Saturday, April 9, 2016

This Group Has More Bigfoot Photos Than Anyone


From Crypto Reality:

Finding Bigfoot for real, Finding Bigfoot was the easy part, every week we get tons of questions about how we do what we do to find Bigfoot, Suggestions about how to find Bigfoot, Crypto Reality is the real deal.

36 comments:

  1. Delusional. Hittin the bottle hard. Give him antibuse an he'll stop claimin bigfoot is everywhere he takes pictures.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Look chap, wildlife photography only started in 1987. The first clear photo of a cougar was only taken in 2003. No clear photo of a black bear until 1993. Bigfoot is 500 pounds and 9 feet tall so it is a lot easier for them to hide. Plus they knock trees, break trees, and have loud calls which prevent them from being located. Also, they're in only twenty or more states so no one would be able to get a clear photo of one.

      Delete
    2. yep...real folks in coustumes

      Delete
    3. Look chap, wildlife photography only started in 1987. Really??? I'd say that there are several outdoors magazines would disagree. They've been showing great shots of wildlife since at least the 50's that I'm aware of. If this is an indication of your 'research'. I'd suggest you might want to start over.

      Delete
    4. 7:11 You're just looking for reasons why Bigfoot should have already been captured. The thing is that cameras, wildlife photography, hiking, traps, etc have only been around for a couple decades. The technology to capture images effectively isn't advanced enough yet to get clear photos of Bigfoot. There are plenty of reasonable explanations why there are no real photos of Bigfoot in 2016.

      Delete
  2. These Woodsmen have had god know's how many thousands of years to practice the art of not being seen and the same here in Australia because there is so much land that is un-track able or uninhabited so I dont expect a real clear picture anytime soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you about not expecting a real clear picture anytime soon . . . because they don't exist!

      Delete
    2. It's very clear. All you haters were day care kids. Bigfoot this and Bigfoot that. Always crying for attention. Get a life, get out of you mom's basement. Go open your own YouTube channel so you can see how the haters will hate you too. Freaking Idiots. Bunch of crying babies. Mommy, I have a rash on my ass. Change my diaper. Grow up!

      Delete
    3. ^ Not Joe, it was actually the guy who made the video. He hates negativity so much he blocks all comments on his videos.

      Delete
    4. Well, they're both very immature so it's hard to tell.

      Delete
    5. Please tell us....Where did you get the information that cameras have only been around for a couple of decades. Same request for your assertion that the first clear picture of a mountain lion was in 2003 and the black bear in 1993.

      Delete
    6. Old Woodsman, They are demonstrating the absurdity of 9 foot tall, 500 pound Bigfoot never having a clear photo taken by being absurd.

      In other words. If Bigfoot existed, there would already be clear photos, bones, actual capture, scientific classification, etc.... just like with bears, elk, bison, cougars, etc.... Even many animals one hundred million years extinct animals are classified scientifically.

      I don't really believe in Bigfoot. I'm into Bigfoot like I'm into Godzilla or King Kong.

      MMC

      Delete
    7. Clear photos;
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg
      Scat;
      http://www.bigfootencounters.com/images/scat.htm
      Hair;
      http://www.texlaresearch.com/okhair4.jpg
      http://www.texlaresearch.com/okhairroot.jpg
      http://www.texlaresearch.com/unknown-chimp-bear.jpg
      Bones;
      http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/621-anthropologists-paper-on-the-lovelock-skull/
      Forensic physical evidence;
      http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints
      Audio;
      http://www.sasquatchcanada.com/uploads/9/4/5/1/945132/kts_p182-186.pdf

      For the circumstances of recognised creatures being photographed, these images are also attained by professionals with professional equipment like news reporters, either that, or they are in a relaxed environment. I find it laughable that most "sceptics" require photographs, when every photograph or footage has and always will be a man in a suit to them. The appliance of rhetorical arguments to make the perception of normal debate. Even wildlife photographers are assigned specific instructions and are allocated specific areas that would imply specific results. They are also professionals with professional equipment that usually erect little hideouts that don't do much for hiding against a creature with the wilderness awareness of five green berets, whereas the majority of this field are people from the general public who have to capture images of a far more evasive and intelligent creature than that of the projects of most wildlife biologists (the innumerable blobsquatches testify to this)."

      For something as large as this we have a level of evidence, and if this creature does exist (and in my opinion it most certainly does), then it would naturally have to have evaded classification for hundreds of years... So what is 50 without a major consorted professional effort at getting to the bottom of this "mystery"? Don't mind the troll, Old Woodsman, he's on a little quest to find some self esteem... The subject matter isn't even all that important to him. He'd not use the same anciently debunked argument if that wasn't the case.

      Delete
    8. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

      Delete
    9. Explained this to you 1,000,000 times. Boring. Yawn.

      Delete
    10. Sorry kid... I guess you're just another psycho-troll with nothing to substantiate your vomit piles... Go back to sleep.

      Delete
    11. Busy, can't baby sit you this time.

      Delete
    12. One day maybe you'll have an original thought... For now you're too stupid and in need of some meds.

      Delete
    13. I'm not the one needing a counter argument for 1:09, chump.

      Delete
  3. I've been waiting for a place to reply on these guy's. I live in Palm Beach county and this is a bunch of nonsense. Everytime this guy goes out he gets a head shot photo he comes back home and reviews film umtil he can find somthing that can be passed off as a potential sightingm nothing more than a bunch of sticks pom froms, vines and tree trunk all coverd up to look like a body or head. He's a very convincing story teller as well. I believe their out there but not in Palm Beach county.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So that qualifies you to say this is nonsense and they don't live in Palm Beach county. Oh yeah, that's right they can't live in Palm Beach county because I said so. You've never been out in the swamp a day in your life. Have you? It shows too. If you did you would at the very least know there something out there. Why don't you just comment on these guys with email directly to them. That way you can ask the horse himself. I would love to see that on video when he replies to your email. It would be very entertaining.

      Delete
    2. Really? You are an expert regarding wildlife Management Areas in Palm Beach County?

      Pfft. You sound like you have never stepped foot outside of your home.

      I can't believe this is the nonsense Mark has to put up with. No wonder he blocks comments on youtube. Most of the comments here are asinine.

      Look at his videos and find your own truth.

      Delete
  4. This guy is another delusional crackpot who thinks he knows it all. His blurry blobsquatch photos are no better than any other crap photo out there.
    The idiot just wants a television show (just a guess). I like his lame excuse for not allowing comments. What an arrogant knob.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like Mark Zaskey but I agree he fields photos of a lot of blob squatches.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Randy you sound like a paid dis-informer.

      There are entirely clear unmistakable bigfoot images in Mark's films. So far as I am concerned the debate regarding existence is *over*.

      I'm moving on to conservation and behavioral research. The rest of you can stay behind and continue to yammer back and forth about whether this obviously extent creature exists or not.

      Delete
  5. Trapper from AIMS team got tons of photos and foot casts

    ReplyDelete
  6. Have not seen his vids; but, he and she are on the right track. Seen one here in B.C. around 1976/77. They exist and are alive and well living around the world. Have had interesting happenings when I have left natural foods behind. Heard that they love peanut butter.

    ReplyDelete