The Paranormal Review heads to a location where a reported bigfoot was captured on video. What did they find at the location, and was it really a bigfoot? Check it out:
I look upon it as a topic that is viewed by calm and serene folk as being rather over the edge of reason.
However,I believe you still have a point to prove so until you`ve managed that particular sticking point I shouldn`t bother with the distraction technique.There is a glaring omission from your "stance".
ps, hint -, bigfoot ain`t real - it`s a silly make believe tale to bolster the lonely lives of the stupid,and lame of mind.
A fringe topic indeed. Why would something so obviously bunk, something so unthreateningly fringe make someone like you require to belittle and reinforce your beliefs so much? If you look at this topic as being on the "edge of reason" (three words you doubt think somehow lifts your burden), then why do you struggle explaining away various evidences when they are presented to you? Surely, for something so ilogical that shouldn't really happen, right? And since you are a commentator of all things logical, why do you apply a culture hopping secret society of gorilla suit wearing conspirators all as a counter argument for these evidences? The burden of proof falls upon the claimant; and the more extraordinary a claim, the heavier is the burden of proof demanded. If a critic asserts that there is evidence for disproof, he is making a claim and therefore also has to bear a burden of proof. When you are presented with consistent scientific evidence, you need a little more than ilogical conspiracies as a means of shifting that burden.
You see, people like you use the Internet and anonymity to deal with psychological and emotional issues. People like you look at these fringe topics as a means of getting back some level of self esteem. Psychologists claim people that regularly conduct themselves in the way you do likely have problems with depression, low self-esteem, and anger; "They want to inject their own emotional turmoil into other people by luring them into negativity. It's a way for them to feel some kind of control or power over their own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense." http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/11/world/internet-trolling/
It's odd how Bigfoot is the only fringe topic where its "skeptics" are more demented and obsessed than its "believers".
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
It's odd how Bigfoot is the only fringe topic where its "skeptics" are more DEMENTED and obsessed than its "believers".
ReplyDeleteVery odd.
DeleteI fancy reviewing comparison videos of different sexy blokes !
DeleteJoe
2:29 - "Fringe" topic ?
DeleteI look upon it as a topic that is viewed by calm and serene folk as being rather over the edge of reason.
However,I believe you still have a point to prove so until you`ve managed that particular sticking point I shouldn`t bother with the distraction technique.There is a glaring omission from your "stance".
ps, hint -, bigfoot ain`t real - it`s a silly make believe tale to bolster the lonely lives of the stupid,and lame of mind.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteA fringe topic indeed. Why would something so obviously bunk, something so unthreateningly fringe make someone like you require to belittle and reinforce your beliefs so much? If you look at this topic as being on the "edge of reason" (three words you doubt think somehow lifts your burden), then why do you struggle explaining away various evidences when they are presented to you? Surely, for something so ilogical that shouldn't really happen, right? And since you are a commentator of all things logical, why do you apply a culture hopping secret society of gorilla suit wearing conspirators all as a counter argument for these evidences? The burden of proof falls upon the claimant; and the more extraordinary a claim, the heavier is the burden of proof demanded. If a critic asserts that there is evidence for disproof, he is making a claim and therefore also has to bear a burden of proof. When you are presented with consistent scientific evidence, you need a little more than ilogical conspiracies as a means of shifting that burden.
DeleteYou see, people like you use the Internet and anonymity to deal with psychological and emotional issues. People like you look at these fringe topics as a means of getting back some level of self esteem. Psychologists claim people that regularly conduct themselves in the way you do likely have problems with depression, low self-esteem, and anger;
"They want to inject their own emotional turmoil into other people by luring them into negativity. It's a way for them to feel some kind of control or power over their own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense."
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/11/world/internet-trolling/
It's odd how Bigfoot is the only fringe topic where its "skeptics" are more demented and obsessed than its "believers".