keep up the good work! shribes
You win,I for one will check out "AQUEOUS"!!!
oh and.....AQUEOUS BITCHES!!!!
Lot of tall trees for13,000ft