Thursday, June 16, 2016

Mojo Bigfoot Encounters With Dave Ortiz


Bono Russell sits down with Dave Ortiz to discuss some of his more frightening bigfoot encounters. Check it out:

30 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. A little Andy White blow out for that fat face?

      Delete
    2. Boring!!

      You'll keep on flogging that dead horse until the proverbial penny drops that Joe's points are waiting to be responded to, whilst he has a sceptic PhD in Andy who endorses 7-7.5 foot tall skeletons in the US. Angry trolls have gotta troll I guess.

      I like Andy, he's a good guy.

      : )

      Delete
    3. Of course you do Joerg, because you are scared to death that you may have to face him in any kind of debate. Last time you tried it, you got squashed like the mental mindget you are. Hey, i mean how many of us here can say they have been told how stupid they are by a PhD?? We know at least one person. AHHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    4. Scared? Sorry, I've never engaged Andy in debate, and (cough, cough) I think you'll find Joe's points, to which I'm in total agreement with (cough, cough), are waiting to be responded to? For someone as sceptical as him to endorse the same skeletal remains I have for the past few years, is brilliant! What have I got to be scared of?

      I like Andy, he's a good guy.

      : )

      Delete
    5. Anyways! It's Wales v England don't you know?! I'm off down the pub!!

      Peace!!!

      Delete
    6. When Andy told you that your ideas were ridiculous and that you weren't worth responding too, did it hurt Joergamina? Like a deep down guy hurt? or maybe even a deep down butt hurt?

      Delete
    7. On here, I'm guessing you can relate those feelings daily. Sounds like you are projecting.

      So, how long have you believed in Bigfoot?

      Delete
    8. Joe, your points are not waiting to be responded to. You were told you your points are nonsense and are not worthy of a response.

      Delete
    9. Joe's shedding a tear in his beer because Wales lost in stoppage time.

      Delete
    10. In science, your feelings or intuitions are often more important than "facts". I feel that that I'm right about the Lovelock skulls being Bigfoot. Before you shat your knickers, hear me out. Ancient people believed in cyclops. It turned out that they felt that way because giant skulls appearing to have one eye had been found. It later turned out that these were elephant skulls. Well, elephants were giants so, in a sense, they were accurate. The Lovelock skulls are Sasquatch skulls. In time we will learn that this is true or there is an element of truth in what I say. Besides, I have revised my narrative to say that Bigfoot is human, so even if the Lovelock skull is 100% modern human, its still bigfoot. If you wankers can't handle the science, you shouldn't be debating with a scientific mind.

      Delete
    11. does Andy White have monkey suit ?
      i'll listen to Andy Williams any day over him
      and Dmaker- your knickers are starting to smell foul from your B.S

      Rule Britannia !

      Joe

      Delete
    12. Cucktomi, you've got to be the stupidest brit ever. You should brexit this blog.

      Delete
    13. blah, blah, blah
      blah, blah, blah
      Have you anything else to add to the discussion without being a prat ?
      show me the monkey suit and I shall leave but you can't so i'm around for a long time mate.
      and England won today !
      Rule Britannia !

      Joe

      Delete
    14. 5:24 and Don-Donz... There is no difference from the average troll finding my ideas as ridiculous, to a PhD claiming the same... If my ideas aren't shown to be bunk then being labelled "ridiculous" with no substantiation, I can handle.

      Fake Joe, quite an effort... If you put that effort into thinking of an argument you'd be dangerous.

      Delete
    15. Fake Iktomi... I see you're still hurting about the schooling you've had on the Humbolt skulls, ha ha ha ha ha!! What a prat you are. A first rate coward.

      : )

      Delete
  2. Big Papi is a bigfooter? Who knew!?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nah, just Pedroia and former teammate Papelbon believe.

      Delete
  3. WALES GOT BLOWN THE FU CK OUT.

    WHAT A WEEK IT HAS BEEN

    ANDY WHITE OBLITERATING JOE AND THEN WALES GETTING HUMILATATED.

    BLOWN

    THE

    FU CK

    OUT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andy White basically backs up what I've been saying all along. If you re-read Andy's writings you'd realize that he's making the case for Bigfoot.

      Delete
    2. "Frankly your ideas sound like a bunch of nonsense to me, and not really worth responding to."

      Andy White, PhD Anthroplogy

      Delete
    3. He is hardly making the case for bigfoot. He simply said that 7 foot skeletal remains have been found. Then he quickly emphasizes that this is in the realm of modern humans and requires not extraordinary explanation.

      It is you, Joe, that desperately tries to shoe horn those comments as support for your bigfoot is human theory. Your theory that Andy described as nonsense not worthy of a reply.

      But as usual the fat pigeon just craps on the board and waddles around in victory.

      Delete
    4. So, according to Joe, any human remains could be proof of bigfoot.

      Delete
    5. "The height average for the sampled population is 7’ 10", derived from a combination of eye witness estimates and scaling from footprints."
      http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_FAQ.asp?id=585

      For further reading on this;
      "Measurements and estimates on Sasquatch dimensions, collected over the last 40 years in the Western U.S and Canada, were subjected to statistical analysis and extrapolation by scaling laws appropriate to primates and mammals. The study has yielded average population values for foot length and width, scaling factors of foot length to height, values for weight, plantar pressure, walking and running gait, speed, and a tentative growth curve as a function of time for the female of the species. The results suggest a substantial population with traits different from those of other higher primates and humans."
      http://www.bfro.net/ref/theories/whf/fahrenbacharticle.htm

      Delete
    6. Quoting witness reports from the BFRO do nothing to strengthen your case. Eye witness testimony is not accepted as scientific evidence. Dimension extrapolated from footprints are not strong evidence either. When your foundation that you base your extrapolation upon could easily be faked or mistaken, is not a strong position.

      Do better, pigeon.

      Delete
    7. You've been exchanging with a fake Iktomi, you twit, ha ha ha!!

      What I will say is dimension extrapolation from track impressions IS strong evidence, because track impressions have forensic detail in them, data that is yet to be shown to be bunk. Sasquatch are human, and if there were 7-8 foot human skeletons in museums in the US today, then the concept of wild hairy versions residing in deep wildness areas wouldn't be so alien to people.

      Delete
    8. Oh... And I probably would have posted the two sources that fake Iktomi did at 2:31.

      Delete
    9. Oh.... like anyone reads any of my links.

      Delete
    10. Just because you're too much of a wimp, doesn't mean everyone else is.

      Delete