Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Thinker Thunker Answers: Why Can't We Film Bigfoot Again?


Let's face it. Since the Patterson-Gimlin film, not much has happened in the way of bigfoot on film. We have much better cameras and technology since then, so what's the problem? Thinker Thunker answers:


40 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Keep up the good work Iktomi...the cement heads will be arriving soon for schooling! Cheers

      Delete
    2. We have Dogman Evidence all over the place.

      Delete
    3. sometime tham dawgmans lookin like tham bigfoots

      Delete
    4. I agree, we have filmed it. I also agree with TThunker that being on horses may have helped them get a little closer.

      Delete
    5. Please say you have returned for good bend over buttcheeks?

      Delete
  2. Hey folks,Check out Kanawha valley in Wv! Valley of the giants,interesting!! Go mountaineers!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey folks,Check out Kanawha valley in Wv! Valley of the giants,interesting!! Go mountaineers!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. "We" have? You and who else? Iktomi, the only creatures you have photographed are the rats in your mom's basement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/biscardis-group-searching-for-bigfoot.html?showComment=1424265382593#c7861569630984876498

      haints Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 5:22:00 PM PST
      Despite what Iktomi may think, I am an active Squatcher who worked with Biscardi and Fasano in Florida.

      Delete
    2. Dude you realize Biscardi is a well-known hoaxer, right? Damn Iktomi you look more stupid with every post.

      Delete
    3. Einstein missing the point^

      Delete
    4. Yes 4:11 please explain how that makes Haints look good. I will be back in a while and knock on your cement head again.

      Delete
    5. Knock knock knock. Have you come up with an answer yet 4:11?

      Delete
  5. Absolute fu cking mental retardation.

    There are no 8 foot hominids roaming undetected across america with the ability to without question avoid every single form of detection that would verify their existence.

    Its 2016 people. We are in an era of unprecedented technology. They unquestionably do not exist and it is so obvious to anyone with even half q brain that it can be stated without even a seconds hesitation or thought. Any replies likewise will be dismissed without a even a second of thought so dont bother i wont read them.

    You can keep circle jerking all you like but your fantasy ape is just that - a fantasy.

    Night.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is a half q brain?

      Delete
    2. 3:51...now that is a classic cement head! Cheers

      Delete
    3. Yep- the cement is thick with that one.

      Delete
    4. 3:51 is a rhetorical tw*t. You can show him every possible avenue of technology that has been used to document evidence of a large bipedal primate such as thermal, trail cams, audio devices, etc... Every day he looks like an idiot trying to explain it away and he'll be back the next day praying the boogeyman away. Classic troll with anger and self esteem issues.

      You won't read replies because you are too stupid, nobody struggles to explain away something so allegedly obvious and gets labelled as remotely intelligent.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  6. Bigfootage is worthless.

    We need a body.

    If you are trying to prove the existence of bigfoot with a camera instead of a rifle you are doing it wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So his argument is that people dont know how to use cameras? Haha go tell that to the millions who partake in the hobby of photography or do it professionally. Really clutching at straws you footers these day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's even less of an argument when you consider that the technology is so good that it is really point and shoot.

      Delete
    2. 3:59... You could show you a close up facial shot and you'd cry out the most unrealistic of SFX methods. It's rhetorical. Let's just say you're in deep enough to a wilderness area to bump into one of these things... You're gonna be more concerned about getting out of there as safely as possible, not asking the thing to say cheese. If you're at a safe distance to attempt to film it then you're gonna get a blob. People aren't going out with a camera in hand expecting to film a "Bigfoot", they are members of the public who get caught off guard with something they don't expect to be there. I love these internet nerds and how tough they think they'd be should they come across something they didn't expect to be there, somewhere remote that makes them think about how they're going to survive.

      I wonder how many videos they'll be managing to upload on to Loveleak after an experience like that?

      Delete
    3. Add people are too scared to the list of excuses.

      Delete
  8. Welcome to footery where the past tense of "think" is "thunk"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The door greeter of footery^

      Also moonlights as a greeter at Walmart. Halloween is his favorite because Walmart lets him dress up in his bigfoot costume and greet the customers.

      Delete
  9. This is one of the biggest black marks against Bigfoot. We got the PG film, but then virtually nothing of comparable quality since then. I know some folks here are impressed by blobquatches and sketchy movement off in the distance, but we haven't had anything of PG quality in decades despite far more advanced camera equipment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, that is the kicker.

      Delete
    2. We've got creatures on footage that achieve impossible stealth. Matching specimens like the Leaping Russian Yeti, which in my opinion is better video evidence.

      Delete
    3. 1. There are less & less people today, that go very deep into the woods
      2. There are almost Zero, people today, looking for Big foot today riding horses.
      3. Most 'Hikers" stay on "Marked trails", and again do not go very far in the Wilderness.
      4. Yes there are 26 Million people, and more carrying cameras, but do not good "if they are not in the woods'!
      5. 98% of people today, have little to no "woodsmen skills" etc. We are now a society of Pavement pounders, with almost 99% of the time are Texting, talking or scrolling their phones, even while hiking. !
      I could go on and on, but i've wasted enough of my time already commenting, to such clueless people!

      John W. Jones Spoke

      Delete
    4. AMEN MR. JONES!! IF PEOPLE WOULD ACTUALLY DO SOME FIELD RESEARCH, THEY MIGHT HAVE EVIDENCE LIKE I DO!!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0q2lkcqNFV4

      Delete
    5. Add people don't go in the woods to the list of excuses.

      Delete
  10. I agree Mr. Jones. Earth has surpassed a tipping point of supporting a larger urban population than rural.
    You should "go on and on" btw!

    ReplyDelete