World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
Andy White RULES!!
Joerg my face and call me daddy.
Andy sure does! A PhD confirming my theories as to 7-8 tall skeletons being excavated in woodland mounds is pretty awesome!
Joerg, do you not remember when Andy said your theories and statements were so stupid that they didn't even command a response? We all sure do. It gave us all quite the laugh.
^ = MORON!!!!:-))
10:26 here..comment was ment for10:24,,
Svante Paabo Say's,Sykes is a overrated Kook!!
This comment has been removed by the author.
Yes 10:25... And then he proceeded to post 19 comments, "responding to Joe's nonsense." Andy's a good guy, and it sure is awesome having a PhD confirming your theories as to 7-8 tall skeletons being excavated in woodland mounds. It's pretty awesome. Sykes literally wrote the book of mitochondrial DNA. Nuff said.
I remember when Andy destroyed Itkomi and showed everybody what a pathetic loser he is. Andy basically said that every bit of knowledge Itkomi thinks he has about the magic ape is complete crap. If only the couple of Itkomi fluffers would use their brains and distance themselves from Itkomi the bigfoot kook.
http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/bigfoot-researchers-still-insist-native-american-skull-is-not-humanPeople can read for themselves. Sorry to see you're having a bad day.
I hope they do!! YA DINGBAT!AC collins
Iktomi Joe gets slapped down considerably on that page by Andy White.
Yes... Why don't you pretend to be another two or three posters? You're slacking! Nut job.
Wrong again Iktomi. You aren't very good at this.
Or maybe we've seen your weird little games about 50 times before, troll? Narrowing it down to the resident three psycho nerds who have a vendetta around here, really isn't providing anything impartial either.
lktomi is a master at twisting things around to suit his agenda. Yes people can read for themselves and then they do will quickly realize Andy White in no way supports your conclusions "Joe".
"You are correct, of course, that there are reports by professionals of very tall individuals excavated from various Early Woodland mounds (I would hesitate to call a 7' or 7.5' person a "giant" . . . those heights fall within the range of human variation and don't require any kind of "supernatural" explanation)."- Andy White PhD"Professionals have reported the excavation of a few individuals in the 7-7.5' range, yes."- Andy White PhD
How in the world does this relate to your contention that giant skeletons are evidence of Bigfoot? This is the part you conveniently leave out.
(Even though this was posted at you only two days ago...)I don't think you'll ever find me using that as proof of "Bigfoot", but considering the average height of Sasquatch are 7-8 tall based on 40 years of studies on track impressions... If these skeletons were acknowledged to exist and in museums today, most people wouldn't have an issue with the idea of wild, hairy versions residing in deep wilderness areas today. There are also oral histories of natives sharing burial grounds with "tall hairy tribes".
Ah, so you are not using it as proof just inferring it then. Gotcha.
Just few weeks ago I saw a comment about Dr. Ekpen Temple, someone talking about how he has help him in his relationship break up, I also contacted him because i was facing the same problem in my relationship, today i can boldly recommend Dr. Ekpen Temple to someone who is also facing break up in his or her relationship to contact him for help today because he has help me restore my relationship back to normal, here is he contact details (firstname.lastname@example.org) or 2347050270218