Beacon Bigfoot Hoaxers Exposed! Again!


This video caught my attention on youtube, not because the costume is believable, but because of the circumstances surrounding it. The photos were taken near a set of railroad tracks, presumably in the Hudson Valley. Notice the person pretending to be a bigfoot, is hanging out where a passenger train can see them. Is this a hoax being set up for passengers on the train? The short answer is "yep". The Beacon Bigfoot site, which has been exposed in the past, is responsible for these images, which back in April they presented as real.


Check out the Beacon Bigfoot page.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Did you know that polar bears are literally always hungry?

      Delete
    2. ...Nothing interesting has been found in years..The prints with dermals, the PGF, the good anecdotes, are years or decades old..In the seventies there were anthropologists who at least responded to proponents like Krantz but now the mainstream engagement is non-existent,save for Sykes dna studies..
      Some proponents say it cannot be found without a mainstream scientific effort, but with every passing year without anything decent turning up such an endeavor is less and less likely to get launched..There will always be conmen, but can this ever be resolved to every honest persons satisfaction?...EEG

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Yawn! been there done that !!
      all have been refuted ×10 !!!

      SAME OLE SAME OLE!!!

      Delete
    5. Given that dermatoglyphics were accumulated in track impressions in 1982, the exact same biological traits surfaced again in September 2000, almost 20 years later;
      "The ridge characteristics (in the Skookum Cast) are consistent with other examples from Sasquatch footprints Meldrum has studied in collaboration with officer Jimmy Chilcutt, a latent fingerprint examiner with the Conroe, Texas, Police Department. The anatomy of the heel, ankle, and Achilles tendon are also distinct and consistent with models of the Sasquatch foot derived by Meldrum after examining hundreds of alleged Sasquatch footprints.
      Hair samples collected at the scene and from the cast itself and examined by Dr. Henner Fahrenbach, a biomedical research scientist from Beaverton, Ore., were primarily of deer, elk, coyote, and bear, as was expected since tracks in the wallow were mostly of those animals. However, based on characteristics matching those of otherwise indeterminate primate hairs collected in association with other Sasquatch sightings, he identified a single distinctly primate hair as “Sasquatch.”"
      http://www.bfro.net/news/bodycast/ISU_press_rel_cast.pdf

      ... This also alludes to up to 12 morphologically uniform hair samples verified to be of an unclassified primate by multiple camps of primatologists over the past couple of decades. You also have footage that in my opinion is better than the PGF, such as the Leaping Russian Yeti. The reason I say this, is because it appears to not only be a matching specimen to Patty, but it's speed and motion is ridiculously impressive. And that's just one footage source of many very good sources that have surfaced in recent years. The extraordinary nature of what this evidence entails is in fact what's holding back the requirement of subsequent mainstream investigative measures. It means that until extraordinary evidence surfaces (a body), the subject isn't going to draw the attention of a majority of mainstream scientists who would only THEN be in a position to become aware of the many evidences that preceded it. Without this, few will see beyond the hoaxing and pop culture. It's a very detrimental circle that can be simplified as the requirement of extraordinary evidence without the extraordinary effort it would require to source it. The cart before the horse.

      Delete
    6. Sorry drunk... You've never done anything of the sort.

      Delete
    7. Don't forget the statue of a wookie in Nevada -- that was literally the best evidence you've cited to date!

      Delete
    8. I actually feel a little bit sorry for you that you have to peddle that rubbish. But it's not like using facts, or even a remote level of intelligence has ever been your style now, eh? The facts aren't important to you. Trolling and getting even for the agitation you've endured is everything.

      Troll.

      Delete
    9. @7:10 If you cant prove me wrong ,,then i am rite,,
      and thats MR.DRUNK TO YOU ,,
      YA LUNATIC!! LOL!

      AC collins

      Delete
    10. Perfect,, you have a drunk arguing with a psychopathic nut case...

      Delete
    11. You believe "Bigfoot" is paranormal. Don't you think you should provide something that is falisifiable before asking someone to prove you wrong?

      What a patoot.

      Delete
    12. AC... You've labelled yourself a drunk in the very next comment to yours at 7:30. Seriously bro, how on earth can you refer to anyone else as a nut case??

      Delete
    13. @7:35 go tell it to Andy White PHD.

      AC collins

      Delete
    14. joe(iktomi)f AT LEAST IM NOT IN DENILE!! ,,LOL!

      AC collins

      Delete
    15. What, tell Andy White that you believe "Bigfoot" is paranormal?

      Delete
    16. I think you mean "denial", and at least I have something to substantiate my ideas.

      Delete
    17. I have debunked every point you have ever made pertianing to your theory that bigfoot being A HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN..

      As far as A White is concerned he already knows you're a "LOON"!! JOE!!

      Delete
    18. Yes... In your intoxicated mind you have, unfortunately in the world of the occasionally sober, that doesn't amount to much.

      Delete
    19. @7:59 haa haaa .at least all I have to do is eat somthing or sleep! ,
      You Joe ! are permanently psychotic!!

      your pal AC collins

      Delete
    20. What the hell is wrong with your spelling and grammar? We don't expect perfection, but TRY MAN TRY!

      Delete
    21. ...True, the Skookum cast is fairly recent and was the cause of some debate among experts..The leaping yeti video not some much: I have not even seen it on Monsterquest type shows...

      Delete
    22. The footage is still relatively new... And I have very little faith on what mainstream sources pick up as worthy of documenting.

      Delete
  2. "Don't you think you should provide something that is falisifiable before asking someone to prove you wrong?" Iktomi, did you really just say that? You violate that idea every day on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Iktomi, once again. I have lived all over Florida, from the Panhandle to the Everglades. I have hit every so-called Bigfoot hotspot in the state. Fly into Tampa or Orlando. I will show you any area in the state you want to search.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Iktomi's airplane would not be able to Make to the usa.
      somthing about TAKEOFF WEIGHT!!

      Delete
    2. Because of his limited income, Joerg won't be traveling anywhere outside a two mile radius of whichever subsidized tenement he calls home.

      Delete
    3. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/biscardis-group-searching-for-bigfoot.html?showComment=1424265382593#c7861569630984876498

      haints Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 5:22:00 PM PST
      Despite what Iktomi may think, I am an active Squatcher who worked with Biscardi and Fasano in Florida.

      Yes... We all know about your level of "research" (pfffffft!!!!)

      Plenty of videos;
      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
      http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
      http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
      http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
      http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
      http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
      http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI
      https://youtu.be/31iMxiZUqVc
      ... Just no Sasquatch "in a zoo".

      Delete
    4. How much field research have you done?

      Delete
    5. Very little where I'm from... But I have the affiliation of researchers who've had their field research and research sites written about and published in books, and have plenty of regular contact with people conducting field research in some of the most pristine wilderness in North America.

      Delete
    6. WHAT A BIG FAT LAZY EXCUSE!!
      THEN AGAIN THAT'S WHO YOU ARE. EXCUSES,EXCUSES,EXCUSES!!

      HAAAA HAAA HAAA !! GOD BLESS YOU BRO!
      YOUR PAL AC collins!!:-))

      Delete
    7. No bigger excuse than attributing 100% paranormal attributes to a creature who's physical evidence you're too drunk to understand.

      Delete
    8. Iktomi, those are not the only people I have worked with. I have also worked with researchers you have never heard of because they keep a low profile.

      I've met with Dave Sheely and gone to places he said were active. Google Gothe State Forest. Google Colt Creek State Park. I've been there.

      Joe, you are a man with a paper yazhool. You never searched beyond your mom's basement.

      Delete
    9. The offer is open. Apalachicola National Forest to the Everglades. Green Swamp. Seminole Reservation. Lake Okeechobee. Ocala National Forest. Myakka. Been to all at least half a dozen times. You can look for yourself or sit on your arse.

      Delete
  4. http://centumentltdreview.com/awakened-millionaire-academy-secrets-review/

    Time is money, especially when it comes to writing. Writers aren't paid by the hour so it stands to reason that the more you write, the more you can earn. And the quickest things to write are short articles. And I'll show you how you can write them fast and how to use them to earn money.

    http://quantumvisionsystemreview.org/ed-conqueror-system-review/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not by s Bigfoot researcher, they can't hit the broadside of a barn....ask the NAWACKIES!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story