World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
Got monkey suit?
The better question has always been "got monkey?"
How does it feel to have Andy White tell you that you are an idiot Joey?
Haha Iktomi, you are still wiping the egg off your face after the humiliation Andy White dealt out to you.You keep saying that Bigfoot is a human; but then you also claim that PG shows a bigfoot. No recent human ancestor of the homo sapiens variety is completely covered in hair.You say that the bigfoot-as-giant-ape theory is bogus, but you are obsessed with the PG film which is the highlight of the "evidence' for the bigfoot-as-giant-ape camp.It's game over, Joe. You lost. Andy White saw to that.
He sure did 8:35. Andy White took Joergamina out with the garbage!!
again we ask you ladsgot monkey suit ?We shall await your answerJoe
Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/
6:28... Well if you can't test the premise that the subject in that footage isn't organic, there's your "monkey"!8:35... Apart from the part where Andy agreed with Joe that there are large human skeletal remains documented in the US, do you think you could quote me where he's managed to debunk the forensic, biological, audio and video evidence for "Bigfoot"?There is nothing, not one thing about Patty's anatomy that cannot be pointed to in either modern humans or ancient humans in our lineage. You take the hair off Patty, and take a look what she looks like; http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-06Q66YaU1hc/UaedBDY7fZI/AAAAAAAAF7Q/NBuj57LXxHA/s1600/Transformation.jpghttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/-p5MXz1az1RQ/UaedStXls5I/AAAAAAAAF7Y/vD7eG9KAKqU/s1600/Harvey1.jpg... We don't have the DNA of Patty, what we do have however is a skull in Khwit with ancient morphology that confirms his mother's descriptions. If you didn't know, Zana was described nearly precisely as Patty looked, a 100 years before any "Bigfoot" pop culture was around. Zana's DNA is ancient homo Sapien.No, no... The pleasure's all mine.
Joe got destroyed by Andy White, telling Joergamina that his ideas were ridiculous, and not even worth commenting on. AHHHHH HAHAHAHAHA. You have been blown the f#ck out Joergamina!!
Even if a million PhD's call my ideas "nonsense", it means little. If there's scientific evidence that not one from those PhD's can explain away, it falls into the bracket of pioneering which has always been in the minority.
Actually Iktomi you are full of fuctardery! Zana was just a slave from Africa and nothing more. No ancient Home Sapien, just a modern humans black slave and that's it.
A Negroid cranium is long in length, narrow in breadth, and low in height. The sagittal contour is flat and the occipital profile is quite rounded. The flatness of the sagittal contour is due to a post-bregmatic depression, a trait that occurs frequently in the Negroid cranium. The Negroid forehead is described as steep, with some sources describing it as rounded. According to studies in the 70's the Negroid cranium exhibits thicker parieto-occipital areas than Caucasoid crama, but nothing as pronounced as paleolithic occipital buns dimensions across a frequency that would determine them an accepted trait. Other features of Negroid skulls are the saggital outline being highly variable, post-bregmatic depression. Nose form is broad. Nasal bone size is medium to small. Nasal profile is straight/concave. Nasal spine is reduced, with the nasal sill being dull or absent. He incisor form is bladed with the facial prognathism extreme, as is the alveolar prognathism. Malar form is reduced and the palatal form parabolic. Orbital form is rounded with the mandible described as gracile and at an oblique gonial angle. Chin projection is reduced with the chin form being median. None of the morphological features we see in Khwit's skull.
You call it pioneering. Everyone else calls it fringe. Hey. I just realized fringe rhymes with cringe. So there's that.
"Even if a million PhD's call my ideas "nonsense", it means little. "So, you are admitting now that you Joe? You forget to refer to yourself in the third person, Josephine.
^Iktomi and his split personalities. He probably wants to distance himself from his Joe account, since Andy White so cleverly and brutally debunked his nonsense.Hey, Iktomi, if you are so sure of the validity of your ideas, why don't you open an account over at Andy White's blog and engage with him regarding your evidence? Andy White clearly has the skills and knowledge to evaluate the evidence for bigfoot. If your evidence is as good as you say it is, why not try presenting some of your links to him in his comments page? You are so confident in the quality and veracity of the evidence that you tout, that surely someone with actual training will have to agree with you, no? Then you can silence your critics on this blog.But you and I both know that you don't have the stones to do that. Because we both know what Andy White will say about your bizarre "stealthy hidden crypto-Native Americans" theory. It is garbage, and after what he did to your Joe account, you fled with your tail between your legs.
Zana described exactly like Patty? And I thought I was high..
9:07... People know where to find me. Your burned remains!
^^Sitting alone in a corner booth of a Waffle House? By the way, they burdened your toast.
5:13... If it's fringe, you'll have no issue concocting a logical argument against such "nonsense". Applying a conspiracy theory doesn't cut it.9:07... Since you're so educated in this "debunking", why don't you post extracts from his blog and show everyone just how "brutal" it was? I don't think you've even been over to his blog and read what's been posted, have you? I have no intention of going over to Andy's blog to comment anytime soon. Why would anyone merely repeat the comments Joe has written over there for an actual response? Andy's blog doesn't need spamming, it's a respectable comment section, unlike this, where silly little chidren try and stir up agravation because they are too stupid to develop a logical argument themselves. And to Donald... What's the matter boio? You've had me on your mind a lot lately, tell me how you feel? What's the bugbear this time around? You see 9:07... In Donald is someone who's actually been over there to read the comment section. Me thinks he's a little p*ssed.
That sure looked real to me.
PAATY HAAS BEEG GUD VA GINA GUD YOOOO NOOWS HOWE GUD MEE NUUT SAZ
SCUUT KAARPEENTIR NOOWS HOWE GUD JANUS HAAS GUD, NUUT SMEELS GUD BUUT STEEL GUD
^ stop yelling!!!
Fox? But Janice said you were dead . . .
^ Hmmm - Janice may well have been correct.
Who is Andy White? Never heard of him.
Just to add to the mix look at this theory on Neanderthals http://themandus.org it is another route to the PG type Bigfoot?
I take that as seriously as I do the PG film.http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/06/19/neandertals-were-monsters/
Nothing clearer about an opposite handed view of the PG film. MK Davis is still looking for new ways to regain his long lost credibility since he went postal and attempted to imply that everyone associated with the PG film was a fraud, and that they were supposedly lying about there not being a massacre. Sorry MK, your were wrong. You just can't fix insanity.
MK - MUCUS KILLER, WHAT EVER HAPPEND WITH ALL THAT POISON MUCUS ORDEAL?