World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
Yes... By not having his points addressed and having a PhD who's sceptical of giant stories, agreeing that 7-7.5 foot skeletons have been found in the US.Like... Totally. : )
"Joe, I see you've been proclaiming some sort of "victory over Andy White" on your Bigfoot forum. I'm not sure if there was some sort of question you expected me to answer? Frankly your ideas sound like a bunch of nonsense to me, and not really worth responding to. If you have something to say to me, please say it where I'll actually be sure to see it. Otherwise what's the point?"OBLITERATED
Tee, hee! Like is said... When Joe's points are addressed, and he u-turns on the 7.5 foot skeletons, let Joe know. Ha ha!!
In Iktomi Joe's world Bigfoot attributes vacillate between modern humans and primitive humans based on how he tries to pigeon hole the argument.
Sounds like Iktomi is proclaiming "victory" again.
2:09... Yet I have the actual biological evidence to reference. Denial will eat away at you... Leave it go... Ssssshhhhh... 2:12... That feeling you're having is actually the realisation that you've been cheerleading a face fall.
No, I'm certain you're proclaiming "victory"- it's not like you don't have a history of doing so when it's not warranted.
It's not about "victories", it's about getting to the bottom of the matter. If a PhD doesn't address Joe's points, and the documented evidence of large human skeletons is agreed upon, we can deduce that maybe the points posed don't have as obvious answers as you would prefer, whilst the matter of skeletons is a slam dunk.Oops!
Iktomi Joe has always tried to "thread the needle" when it comes to Bigfoot.We end up with super ninja Bigfoot that can evade humans easily but still leave plenty of evidence (in his world) with buttloads of sightings.We also have different "types" of Bigfoot to explain different sighting descriptions. My favorite is the one that is in every way a modern human, yet at the same time a Bigfoot! Obviously Patty was a different "type"- the hairy gorilla.
From poster little foot on the AW blog page:"I can guess the direction it's going: perhaps sasquatches in fact aren't really exceptionally hairy; in fact, it's possible they wear fur of animals such as bears. That could have led to the myth/theory of their hairiness. They could be somewhat hairier though, like the Ainu in relation to the rest of the Japanese, perhaps they just share those genes with the Ainu. Both hypotheses aren't even mutually exclusive.And their "big foot" could be just snowshoes. Soon the orthodox bioantrhopological establishment will have no choice but to accept that there was a Sasquatch tribe after all, but probably they will try to ridicule it with strawman of "giant ape men" for a while, before they finally accept they were just a tribe, with perhaps exceptionally tall individuals, like the Patagonians, tall, but no real "giants". And then cryptoanthropozoologists will have been vindicated."
The sightings reports are precisely in line with what one would expect from a largely nocturnal creature tat buries it's dead and evades in social groups. It also has 70% of wilderness in the US to evade in. Like all intelligent creatures, it is subsceptible to curiosity and mistakes. Twisting the fact to your favour that if something exists, it is seen... Is seriously audacious. For such alleged contradictions, it should be even easier to explain away the evidence. 2:37... It's a shame there is forensic evidence in tracks, and hair samples with uniform morphology attributed to an uknown primate.
2:32... There are two widely reported types of relict hominid reported in the US. The Patty type and the Native American type. Nobody can expect someone who's been into this topic for ten minutes as a self esteem exercise to know this, however.
Honestly joe. Please seek medical help.
Your naivety is your own shortcoming... Nobody else's.
You are claiming there are not 1 but 2 different undiscovered primate species in north america. We can only tell you you are wrong so many times. Only you can help yourself now by seeking out a professional.
I would get around to explaining away the physical evidence for the type that's leaving its sign around the wilderness, don't worry about anything else.
At one time, Joe claimed there were three types of Bigfoot, but even he realized how idiotic that was!
... All the while the physical evidence remains. Chop! Chop!
There he is. There he goes again. Look, everyone! He posted it once again! Isn't he just the funniest guy around?! Oh my God.I can almost see your pathetic overweight frame glowing in the dark, lit by your computer screen which is the only source of light in your room, giggling like a like girl as you once again type your little "explain away the evidence" drivel and fill in the captcha. Or maybe you don't even fill in the captcha. Maybe you're such a disgusting NEET that you actually signed up for a blogger account, so you just choose a dumb native american name and equally moronic profile picture. Oh, and we all know the picture. The "epic" forest people, isn't it? I imagine you little shiit laughing so hard as you click post that you drop your Doritos on the floor, but it's ok, your mother will clean it up in the morning. Oh, that's right. Did I fail to mention? You live with your mother. You are a fat fu cking fu ckup, she's probably so sick of you already. So sick of having to do everything for you all goddamn day, every day, for a grown man who spends all his time on a bigfoot blog posting about a non existent monkey man. Just imagine this. She had you, and then she thought you were gonna be a scientist or an astronaut or something grand, and then you became a footer. A pathetic footer. She probably cries herself to sleep everyday thinking about how bad it is and how she wishes she could just disappear. She can't even try to talk with you because all you say is "GOT MONKEY SUIT???" You've become a parody of your own self. And that's all you are. A sad little man laughing in the dark by himself as he prepares to indulge in the same old dance that he's done a million times now. And that's all you'll ever be.
Ad hominem.So... Nothing about the evidence?
4:04 Come back to school, After you learn what the term Sub-Saharan African means!!!Until then,Sit in the corner with your "DUNCE CAP" on you Blathering Stoodge!!HAA HAAA HAA LOL!!:-)) Dr.B Sykes
4:41 was in reply to 3:44!oops...TYPO!
West Africa being a detail of geography of subsaharan Africa. AC Collins, you're just angry you didn't know humans are primates.
Wrong Joe! The simple fact is You need to google Sub-SaharanBefore you can remove your Dunce cap!!! Haaa Haaa lol."SCHOOLED BOYO" Big Boss Man :-))
Lol, So much for Iktomi's Zana theory!
Nice to see you've dropped the Sykes name, he'd be embarrassed to have his name to a person's comments who didn't know humans were apes.12:25... Did AC Collins manage to find a skull with the same morphology as Khwit's? Oops!