World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
Some people think Bigfoot is a myth, but people who attended the 10th annual Down South Bigfoot Rally said they have seen the creature face to face.
BigfootFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia"Sasquatch" redirects here. For other uses, see Sasquatch (disambiguation) and Bigfoot (disambiguation).BigfootPatterson–Gimlin film frame 352.jpgFrame 352 from 1967 Patterson–Gimlin film; some claim it shows a Bigfoot, and others a man in a gorilla suit.Similar creatures Skunk Ape, Yeren, Yowie, Mande Barung, Orang Pendek, Yeti, BarmanouOther name(s) SasquatchCountry United States, CanadaRegion Pacific NorthwestHabitat Mountains, forestBigfoot (also known as Sasquatch) is the name given to a mythological simian, ape, or hominid-like creature that is said to inhabit forests, mainly in the Pacific Northwest. In North American folklore, Bigfoot is usually described as a large, hairy, bipedal humanoid. The term sasquatch is an Anglicized derivative of the Halkomelem word sásq'ets.Scientists discount the existence of Bigfoot and consider it to be a combination of folklore, misidentification, and hoax, rather than a living animal, because of the lack of physical evidence and the large numbers of creatures that would be necessary to maintain a breeding population. Occasional new reports of sightings sustain a small group of self-described investigators. Most reports of sightings are attributed to being various animals, particularly black bears.
^ hey , we heard you the first time. No need to repost 16 times mate unless you've been at the ISF ranch enjoying the roughhousing a little too long.Joe
run another dodson video motherfucker!
run another dodson video you little fucking worm!
are you trying to set a new record for number of posting the same bollocks mate ?Go dunk yourself in the river Thames tosser !Joe
Joe can't handle the truth. Tissue for your issue Joey boy. Must be tough, special pleading everyday and carrying such a huge burden. I feel sorry for you little guy.OGTG
The truth is that bigfoot is real and it's you my dear boy who is unable to handle the truth about it. Both you and the tosser who has spammed this post tonight really need special psychiatric examinations ASAP. Fear not, they have special medications for loons like you and in no time you'll both be feeling much better . Chin up boyo, there's a cure for your disorderJoe
Unfortunately for you Joey boy, there is no cure or medication for stupidity. You will have to live your life special pleading and burden carrying in your stupid little world for the rest of your life. You might want to do something about your anger issues. You're such an angry little fella. OGTG
Hey Original Giant Turd Guy -it's you that has the anger issues. Why not take a look in the mirror mate and tell us all what you see. I'll bet it''s something really ugly that goes back to your childhood. where you dropped on your head as a baby ? it might explain your psychosis Talley Ho tosser !Joe
WOW,,,you shure told them off Hater Joe!!!...Now run along ya creep!!!
Sooooo much anger in you little fella. You get so abusive and your personal attacks are getting worse and worse. I understand though, if I special pleaded everyday for bigfoot and had so much burden to carry I would be pretty angry too. Chin up old chap!!!!OGTG
it's only abusive towards tossers like you who deserve the special treatment When troll killer isn't here I make sure I handle cherry coated knobs like you Run off little childJoe
Troll killer? whats that ? dont be scared son , you're Safe!!
Dermals that exceed decades and States with same species traits found 50 miles into wilderness areas. Unknown primate hair confirmed by primatologists & wildlife biologists... Multiple examples of it with species traits and morphological consistency means it cannot be hoaxed or from any known animal, found near tracks and sightings. Tracks are what wildlife biologists conduct much of their research on. Add a complex application of forensic scientific methods, a study of dermal ridges that outline a species then you at the very least, have 'something' that is undeniably leaving such a physical source. Pair this with sightings and the hair accumulation sometimes in the exact same instance, then that's as profound as you like. These two sources of evidence are accumulated and verified by professionals that have used the exact same scientific methods that have excelled them above the majority in their respected fields. Audio recordings that have become the subject of a year-long University of Wyoming-based engineering study to determine authenticity and the nature of the vocalizations relative to those of humans and other primates, with the results of that study being published concluding that the unusual vocalizations were primate in origin, and that at least one of the voices exceeded normal human ranges, that the vocalizations were spontaneous at the time of recording and that there was no evidence of pre-recording or re-recording at altered tape speed. These recordings were in turn analysed to have a complex language that's also been transcribed. When you have any level of physical and biological evidence to support whatever frequency of anecdotal evidence, then it might be news to wikepedia, but it is in fact unscientific to be reliant on a preconceived conclusion, to recline to a position that centres around not explaning adequately the data in question. Wikipedia's big 'nothing' would actually account for an accumilation of evidence like tracks & dermals, hair, scat, footage, archeological & anthropologocal studies, verified and published audio recordings with language, thousands of years of native culture, tens of thousands of eyewitnesses many of whom are multiple person. The frequency of sightings are exactly what one would expect from a highly social, highly evasive and largely nocturnal subject that bury their dead and have plenty of space to do so. The accumilation of tracks, hair, etc... May have turned into more definitive proof if mainstream science would have contributed by now. When you have people from walks of life like geologists, lawyers, teachers, police officers, historians, wildlife biologists, primatologists, anthropologists, doctors, psychiatrists, business owners, forensic specialists, forestry commissioners reporting the exact same thing from unprovoked and impartial circumstances you have an issue to deal with called credible consistency. More so when you put ocassions of mutiple eyewitness accounts where physical and biological evidence had been accumilated from the same site. When there is steady level of reports that span cultures, then mediums, then physical and biological evidence, then the reports by reliable professional people hold weight. The truth is that sheer frequency of professional people who are accustomed to decades worth of experience in wildlife and the wilderness account for much of the opinion and accounts to which from the basis of this field. Police officers for example, are trained in the art of observation and attention to detail.I really hope you don't rely on Wikipedia for your school projects.
wow all that cut paste for nought, while all you had to say,,cherry picked special pleadings with"World Beating" experts proves my weak logic to ALL THREE OF US,,,(joe f),ME,MYSELF,AND I..!AS ALWAYS ,,THE REAL AC Collins,,later Joe F,,,,just too easy.
^ can anyone understand that???
So you admit your shortcomings in reading comprehension,,,6:22 ?try screaming upstairs for a ADULT to help you!
You are a drunk ninkompoop. Go back to school and learn how to write like normal people.
it appears that Haints/dmaker are off their meds once again. oh the horror of it all. They must be a real pain in the arse for their nanny's tonightSuch impudent childrenTalley ho !Joe
Joey boy hates the burden and loves to special plead. Poor little guy. So stupid!!!!!!OGTG
^ we just found evidence of bigfoot scat and there's plenty of it !Joe
^ Be careful,it might tast like SH#T
I don't know what's more cringeworthy... This guy's meltdown or the fact that he doesn't know how to apply special pleading properly. (Creased)
Looks like somebody carpet bombed the Dodson thread and a few landed here. Collateral damage.
"Scientists discount the existence of Bigfoot and consider it to be a combination of folklore, misidentification, and hoax, rather than a living animal, because of the lack of physical evidence"WHO AND WHERE ARE THESE DOUCHEBAG SCIENTISTS!! BRING THEM TO ME!!
Here we go with the tough guy act again. Why don't you send them your hoaxed photo and bring them to yourself. Or maybe your compelling evidence from when you took a y shaped stick and stuck it in the ground. Maybe show them some of your fascinating blue bag photos which as you so cleverly pointed out, can't be debunked. Or wait, no wait.. the eye's.. show them the eyes that you put through 10 different photoshop filters!!! That will bring those douchebag scientists to your doorstep!!!
Why so they can laugh at your blurry pictures