World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
Patrick from Nanaimo BC sent us these stealth cam 5mp photos of something interesting. He may have captured the head & face of Bigfoot on Vancouver Island, Kennedy Lake.
"What do you say to thousands of people? Credible respectable people with nothing to gain, sometimes much to lose by coming forward and telling the stories of Sasquatch encounters? Are they all lying? Delusional? The continued increasing eyewitness accounts are going to be a problem for the skeptics."Les Stroud Survivorman.
The continued lack of quality evidence is a bigger problem for the believers... if they want anyone to take them seriously.
More Stroud !
9:16... Yet sources of evidence such as forensics are valued as extremely high quality for scientiic and justiciary systems that you know doubt hold on high regard. Are these Stroud quotes legit? If so... Can I have a direct link please??
^ This clown thinks forensics are never wrong, but if you Google bad forensics, well....http://www.forensic-pathways.com/confirmation-bias-ethics-and-mistakes-in-forensics/
More on the flaws in forensics (there are many, many articles that address the problems)https://theintercept.com/2015/04/24/badforensics/
And more still....http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20150512-can-we-trust-forensic-science
This comment has been removed by the author.
It doesn't help your argument... You still have reliable pillars of modern society, to which judiciary systems as well as scientific arenas still stand regardless via forensics... Pillars that you no doubt stand by regardless of occasions where mistakes and even hoaxing occurs. Even your beloved peer review process is subsceptible to manipulation and confirmation bias. You also can't hoax or missinterpret species traits across samples States and decades apart...Oops!
Uses "confirmation bias" to support his argument. Oh the irony.
It does nothing BUT support my idea when it comes to peer review process.
^ you are truly a singular human being. The only one in history who is absolutely inapable of admitting an error. I can't imagine what being in the same room with you is like, no wonder you spend so much time on here.
^ another cement head from JREF who has nothing better to do with his life than come on here and trollPip pip cheerio !Joe
10:59... I didn't seem to read you explain away the forensics applied to this subject???: (
Keep up the good work Iktomi,there will always be cement heads to school!
Cement implies some form of cohesion.. I'd go with custard.
7:04 doesn't really understand confirmation bias. Watch any episode of Ancient Aliens and virtually anything that comes out of anybody's mouth is CB. Incidentally: did anyone see the Bigfoot one? LMFAO.
I'm pretty sure I do understand it. Let me spell out my point. Iktomi commits cb all the time by starting with his belief that Bigfoot exists and then sees poor evidence as confirmation of that belief.
... Yes not once do you present a single point to which demonstrates that my stance is weightless in any scientific basis. Just using big words (for your level) doesn't lend to shifting that burden... And I think in your case, one could quite easily apply cognitive bias. And I have no reason to merely believe, because I have the evidence to be convinced by.