Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Scientist Shares Some Of His Sasquatch Evidence Collection


Scientist and bigfoot buff, John Mionczynski, opens up his storage building and shares some of the evidence he has collected over the years. Check it out:

26 comments:

  1. "Several hair samples collected from one of the 16 1/2″ tracks were analyzed at two institutions and found to be non-human primate after which it was sent to Dr. Walter Birkbe a respected primatologist and specialist in primate hair, well know at the time as a skeptic on the subject of sasquatch. His comments were not made public but unofficially he remarked, “you’ve sent me my first stumper”. It was definitely primate but not a known primate and not human."
    - John Mioczynski

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...sounds like something he should have got a paper out of: A hair is found in NA and a specialist deduces it is primate, but from no known species..This is not publishable? Something is wrong....

      Delete
    2. Until the sample would have been tested for DNA and subsequently labelled "contaminated" due to its human origins.

      Delete
    3. Hey iktomi you dingbat!
      define human?

      AC collins

      Delete
    4. a.c ,, you think iktomi will give you a answer to your question ?

      Hell no he/she will deflect &
      then special pleading will commence with a torrent of Cut&paste!!

      AC collins

      Delete
    5. human
      ˈhjuːmən/
      adjective
      1.
      relating to or characteristic of humankind.
      "the human body"
      synonyms: anthropoid
      "the survival of the human race"

      In addition to the great apes, the family Hominidae includes our species, Homo sapiens. In the past, there also were other species of humans as well as hominids more similar to us than the chimpanzees and bonobos. They will be described in the last three tutorials of this series. It has been historically difficult for people to accept that we are in fact just another primate species with African origins and that we differ physically only in degree from some of the others. The similarities can be seen throughout our bodies. The African apes and humans have essentially the same arrangement of internal organs, share all of the same bones (though somewhat different in shape and size), lack external tails, and have several important blood type systems in common. We also get many of the same diseases. Humans and the African apes have hands with thumbs that are sufficiently separate from the other fingers to allow them to be opposable for precision grips. Like all of the great apes, humans are sexually dimorphic--human men are 5-10% larger on average and have greater upper body muscular development. Like chimpanzees and bonobos, we are omnivorous. We kill other animals for food in addition to eating a wide variety of plants.
      http://anthro.palomar.edu/primate/prim_8.htm



      That concludes your lesson for today. Take the rest of the day off, look. Maybe go and troll yourself again, or whatever complex mental health rituals you enjoy.

      Delete
    6. So human is Homo sapien sapien ? yes or no Boyo???

      AC

      Delete
    7. lets see if iktomi has the iq to understand the question!

      Delete
    8. Iktomi is far to DUMB&insecure to answer a yes or no question.

      Delete
    9. Everybody on this blog grudgingly admits that "ME"
      AC collins,Has an always will DOMINATE Joe With only One sentance!!!

      HAAAAA HAAAAA HAAAA LOL!!

      AC collins

      Delete
    10. AnonymousWednesday, October 19, 2016 at 8:06:00 PM PDT
      Hey iktomi you dingbat!
      define human?
      AC collins

      AnonymousWednesday, October 19, 2016 at 8:14:00 PM PDT
      a.c ,, you think iktomi will give you a answer to your question ?


      Talking to yourself again, AC? You're losing the plot mate.

      Delete
    11. Nobody who's needed to be explained to the wide range of primates (that includes Homo sapiens), has ever dominated anyone around here.

      Back to that booze, AC!!

      Delete
    12. Iktomi a.c. escaped from rehab.


      Delete
    13. Sorry Ikky, but no. You're wrong. You are confusing "human like" for human.

      Essentially if it isn't in the genus Homo, it's not human. Not really. At best it's "human-like" or human related. That is what hominid means. They are related to humans, but they are not human, just as your cousins are related to you, but your cousins are not you.

      Delete
    14. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    15. Actually... I provided you with the most basic, ten year old's standard of definitions for what "human" means... And it appears you're showing your scars AGAIN. D'you know, if I was to bring up the same argument at every opportunity, whenever I was frequenting his blog... Someone would be totally warranted in claiming that I lacked satisfaction regarding it, and that can only mean one thing. I THINK you're trying to say that Bigfoot aren't human again (yawn), and actually, humans ARE primates. Pick up a fool's guide on the subject, because defending that nut job on the matter has essentially just embarrassed you. I may be tempted to remind you of this next time you try condescend anyone on the anatomy of ancient humans.

      Delete
    16. Joe Iktomi is a remarkable man.The utmost authority on the subject of Bigfoot.

      Delete
  2. I will take this 1st for the Super Friends :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why does Iktomi think we need his rants everyday all day? Get a job,get a life and spend some time out of your basement! Trust me you'll feel better about yourself!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. go smoke some more of your weed A.C, you tragic loon

      Joe

      Delete
  4. I have heard many interviews with John on several podcasts. He is a really nice and interesting fellow.

    ReplyDelete