Youtuber Tri diver takes a look at a piece of footage reportedly that of a bigfoot being pursued through the woods by the cameraman. Is it the real deal?
I thought joe finally left after that absolute embarasment the community suffered when johnsons friend claimed to have an all night foot massage from a cloaked bigfoot. I mean that is right up there with portals, bigfoots living under a tree, bigfoots being tree people, mindspeak, bigfoots knocking on your door to offer you garlic and even nephilim hybrid dna. I mean who wouldnt think "wow this has gone too far now"? But no... hes back hoping we have forgotten. But we have not forgotten.
Apart from the sensationalist stuff that you enjoy highlighting, 3:29, it's funny how in all that list you never once highlighted the physical, biological, audio and video footage that makes all your focus a little pointless? There's a reason that you focus on this, and ironically it's for the same reasons some crack pots use it in defence for the creature... Because it cannot be proved either way. You should be focussing on what CAN be measured by science. Everything else afterwards is irrelevant when the creature you're trying to sensationalise is by scienific methods being shown to be leaving its sign on the environment.
The sensationalisation exists precisely because there is no physical, biological, audio or video evidence.
Why dont you get sensationalist youtube videos about creatures that actually exist? Thats right, because they actually exist and are discussed in scientific venues, not by some nutters on youtube and obscure blogs.
Sorry kid, but it must be a sad existence spending your life trying to convince people that there is no evidence, only to have someone like me copy and paste your self esteem away.
When the self proclaimed #1 Bigfoot and cryptid researcher is some quack chiropractic religious fundamentalist lunatic then you should know exactly what you are getting into by coming to this blog. Its either that f ucking stooge or Iktomi who will copy and paste old irrelevant already disregarded data and when presented with this fact he will then present you with wild conspiracy theories while simultaneously building a verbal shrine of himself to jack off to. Its like listening to Donald Trump. All these researchers and enthusiasts will give you a hour long speech on how smart they while telling you the dumbest shit you've ever heard in your life. And this is the best this blog has to offer. Only when Dmaker comes on and destroys these idiots does this blog offer anything of value, and thats only comedic value, as you watch Iktomi meltdown and retreat back to his middle school level circular logic arguments. Just look at Doctor Squatches rant up there and tell me that sounds like a sane person to you. Nah, there's obviously some bats in the belfry. So welcome to Bigfoot Evidence, everyone here is a f ucking idiot.
Here we go... Get busy showing me how the following can be so easily disregarded... Clear photos; http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg Bones; http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/621-anthropologists-paper-on-the-lovelock-skull/ Forensic physical evidence; http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints Audio; http://www.sasquatchcanada.com/uploads/9/4/5/1/945132/kts_p182-186.pdf
... Maybe if you name drop "dmaker" enough, he'll come and give it another go for you. It's not circular logic when I'm referencing evidence that stands up to scrutiny, but it's nice to see you trying to work on your vocabulary even if it's off the back of projection. In science, the burden of proof falls upon the claimant; and the more extraordinary a claim, the heavier is the burden of proof demanded. Your extraordinary claim is that there is nothing to thousands of years of cultural and contemporary reports, that have physical evidence to support. If a critic asserts that there is evidence for disproof, he is making a claim and therefore also has to bear a burden of proof. Using your very own culture hopping, hundreds year old conspiracy to shift that burden is beyond embarrassing, especially when you're pointing the fingers at others attempting the same.
But you're not known for being a very clever boy, are you Chewie?
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Peace!!!
ReplyDeleteMirror mirror on the wall
DeleteWho's the fairest one of all
JOE !!! :)
It's just me,
Ricky:)
^^ back to the gay sites with you Ricky retarto
DeleteStove pipe!
DeleteTee Hee Hee Hee !!! Sausage dogs !
DeleteHello again new friend 3:08. Weenie jokes always make my laugh OUT LOUD !!! :)
It's just me,
Ricky:)
You have no friends Ricky Pindickie
DeleteI thought joe finally left after that absolute embarasment the community suffered when johnsons friend claimed to have an all night foot massage from a cloaked bigfoot. I mean that is right up there with portals, bigfoots living under a tree, bigfoots being tree people, mindspeak, bigfoots knocking on your door to offer you garlic and even nephilim hybrid dna. I mean who wouldnt think "wow this has gone too far now"? But no... hes back hoping we have forgotten. But we have not forgotten.
ReplyDeleteGot cloaked foot massaging bigfoot?
Are you serious, Johnson actually said this? Wow. Too think Joe cheered Johnson on for years.
DeleteSo you follow Johnson closely, ---is what your saying?
DeleteHA HA HA HA HA.
Meanwhile, Dogman Evidence paves the way for the future of Cryptozoology.
DeleteApart from the sensationalist stuff that you enjoy highlighting, 3:29, it's funny how in all that list you never once highlighted the physical, biological, audio and video footage that makes all your focus a little pointless? There's a reason that you focus on this, and ironically it's for the same reasons some crack pots use it in defence for the creature... Because it cannot be proved either way. You should be focussing on what CAN be measured by science. Everything else afterwards is irrelevant when the creature you're trying to sensationalise is by scienific methods being shown to be leaving its sign on the environment.
DeleteThe sensationalisation exists precisely because there is no physical, biological, audio or video evidence.
DeleteWhy dont you get sensationalist youtube videos about creatures that actually exist? Thats right, because they actually exist and are discussed in scientific venues, not by some nutters on youtube and obscure blogs.
Sorry kid, but it must be a sad existence spending your life trying to convince people that there is no evidence, only to have someone like me copy and paste your self esteem away.
DeleteWhy do it to yourself?
When the self proclaimed #1 Bigfoot and cryptid researcher is some quack chiropractic religious fundamentalist lunatic then you should know exactly what you are getting into by coming to this blog. Its either that f ucking stooge or Iktomi who will copy and paste old irrelevant already disregarded data and when presented with this fact he will then present you with wild conspiracy theories while simultaneously building a verbal shrine of himself to jack off to. Its like listening to Donald Trump. All these researchers and enthusiasts will give you a hour long speech on how smart they while telling you the dumbest shit you've ever heard in your life. And this is the best this blog has to offer. Only when Dmaker comes on and destroys these idiots does this blog offer anything of value, and thats only comedic value, as you watch Iktomi meltdown and retreat back to his middle school level circular logic arguments. Just look at Doctor Squatches rant up there and tell me that sounds like a sane person to you. Nah, there's obviously some bats in the belfry. So welcome to Bigfoot Evidence, everyone here is a f ucking idiot.
ReplyDeleteHere we go... Get busy showing me how the following can be so easily disregarded...
DeleteClear photos;
http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg
Bones;
http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/621-anthropologists-paper-on-the-lovelock-skull/
Forensic physical evidence;
http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints
Audio;
http://www.sasquatchcanada.com/uploads/9/4/5/1/945132/kts_p182-186.pdf
... Maybe if you name drop "dmaker" enough, he'll come and give it another go for you. It's not circular logic when I'm referencing evidence that stands up to scrutiny, but it's nice to see you trying to work on your vocabulary even if it's off the back of projection. In science, the burden of proof falls upon the claimant; and the more extraordinary a claim, the heavier is the burden of proof demanded. Your extraordinary claim is that there is nothing to thousands of years of cultural and contemporary reports, that have physical evidence to support. If a critic asserts that there is evidence for disproof, he is making a claim and therefore also has to bear a burden of proof. Using your very own culture hopping, hundreds year old conspiracy to shift that burden is beyond embarrassing, especially when you're pointing the fingers at others attempting the same.
But you're not known for being a very clever boy, are you Chewie?
5:18- why do you come here if you think that way . must be that you yourself are the big idiot wanker you seem to think everyone else is
Deletego away and never darken our site
Joe
Although if you'd like to "darken my site," I'd fancy that !
DeleteJoe
God your smug iktomi I would like to name drop your face 🙉🙈🙊
DeleteShove off shribes . Your name sounds like an STD.
Deleteand fake Joe- you're probably riddled with a ton of STD's
Other than that have a great weekend lads. tiddly doo
Joe
Wow, Joe cleared that situation up rather perfectly.
DeleteThe only thing Joe has ever cleared up was his allegiance to all things bigfoot. God forbid he ever have an original and meaningful thought.
DeleteAt least fake Joe occasionally has a funny line.
^fake Joe's fake wannabe concubine
DeleteJoe
Fake Joe rules!
DeleteLol you guys need to get a job the dry docking must be getting old
DeleteAnd who says tiddly do? No real Brit I bet..
DeleteStan Gordon !
ReplyDelete