Friday, July 1, 2016

Chasing Bigfoot Raw Footage Video Breakdown


Youtuber Tri diver takes a look at a piece of footage reportedly that of a bigfoot being pursued through the woods by the cameraman. Is it the real deal? 


26 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Mirror mirror on the wall
      Who's the fairest one of all

      JOE !!! :)

      It's just me,
      Ricky:)

      Delete
    2. ^^ back to the gay sites with you Ricky retarto

      Delete
    3. Tee Hee Hee Hee !!! Sausage dogs !

      Hello again new friend 3:08. Weenie jokes always make my laugh OUT LOUD !!! :)

      It's just me,
      Ricky:)

      Delete
    4. You have no friends Ricky Pindickie

      Delete
  2. I thought joe finally left after that absolute embarasment the community suffered when johnsons friend claimed to have an all night foot massage from a cloaked bigfoot. I mean that is right up there with portals, bigfoots living under a tree, bigfoots being tree people, mindspeak, bigfoots knocking on your door to offer you garlic and even nephilim hybrid dna. I mean who wouldnt think "wow this has gone too far now"? But no... hes back hoping we have forgotten. But we have not forgotten.

    Got cloaked foot massaging bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you serious, Johnson actually said this? Wow. Too think Joe cheered Johnson on for years.

      Delete
    2. So you follow Johnson closely, ---is what your saying?


      HA HA HA HA HA.

      Delete
    3. Meanwhile, Dogman Evidence paves the way for the future of Cryptozoology.

      Delete
    4. Apart from the sensationalist stuff that you enjoy highlighting, 3:29, it's funny how in all that list you never once highlighted the physical, biological, audio and video footage that makes all your focus a little pointless? There's a reason that you focus on this, and ironically it's for the same reasons some crack pots use it in defence for the creature... Because it cannot be proved either way. You should be focussing on what CAN be measured by science. Everything else afterwards is irrelevant when the creature you're trying to sensationalise is by scienific methods being shown to be leaving its sign on the environment.

      Delete
    5. The sensationalisation exists precisely because there is no physical, biological, audio or video evidence.

      Why dont you get sensationalist youtube videos about creatures that actually exist? Thats right, because they actually exist and are discussed in scientific venues, not by some nutters on youtube and obscure blogs.

      Delete
    6. Sorry kid, but it must be a sad existence spending your life trying to convince people that there is no evidence, only to have someone like me copy and paste your self esteem away.

      Why do it to yourself?

      Delete
  3. When the self proclaimed #1 Bigfoot and cryptid researcher is some quack chiropractic religious fundamentalist lunatic then you should know exactly what you are getting into by coming to this blog. Its either that f ucking stooge or Iktomi who will copy and paste old irrelevant already disregarded data and when presented with this fact he will then present you with wild conspiracy theories while simultaneously building a verbal shrine of himself to jack off to. Its like listening to Donald Trump. All these researchers and enthusiasts will give you a hour long speech on how smart they while telling you the dumbest shit you've ever heard in your life. And this is the best this blog has to offer. Only when Dmaker comes on and destroys these idiots does this blog offer anything of value, and thats only comedic value, as you watch Iktomi meltdown and retreat back to his middle school level circular logic arguments. Just look at Doctor Squatches rant up there and tell me that sounds like a sane person to you. Nah, there's obviously some bats in the belfry. So welcome to Bigfoot Evidence, everyone here is a f ucking idiot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here we go... Get busy showing me how the following can be so easily disregarded...
      Clear photos;
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg
      Bones;
      http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/621-anthropologists-paper-on-the-lovelock-skull/
      Forensic physical evidence;
      http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints
      Audio;
      http://www.sasquatchcanada.com/uploads/9/4/5/1/945132/kts_p182-186.pdf

      ... Maybe if you name drop "dmaker" enough, he'll come and give it another go for you. It's not circular logic when I'm referencing evidence that stands up to scrutiny, but it's nice to see you trying to work on your vocabulary even if it's off the back of projection. In science, the burden of proof falls upon the claimant; and the more extraordinary a claim, the heavier is the burden of proof demanded. Your extraordinary claim is that there is nothing to thousands of years of cultural and contemporary reports, that have physical evidence to support. If a critic asserts that there is evidence for disproof, he is making a claim and therefore also has to bear a burden of proof. Using your very own culture hopping, hundreds year old conspiracy to shift that burden is beyond embarrassing, especially when you're pointing the fingers at others attempting the same.

      But you're not known for being a very clever boy, are you Chewie?

      Delete
    2. 5:18- why do you come here if you think that way . must be that you yourself are the big idiot wanker you seem to think everyone else is

      go away and never darken our site

      Joe

      Delete
    3. Although if you'd like to "darken my site," I'd fancy that !

      Joe

      Delete
    4. God your smug iktomi I would like to name drop your face 🙉🙈🙊

      Delete
    5. Shove off shribes . Your name sounds like an STD.
      and fake Joe- you're probably riddled with a ton of STD's

      Other than that have a great weekend lads. tiddly doo

      Joe

      Delete
    6. Wow, Joe cleared that situation up rather perfectly.

      Delete
    7. The only thing Joe has ever cleared up was his allegiance to all things bigfoot. God forbid he ever have an original and meaningful thought.

      At least fake Joe occasionally has a funny line.

      Delete
    8. ^fake Joe's fake wannabe concubine

      Joe

      Delete
    9. Lol you guys need to get a job the dry docking must be getting old

      Delete
    10. And who says tiddly do? No real Brit I bet..

      Delete