Thursday, October 6, 2016

Bigfoot Hunter Posts Startling Video Of Haunted House


As if chasing big hairy creatures around the woods wasn't bad enough, now the SquatchMaster takes on a whole new phenomenon. Apparently he moved into a house that has paranormal activity. In this video he claims he is interacting with a spirit. Check it out:

In April of 2006, I bought another house in a new town when my family and I decided to relocate from the town where I had spent my entire life. It was a very nice older home built in 1912. The town it is located in what had been an important Native American village since the 1700's. In the early 1800's European settlers to Ohio came in because of the huge fur trade in this part of the area with those Indians. The house was built by and for, the Rothenstein Family. Mr & Mrs Rothenstein had one child, a daughter. Both parents passed away in the home of natural causes...the daughter lived her entire life in the home until her passing. She lived well into her 90's. There have been several times here that we have experienced their presents, sometimes by the feeling of being watched and even touched. Then there are the voices...as was captured here.

197 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Glory hole every time.

      Joe

      Delete
    2. JOE + MMC = "FAGGOT'S!!!

      FACT!!

      Delete
    3. My glory can cause death. I've got every disease you can get.

      Joe

      Delete
    4. Oh yea my STENCH TRENCH smells like KHAT HIALITOSIS,,,,,
      TOP DAT!!

      Delete
    5. ^ yeah it sounds like him

      Delete
    6. Poo wittle Stuey got twiggad

      Delete
    7. get buttfuckrd u stupid faggot assh0le!
      !!!
      HAAAAA HAAAAA HAAA haa lol!

      Delete
    8. ^ Poor baby got no friends

      You mad bro ?

      Delete
    9. ^ i have a nice thick dick for your greasy and sweaty anus

      are you ready for induction ?

      Delete
    10. "Well fu k me I got duh white out treatment.. SHlt fu ck!!!!

      Delete
  2. Finally there seems to be news of a (very possibly) real sighting and excellent reports from reliable witnesses.

    Check this out.It is literally hot off the press.Links to news articles too.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4lH4ZsoEUU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YOULL GET NOTHING AND LIKE IT

      Delete
    2. ^ the Boy Joe hates having nothing and is trying to share it

      Delete
    3. Boy Joe = Faggot!!
      Haaaaa HaaaaaaHaaaaaHa ha. Lol!

      Delete
    4. ^ of course it is you stupid faggot assh0le

      Haaaaa haaaa haaaa lol!!

      Delete
    5. ^ Stuey has.wost his witto mind

      Waff
      Out
      Wowd

      Delete
    6. I feel much better now..
      Carry on!

      Delete
  3. Keep an eye out for those thunderbirds and river panthers, too! There are native legends about them, so by footer logic they must have basis in tangible, biological reality.

    Extending this concept to the rest of human culture, be sure to beware of minotaurs, leprechauns, pegasi and unicorns. All real, because otherwise there would be no stories about them!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i have proof of the snallygaster

      honestly i do

      Delete
    2. Reports of Thunderbird sightings go back centuries, and the fossil record does show that giant birds (teratorns) with wingspans between 12 and 18 ft (3.7 and 5.5 m) were likely contemporary with early man.They also described beavers, coyotes, all these things that are in myth and legend that exist in reality.

      Now find three whole databases that transcend native cultures' core belief systems & oral histories that mimic unicorn, minotaur, leprechaun and pegasi reports... And find at least one scientist that supports the ideas that they exist, not to mention a unique species trait that can be attributed to an unclassified version of the aforementioned. If Sasquatch reports were like unicorn reports, where are the equivalent databases of contemporary reports that are "taken at face value"?

      Delete
    3. Someone should compile "three whole databases" of your insane comments for future study by psychologists studying pathological disorders!

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. The reality is... At this rate there'll be three whole databases of psychological studies on the behaviour of trolls. I wish I was joking.

      Delete
    6. my my such a effeminate kunt
      you are 6:57 .You say that you are a american male??
      DONT THINK SO !!

      Delete
    7. 6:57 enjoyed my comment so much he decided to steal it immediately!

      Delete
    8. How is that fossil record for bigfoot doing?

      Delete
    9. Turns out to be human skeletons but you know how stupid those scientists are

      Delete
    10. Well apart from the archeological record of very large human skeletal remains found in early woodland mounds... (cough, cough)... About as well as the fossil record for chimps and gorillas on the African continent?

      (Sigh)

      Delete
    11. 7:54... It was more like the irony being irresistible.

      Delete
    12. Nothing is proven, ta daaaa

      Delete
    13. Actually... It's pretty much established that those skeletons existed. Just ask Andy White.

      Delete
    14. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 8:56:00 AM PDT

      Dogs and squirrels exist

      Delete
    15. Skeletons exist, Bigfoot

      Delete
    16. "THATS A FRIGGIN LIE IKTOMI!!

      Andy White never said such a thing!!

      Maybe you should concern yourself to your own personal betrayal!!!!!

      D DOVER IS SLATHERING & BOBBIN ON MY NEIGHBORS KNOB !!
      AS we speak ,,(good ole cleofus)
      so black he's blue.

      Delete
    17. HAAAAA HAAAAA HAAAAA HAAAA HAAAAA HAAAA LOL!!!

      Delete
    18. "You are correct, of course, that there are reports by professionals of very tall individuals excavated from various Early Woodland mounds (I would hesitate to call a 7' or 7.5' person a "giant" . . . those heights fall within the range of human variation and don't require any kind of "supernatural" explanation)."
      - Andy White PhD

      I wonder what Andy would think of your proposition that Sasquatch are paranormal, AC? I wonder what any of the trolls would think??

      Delete
    19. "(T)he 'excavators,' more appropriately called looters, who dug up mounds and reported to the Bureau lacked academic training and were totally untrustworthy either to measure skeletons (which is no easy task) or to infer living height from those skeletons. Nor could they be trusted to report accurately or even truthfully, since they often were making money from the sale or display of what they unearthed. Powell was constantly riding herd on what he knew was malarkey."

      Geoffrey Sea, A.B. Magna cum laude, Harvard

      http://portcitiesreview.com/lincolns-mystery-mound-tour-by-geoffrey-sea/

      Delete
    20. Yeah, I didn't ask about chimps in Africa, though, did I? Bigfoots have identical habitat as bears according to reports. We have plenty of bear fossils. What happened to the bigfoot fossils?

      A tall human skeleton is not a bigfoot fossil.

      Delete
    21. Are you calling Andy White, a PhD anthropologist a liar? Aren't you like, sourcing someone qualified in history over an actual PhD in anthropology?

      (Oh dear)

      Anyway... As has been rubbed in your face a few times, the best way to validate the 150 years worth of 7-8 foot skeletal remains, would be photographs in the 20th century of excavations;

      http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/gigantes/esp_gigantes_15.htm

      Delete
    22. Google Bigfoot skeletons you fools

      Delete
    23. But where are the chimpanzee and gorilla fossils? Last time I checked... They're primates, correct? And if Sasquatch exists (and it most certainly does), then the social capacity it no doubt has (given that it is widely described as an archaic human), would suggest that it would naturally have far more complex behaviours sureounding death than a bear.

      Delete
    24. Sea has studied the history of the Smithsonian in depth and Andy White only acknowledges that there have been "reports" of giant skeletons. Also, if you've been following Andy's blog, Vieira himself has backtracked on his claims. Your link includes reports of 18 foot tall giants and is laughable.

      Delete
    25. I would expect a Harvard graduated history dude to be able to source Smithsonian Bureaus, which is the area of expertise that an anthropologist would cover. Andy White and Jim Vieira's ideas on 7-8 foot skeletons are validated here;
      http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/gigantes/esp_gigantes_15.htm

      Sorry kid. Your entire jig has been obliterated.

      Delete
    26. What do burial customs have to do with fossils?

      Delete
    27. Because paired with the fact that fossils in that type terrain are notoriously lacking for primates, a fossil specimen might be very much more difficult to source than that of a cave bear.

      Delete
    28. What type of terrain is that? Bigfoot is reported all over North America. Even on PEI, according to you. In fact, Ohio is one of the top states for bigfoot sightings. Are you saying that the terrain in Ohio is similar to that of an African jungle?

      Delete
    29. Well the greatest concentration of cultural and contemporary reports are in the PNW, which obviously has a lot of acidity in the soil. For other parts of the US, my points up top would apply.

      Delete
    30. What points up top would those be? What could bigfoots do in Ohio that prevent their bones from fossilizing?

      Delete
    31. Right, but what "complex behaviours" would those be?

      Delete
    32. Use your imagination Don "50 questions" Maker. Maybe as complex as other hominins that have graced the face of this beautiful planet.

      Delete
    33. Listen, stop pointing to lack of evidence and spoiling Bigfoot for me

      Delete
    34. Why do you constantly expect me to flesh out your claims for you? Anyone can just say something like complex behaviours. You need to provide some examples that explain how these behaviours could possibly explain the lack of a fossil record.

      Delete
    35. URP , everyone knows that Bigfoot go into the portal to die you foolish fool

      Delete
    36. Do I have to pull a ten years old's palaeoanthropology book for you and explain how that might work?

      Only a couple of years ago, a new species of primitive hominid, homo Naledi was discovered that very much appeared to bury its dead in caves. These were very primitive hominids that lacked the evolved brain capacity and intelligence of later hominins such as Neanderthals that also buried their dead. By this, it is not a stretch to assume that Sasquatch do the same. In fact, there is more reason to assume so than otherwise, given the fact that they are quite clearly human and not a dumb animal. Even if we didn't have the hairs that are morphologically consistent with a wild human, if we didn't have the track castings that quite clearly show a large human, then the innumerable reports that basically describe what one would expect from a caveman attest to this. Given the high frequency of science journals that account for such large human remains being found, and the long standing cultures to which state that Sasquatch are another tribe of large humans, one does not require Sherlock Holmes to be able to draw a link from such data. "Bigfoot" burying their dead is logical, and because far cleverer people like you fail every day of your obsessed lives to explain away the evidence, then there is little doubt that they exist. From this premise it is possible to use heuristical principles such as Occam's Razor, and it is therefore logical to theorise as to how they might deal with their dead in-line with accepted hominid behaviour. Do you see how this works? Try it one time... Substantiate one of your claims and from their there is reason to make educated theories.

      Delete
    37. BELCH , also because I agree with Khat Hansen it is also known that Bigfoot are large lizard men so maybe the skeletons mistaken for alligators are actually Bigfoot , I'll of course come by with my avatar self to deflect from this quickly

      Delete
    38. It's not a stretch to apply any reason for physical evidence of Sasquatch schooled!

      Delete
    39. Why would burying their dead prevent fossil remains from being found? We bury our dead. Our remains are still found.

      Delete
    40. Because they're fossilised in places that have not been explored yet. We have modern human burial customs.

      Delete
    41. The oldest human remains found in North America are estimated to be 13,000 years old.

      So, they are there, just not found yet? Convenient.

      Delete
    42. Yes but we bury in this dimension like stupid neanderthal did, wouldn't you bury yourself on the other side of a portal where the grass is red? Jeez you're like a child

      Delete
    43. I in fact have pretty clear cut examples of hominid behaviour to draw comparisons from, Don.

      Delete
    44. We find remains from other hominids that are probably more intelligent than a bigfoot would be, yet we still find those remains.

      Delete
    45. Darn right I do, I think I have the upper hand here yet again

      Delete
    46. Iktomi and his special pleading

      Delete
    47. Iktomi must have Bigfoot threading the eye of very many needles to exist. What mental gymnastics of belief.

      Delete
    48. See here, Bigfoot eat their dead and then when there is only one left he eats himself, only the lips remain but since they are meaty and fatty they are quickly taken care of by forest vermin

      Delete
    49. I'm confused what these tall skeletons have to do with Bigfoot. From the old pictures I have viewed they just look like very tall individuals. Lots of tall people exist today and I'm sure they did then as well. Is there something in those old photographs that would specifically point to it being something other than a tall human? Could anyone link it? Before we go into the double rows of teeth and the Lovelock skull I believe Andy White has covered it here:

      http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/the-modern-mythology-of-giants-double-rows-of-teeth

      and here:

      http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/lovelock-cave-and-the-illusion-of-a-jawbone-that-slips-over-that-of-a-large-man

      He has also posted a new blog on giants which I have not even read yet:

      http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog

      Delete
    50. "I'm confused what these tall skeletons have to do with Bigfoot. "

      Join the club.

      Delete
    51. I think we've won yet another round against these fools avatar self

      Delete
    52. Joe would have us believe that bigfoots are just tall, hairy humans. But when people discuss the pgf they constantly talk about limb proportions being outside the human realm. So, would not these tall human skeletons have obviously nonhuman limb proportions if they were, in fact, bigfoot skeletons?

      Delete
    53. Ixnay eletonskay comprende?

      Delete
    54. Dry bones shrink. ..fact sir, fact

      Delete
    55. Brow ridges on Bigfoot are passed on upon death to living members of the clan , fact , neanderthal did this also , fact sir

      Delete
    56. According to the Introduction to Forensic Anthropology ( Steven N. Byers, p229), that type of shrinkage is only about 1.5%

      Delete
    57. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    58. Don... Throwing something out because it doesn't fit your expectations of something who's existence you don’t even think is credible, isn't very good logic. To throw it out for a theory that which you've just applied (comparative intelligence) to a creature you don't find credible... Beyond illogical. It means that nothing you claim can be taken as a substantial argument, because your original premise contradicts your methods of moving the goal posts. I also sourced you an example of burial from one of the most primitive of hominids as an example. There is nothing that we see in the PGF that we can't point to in the anatomy of both modern and ancient humans in our lineage.

      Curious... If 7-8 foot skeletons were readily viewable in museums today, then people might not have such an issue in believing that living-breathing hairy versions might be residing in deep wilderness areas today. And no... Even though I have enjoyed Andy's work on double rows of teeth, I have yet it see anyone provide a modern skull example of what we see in the Humboldt skull (not the Lovelock skull). Aside from the robust jaw, there is a prominent brow ridge, glabellar development, the notably strong nuchal crest, low retreating forehead with post-orbital construction, os inca, divided occipital or interparietal bone, accompanied by generally high sutural complexity with several Wormian bones. The simple fact remains that some singular elements of that archaic morphology do indeed exist in contemporary examples, but not to the highly pronounced and collective frequency as we see in the Humboldt skull.

      Delete
    59. "There is nothing that we see in the PGF that we can't point to in the ananroy of both modern and ancient humans in our lineage. "

      Incorrect. One of the main arguments put forth for the authenticity of the PGF is that the limb proportions are well outside of the human range. You can't just wave your hand and say that modern human anatomy includes those proportions. That is clearly incorrect.

      Delete
    60. See fools, if you look at elephant bones is it such a leap to an elephant man, fact sirs, there was one, see if you look at a butterfly pinned to a board is it such a leap to see a fairy , yes ,that one's a leap

      Delete
    61. I'm not moving any goalposts. I am just asking you to explain why burial prevents remains from being found later.

      Delete
    62. I'm working on a nonsensical answer, don't rush me

      Delete
    63. Notice that I have totally deflected from the fact that these tall skeletons I CONSTANTLY reference as evidence in no way resemble the skeletons of early man that I compare Bigfoot to, this would actually defeat an argument of documented evidence I have been CONSTANTLY making on this very site, please disregard this whole remark fools

      Delete
    64. "The arm length expected for this height in a human is 38.5" [Winters 1990]. The standard arm to height ratio is .44H [Winters 1990] (See Appendix D). The ratio extracted from the film is .49H. The arm length of the subject is 5.5 standard deviations from the human mean which is the 99.9999981 percentile or is present in one out of 52.5 million people [Weimer 1993].

      The arm length expected for this height in a human is 38.5" [Winters 1990]. The standard arm to height ratio is .44H [Winters 1990] (See Appendix D). The ratio extracted from the film is .49H. The arm length of the subject is 5.5 standard deviations from the human mean which is the 99.9999981 percentile or is present in one out of 52.5 million people [Weimer 1993].
      http://www.bigfootencounters.com/biology/nasi.htm

      12:18... This looks like a "Bigfoot";
      https://thedavisreport.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/unusual-skull-found-near-lovelock-nevada-in-1967/

      Innumerable 7-8 foot tall human skeletons found in a country that has cultural and contemporary reports of 7-8 foot tall hairy humans, is in no way shape or form detrimental to my argument.

      Delete
    65. corr futt me yous iss finkin dem bigfeets fingys iss mek bleev

      corr futt me

      Delete
    66. ""The arm length expected for this height in a human is 38.5" [Winters 1990]. The standard arm to height ratio is .44H [Winters 1990] (See Appendix D). The ratio extracted from the film is .49H. The arm length of the subject is 5.5 standard deviations from the human mean which is the 99.9999981 percentile or is present in one out of 52.5 million people [Weimer 1993]."

      So, 1 out of 52.5 million persons would share the same limb proportions as Patty. And you quoted this why, exactly?

      Delete
    67. Nobody believes me now, looking foolish, desperate, took a long time to research that non answer

      Delete
    68. It demonstrates that these proportions are seen in examples of modern humans, be it at very, very small frequencies. Would you like me to continue about her human traits?

      Delete
    69. You have to be kidding me. You quoted a source that is arguing that Patty's limb proportions are outside the human range and, therefore, some sort of extension would have to have been used in the costume. You then try to use this to say that Patty's limb proportion is actually within human range?

      Wow. You really are an idiot.

      Delete
    70. So, Patty is a 1 in 53 million long limbed bigfoot?

      No pun intended, but you're really stretching there.

      Delete
    71. Or perhaps Roger found a 1 in 53 million long limbed human to wear the costume?

      LOL.

      Delete
    72. Breasts, deflect from skeletons to breasts, good, good

      Delete
    73. They're not totally outside the human range, because there are examples in very small frequencies of modern humans.

      "The use of such a sophisticated prosthesis appears to be at odds with the year the film was made, the technology available at that time, and the financial resources of those involved with the filming."

      You seem to be getting a little hot under the collar there, Don?

      Delete
    74. Why doesn't it fit those tall skeletons I CONSTANTLY reference, dammit, losing argument

      Delete
    75. Um... No... We in fact don't see modern humans with the collected anatomical traits, though singular instances are seen in modern humans... Right the way down to the mophologically, throw-back-esque feet.

      Delete
    76. 12:44... I think you have a comment to respond to.

      Delete
    77. That still does not explain why the alleged bigfoot skeletons do not share Patty's limb proportions. Do you not think Patty was a real bigfoot. Of course you do, you have said so many times. Then why do your bigfoot skeletons not share her proportions?

      Delete
    78. Stupid Patterson, lying stupid man making me look like a dick

      Delete
    79. I'm sorry... Um... Do you know something that we don't about the limb proportions of those large skeletons? Or are you moving the goal posts again?

      : )

      Delete
    80. Nope. I'm just assuming that if skeletons were found that obviously out of human limb proportion that that would be known. Are you suggesting that they do, and no one felt it worth commenting or documenting?

      Delete
    81. Joe please seek medical help. Honestly from one human to another it troubles me to see someone in such a mess. Please before its too late.

      Delete
    82. Assumptions are the route of all **** ups, Donny. And Patty's arm ratio might easily be something that is not immediately noticeable to an archaeologist putting remains in boxes for shipping.

      Delete
    83. 12:52... Which one out of the two of us actually has psychologists analysing our behaviour?

      Delete
    84. I'm going to stop referencing those stupid skeletons, shut up dMaker, you smell

      Delete
    85. You actually. Trolls which you have declared yourself "king troll" and those who believe in fringe topics. Both studied by professionals.

      Delete
    86. Is that a little plead? Thought you were gonna steal my avatar?

      Delete
    87. It's only "King Troll" when I'm giving you a piece of your own medicine. Luckily for me I don't post racism, sexism and homophobia.

      Delete
    88. Don't forget brow ridges and sagittal crests on those skeletons avatar me, just like early humans, on second thought forget it

      Delete
    89. Neither do I. You do know there isnt a person called "Anonymous" right?

      Delete
    90. An anthropologist would definitely overlook those and just throw them old mound bones right in the box, Winner

      Delete
    91. Sorry, for those very reasons nobody would believe that it isn't you posting that filth, and the very fact that you focus on what I do as opposed to that filth, is very telling as to your mindset towards it.

      Delete
    92. My comment still stands. I hope you get better soon

      Delete
    93. 1:05... Yes, but an ARCHEOLOGIST might.

      (Head shake at how stupid he is... He IS struggling to copy my avatar after all).

      Delete
    94. 1:08... As does mine. You might wanna speak to someone about your issues, you at least have a very real diagnosis out of the two of us.

      Delete
    95. That is some great deflection from those skeletons, I hope nobody realizes how mad I am right now

      Delete
    96. Stupid archeology students, all the bones look the same to them

      Delete
    97. I know you struggle to follow the comments of others, but it appears I've done nothing but address every point out my way regarding these skeletons.

      How's about that copied account?

      Delete
    98. Sorry mate, dmaker schooled you on Patty. You just make Bigfoot fit into whatever evidence is presented, regardless of the contradictions.

      Delete
    99. My balls in your mouth^ WAAP WAAP WAAAAAAAP

      Delete
    100. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    101. Sorry cheerleader... It appears I've demonstrated that Patty's proportions are within human capabilities (be it in singular instances and in very small frequences). And I didn't even really get started. There is no contradiction about always maintaining Patty is human, and having the capacity to substantiate that.

      No, no!! The pleasure's all mine!!

      Delete
    102. Arguing with no one again, you're making us look bad

      Delete
  4. "...The world needs to know that this species, the North American wood ape, exists, and that it could very well be on the brink of extinction..."

    Spoken as if the world just refuses. The tonnage of brain-deadness required to say such stupid **** really can't be quantified or qualified without expensive equipment and trained personnel. What reason could there be that "Wood Apes" would go extinct right under our noses without the benefit of ever letting us know of their existence right under our noses?

    Well, there is one good reason. The BLAARG. To preemptively justify any (potential) lack of reports, sightings, photos etc. Claims of their diminishing numbers allows the "No Bigfoot Pictures" law to grow even more teeth. You know the law:

    "[102.067] Whenever one encounters a Bigfoot (Woodus Apesuitis) in the protected wilds, they shall automatically be stripped of any and all ability to take clear or in focus pictures of said protected beast (or the area around it) with any camera type device until said protected beast is at least 1,000 yards away from the offending camera type device's location (as measured in a straight line from lens to lips)."

    You can't make this stuff up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. is it made up by the Boy Joetomi ?

      Delete
    2. Joto= faggot.Joto= faggot.Joto =faggot

      Joto+mi= Faggot!!!. . Get it ??

      HaaAAaa haaaaa haaaa Haa lol!!!

      Delete
    3. SEE ,, WHO DA MAN NOW??

      YOU STUPID FA66S!!

      HAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAA LOL!!!!!!

      Delete
    4. Three databases of reports; Ray Crowe's Track Record, The BFRO and John Green's.

      Clear photos;
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg

      Delete
    5. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 8:33:00 AM PDT

      Actually I make this stuff up all the time , Bigfoot blur the whole forest that's why my expensive camera takes blurry pictures

      Delete
    6. PLUS, all my "FRIENDS" Say that im tight as a "NUN"!!

      RENEE(from dago)F,B.

      Delete
    7. thank god for the sanity of iktomi amid a sea of bollocks on here. if there a full moon or are the hillbillies going full force ?

      God save the queen !

      Joe

      Delete
    8. Hello over stereotypical British guy. I have a feeling you know all about hillbillies "going full force" in your life.

      Delete
    9. ^ oh yes we "accommodate" regularly for just a small fee...yummy

      Joe

      Delete
    10. I dress like the Queen - tally hoes. Joe

      Delete
    11. hitting the moonshine early today lads ?

      Tally ho !

      Joe

      Delete
  5. "There have been several times here that we have experienced their presents"

    LOL!

    You just ruined the little credibility you had.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OH NO!!! it seems "somebody" just lost a little credibility with,,,

      dr.BLUE BAG FAG!!!!
      BLHAAAAAA HAAAAA HAAA LOL!!

      Delete
    2. Not a chance! Loading a video now, found at least 20 bags, all strategically placed!

      Stinks to be you!

      Delete
    3. 7:33 = FAGG0T!!
      HAAA HAAAA HAAAA LOL!
      ps utah squatch has real evidence!!

      Delete
    4. WELL THEN, POST HIS EVIDENCE RIGHT NOW SO WE CAN ALL GET A LAUGH....DOUCHBAG!!

      Delete
    5. dr sadsquatch is a blu bag fag hag!Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 8:18:00 AM PDT

      ALL DUE RESPECT Dr sasquatch,
      go to his utube channel fagg0t,!

      Delete
    6. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 8:34:00 AM PDT

      You stupid, I took all morning deliberately placing those blue bags

      Delete
    7. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 8:39:00 AM PDT

      Where's my evidence, blue and blur,brrrrr

      Delete
    8. ^ We know you don't have any pics...You must be Utah.....SERIOUS LOL!!!

      Mad because I called youR fake no evidence butt out!

      HILARIOUS!

      Delete
    9. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 8:59:00 AM PDT

      I also have no pics,at least no clear ones, you see Bigfoot blur the whole forest so that's why I can't focus my very expensive camera. .because you know, Bigfoot

      Delete
    10. @ 8:49 ...
      Hi my friend ,,uhh that troll was'nt me ,,Honest,,!!

      Utah squatch!!

      Delete
    11. #1 in Bigfoot Crapturd research -Squatch (not a real Dr)Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 9:26:00 AM PDT

      KAUPE meet me in the woods behind Shoprite

      Delete
    12. Just like me...waap Waap waaaaap

      Delete
    13. It's hilarious to see DS get all worked up. His family must be proud.

      Delete
    14. So let me get this straight DS... You hail BC Squatchers for incredible evidence, who until recently, literally point out small stick patterns lying on the ground. As apposed to Utah, who discovers complete structures far off trail that would be impossible to construct without machinery? Jealous much? You have double standards DS.

      Delete
    15. You are just jealous, WOODS, BLURRY PICTURES BWAHAHA BWAHAHA BWAHAHA

      Delete
    16. Wow , now Jeff Meldrum is saying sasquatch could be related or descended from ALIENS.

      HOW WILL THE BOY JOE DEAL WITH IT ???

      Gneeeerrrrkle Gneeeeeeeeeeeffendurrrrphlump

      FART FART FART SQUIRT SQUIRT SQUIRT FART

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za_HFqsKyQE

      Delete
    17. In a parallel universe Jeff Meldrum slices meat at a deli.

      Delete
    18. In another parallel universe DS is a MD and touts his foliage photography online.

      Delete
    19. Yes, its the same universe where you graduated high school and college, and now have a steady, well paying job that provides for your wife and children.

      Delete
    20. fluff girl in the house.....sup fluffer

      Delete
  6. You leave my friends alone....A GH GH GHOST!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Guzzin any kind of Sperm is FUN!!

      . MMC .

      Delete
  7. VR video cardboard Dream Jump Dubai 4K [ 3D Side …: http://youtu.be/6IaPCIuaa5s

    A vr 3d video you watch through a 3d headset

    MMC


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01JBQ1EUI/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1475768962&sr=8-1&pi=SX200_QL40&keywords=evo+vr&dpPl=1&dpID=51CxnqbEiWL&ref=plSrch

      This is the Ego Vr headset I picked up at walleyworld for $15

      Very cool watching YouTube 3d videos

      You can game with these also

      MMC

      Delete
    2. May I also suggest bobbing for apples. In regards to GOAT'S????

      MMC

      Delete
  8. Yes trolls,you are being schooled by Iktomi, I have Bigfoot evidence, skeletons of dogs and squirrels in blue bags but you shall never see it, it's all mine, all mine

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Khat ha, ha ,ha, ha, priceless, you showed those trolls, will you send me more pictures of your peni..I'll email you,ok

      Delete
    2. Spacing With Punctuation. With a computer, use only one space following periods, commas, semicolons, colons, exclamation points, question marks, and quotation marks. The space needed after these punctuation marks is proportioned automatically. Use no spaces on either side of a hyphen.
      Spacing with Punctuation | Punctuation Rules - The Blue ...
      www.grammarbook.com

      Delete
    3. Deflect from magic monkey man

      Delete
    4. Aren't you having this "episode" because of what I have to say about "magic monkey men"?

      Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    5. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...laughing in writing doesn't look stupid and crazy

      Delete
    6. Jeff MELDRUM says bigfoot might be descended from ALIENS.

      Hmmmmm GNERRRRRKLE fruurrrrmph fart fart

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za_HFqsKyQE

      Delete
    7. No... It's pretty essential when you find the comments of others a projection of how useless they are at the blog's subject.

      Delete
    8. Deflect from Meldrum comments and skeletons, winning, winning

      Delete
    9. I didn't even open the link... And even if what you say is true, how does that make the evidence for "Bigfoot" go away?

      That's right... That feeling is the realisation of how stupid you are.

      Delete
    10. I think it's a good idea to run from dMaker and argue with myself, I got my ass handed to me between him and Curious

      Delete
    11. Did I miss something? You're right... What's the point in exchanging with someone who's projecting his incompetence?

      Adios!

      Delete
    12. In some parallel universe Jeff Meldrum slices meat at a deli.

      Delete
    13. True that avatar me, but don't take it so hard that those guys beat us

      Delete
  9. Snowblowerprime say's the earth is flat....hjs proof, if the earth is not flat why is all the water flat? and yes he really said that...the man has gone batty

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It makes me sad. I like him he is a good dude but he has become suspicious of everything. That is a natural response to realizing you've been lied to about bigfoot. You start wondering what else they are lying about. I get that.

      Delete
    2. Someone point out to him ^ how much sense is lacking in that sentence.

      Delete
    3. Good, deflect from those skeletons, never mention again

      Delete
    4. You got nailed on your skeletons dude. Photos and all.

      Get well soon.

      Delete
  10. A whole "thread" of existence debate! Sweet!

    Dr. Squatch knows... they don't just exist they thrive in numbers that are as strange and unlikely as the thing itself.

    Oh and they are caucasian and some are yuge. So big that in-orbit IR national assets can probably see them.

    Uncle Sam knows all about them and is just slowly trying to pen them in or manage them.

    Ask Mark Zaskey about the fencing around some of the Wildlife Management Areas he lives near. It looks like chain-link but it is reinforced steel and it is rigid, the links are fused, something like a prison fence. The 45-degree canted razor wire section at the top is angled *in* not out. The fence is designed to keep stuff in. Honestly some of the ones I'm seeing could step over it then easily pull it down for their family/clan.

    As Zaskey about that too. He originally found Bigfoot when he went to inspect some of this reinforced fencing that was knocked down and destroyed. He noticed a game trail and followed it until he got growled at.

    Existence? Yes.

    There is even DNA evidence though its release, from independent teams, is so hopelessly muddled and botched as to actually make the whole issue murkier. If you look at it closely, however, there are some clear results. Bigfoot mitochondrial DNA is unambiguously human. Bigfoot nuclear DNA, the genome, has substantial differences from human nuclear DNA. So Bigfoot and humans shared some common ancient ancestor but large genetic differences exist between modern humans and present day Bigfoot. It is thought that they could not even produce offspring together.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, facts here gentlemen, facts

      Delete
    2. Facts!? We don't need no stinking facts.

      Delete
    3. Yes sir,we never did and never will, magic monkey man good

      Delete