Monday, July 18, 2016

Sasquatch Ontario and the Talking Bigfoot are Back!


Sasquatch Ontario has returned with a video titled "A New Beginning". What is going on with this? Bigfoot talking, making marbles appear out of thin air, the high strangeness continues.


33 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Sasquatch Ontario does have a very large following.

      Delete
    2. DS doesn't like others tapping into his market

      Delete
    3. Your getting on my nerves too, Vegas! You're just as bad as Douchebag-maker, if you aren't going to tell me which of my 1,800+ vids are not Legit.

      WHY WOULD I GO AFTER OTHER BOGUS RESEARCHERS, IF I WASNT CONFIDENT WITH MY OWN EVIDENCE...THINK ABOUT THAT!

      Delete
  2. Was just watching some of the old videos last night

    ReplyDelete
  3. MIKE MIKE......toilet paper...MIKE

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wonder if the Sasquatches hate BLM too?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yeah, when nothing happens you can always revert to "bigfoot mimics mosquitoes." Un-f-ingbelievable! What will it be next, "Bigfoot was mimicking my g/f while I got pegged last night." For cripes-sake. Will it ever end with this nonsense?

    ReplyDelete
  6. And people wonder why science doesn't take bigfoot "research" seriously?

    Remember where I said flat earthers make bigfoot believers look sane by comparison? I take it all back.

    I can't wait to see how Ikky tries to defend this idiocy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You don't know the first thing about how science works, Hates... Otherwise you'd have cited at least one mainstream source to put all this to bed, god knows you haven't the intelligence to come up with anything original.

      A failed researcher who's bitter at everyone else for his short comings. What a patoot.

      Delete
    2. Poor Ikky. He still has no clue who he's talking to.

      He thinks I need to cite a "mainstream source" to show that flat earthers are wrong. Or maybe he's demanding a "mainstream source" to show that a youtube attention whore shouting "mike!" isn't bigfoot.

      And he thinks I'm the one who doesn't understand science?

      And that's not even starting on the personal insults. Notice how he immediately tries to go on the attack instead of making even a bare attempt to defend his fellow bigfoot "researcher". I guess even Ikky is smart enough to know better than try to defend this bunk.

      Or maybe not.

      Delete
    3. THOU SHALL SPEAK NO EVIL AGAINST A FELLOW BIGFOOT BELIEVER!

      So shall it be written so shall it be done.

      Delete
    4. Haints... Sorry, you probably need to develop from a ten year olds literacy, but you need to cite at least one mainstream source for the general, not immediate subject matter, that to you is so obviously bunk. The only person who's blithering about flat earthers is you. The only person who cares about Sasquatch Ontario, is you.

      If you understood science, you'd be able to cite one definitive source that shuts me up. But that's just it... It's why you're back here all the time name dropping me and bi*ching, because that's your level, not science. But aren't you a "researcher", Haints? Self-admittedly? Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    5. Who is Haints?

      You REALLY have no clue who you're talking to, Ikky.

      And you're really claiming that some Canadian schmuck shouting "Mike!" while burping Molson is actually a bigfoot talking? Seriously?

      That doesn't need any documentation cited against it. All it needs are two words: Prove it.

      Tell Sasquatch Ontario to put down the Molson (because I know he can't spring for Kokanee) and prove it.

      Where is the specimen?

      And don't try to bring up those human skulls again. If you're going to try pushing some bunkum, at least try some new bunkum.

      Delete
    6. That seems to be a favorite tactic by some of the "true believers" here-- an opposing anonymous poster has to be a boogie man like haints or dmaker.

      Delete
    7. Sorry chump! I'll say it again... The only person who's remotely concerned with SO is you... Here's your specimen;

      https://thedavisreport.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/unusual-skull-found-near-lovelock-nevada-in-1967/

      ... And there's such a long list of comment sections as to the reasons why you're such a little butthurt b*tch. I'm still waiting on an example of those collective archaic traits that are allegedly, "so common in native Americans"... Why's that so hard? It's beautiful to see you blithering and whining, putting words in peoples mouths and bringing the Humboldt skull up all the time... You must have needed a dummy after following Joe around on other blogs, ha ha!!

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    9. The best I've ever read from you is a misunderstanding of the word "neolithic" in the Humboldt paper. What you're too stupid to realise, is that the person that skull belonged to was merely ALIVE in the Neolithic. Those features can't be categorised as Neolithic, because there are none categorised by anthropology as being unique for that time period, you stupid twat. It does nothing but present a timeline for such prehistoric features that transitions into the present... It means that the idea that such people living into modern times, is in fact proven. You blithering patoot. Ha ha!!

      And that's your best argument... So how's about that skull?

      Delete
    10. that's because Haints and Dmaker do post on here as anons . They are ISFers whose only mandate is to come on here and start bloody drama. miserable lads who cloak themselves in the same misery. Go out for a pint , you might enjoy yourselves

      Joe

      Delete
    11. That's actually a great idea, they should go out together for a pint. I highly doubt either has any friends.

      Delete
    12. Oh Ikky. You were told not to bring up those human skulls again.

      You do this every single time, and every single time you only demonstrate your own ignorance.

      For your own sake, go find a class on physical anthropology or anatomy and take it. Then maybe you'd know what to look for when looking for bigfoot evidence.

      Oh who am I kidding? You'll never actually look for evidence. All you ever do is drag up laughably irrelevant junk and insist it's evidence.

      Delete
    13. What an absolute failure you are... I guess these "all so common native Americans features", aren't so common after all, eh? If you haven't got the b*lls to back up your crud, don't spout it.

      Tee-hee!!

      Delete
  7. Swamp gas was ignited by fireflys causing a blue bag to fly up into a tree all the while making a mosquito sound. Erie and Squatchy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Seriously if it comes out of Canada it is totally suspect I don't care who it is. Bigfoot research from north of the border is pure unadulterated bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am ecstatic that Sasquatch Ontario is back making videos for 2 reasons. The first reason being that he was making incredible progress and I hate to see that come to an end. The second being that the most jealous Bigfoot researcher on the planet, Dr. Matthew Johnson, is probably in the middle of some epileptic fit as a result of being faced with more compelling recordings from Sasquatch Ontario, that the Dr. is going to have to find someway to refute. Dr. Johnson has never produced one single compelling video recording of a Sasquatch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^^ Sure sounds like Sas Ontario, who the heck cares what a bogus researcher thinks about another bogus researcher, for real??
      You lost your marbles!! Oh wait, Sas Ontario found them!

      Delete
  10. This guy and Alex Midnight Walker are the same! Two fuctards of bigfootery!

    ReplyDelete