1. If you know the date, time and location, it would be possible to determine the height of the running figure based on the shadow cast. It would also be possible to return to the location, check the height of a tree and the length of the shadow cast by the tree and determine the height of the figure.
2. Immediately below the initial location of the running creature, there is what appears to be an automobile.
I would regard it as a *possible* that can never be conclusive so not something I would spend time wringing my hands over.
There are so many *probable* images being obtained now that offer new information about appearance, behavior and origin that it doesn't make sense to spend time on long-range images that can never convince anyone or that offer no scientific information.
If we knew the location, time and date, we should be able to find the angle of incidence for the sun, and thus the height of the subject, from the length of the shadow. (Slope could throw that off, but an onsite should establish that). https://www.google.com/maps/@42.4967352,-112.3728128,78m/data=!3m1!1e3
Actually, just finding a tree there, and getting the shadow length in the video, relative to the known height of the tree would accomplish that as well, but an onsite is definitely needed then.
Foot speed should be easy to calculate too.
These two things could shed light on whether those factors fall within human range.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Peace & love!!!
ReplyDeleteFFS! Same 2 U brother! FFS!
DeleteDude the peace and love shit is kinda gay?
ReplyDeleteFFS! You an authority on that lmao FFS!
DeleteEl fucko youo
DeleteToodle doo fellas !:)
ReplyDeleteI like the part when the frog jumps in the water!
ReplyDelete1. If you know the date, time and location, it would be possible to determine the height of the running figure based on the shadow cast. It would also be possible to return to the location, check the height of a tree and the length of the shadow cast by the tree and determine the height of the figure.
ReplyDelete2. Immediately below the initial location of the running creature, there is what appears to be an automobile.
Clearly fake.
Assuming the tire tracks in the road were created by standard sized vehicles and not an M-1 tank, I'd guess this particular bigfoot tops out at 3'7".
DeleteThere is a category for this type of sighting.
ReplyDeleteI would regard it as a *possible* that can never be conclusive so not something I would spend time wringing my hands over.
There are so many *probable* images being obtained now that offer new information about appearance, behavior and origin that it doesn't make sense to spend time on long-range images that can never convince anyone or that offer no scientific information.
Just sayin'.
There are no probable images that offer anything worthwhile. They are all worthless when it comes to evidentiary value.
DeleteIf you can't conclusively prove that a figure in a video is not a genuine bigfoot, then it is definitely a bigfoot.
DeletePeace and Love,
Cucktomi
Got drone suit? I'll see myself out....
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIf we knew the location, time and date, we should be able to find the angle of incidence for the sun, and thus the height of the subject, from the length of the shadow. (Slope could throw that off, but an onsite should establish that).
ReplyDeletehttps://www.google.com/maps/@42.4967352,-112.3728128,78m/data=!3m1!1e3
Actually, just finding a tree there, and getting the shadow length in the video, relative to the known height of the tree would accomplish that as well, but an onsite is definitely needed then.
Foot speed should be easy to calculate too.
These two things could shed light on whether those factors fall within human range.
oops, I see "haint" said almost the identical thing in their post already
ReplyDelete