Friday, May 6, 2016

Classic Interview With Bigfoot Legend Mike Rugg


Here's a classic interview with Bigfoot Discovery Museum curator and bigfoot historian Mike Rugg.


27 comments:

  1. Lon Chaney Jr. was a Dogman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw a movie one time called Dog Soldiers that was better than any Bigfoot flick. ...Cept maybe Legend of Boggy Creek.

      P. S. Lon Chaney Jr's hair was perfect.

      Delete
    2. Hello mate, would you like to pay a visit to my "Boggy Creek" ? Tiddly doo !

      Joe

      Delete
    3. Evening Fake Joe,

      Think I'll pass on that offer but I do appreciate the tiddly doo.

      Delete
  2. Mike Rugg for president.

    This guy is cool.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good old Rugg and tugg. Talking a heap of crap. How do you become a Bigfoot legend? Step 1. Never see bigfoot
    Step 2. Lie about seeing bigfoot
    Step 3. Find a group of retards that will believe your bulls-hit story.
    Step 4. Wait for story to be posted on bigfoot no-evidence.
    Step 5. Enjoy the praise and admiration of Itkomi/Joe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi ISF'er. Why are there so many pathological liars in your tiny little sub culture ?

      Delete
    2. There are three distinct types of troll that frequent this blog;
      *One type actually believes in "Bigfoot" but is a little too scared to admit it and for the sake of not being caught being positive on a blog like this, pretends to be "sceptical" and gets his queries answered about the creature's existence by pasting the ISF's best pseudosceptical mantras.
      *An other is a troll who suffers emotional issues such as depression, low self-esteem, and anger. This type wants to inject his own emotional turmoil into other people by luring them into negativity. It's a way for him to feel some kind of control or power over his own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense.
      http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/11/world/internet-trolling/
      *And then you have the other type who's quite simply on the psychopathy spectrum.
      https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists

      9:35 firs be second type, and is so butthurt at never having substance at countering the evidence I post, is just better off remaining at his dense level and claiming everyone is a liar.

      Delete
    3. Fourth type of troll believes in bigfoot and can't handle the fact that there is no proof of its existence. It angers him so much that he abuses everybody he can that doesn't agree with him. He is racist and a sexual deviant. He even threatens violence if you don't agree with his opinions. He has a superiority complex and has never found love. He was probably teased as a young fat kid and had no friends. He lives his entire adult life on the net because he can pretend to be somebody else. Remind anybody of somebody?

      Delete
    4. ^ Yes, you, the hypocrite!!!!!

      Delete
    5. It describes me in every way except I found love with a big hairy man.

      Joe

      Delete
    6. Why would any enthusiast be angry? They're sitting on evidence that they can't explain away. And if something doesn't exist, it doesn't leave evidence. I'm sorry you feel abused, it appears you are subsceptible to exaggerations when you get your best arguments kicked back through the desktop at you.

      Considering you can't source st least lne decent argument about the topic, I doubt it'll do any good to request you source at least one example where anyone enthusiastic about the topic has stooped to any of the crazy things you've listed. But you're a troll, of course.

      Delete
    7. Sorry dopey, I don't cut n paste other people's research I use a thing called common sense. You clearly have none if you believe that a 9 foot 500 pound ape is running around America but nobody has ever taken a clear photo or got footage of one. Let's not forgot that a body has never been found dead or alive. That is why I don't believe in the magic ape and until somebody turns up with a body dead or alive I will continue to think that way. Oh yeah Rick Dyer doesn't count.

      Delete
    8. No... The truth is you are incompetent to source at least one definitive argument for something that is allegedly so obvious.

      You have one of two options for your predicament;
      1. You are stupid.
      2. What you are preaching all day, every day of your life really isn't that obvious.

      Clear photos;
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg

      "You are correct, of course, that there are reports by professionals of very tall individuals excavated from various Early Woodland mounds (I would hesitate to call a 7' or 7.5' person a "giant" . . . those heights fall within the range of human variation and don't require any kind of "supernatural" explanation)."
      - Andy White PhD

      ... If something is "magic", it doesn't leave evidence. Oh, and the height ratios are proven by the data found in the physical evidence left;
      http://www.bfro.net/ref/theories/whf/fahrenbacharticle.htm
      ... Does it burn? Does it burn??

      Delete
    9. Good point, bigfoot must be magic because it has never left evidence. Does what burn? If your getting a burning sensation when you pee Itkomi it's time to see a doctor. It's a good idea to wear a condom when you bang strange men in the toilets of your local gay bar.

      Delete
    10. "It has never left evidence..." Yet you've just been sourced the opinion of a PhD you've championed, as well as physical evidence? You're like a chronic, perverse denialist... That's how I know it burns, kid.

      One day you'll stop being a coward and actually address someone's comment properly. Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    11. Who have I championed?

      Delete
    12. I'm not playing your rhetorical games, kid. It appears you've been shooled.

      Delete
    13. No no no Itkomi I really want to know who you think I have championed. I think you are a bit confused.

      Delete
    14. That's what I thought. You make statements and then can't back them up. Weak!!!!!

      Delete
    15. Games, games, games. Concentrate on getting a better argument now, not your contradictions.

      Delete
    16. No games here. It's a simple question that you can't answer because you know that your wrong. I have never championed anybody in the bigfoot community. Which makes your statement a complete lie. You feel pretty stupid don't you old chap.

      Delete
    17. I alluded to no expert from the "Bigfoot community", dear boy... And if you're going to adhere to an expert's opinion, you'd better be sure you know what you're talking about.

      Pro tip... Andy White.

      Delete
    18. bigfoot protip #59
      if you are going to be a skeptic and come on to a blog pretending to be many different people as a confused troll be prepared to be schooled royally by Iktomi.
      Bigfoot deniers are in the same air space as flat earthers

      Joe

      Delete