Wednesday, October 5, 2016

The Chattering Sasquatch


A hunter has an encounter with a sasquatch in British Columbia. He says the bigfoot creature was chattering to itself, sort of like a bear does when angry.

258 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Just think, if it weren't for Chicks lies about Abholi, then today she likely wouldn't be trolled. I bet she regrets it now.

      Delete
    2. Calling a nice lady a liar ^

      When you grow up you're going to be a democrat for sure

      MMC

      Delete
    3. ^ There are no adults in today`s democratic party.

      Delete
    4. http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/11/world/internet-trolling/

      "Some trolls think that spending your time posting condolence messages on Facebook to someone you've never met is weird, and grounds for being trolled. They think they're teaching people a lesson, teaching people how to behave online."

      "They want to inject their own emotional turmoil into other people by luring them into negativity. It's a way for them to feel some kind of control or power over their own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense."

      Delete
    5. Just think... If you had any belly or confidence in what you spout, you'd post your name.

      Eh Stuey?

      Delete
    6. Youre the best Iktomi,undefeated in this forum of miscreants.

      Delete
    7. Hello Mazzini! Hope you are well bro!!

      Delete
    8. Is your real name lktomi?

      Delete
    9. According to you, my name isn't a mystery... And I don't use "Iktomi" in a remotely sadistic way.

      P*ssy.

      Delete
    10. But someone who had "any belly of confidence or integrity" would post his real name. Is your real name lktomi?

      Delete
    11. Anyone would think your getting a little angy there lktomi. You should really take a break from this bigfoot stuff and maybe cool your heals. You seem upset.

      Delete
    12. Nope! But you know my real name... Don't you?

      : )

      Maybe if I was to use that avatar to post racist, homophobic, sexist filth, then maybe I could be lumped into the bracket of lacking belly. Does this mean you have no confidence in the things you publish?

      Delete
    13. Anyone would think your upset. But you have labeled yourself "king troll" in the past. And one troll is the same as the next. Trolls troll for sadistic pleasure remember? And you titled yourself king troll?

      You also made the statement above that if trolls had integrity they would post there real name. Since lktomi isn't your real name, then that must mean you don't believe in what your saying and that you don't have integrity.

      If you believe in bigfoot and your statements, post your real name. Im not asking what others think your name is, im telling you to post your real name if you believe in your statements.

      Delete
    14. You're not using your real name either, Joe. Stop being a hypocrite. Using the same username and avatar pic hardly constitutes using your real name.

      Delete
    15. Ha,I like to preach but not practice, That's a win for you guys

      Delete
    16. Actually... I've named myself "Troll of Trolls", and only ever required the likes of you to refer to me as "King Troll". And considering your hate campaign, frequent crying for my removal, paragraphs about how nasty I am, all stem from having a bit of your own medicine... It makes it all the more sweet! But 6:56... You're not addressing what's being put to you, deer boy. You know my name, don't you? Isn't it the worst kept secret as to who I am? And I'll say it again... Maybe if I was to use that avatar to post racist, homophobic, sexist filth, then maybe I could be associated with the likes of you.

      If I had a family member that did what you did, I wouldn't know what to do. I would be so ashamed. Don't take it from "the nasty Bigfooter", take it from anyone with an ounce of moranity... People who tend to have been shown affection when growing up.

      Oh and Don! Again Don comes to the aid of the resident racist homophobic, mysogenist. Just watch him have the biggest of tantrums when you then suggest he keeps poor internet company. How many times have you been busted using anon, Don?

      Delete
    17. So sweet to see a troll cry about getting trolled-poetic ^

      Delete
    18. Not coming to the aid of anyone, Joe. I was simply pointing out your hypocrisy.

      Delete
    19. "take it from anyone with an ounce of moranity... "

      Yeah, you are quite the moron.

      Delete
    20. Don, as usual... You were most certainly aiding the racist troll. It's not a good look after you bleeped out your profession in the most petulant of tantrums the last time someone suggested that was suspicious.

      Just remember why you've written your name like that next time you want to point out someone else's typos.

      Delete
    21. See how I admitted I'm wrong but then used everyone does it as an excuse?Yep, pretty petty

      Delete
    22. I wonder why Don never points out your terrible grammar? Maybe you've got a little fan?

      Delete
    23. ^ has CSE grade 5 in English to back him up

      Delete
    24. I think you needed to add a full stop at the end of that?

      Delete
    25. Getting pretty petty and desperate now,yes I am,so snippy of me ,losing argument, getting angry,can't ever be wrong

      Delete
    26. Wow LKTOMI is blowing lktomi the f#ck out!!!!

      Delete
    27. Anyone would think your a little upset lktomi. I guess dmaker tore you up even more than i thought.

      Delete
    28. You need some commas in that sentence bro. Something about "CSE grade 5 English"?

      Delete
    29. Yep, petty, snippy, angry,sad

      Delete
    30. Spacing With Punctuation. With a computer, use only one space following periods, commas, semicolons, colons, exclamation points, question marks, and quotation marks. The space needed after these punctuation marks is proportioned automatically. Use no spaces on either side of a hyphen.
      Spacing with Punctuation | Punctuation Rules - The Blue ...
      www.grammarbook.com › punctuation

      Delete
    31. So angry,give up arguing magic monkey man, just pick on others now

      Delete
    32. Nwah, is the troll crying about being picked on?

      "Magic monkey men" can't be all that "magic" if they make mistakes like leaving tracks.

      Delete
    33. But Khat says they are magic lizard men,getting hard to walk tightrope of stupidity

      Delete
    34. Khat knows how to use spacing properly.

      Delete
    35. Khat is insane, I'm sorry I friended her but I think she's a witch so I'm stuck

      Delete
    36. @6:33 You had a one word insult to pull off and managed to bungle it up and spell it wrong. "fagget"? Thanks for the comedy!


      Morning Iktomi and MMC! Thanks for taking up for me up there! Iktomi, you've had Stewey trotting all morning on those stubby thick legs. I do enjoy watching you put him through the paces.

      Delete
    37. Poor little chick has to thank lktomi for taking up for her. And it seems the joke is on you chick. If he would have spelled that with an "o" instead of an "e", it would have been whited out. So it appears the troll is operating at a level way over your head.

      Delete
    38. type it in and see for yourself chick. And we will all laugh as you try.

      Delete
    39. Good Morning Iktomi and Chick, I see you are having to do schooling again as usual. That's a lousy job when you don't get paid for it.
      Troll, I too am sorry if you friended me on FB. Unlike the awesome Superfriends here onsite, I simply do not have the time nor good will to give you proper English lessons for free. So do us both a favor and delete yourself from my friends list asap please.
      About creating multiple Iktomi profiles? I can totally understand why you need to do that Troll. Low self esteem and abuse issues. Leading you to suffer from from MPD.
      Thank you for finally admitting it to everyone here onsite. You simply need one Iktomi profile to teach for each of your personalities! It's alright, you are among friends. We understand how much you admire and res'pect Iktomi and are too shy to come right out and tell him. We get it.
      I think this is a big step for Troll and henceforth he doesn't have to try so desperately for your attention Iktomi. LOL

      Have a great day Iktomi, Chick, MMC, PIB and TK

      Delete
    40. Thanks Khat,will you tell us all about Crapturd Latrine again, don't hold back you good upstanding Christian women, with a penis ha, ha, ha...hope you were able to follow my poor english

      Delete
    41. Aaah guh guh guh. . Penisk

      Delete
    42. Booom!!! Chick and Khat, two ladies (which the misogynistic psycho troll is gonna hate), have just obliterated Stuey.

      That was beautiful.

      Delete
    43. Say Khat, as long as you're here you can apologize for feeding delusions to the already delusional Leon , you should be smart enough to realize that's irresponsible and dangerous, I think even the superfriends would agree how foolish and unwise that is

      Delete
    44. Oops seems I support that dangerous game, we'll hope it doesn't come crashing down

      Delete
  2. Too all my troll peeps. I really would like to see an exact duplicate lktomi account. Make sure and use his current avatar photo as well. The more accounts the better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. to f/ck,in rtard.ed to mak]] yor own?

      Delete
    2. Hey man I'm on it.  As soon as my sister gives my fu/king crayons back, I got the avatar thing dialed.

      Delete
    3. Id like to second the motion 12:16. We need some exact duplicate lktomi accounts. And also:

      There once was a man named Joerg
      He swallowed my flagella like borgs
      He used his pubes
      To shine my shoes
      And ate poop on a shingle.

      Delete
    4. Talking to yourself is a bit weird right?   12:43 @ 12:16?

      Delete
    5. I don't come here often, but i have to agree with 12:16. I think we should see more duplicate lktomi accounts.

      Delete
    6. You come here more than often. You come here everyday.  And if you were smart enough you'd done that by now.  The other troll was much smarter than you.  He knew how to do that already.

      Delete
    7. I have to say that i agree with 12:16. I too have rarely commented on this blog site, but i feel things would be much better if we had some extra lktomi accounts. I know there are others who agree a well.

      Delete
    8. Many people who don't come here often, agree, we need to create more Iktomi accounts... because apparently one does not sastify your desire for more.

      Delete
    9. I personally don't care if a woman puts up a fight. If she dresses a certain way, then she wants it. And im gonna give it to her.

      BB

      Delete
    10. Not with that 2" of disappointment you've got. She will just think your swatting imaginary flies or having a seizure or something.

      Delete
    11. IktomiMonday, October 3, 2016 at 8:16:00 AM PDT
      7:43... I at least no the difference between monkeys and apes.


      Oh dear ... typo ? .. or plain stupidity ?

      Hahahah hahahah hahahah

      Delete
    12. Isn't it funny how many anons don't come here often but all turn up at the same time lol xx

      Delete
  3. H
    A
    H
    A
    H
    A
    H
    A

    C
    O
    C
    K
    S
    U
    C
    K
    I
    N
    G

    I
    K
    T
    O
    M
    I

    J
    O
    E

    F
    A
    R
    T
    F
    A
    R
    T

    HAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, Joetomi just got blown the f#ck out.

      Delete
    2. MMC at 1:21 just got his as@ handed to him!!
      HAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    3. Look again shlt for brains ^

      Delete
    4. Joe thinks 10ft monkeys are running around the woods - though there is no proof whatsoever - despite his nightly "knee-time" visit to his Lord - where he prays for something,nay anything,on the morrow that will give him respite from his nemesis,reality - alas,the only dawn that ever arrives is groundhog day...heh heh heh.

      Delete
    5. Science has been used to verify a list of evidence that points to a creature with the same widely reported anatomy as "Bigfoot" leaving its sign on the environment of the US & Canada. The data extrapolated from that evidence over a 40 year period, gives the creature leaving that evidence an average height of 7.5 feet tall. None of this data would be readily available of course, if the creature in question didn't exist.

      Now... Please me all about this hoaxing conspiracy of yours?

      Delete
    6. No one has mentioned a conspiracy, of course other than yourself.

      Delete
    7. But isn't "Bigfoot" the product of hoaxing? That's right... Quite a ridiculous idea isn't it?

      Delete
    8. No its the product of simpletons, such as yourself

      Delete
    9. Argh right! So are these "simpletons" all in on this conspiracy?

      Delete
    10. Again, no one is mentioning a conspiracy but you. You seem agitated. Anyone would think your havin a meltdown.

      Delete
    11. Google squatch skeletons you fools

      Delete
    12. But what about all these "simpletons"? So you don't adhere to the drivel that this topic is the product of hoaxing? I wonder how quickly you'll forget how ridiculous such an idea is when you're trying to explain away the evidence I reel off?

      Delete
    13. I guess I'll keep wondering since my evidence is really just my made up theories

      Delete
    14. Nothing made up about a cast that can clonk you around the head. Haven't you worked out how to copy avatars yet? Not a very clever troll, are you?

      Delete
    15. Yes, no one is as clever as me,my name and avatar shall be put on my tombstone as a footnote in foolery

      Delete
    16. And to that pesky avatar... A little tricky getting it copied, eh?

      Delete
    17. So proud of avatar, a milestone of my sad life, hope someone besides Dr Squatch produces a Bigfoot, please, please

      Delete
    18. Please be impressed by my avatar

      Delete
    19. It's impressive enough to stump you... A little tricky?

      Delete
    20. Concentrate on avatar Bigfoot argument lost

      Delete
    21. Did I miss the part where you actually addressed the evidence for once?

      Delete
    22. Deflect from stupid avatar, back to magic monkey man

      Delete
    23. I seem to be waiting on a counter argument on the posts I made about "monkey men"?

      You finally got your spacing right but forgot to use a full stop.

      Delete
    24. Yes, pick on grammar and deflect from avatar and magical monkey men

      Delete
    25. Iktomi should get the pay your grammar teachers received when they passed you on F's.

      Delete
  4. OMG Michael Merchant has lost his mind!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swDj2gCHDQA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course he lost his mind, he supports Utah Sasquatch, who has ZERO proof!

      Delete
    2. Its been quite some time now, has Utah Sasquatch gotten any Bigfoot imagery yet?

      No?

      Its way past embarrassing now. Its the Coolest Cooler of Bigfootery. Collect tons of money while dropping videos of maps with circles and arrows and tactical military jargon... and then don't find jack.

      Delete
    3. omg flat earth

      poor bastard

      Delete
    4. Exactly 4:44, he will Hoax, mark may words!! Happens every time a researcher gets called out for lack of evidence.
      I think he actually got a new camera with his Go-fund-me $...I asked on his channel, but he didn't reply back.

      Delete
    5. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 7:12:00 AM PDT

      Oh, I also forgot to mention that Bigfoot blur the whole forest so that's the reason I can't focus my very expensive camera,you know. ..because of Bigfoot

      Delete
    6. Blur the whole forest huh.....WHAT A COMPLETE IDIOT!

      For the 6th time, I have at least 1,00 video's that make you look even more stupid (If that's even possible)

      Delete
    7. Pretty sure you're Matt trolling me for hits, because no one is this stupid!

      Done with you!

      Delete
    8. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 8:39:00 AM PDT

      Goodbye, no one will miss me or my "1,00" blurry crap shots, where is my camera reciept?

      Delete
    9. You never answered my accusation...Have you ever been in the woods, and do you own a camera?

      Delete
    10. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 9:48:00 AM PDT

      I thought I was leaving, a good Christian should keep his word

      Delete
    11. I'm done with you on the blurry topic.

      Have you been in the woods, and do you have a camera.

      Delete
    12. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 10:19:00 AM PDT

      Deflect from my blurry non evidence dog and squirrel closeups presented as Bigfoot evidence evidence, talk about woods , no one but me has ever been in the woods behind Shoprite

      Delete
    13. Yeah, you answered my question!

      BTW, the last several pics posted here are 100x more blurry than my worst pics? Why don't you comment on those?
      Yeah, it's obvious.

      Delete
    14. You deflect my question, then accuse me of deflecting??
      You deflected my original question on how I get squirrels and Dogs to stay motionless? And you must think I rent Dogs from the kennel, IDIOT!

      Delete
    15. I just admitted I photograph dogs and squirrels, they're blurry because they don't hold still, okay, since I'm a good christian I'm going to leave here like I said I would

      Delete
  5. So a bigfooter believes the earth is flat. Not surprising. Both ludicrous ideas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nothing more ludicrous than someone claiming he's so sure of his ideas, only to have to try and reinforce these ideas every day of his life. One day you might become a little contended in your drivel, feel a bit better about yourself... but it won't be while I'm around to remind you how crazy your conspiracy theory is.

      Delete
    2. Is joe fltzgerald, dare i say it, a flat earther?

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Debating a denialist is akin to a biology evolutionist debating a a flat earther. The denialist will focus on his own unsubstantiated belief and be unable to digest any counter argument (however substantiated with reliable data). This serves as an essential level of self-worth and belonging to a theory group that can provide some sense of community, whilst it also avoids the awkward reality of countering information that is without countering data. If there wasn't such thing as "Bigfoot" and there wasn't even cause for all the effort; they wouldn't be here... Would they? My analogy would fit too... Their theory group is a quasi-religion based around cognitive biases, and for all their faith that they practice the scientific method; they actually stand against it.

      "Cognitive Biases are systematic errors that predispose one's thinking in favor of a certain viewpoint over other viewpoints. The scientific method developed, among other reasons, to counteract these biases in order to derive objective knowledge."

      Delete
    5. Way to go, I'm talking about myself in a lecture to others, wow,elephant ass in the room there

      Delete
    6. Your impersonations are almost as bad as your generally knowledge of this subject.

      Is that meant to be trolling?

      Delete
    7. The fact is that all my so called knowledge is just theories I've created, when science denies them I call them hacks

      Delete
    8. Sorry, you might have a ten year old's understanding of how science works, but science is a tool and has been used to verify all sorts of evidence ranging from biological and forensic.

      Delete
    9. ^ You know nothing of how a professional,in any field of endeavour,works.

      Delete
    10. 7:39... Argh yes! I suppose there's another bipedal primate, twice the size of normal human primates running around, other than Sasquatch.

      7:39... I think you need some spacing between those commas mate. Someone could get a PhD trying to understand what you're trying to say.

      Delete
    11. ^ Not at all - I suggest it is the large spacing between your ears that fools you...learn basic English you moron and you`ll have a leg to stand on - as it is you`re merely showing yourself to be an idiot with a lack of knowledge - and you`re still very sore for being caught yesterday for your sloppy error...as always.

      Delete
    12. True,my desperation is shown

      Delete
    13. let`s see it again shall we - just so we remember exactly what you are incapable of -

      IktomiMonday, October 3, 2016 at 8:16:00 AM PDT
      7:43... I at least no the difference between monkeys and apes.

      Now go and learn basic English - you sad and bitter fool.

      Hahaha hahaha

      Delete
    14. 7:48...
      "Spacing With Punctuation. With a computer, use only one space following periods, commas, semicolons, colons, exclamation points, question marks, and quotation marks. The space needed after these punctuation marks is proportioned automatically. Use no spaces on either side of a hyphen."
      Spacing with Punctuation | Punctuation Rules

      IktomiMonday, October 3, 2016 at 10:48:00 AM PDT
      I know I'm stopping, but using Google Chrome? Type in "know" and follow the authors of comments with the word "know" in. You'll notice four comments that are mine in this very comment section.
      "Chimpanzees aren’t monkeys. Chimps are instead great apes, belonging to a family of mammals known as Hominidae. Other hominids include gorillas, orangutans, bonobos, and humans."

      https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/leprechaun-bigfoot-caught-on-camera.html?showComment=1475569048791

      Delete
    15. Sad,sad ,petty, angry, must always win

      Delete
    16. Spacing mate. No wonder you can't work out how to copy an avatar.

      Delete
    17. Deflect from life, declare avatar greatest ever

      Delete
    18. ^ 8:12 - you`re merely proving your stupidity now - you`ve no money or job or qualifications - and consistently fail to reach basic standards of English...you truly are a jerk.


      Hahaha hahaha

      Delete
    19. let`s see it again shall we - just so we remember exactly what you are incapable of -

      IktomiMonday, October 3, 2016 at 8:16:00 AM PDT
      7:43... I at least no the difference between monkeys and apes.

      Now go and learn basic English - you sad and bitter fool.

      Hahaha hahaha

      Delete
    20. 8:18... This was your rally to arms about copying my avatar. What a useless troll you are.

      8:19... Spacing With Punctuation. With a computer, use only one space following periods, commas, semicolons, colons, exclamation points, question marks, and quotation marks. The space needed after these punctuation marks is proportioned automatically. Use no spaces on either side of a hyphen.
      Spacing with Punctuation | Punctuation Rules - The Blue ...
      www.grammarbook.com › punctuation

      Delete
    21. Deflect from magic monkey man , losing argument

      Delete
    22. Wow,Joe`s getting blown away.

      Desperate to escape the monkey on his back he`s deflecting at all cost.

      How many times is that today ?

      Delete
    23. Its all he knows how to do. When getting pounded, he just deflects or tells people how angry they are.

      Delete
    24. Did someone even attempt to address my comments on the subject?

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!

      Gotta love it.

      Delete
    25. Need constant attention ha ha ha

      Delete
  6. Couple of facts for the brain dead:

    1. The earth is not flat
    2. Bigfoot does not exist

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Bigfoot doesn't exist"... Yet you have to come here and check on its existence every day of your life.

      Delete
    2. Heres another fact. People can be interested in fictional ideas while knowing full well they are fictional. Hell theres multi billion dollar industries based on it.

      Delete
    3. The word "facts" in your comments is such a travesty. I have a lot of friends, a couple who are even qualified in biology, who don't for one second believe in "Bigfoot" but wouldn't need to reinforce that because they are confident about that premise.

      Sorry kid, your actions have always spoken far louder than anything you have to say.

      Delete
    4. Your first lie is that you have "alot of friends". Now thats laughable!!

      Delete
    5. I'll take that as a capitulation on your part. Don't let "Bigfoot" worry you so much... It'll eat away at you.

      Delete
    6. Tell us that billi ape story dmaker swatted down yesterday.

      Delete
    7. Argh yes!! A man sized primate... Reported to exist by indigenous peoples for the past few decades... That was largely ignored by western scientists... Only to be discovered in the late 1990's when these scientists eventually made a consorted effort...

      I sure got "swatted" with that one alright!

      Delete
    8. Can you tell us about how the scientist established it was real by using the dna of a hair. Please tell us that one.

      Delete
    9. That's actually unnecessary... DNA is always extracted from newly discovered primates, notably the hair. Would you like a ten year old's guide to zoology to clarify that?

      Delete
    10. I'm not bringing that back up because dMaker won that argument

      Delete
    11. Actually, I'm more than happy to bring up the fact that Sasquatch, an unclassified primate, has the same frequency of evidence as that of classified primates that are studied in their habitat.

      Why wouldn't I?

      : )

      Delete
    12. I don't because there's no verified scientific proof of Sasquatch, I've said so myself, stupid hack scientists

      Delete
    13. Actually... I applaud scientists. They've managed to scientifically verify the evidence I can reference. Evidence of a creature who shares the exact same anatomy as what is being widely reported in "Sasquatch".

      Delete
    14. Or people mucking around the woods

      Delete
    15. Argh of course! For thousands of years, there has been a culture hopping secret society of gorilla suit wearing conspirators all mucking around in the woods. These people, though finding each others cultural customs undesirable, and spanning from a time when they didn't even know what a non-human primate looked like, have in fact managed to cheat experts with fake biological species traits that span decades and States, in lottery win fashion too!

      Delete
    16. So you deny a multi billion pound industry for fans of fiction exists because your friends arent interested in bigfoot?

      Delete
    17. You should see me on Harry Potter sites

      Delete
    18. Nope! There opinion has no bearing on what I think, because like you they haven't familiarised themselves with the facts. It doesn't look good on you that you should continue to deny when you've got evidence rammed down your throats every day of your life.

      Argh right! For thousands of years, there has been a culture hopping secret society of gorilla suit wearing conspirators all out to contribute to a "multi billion pound industry" for fiction fans. These people, though finding each others cultural customs undesirable, and spanning from a time when they didn't even know what a non-human primate looked like, have in fact managed to cheat experts with fake biological species traits that span decades and States, in lottery win fashion too!

      Incredible.

      Delete
    19. Invisible magic human primates from the Bible, Khat says so

      Delete
    20. ... Irrelevant really when whatever they are, they are shown to exist via the physical sign they leave.

      Delete
    21. So I admit to Khat Hansen's magical bible stories then try to deflect from them, sad, petty ,angry

      Delete
    22. You don't know the first things about Khat's theories.

      Spacing mate... Go back to school.

      Delete
    23. Agreeing with Khat hurts my argument but have no friends must defend woo and science, be a Dr like Squatch and Johnson, really getting hurt here

      Delete
    24. "Sasquatch, an unclassified primate, has the same frequency of evidence as that of classified primates that are studied in their habitat."

      Okay, let's go with that. With all of the ponderous evidence claimed why is there not a concerted effort by the mainstream scientific community to seek out the Sasquatch? The answer to me is simple - it's the Bigfoot advocates themselves. Let me explain.

      When citing evidence a few experts in their fields are always mentioned as professionals who support the existence of Sasquatch and back it with their findings. If the evidence they support is that good, why do they not individually or together submit a paper to a recognized scientific paper proving such? Why do they all not get together hold a press conference and explain to the world that they have strong evidence and that mainstream science is ignoring them? I'm sure informed of such news the public would react and demand that it be thoroughly investigated. But here's the other side of the coin. After years have passed since the PG film and countless hoaxes and weak attempts such as the Melba Ketchum fiasco, the general public now considers it (rightfully) as a myth. Adding to this disbelief is EIGHT seasons of the woefully named Finding Bigfoot show producing nothing of value. This show has the best opportunity to convince the public that there was truly merit to these claims but it has reduced the subject to a endless joke. On top of this we read constantly right here of the most wildest of claims. The one I distinctly remember is Khat Hansen making a claim of Bigfoot skulls. When I inquired about it I was summarily dismissed by her. Now I'm sure everyone realizes that if we have a skull that can be examined then the wheels of investigative science would surely start moving which is exactly what happened with the Bili ape and I quote from Wikipedia:

      " When Karl Ammann, a Swiss photographer and anti-bushmeat campaigner, first visited the region in 1996, he was looking for gorillas, but instead discovered a skull that had dimensions like that of a chimpanzee, but with a prominent crest like that of a gorilla."

      All these amateur researchers seem to rather dismiss each other's evidence than to join together and collaborate each other's findings. Why should mainstream science recognize them and their evidence when they can't even agree among themselves? If they fail to get official recognition then the Bigfoot advocates have not the skeptics who ask the questions to blame but merely themselves.

      I'm absolutely convinced that Bigfoot is not a zoological mystery but a social and psychological one. Bring us a skull (apparently someone supposedly knows where one or two are) and I will gladly recant my statements.

      Delete
    25. If it's "woo science", you'll have no issue finding at least one "decent scientific" argument against it then?

      Delete
    26. Joe, the multi billion pound industry i was refering to is not bigfooting. Silly man.

      Delete
    27. I agree with Khat because I am lonely and want a friend. This is the only place in the world where anyone respects me. At least here I have the respect of 5 or 6 weirdos and a couple of psychopathic lunatics. That is more than I get in the real world.

      Delete
    28. I'm not finding one decent scientific argument supporting it, will deflect by yelling at Curious because he wrote long thing, only I copy and paste long things

      Delete
    29. Just because I don't understand the difference between claimed and proven, does not make me stupid. There are plenty of other things that make me stupid, too.

      Delete
    30. I think I'm getting some great insight to myself, please everyone cut and paste my avatar comments for future reference

      Delete
    31. Curious... though it's been addressed too many times to count, I'll respond to your comment soon.

      Delete
    32. At times I do see parallels with belief in Bigfoot and religion. Both have beliefs in the existence of something that science cannot verify. Both claim evidence that science does not accept. Both claim eyewitness accounts (Jesus, Allah or God of your choice appearing before them). Both have a multitude of adherents who believe in the same basic principle (existence) but differ greatly on many points of interpretation. Both hold a belief that will not be changed no matter how strong the argument against it.

      Is this idea absolutely solid? No - but it certainly is interesting and makes one think. I would be curious as to how many have a strong belief in Bigfoot and are religious as well.

      Delete
    33. Curious, I kind of foreseen what you were looking to post last night. I like to think I have a decent idea of your mindset these days and what I posted last night kind of explained this on a couple of levels.

      I believe that the reason these advocates don't get together and submit a paper on the existing evidence, is more than likely that the current state of accumulative evidence falls short of the requirement of extraordinary evidence, for an extraordinary idea. For example... The track castings that were used to track the Bili Ape for a whole year required no DNA for classification before hand. Yes, Bili Ape tracks just look like that of a very large chimp, but the track impressions of a Sasquatch look like that of a very large human; both are primates, but one has far greater repercussions for scientific history than the other. Even though you don’t have a means of classifying what that bipedal primate is, the objective outcome is you still have the anatomical impression of an unclassified bipedal primate that can easily be falsifiably tested to scientific standards. However, as I mentioned previously, it is the extraordinary nature of what this evidence entails that is in fact what's holding back the requirement of subsequent mainstream investigative measures. It means that until extraordinary evidence surfaces (a body), the subject isn't going to draw the attention of a majority of mainstream scientists who would only then be in a position to become aware of the many evidences that preceded it. Without this, few will see beyond the hoaxing and pop culture. It's a very detrimental circle that can be simplified as the requirement of extraordinary evidence without the extraordinary effort it would require to source it. The cart before the horse. Another important thing to note, is that when mainstream scientists are interested in studying the topic, unless they are already established then they have careers and credibility to look out for.

      The general public which accounts for people in all professions (including mainstream scientists), have "flag ships" like Finding Bigfoot as the main mainstream output, which would make anyone remotely intelligent cynical. I'm not ignorant enough to think I talk on behalf of anyone. But unfortunately, the majority of people who believe in the existence of this creature watch that show, and it's no coincidence that they have their knowledge of the evidence for this subject embodied in that programme. Hoaxes always get massive publicity and when people are already suspicious of the credibility of the subject, they'll settle very quickly for an uncountered "debunking" due to the "extraordinary" nature of what's being proposed. However, should these people listen to the actual experts' counter opinions to these shoddy "debunkings", they'll realise very quickly that the evidence is reliable by consistent scientific standards. The problem is the only people who realise this are those willing to put in the time to look at it. A prime example of this is the stuff on dermals. So many "sceptics" claiming they rest on the high standards of scientific absolutes, yet they are happy to lessen these standards and rest on what someone grossly unqualified puts forth rather than listening to what the actual experts say.

      Delete
    34. "All these amateur researchers seem to rather dismiss each other's evidence than to join together and collaborate each other's findings. Why should mainstream science recognize them and their evidence when they can't even agree among themselves? If they fail to get official recognition then the Bigfoot advocates have not the skeptics who ask the questions to blame but merely themselves."
      This is probably the most agreeable thing I've read from you, however, contrary to what you would prefer people believe has been verified... Maintaining that a phenomena that sports scientific supporting data is merely the product of faith, without presenting a single equivalent piece of countering scientific data, is pretty audacious. It means that you rest on the aspect of FAITH that such data isn't authentic and is as belief based and religious like as you can ever point to. It simply comes down to the fact that to suggest that thousands of years of cultural and contemporary reports that are supported by physical evidence are the result of hoaxes and misidentification, is a bigger leap of faith than anything you can reference.

      The Virgin Mary don't leave tracks.

      Delete
  7. 7:20 - but you`ve no actual evidence of that have you.No verified or accepted evidence of that and all you have to "prove" your belief is something you`ve read or seen on youtube;you`ve never been into the woods yourself or even met anybody who has - and so your belief is akin to the belief of a child looking forwards to the coming morning after the tooth fairy has visited.

    Oh no - Schooled again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry... You'll "school" me when you actually address the evidence and demonstrate it isn't authentic. Considering peoooe ten times cleverer than you haven't managed that yet, it's not looking good for you.

      Who needs belief when they have evidence to be convinced by?

      Delete
    2. Not that I've shown it to be authentic but that's not my problem, Rick Dyer had a Bigfoot body

      Delete
    3. Nothing more profound that repeatable scientific evidence. One day when you learn the difference between chimps and monkeys, I may elaborate on that for you.

      Delete
    4. Repeatable but no scientific confirmation of Sasquatch

      Delete
    5. Confirmed by the manner of its repeatability. Unknown to mainstream scientists who require extraordinary evidence.

      Delete
    6. Nothing much within the bigfoot world has been repeated.

      Oh,aside from the hoaxes...yes,they`ve been repeated many times.

      Delete
    7. Like physical evidence, oh this wicked circle

      Delete
    8. If the ridge characteristics in dermatoglyphics are consistent with other examples from Sasquatch footprints, are verified in collaboration with tens of scientists who have determined anatomy like heels, ankles, and Achilles' tendons... And are consistent with casts over a period of 50 years (after examining hundreds of alleged Sasquatch footprints), then this is repeatable scientific evidence. There are ways of testing biological evidence in the many hair samples found at locations of alleged Sasquatch activity, notably primatology and field biology in comparing against known primates' uniform morphology. If repeated samples are all morphologically congruent (ruling out hoaxing), and are definitively indistinguishable from classified human and non-human primates but uniquely uniform... Then again you have repeatable scientific evidence.

      8:14... Are you aware of how terrible your comments look before pressing "publish"?

      8:14... No, like a body.

      Delete
    9. Lashing out, looking bitter and angry

      Delete
    10. Oh dear - I know it makes you SO angry that I`m going to post it for you again - hahahaha - excuse my sick sense of enjoyment ,hahahahaha


      IktomiMonday, October 3, 2016 at 8:16:00 AM PDT
      7:43... I at least no the difference between monkeys and apes.


      Hahaha hahaha hahahaha hahahahaha

      oh you angry boy

      Delete
    11. Angry? I'm waiting for an counter argument up top bro, ha ha ha ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    12. Wow, Joe`s getting the f#ck blown away.

      How many times is that today ?

      Delete
    13. Wow... I actually came back to see if anyone had attempted to counter my comment about repeatable evidence. What was I thinking? At least one of the psychos finally managed to use commas and full stops in a sentence.

      Delete
    14. Repeatably crappy "evidence."

      Delete
    15. Please pay attention to Iktomi, you are making him sad and desperate

      Delete
  8. IktomiMonday, October 3, 2016 at 8:16:00 AM PDT
    7:43... I at least no the difference between monkeys and apes.


    Oh dear !!

    hahaha hahaha hahaha

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good times, good times, actually like and respect Iktomi

    ReplyDelete