Friday, September 2, 2016

Bigfooter Catches 7 Foot Tall Monster On Trail Cam


Robert Dodson has solved the case once and for all. He has confirmed the culprit responsible for raiding his baiting station in his bigfoot research area. It's a 7 foot tall monster alright, of the bear variety.


32 comments:

  1. I noticed that old Joerg has been frequently mentioning that "karma" is going to catch up with mean trolls who have repeatedly hurt his delicate feelings and caused him to whine and complain almost constantly.

    Here is an idea Joerg: stop acting like such a total git and the trolls will consider stopping their crushing of your fragile ego!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. GO GET IN YOUR SAFESPACE YOU F'N RETARDED LITTLE PUSSY!

      Delete
    2. 12;23 - he`s too stupid to realise he`s living his very own episode of instant karma - retribution for his actions is not a concept he`s able to grasp - so he`ll be receiving a lot more attention until he`s able to understand that it is,and always has been,his very own actions that have led to his very own pain.


      12:45 - hello Joe ... is it hurting very badly?

      Delete
  2. I love Iktomi! He is a genius! He knows more about Bigfoot than anyone on here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ He must have a vivid imagination and has indulged in more than his fair share of "trips".

      Delete
  3. I'm just going to this this out there for whoever might be interested: I'm considering having "Forbidden Friday" guest posts on my blog.

    http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/forbidden-friday-on-my-blog-brilliant-idea-or-recipe-for-disaster

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr Dodson certainly made a lot of work out of this puzzle.

      Delete
    2. Ha ha ha ha ha!! Andy, that's a great idea. I'm not sure who you'll find stupid enough to go along and do it though.

      ;

      Delete
    3. Your buddy Jim Vieira was stupid enough to agree to go to Andy's class in person and present his bat sh*t crazy ideas!

      Delete
    4. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/gigantes/esp_gigantes_15.htm

      Sssssssssssshhhhhhh... Go back to sucking that thumb...

      : )

      Delete
    5. Yes, Vieira's ideas on ancient giants are completely misguided but you have to give him credit for having the guts and conviction for going in to the lion's den and presenting his argument. Now lktomi on the other hand prefers to cower in the corner of a Bigfoot blog and does not have the conviction or the bravery to spout off his statements about giants to those educated and informed enough to dispute them. You will never see him blog on Andy White's site because he would be torn to pieces by those who are knowledgeable about the subject.

      Delete
    6. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/gigantes/esp_gigantes_15.htm

      Ssssssssshhhhhhh... Open the link... Photographs... Ssshhhhhhhh... Go back to sleep...

      : p

      Delete
    7. I hope Vieira highlights the "18 foot tall skeleton" so Andy's students can have a hearty belly laugh!

      Delete
    8. lktomi...TORN...TO...PIECES!

      Prove me wrong!

      Delete
    9. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/gigantes/esp_gigantes_15.htm

      Just did... Now for the 3rd time... Ssssssssshhhhhhhhhh...

      Delete
    10. As I thought. Brave commenter on an obscure Bigfoot site but coward in the face of those who could dispute his argument that giant skeletons could have anything at all to do with Bigfoot. You may convince some here with your argument but you would be in a whole different league there.

      Delete
    11. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/gigantes/esp_gigantes_15.htm

      Sssssshhhhhhh... Open the links, angry boy... Ssssssshhhhh...

      Delete
    12. And those make the argument for the existence of Bigfoot because........?

      Delete
    13. I don't think you'll ever find me using that as proof of "Bigfoot", but considering the average height of Sasquatch are 7-8 tall based on 40 years of studies into track impressions... If these skeletons were acknowledged to exist and in museums today, most people wouldn't have an issue with wild, hairy versions residing in wilderness areas today.

      Delete
    14. You have most certainly inferred that these giant skeletons are evidence of Bigfoot and stating that the average height for Sasquatch is 7-8 foot tall is just another one of your many assumptions about them. You are simply trying to mold these skeletons to fit your ideas about Bigfoot.

      Delete
    15. The height average for the sampled population is 7’ 10", derived from a combination of eye witness estimates and scaling from footprints."
      http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_FAQ.asp?id=585

      For further reading on this;
      "Measurements and estimates on Sasquatch dimensions, collected over the last 40 years in the Western U.S and Canada, were subjected to statistical analysis and extrapolation by scaling laws appropriate to primates and mammals. The study has yielded average population values for foot length and width, scaling factors of foot length to height, values for weight, plantar pressure, walking and running gait, speed, and a tentative growth curve as a function of time for the female of the species. The results suggest a substantial population with traits different from those of other higher primates and humans."
      http://www.bfro.net/ref/theories/whf/fahrenbacharticle.htm


      ... I'm also about to read a book regarding the Cherokee who have oral histories of sharing burial mounds with tall hairy tribes. I'll let you know how that comes along.

      ; )

      Delete
  4. I'm just going to throw this this out there for whoever might be interested: I'm considering having "Forbidden Friday" guest posts on my blog.

    http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/forbidden-friday-on-my-blog-brilliant-idea-or-recipe-for-disaster

    ReplyDelete
  5. Weiner confirms he IS being investigated by child services amid claims Huma was already planning to leave him before the latest sexting scandal
    like most Dems they just be wieners

    ReplyDelete
  6. #1 In Bigfoot Crapturd research-(Not really a Dr )SquatchFriday, September 2, 2016 at 1:13:00 PM PDT

    That is better evidence than any of mine

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm seeing a bear standing on its hind legs.

    Where's the monster?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. about to be pushed into your rear lurve passage - t`will be monstrously exciting and pleasing for you

      Delete
  8. Stocking up for a really bad upcoming winter! Grr!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That ain't it. It hasn't snowed in K.C. in seventeen years. Which sucks because I have a Jeep that's dying to play in the elements. That aside, I still think an adult male grizzly would take out a sasquatch in about 15 seconds. Have you ever seen footage of a bear fight? Imagine a 2 ton cat with no plans for tomorrow.

      Delete
    2. I don't think a serious lacking four legged animal would be able to handle a excellent two legged animan with 2or3times the power. Yes I would watch it on a pay per view event that's for sure. I got my cash money on the Sasquatch!

      Delete
  9. Only white people see the magic monkeys of the forest.

    ReplyDelete