Friday, June 3, 2016

Bigfoot Caught Tree Jumping?


Is this really a bigfoot, or an optical illusion? From Brenton Sawin Mysteries To Search:

Mark Hawkins caught several Sasquatch on camera tree jumping. Mark also has Dogman footage and an area of Bigfoot tree structures that seems very large and active. The video evidence is hard to catch while the Bigfoot or Dogman is moving but some of the footage does show movement.

53 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Woman wearing a burka attacks homeowner with an American flag

      THE NEW NORM

      Delete
    2. Hope everyone has a great day, peace and contentment to you all.

      Delete
    3. Yes

      And thanks for the ride home last night

      Buster Bodycrabb

      Delete
    4. This video is years old and was shown to be a squirrel or similar.

      More bullshite videos of "possible bigfoot"...yeah,sho`.

      Delete
  2. Why no unambiguous photos of bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg

      Delete
    2. the trolls love their daily schooling by Iktomi. They keep coming back for more and more just like Oliver "Please, sir, I want some more".

      Joe

      Delete
    3. ^ Blatant outright lie...but not surprising from somebody who is replying to himself.

      Delete
    4. Did you ever get around to explaining how your hundreds year old conspiracy works?

      Delete
  3. When a bigfoot is chasing a deer does it know if there is a trail camera up ahead and stop chasing it if that is the case?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Are bigfoots able to identify the make and model of cameras in order to deduce the focal length of the lense such that they stay just out of focal range every single time? If they avoid technology as footers claim why are there videos where people claim there is a bigfoot being filmed but its just out of focal range? Why dont the technology avoiding bigfoots just completely avoid people with cameras full stop?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's speculate for a minute that Sasquatch have evolved the perfect blend of both animalistic and human attributes to their evasion, then it would be an extremely difficult creature to spot, unless it makes the odd mistake or is partial to bouts of curiosity (both very much being the case). An experiment shows that chimpanzees have startling photographic memories; they easily beat humans. From the Primate Research Institute at Kyoto University;
      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Zz7ShiQqLQg

      Both animals and humans leave sign of their passage in addition to tracks. These include chewed or bruised vegetation, droppings, scratches in tree bark, hairs snagged on branches or in bark, rubbings on trees, gnawed bones, feathers, opened nuts, dens, burrows, and nests. You may also find well-worn trails and runways through the grass that many animals use regularly. These signs may not be obvious at first, but with practice, you will see them. If Sasquatch somehow had Photographic memories as well as the level of sentience as humans, all this could be why they see sign of human interference and things like trail cams having been erected.

      Delete
    2. Yes

      MMC

      Hey there Iktomi. Hope all is well

      Delete
    3. I guess you didn't know that humans are animals. It's okay, I'm here to help you.

      Delete
    4. Well you certainly are an animal. Its ok, they have room in the zoo. ^

      Delete
    5. That's right, the bigfoots are always just out of camera range because they are baby einsteins who can sense recording equipment via the electromagnetic fields that they pick up via mindspeak/infrasound.

      Delete
    6. "baby einsteins"? Hey there Stue. You're such a weirdo.

      Delete
    7. 8:14... Quite simply so intellectually redundant that he has to sensationalise words in people's mouths.

      What a failure for his obsession.

      Delete
    8. It's always hilarious when you begin a sentence with "Quite simply" and then proceed to write something that's totally incomprehensible! Thanks for giving me a good laugh mate!

      Delete
    9. Iktomi 8:49

      L. O. L. !!!!

      + 1gig

      Delete
    10. So the current lame brained idea is that Bigfoot is a modern human with the brain of a chimp? Ha ha ha! Good one!

      Delete
    11. If you've ever listened experienced hunters, they say their senses increase ten fold if in the bush for a long period of time. Listen to Vietnam vets describing their time in the jungle... Their claims are incredible about how much they were able to sense. Just think of a wild human 50 million times more intuned to its environment than us. At the end of the day... Chimps and humans are primates.

      Delete
    12. Ok, I just made an ass out of myself.

      1. There is no scientific evidence or studies that demonstrate hunters increase their senses 10 fold in the bush.

      2. There is no evidence that a "wild human" is 50 million times more "intuned" with it's environment than us.

      3. I meant intune in my initial post, not intuned.

      4. There is no scientific of wild humans even existing, if wild humans refers to a Bigfoot.

      Sorry, I get carried away sometimes.

      Delete
    13. I admire you for admitting your errors Iktomi. We all get carried away sometimes brother!

      Delete
    14. Cool, Iktomi. Yes, lets keep it real. I can respect your POV if you keep it honest.

      Delete
    15. 11:53 - when did you ever speak to a hunter or Vietnam "vet" ?

      Or are you really just repeating something you`ve read ?

      I know which my money would be on.

      Delete
    16. 1:19 I was wrong. I made myself look foolish. I've also never been to the US so, to me, it seems like Bigfoot could live there. I live in Wales. I just like debating about Bigfoot is all.

      Delete
    17. Is this the real lktomi? If so I must say I'm impressed that you admit when you are wrong. Perhaps there can be a dialogue with you after all.

      Delete
    18. Fake Iktomi...
      1. There is in fact plenty of hunters who attest to this. 9mins mark in the below link, ex-paratrooper & bow hunter Mike Phillips briefly explains how the senses of a hunter heighten when in wilderness areas for prologued periods;
      https://youtu.be/xtUBvb4V5o4
      ... His Sasquatch encounters are incredible too.

      2. Early human ancestors and most other mammals' brains are wired with straightforward circuits that pick up information from the surrounding environment through the senses and relays that information to motor neurons so the body can move and respond to the surrounding environments.

      3. Maybe if I wasn't too good at thinking up counter arguments, I'd wait around all day for your typos too.

      4. There is repeatable, forensic, scientific evidence for something with the same widely reported anatomy as Sasquatch. Sasquatch are a wild hominid.

      1:19... 40seconds mark here;
      https://youtu.be/8RWzeK6JBVw

      Delete
    19. Sorry, just made an ass out of myself again.

      1. There is no scientific evidence or studies that demonstrate hunters increase their senses 10 fold in the bush. ****The operate words in my error are "10 fold"******** I made that number up.

      2.There is no evidence that a "wild human" is 50 million times more "intuned" with it's environment than us. ****The operate words in my error are "50 million times"******** I made that number up.

      3. It wasn't a typo. I typed what I thought was the right word. My fingers didn't slip. I was wrong to call it a typo.

      4. There is no species of man called a Saquatch or Bigfoot. I was wrong to say there is. I believe there is evidence that it does exist, however.

      Delete
    20. "IktomiWednesday, June 1, 2016 at 10:57:00 AM PDT
      Sorry Donald, I know you're trying twist things literally for lack of genuine argument. However... "

      1. You haven't provided any counter argument to a direct quote from an ex-paratrooper, nor the Vietnam veteran.

      2. You haven't provided any counter argument for the manner in which a primitive human would naturally be far more evolved for its environment.

      3. Maybe you're just a little angry having capital letters pointed out as lacking.

      4. There are species traits across forensic samples that indicate a creature with the same reported anatomy as Sasquatch leaving its physical sign. If this is not Sasquatch, maybe you can let us know what other bipedal primate that is twice the size of normal human primates is running around the wilderness of the US?

      Delete
    21. I made up numbers, statistics, and facts. I said 10 times when I had no idea how many times. I also said 50 million times. I totally made up that number.

      Of course mainstream science doesn't recognize Bigfoot as real. I'd be an idiot to say that it does.

      Look, I just like debating about Bigfoot. I don't care what the reality of it is. I get something out of debating the subject.

      I don't claim to be intelligent. You've already picked up on the fact that I'm not formally educated.

      Delete
    22. Of course... Why would anyone sensationalise obvious exaggerations for statistics when they're all out of everything else for an intelligent counter argument?

      Who cares what "mainstream science recognises"? If there's scientific evidence that not one from that mainstream can explain away, it falls into the bracket of pioneering which has always been in the minority.

      It appears you don't like debating "Bigfoot", because you're really not that good at it for your time spent. Hence the fake Iktomi account.

      When all else fails, I suppose you can just claim I'm not educated again, that usually helps with your inferiority complex until next time you end up looking like an idiot.

      Delete
    23. Couldn't sleep. I have to mention that Bigfoot can exist through debate. I feel that if can basically argue Bigfoot into existence. Once you get tired of debating, I win and Bigfoot lives.

      Got monkey suit? Schooled!

      Delete
    24. "Bigfoot" exists through the physical evidence you fail to explain away.

      "Science is founded on the premise that we exist in a rational reality and from this premise it follows that every scientific belief can and should be based on evidence, otherwise it is not science. To be completely clear as to what is science it can be defined in one simple sentence; science is the unbiased effort to understand reality based on the observable physical evidence."

      Schooled.

      Delete
  5. ...Its odd how heavy metal is the only genre where the fans do as much drugs as the rock stars..lol...

    I should be tired, but all I am is wired
    Aint felt this good for an hour

    Rip Lemmy....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Punk too

      Both styles are cutting edge

      RIP Peter Steele

      Delete
  6. This is foilage and what I believe is a dynamic range issue with the camera.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here here! Well said old bean. The man is either a Visigoth or a Philistine. you can tell by his accent. I hope the one true God smotes him in the chops.

      Delete
  7. I once witnessed a sasquatch knock over a tree with some kind of "mind-blast" -- scared the crap out of me. I could make out a large figure about 30 yards off in the woods. It looked like the creature raised its hand to point at a tree and then the next thing I know the tree was blown over. I think the sasquatch needed to make a small clearing for himself, because as soon as the tree was down a portal opened which the sasquatch walked through. Then the portal snapped shut.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^
      Hi ISF'er. Why are there so many pathological liars in your tiny little sub culture ?

      Delete
    2. I have no idea whole ISFer is, but that's not me. I just recently found this website after my own encounter camping. Why are you so hostile?

      Delete
    3. With that kind of story you're obviously just as mentally ill as the ISF'ers anyway !

      Delete
  8. Do you ISF Libs support Hillary because her main supporter Elizabeth Warren pretends to be an Indian kinda like the way you mouth breathers pretend to be what you're not ? Is this why liberalism is referred to as a mental disease ?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have eaten nothing but stink bugs for two weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  10. All liberals must either die or move into the nearest ghetto with their beloved pets. They love them some black peoples but just not next to their houses. Hypocrites much!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ lives in a residential gated community with not a tinted skin within miles...why not show your "humanity" and invite a family of refugee Syrians to live in your house for as long as they feel ?

      Delete
    2. ^Manipulated meathead.

      Delete