World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
This video explains the extreme likelihood of a North American Great Ape, and why Bigfoot's origin is so important to understanding this little understood great ape.
This guy's theory, although still crazy, is a lot more reasonable than Joerg's insane "bigfoot is human" idea.
Patty didn't look human to me.
^ You`re correct as the latest from researchers of bigfoot are that it is in fact one of the Nephilim...yes,really...THAT Nephilim you`ve heard of from the Sumerian chronicles and the Annunaki...Here`s the latest from a bigfoot researcher -“Sasquatch is definitely Nephilim, we have hair samples that are being tested right now (April 2016), in two different labs, they have a language, they can materialize and dematerialize, we have had many accounts of that”https://bf-field-journal.blogspot.co.uk/
^ that`s the trouble - bleevers can`t even agree on what it is or is not
The three trolls around here can be divided into three distinct types; *One actually believes in "Bigfoot" but is a little too scared to admit it and for the sake of not being caught being positive on a blog like this, pretends to be "sceptical" and gets his queries answered about the creature's existence by pasting the ISF's best pseudosceptical mantras.*Another is a trolls who suffers emotional issues such as depression, low self-esteem, and anger. He wants to inject his own emotional turmoil into other people by luring them into negativity. It's a way for him to feel some kind of control or power over his own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense.http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/11/world/internet-trolling/*And then you have the other who is quite simply on the psychopathy spectrum.https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadistsIt's odd how Bigfoot is the only fringe topic where its "skeptics" are more demented and obsessed than its "believers".
12:05 fits the bill for ALL 3 ABOVE! Ever so easy. :-)) Dr B Sykes.
It looks like Dr B Sykes has you figured out mate.
Looks like Dr.B Sykes must be feeling nostalgic??As it's always fun to see him play , "SLAP THE CHUMP"!! LOL!
It's not convincing but as a thought exercise, it wasn't badly reasoned through... So... Yeah. Okay.Just need to work on the semi quadrupedal going to full bipedal and the insane amount of specialisation that requires. Along with the presumed cognitive development that requires the impetus of emerging culture and self awareness as another prerequisite. ... Because every other example was an example of single specialisation. Extreme herbivore or extreme carnivore or extreme omnivorous hibernative canine- based predator.But nevermind: s'good effort.
"Ophir cranium Virginia City: There is in this skull a peculiarity that is seen in some of the ancient Peruvian skulls, namely an interparietal bone. The general contour of the skull is that of a very low type; the anterior portion is very slightly developed and receding; the hinder portion is largely developed. It bears a similarity to the skull of the carnivorous apes,the cavity for the low-bone being very deep and now allowing of any grinding motion of the jaws. The skull when found was covered with a metallic layer (in a cave) of a different type from any form that have been found, and belonged to a carnivorous man who could walk easier on all fours than on two feet. Several ancient Peruvian skulls were then produced in order to show the interparietal bone."http://dpg.lib.berkeley.edu/webdb/anthpubs/search?all=&volume=66&journal=7&item=5
Of what Peruvian skull are jibbering on about Dimbulb??Dr.B (Joes demi god)Sykes .
Read the paper, you insufferably dense pube.
^ Bigfoot = Nephilim.Hahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahah AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.THAT is damn FUNNY.
Bigfoots are human. Bigfoots = Human. But then?Humans = Bigfoot. Which implies...Humans are Bigfoots? Thus, Bigfoots exist. Because humans exist. And Bigfoots are humans.-Iktomi
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."- Bertrand Russell
@12:07 Sub Saharan african and west african = Same thing! You porous brained dolt!! NOW sit in the corner with your dunce cap on!! SCHOOLED SON!Dr B Sykes
Subsaharan... Specifics being West African. Details; try familiarising yourself with them some time.
Bigfoot is an archaic human species found anywhere that has a temperate forest with game, water and low cover.Later, when science is basically forced to admit it you will invent various mental gymnastics to justify the obviously stupid things you said here and elsewhere. You will probably utter "I knew it all along" to your grand-kids who will know deep down that you are a putz and modern humans are stupid barely-aware hive creatures who, despite traveling to the moon, possess the collective intelligence of a peach pit.
Lots of low cover for the Mongolian almasti out there on the on the grassland....
There's not much cover on my arse right now mates !Joe
Almasti has consistently been reported as human-like. Americans seem to require something more like an ape as it is slightly less embarrassing than not noticing a parallel human species living in your backyards for millennia.
Where did you get that skeleton picture? It looks like the remains of a red headed giant! Did you find it in America's Attic? We need to get those remains to the Harvar Museum of Natural History post-haste so all my knowledge of Bigfoot can be confirmed by Real Scientists and finally but the deranged ISF-ers to rest.Got monkey suit?-Iktomi
100% "TARD"!!!!!!! ^
What if the stupid man thinks he is the smart man but too stupid to realize he's stupid?
You would be an authority on that.
I know you are but what an I?
So on the one hand we have a bunch of animals that we know about only from the fossil record. And on the other hand we have a giant primate that we know about only from the ravings of attention whores and hoaxers.And these things are somehow comparable?