Friday, January 8, 2016

Finding Bigfoot Filming In Mississippi


The Finding Bigfoot team is in the great state of Mississippi looking for bigfoot and bigfoot witnesses. Filming will begin January 11th, and continue through the 18th. If you're in the area and have had a sighting, you can email them at mslafindingbigfoot@gmail.com.

Canton and Jackson are no strangers to movie cameras, but instead of the towns' historic locations, soon the cameras will be traveling into surrounding campsites, farms and hunting land in search of the elusive 'Bigfoot.'

Producers for the hit Animal Planet show "Finding Bigfoot" have been canvassing a 100-mile radius of Jackson looking for people to tell them stories and show them places where sightings have occurred.

Jen Green said that they have traveled hundreds of miles and were on their way to the Alabama state line Wednesday morning to follow up on a sighting.

"We have talked to people all over the state and we are looking for people to share their stories. Some people are hesitant to tell their stories because they think people wont believe them. We want to make it a safe place so that people will not feel intimidated," Green said.

Filming will begin Jan. 11 and go through Jan. 18. One of the shows signature "town hall" meetings will be held on the evening of Jan 12., a Tuesday.

"We are looking for anyone who has a story or sighting of Bigfoot and would be willing to share their story with us on the show," Green said.

Anyone with a Bigfoot sighting can contact the shows producers at mslafindingbigfoot@gmail.com to inquire about participating in one of the shows town hall meetings.

For the rest of the article, click here. 

185 comments:

  1. I'm confident that they will find a bigfoot in Mississippi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trapper and the Mountain Monsters AIMS team goin git that sumbitch bigfoot YES SIR and get the JOB DONE

      Delete
    2. Without any real empirical evidence
      regarding the mythical hominid in question. The plain hypothesis arises that simply suggests- sometimes you thinkin you seein bigfoot but its just a homeless livin off the grid.
      Sho nuff.

      Delete
    3. Trapper frum da AISM teem sayin itbe da gummint knowin abouts tham bigfeets ans keepin yalla in da dark shure is

      Delete
  2. 2016 year of finding no bigfoots. Just more coming out of the closet and yelling in da woods.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ you are coming out of the closet and yelling in the woods?

      Delete
    2. Gunman attempts to execute Philly cop 'in the name of Islam' by firing 13 shots from point blank range as officer sits in squad car

      we need to bring in more refugees and more gun control

      Delete
  3. I just sucked off my dog. Yummy!!!!!!

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Try peanut butter for reverse play.

      Dmaker.

      Delete
    2. Both you guys are idiots and deserve each other

      Joe

      Delete
  4. That quote from rene dahinden is really quite a devasting blow to the community. When someone who has researched for 40 years, following all the leads yet has come up with no bigfoots states that he doubts the existence then there is not a lot that a proponant can do to get any confidence back in the topic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. what's a blow to the community 4:40, is when someone who has researched nothing has nothing to say.

      Delete
    2. Ha! Schooled... What that quote doesn't erode, is his vast contributions to progressing the understanding of Sasquatch tracks, not to mention his fervent enthusiasm for the PGF.

      RIP Rene.

      Delete
    3. Large SOHA Juvenile SasquatchFriday, January 8, 2016 at 6:44:00 AM PST

      Matt...Iktomi. ..Matt. ..Iktomi. ..hoot. ..hoot. .whooo. ..Matt. ..Iktomi

      Delete
    4. >>his vast contributions to progressing the understanding of Sasquatch tracks

      Does that include the admitted fakes he declared real?

      >> his fervent enthusiasm for the PGF.

      And drunks have a " fervent enthusiasm" for alcohol. Your point is meaningless as usual.

      Delete
    5. And yet like every researcher that has come before and after him absolutely zero confirmed bigfoots. Unlucky.

      Delete
    6. 6:47... I wonder how many wildlife biologists would be just as easily fooled with fakes if someone was to attempt to sabotage their integrity the same way? Plenty of fake animal stompers out there... It's a bit of a silly argument. Whilst, for every fake track that has been identified (whether it be slow in being identitied or not), it's been used to progress the field's understanding of such tracks going forward. No... My point regarding the PGF is that for someone so cynical and challenging of the subject matter, he stood by it's authenticity to the end. Lumping one of your main sources of denial, not to mention one of your biggest boogeyman fears not doubt, with alcoholism doesn't really get around to finding a monkey suit now... Does it?

      6:48... Plenty found, none caught.

      Delete
    7. Large SOHA Juvenile SasquatchFriday, January 8, 2016 at 7:17:00 AM PST

      Matt. ..Iktomi. ..Matt. ..iktomi. .hoot. .hoot. .whooo. ..Matt. .Iktomi

      Delete
    8. Matt and BOBO are 1%ers - they finding BIGFOOT you can BANK onit $$$$

      Delete
    9. PS...

      http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/34635-what-did-rene-dahinden-do-wrong-and-right/

      Delete
    10. Habituate, habituate kumbaya

      Delete
    11. the troll that continually schools joe is back above. Good work fellow troll. Keep exposing his lies

      Delete
    12. Looks like the village idiot sock puppet is back... Hey, how about you point out these "lies", kid? It's funny... When Donald isn't around you seem to fall away into your hole of depression a little harder, void of any ideas to hang on. Brainless.

      Delete
    13. ^ just clocked-on for his 8 hour shift here

      t`is the only employment he`s had for years

      Delete
    14. "Please leave the blog so I can pursue my hate campaign?!"

      Delete
    15. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    16. Cottingley fairies are real.

      Got fairy suit?

      Delete
    17. ^ it's wonderful clockwork how you bust out the fake Iktomi account once you get a bit of a pasting.

      Delete
    18. ^^ Fake Iktomi.

      Prove that you are the real Iktomi, or you're fake.

      Got fake Iktomi suit?

      Delete
    19. Slipadiktomi getting schooled again by his own ridiculous logic!

      Love it!!

      Delete
    20. "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
      - Bertrand Russell

      ... How quickly does it take you to switch between accounts when you cheerlead on your own comments? Creepy ****.

      Delete
    21. When a stupid man pastes the comments of a clever man, he is still a stupid twat.

      True story.

      Delete
    22. When a stupid man pastes the comments of a clever man at the expense of a serious dense kid... A daily friendly reminder of why you don't attempt the subject matter is always just around the corner.

      Remember that.

      : )

      Delete
    23. You're so fake! Why are you faking?

      Delete
    24. LOL!

      Slipadiktomi arguing with himself! That is some awesome craziness right there.

      Delete
    25. Not as crazy as watching you flip through two accounts like a pervy Gollem.

      Delete
    26. The real Iktomi would know how to properly spell Gollum.

      Delete
    27. That's why they call me Pod. Short for Tripod.

      Delete
    28. The real Iktomi would know how to properly spell Gollum.

      Delete
    29. NRA sayin da gummint cumin fer da guns ans bebe needin tham NRA folks so we cans keepin tham guns fer shure

      Delete
    30. >>The real Iktomi isn't perfect.

      Would never know that reading your drivel.

      Remember I am able to see the difference between you two. I am responding to the real jerk.

      Delete
    31. "Drivel" you don't appear to be able to contend with... Not a good look, kid.

      Delete
    32. the real Iktomi will kick the fake Iktomi's arse every single time. I don't know why the trolls even bother unless they are used to losing at halo 4 and life in general and enjoy the punishment

      Joe

      Delete
    33. ^
      They are playing Halo 5 now, Halo 4 is old news.

      Delete
  5. Yea but sometimes there are homeless in the woods, you think its bigfoot but its really just
    homeless.
    Kapow!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's true,sad but true

      Delete
    2. Yea one time me and tim were swimming in the old crick, and we thought we saw a bigfoot but it was just a homeless.

      Delete
    3. BIGFOOTS are swimmers so you see something swimming in the creek you thinking that's a BIGFOOT but its just a homeless guy fishing for his dinner

      Delete
  6. Replies
    1. BIGFOOTS like moonshine, so you thinking that's a drunk hillbilly over there but its a drunken BIGFOOT in the bush

      Delete
  7. We chased him anyways. TREE KNOCK.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I shot a homeless guy behind Home Depot once, he was eating ribs off a tree,I had to make a big dummy to cover it up, real pain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sometimes homeless looking like BIGFOOTS so you thinking that's a BIGFOOT but its just a homeless living in the bush and off the grid

      Delete
  9. I'm not homeless I just look that way

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sometimes Mexicans looking like homeless folk so you thinking that's some more homeless in the bush but its just more Mexicans here in the bush

      Delete
  10. Yea me and Bobo were swimming in the old crick onetime, and we thought we heard a squatch.
    turns out it was just Dr Mathew Johnson crying.
    or a homeless.
    HOOOP WOOOP.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm not homeless, I just smell like it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sometimes homeless smell like BIGFOOTS so you thinking that's smell like a BIGFOOT but its just some homeless guy living in the bush and off the grid

      Delete
  12. I'm not homeless, I just enjoy eating out of dumpsters

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lots of homeless doing dumpster diving also BIGFOOTS dumpster dive so you thinking that's a BIGFOOT dumpster diving but its just a homeless guy dumpster diving for his dinner

      Delete
  13. Replies
    1. but not BOBO he's a BIGFOOT GURU

      Delete
    2. sometimes you thinking you see BIGFOOT in the bush, but it's just BOBO looking for BIGFOOT

      Delete
  14. The entire state of Mississippi has only twelve teeth in total, Shawn will back me on this

    ReplyDelete
  15. This one time at bandcamp me and Bob Gimlin were skinny dippin at the ole crick taking bout the old days. We could just hear Mathew cryin off in the distance.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Sometimes you think you seeing homeless in the woods but its really Mathew and his portal. crying like a plump baby.
    EYESHINE.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I believe in Bigfoot and even I think they're just homeless people

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are homeless forest people, the portal leads to a wonderful outhouse, this is why they smell

      Delete
  18. Yes... 9 foot hairy homeless people, that can twist your head off like a soda bottle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What a fantasy world you live in

      Delete
    2. ... Considering the frequency of supporting evidence there is in my favour, not quite as much as a fantasy of a ten thousand year old conspiracy, chump.

      Wow, what a burden that must be to shift.

      Delete
    3. Come to SOHA with me Iktomi, they will call out to you in the night, I will take only believers like you into the portal, only believers can see it

      Delete
    4. Can I come, I could seriously use an outhouse

      Delete
    5. You must have at least 5 accounts going here at one time... And you honestly expect honest people to believe you're not the only troll trying to bring this blog down all along?

      : )

      Delete
    6. You know I'm just funnin',you and I are fast friends

      Delete
    7. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!

      I had a feeling it might be you... Fox was funnier though.

      Delete
    8. But its not in your favour. The lack of any verified evidence is strongly in the skeptics favour. Its like you enjoy getting blown the fu ck out.

      Delete
    9. True,true,Happy New Year

      Delete
    10. You too Rum.

      9:22... Yet the evidence I list stands up to scientific scrutiny, regardless of your lies and gross naivety, and that heavy burden of proving a many thousand year old conspiracy remains as heavy as ever.

      And please don't refer to yourself as a sceptic, or representative of that way of thinking. You don't even understand the meaning of the word, and to paint yourself in a remotely intellectual light when your best angles are lies and failure to provide substance to your claims, is ever so slightly cringey.

      Delete
    11. You SAY it stands up to scientific scrutiny but it doesnt, hence the non confirmation of the species. You arent doing too well are you?

      Delete
    12. For confirmation of a new species as profound as a relict hominid... Only a body is ever going to suffice. But that doesn't mean there isn't reliable scienific evidence to warrant further investigation, and quite frankly it is a travesty that it hasn't occurred on a mainstream level yet. Think about that... There IS physical evidence for Sasquatch without a consorted effort by mainstream science yet. Just think what would occur should people pull their finger out. And trust me... I've spent more time researching your point of view than you have, and if there was a means to successfully denounce the evidence I list, I wouldn't list it.

      Delete
    13. "Cringey" is such a tinny word. I do prefer a good woody word. "Pareidolia" is a splendid woody word, don't you think?

      Delete
    14. Nargh! Watching someone pretending to be clever is what it is... And using a term like "pareidolia" out of context for the immediate discussion, isn't helping that to be honest.

      (Cringe)

      Delete
    15. It is a fun word to say though.

      Delete
    16. ... I guess so... And normally very relevant.

      Delete
    17. Relevance seems rather irrelevant on here. But I can tell you like to say the word cringey. It's fun!

      Delete
    18. "Nargh! Watching someone pretending to be clever is what it is..."

      I wish you would take that to heart.

      Delete
    19. It's kind of cringey, isn't it 10:21.

      Delete
    20. Las time I checked... I'm the one sitting on the evidence you can't explain away.

      : )

      Laters, nerds!

      Delete
    21. Yes it is. I can see why someone accused him of being Steven S. at one time. At least Steven has some intelligence despite being long winded at times.

      Delete
    22. Lol, it's been "explained away" many times.

      Delete
    23. ^ uses words out of context, and anyone else is unintelligent?

      (Cringe)

      Delete
    24. 10:36... You'll have no problem bringing something of substance along with your conspiracy theories next time then, eh?

      Delete
    25. I would say that your ideas constitute conspiracy theory. That along with a extremely strong confirmation bias.

      I suppose I'm being paid to support Bigfoot "disinformation", right?

      Delete
    26. So what words are being used out of context?

      Delete
    27. ^ you should take all the undisputable evidence you have along with the thousands of years of native campfire tales,contact the press and any scientific people sympathetic to your cause and see what that gets you. committed to your local asylum is most likely the outcome. make sure you bring that kook dr squatch along...blue bags are a real game changer no?..

      MMG (the real deal)

      Delete
    28. Conspiracy? And at what level have I came across as to endorsing anything of the sort? Might I remind you that it doesn't help your desire to come across intelligent by using schoolyard, "I'm not, you are" methods, dear boy.

      You, a disinformationist? Nargh... You would have to know a bit about the subject matter for that, and you don't seem remotely clever enough. Nobody cares who you are, stop flattering yourself, it's cringey.

      Delete
    29. 10:47... Learn to keep train of a thread of comments.

      10:48... Fake MMG... Well having said that, the current state of evidence is good enough for some of the very best conservationists and primatologists on the planet. I think I'll content myself being lumped into a group of pioneering thinkers until mainstream science drops shoddy processes like BIASED peer reviews.

      Delete
    30. You have frequently expressed the idea that the government pays agents to discount the idea of Bigfoot and other fringe ideas. You have also made it clear that the government is aware of Bigfoot's existence and is covering it up.

      If that isn't conspiracy theory I don't know what is. That's not even getting into your ideas about scientific inquiry.

      Delete
    31. 10:47... Learn to keep train of a thread of comments.

      What a BS answer.

      Delete
    32. "You have frequently expressed the idea that the government pays agents to discount the idea of Bigfoot and other fringe ideas. You have also made it clear that the government is aware of Bigfoot's existence and is covering it up."
      ... Cool! Quote me then, kid! Should be easy, right? D'you know what I think? I think you're so embarrassed at having your ideas pointed out as being akin to conspiracies, that you're trying a little too hard now. Not a good look, you seem a little lost for original thought, dear boy. Still... You'll no doubt be able to find hose quotes and your stance will be proved well about, right?

      Like I said... You're not important enough OR have any remote argument worth taking note of for anyone to wonder who you are... Sorry!

      Delete
    33. 10:59... I'm not the one asking painfully stupid questions, to which a ten year old could follow a thread of comments and follow.

      Delete
    34. >> And you honestly expect honest people to believe you're not the only troll trying to bring this blog down all along?

      This is now my 3rd reply on this thread. So yes more than one person is at work here.

      I suspect you are a few of the "names" that you rant against. No proof other than the time posts are made.

      Delete
    35. I hear ya 11:03. That's as cringey as something that is really really cringey.

      Delete
    36. >>I'm not the one asking painfully stupid questions,

      No you just give painful explanations. When you ask questions you are pretty much shot down fast. That is easy to see in the blog archive.

      Delete
    37. >>Like I said... You're not important enough OR have any remote argument worth taking note of for anyone to wonder who you are... Sorry!

      Wasn't me joe.

      Delete
    38. 10:59... I'm not the one asking painfully stupid questions, to which a ten year old could follow a thread of comments and follow.

      So point out what was so painfully stupid. What was out of context? Come on show me what's what.

      Delete
    39. "Cool! Quote me then, kid! Should be easy, right? D'you know what I think? I think you're so embarrassed at having your ideas pointed out as being akin to conspiracies, that you're trying a little too hard now. Not a good look, you seem a little lost for original thought, dear boy. Still... You'll no doubt be able to find hose quotes and your stance will be proved well about, right?"

      So you want me to go back and hunt for quotes? It some situations that would be fair, but here you are just being a weasel.

      I know you have expressed the idea that the government has hired people to spread misinformation and troll forums. You even linked to a story to try to prove your point.

      You have also expressed the idea that the government and the timber companies have known about the existence of Bigfoot and have hidden that fact for financial reasons. You even espoused the idea that the infamous Environmental Atlas (from the seventies) from the Army Core of Engineers represents an admission of government knowledge.

      I would have more respect had you tried to explain yourself. Instead you deflect and take the easy way out. Either that or you have a terrible memory and can't be trusted on your arguments.

      Delete
    40. 11:22... You're desperate to appear like anyone wastes time thinking about you. Sorry kid, you didn't enter my mind when I posted that.

      11:24... I'd love to read where I've been shot down? Maybe you can use your wonderful grammar skills (>>>) and quote to everyone exactly where that's happened? "Explanations" being a little ironic in your case.

      11:32... Get an adult to help.

      Delete
    41. >> Either that or you have a terrible memory and can't be trusted on your arguments.

      Or he is a poor troll.

      I have challenged him lately on his true belief in the monkey man. Everytime he deflects. Of course he does not believe a word he types. He is a troll and a very weird one.

      Delete
    42. If trolling is his objective, I'd admire his time devotion to the game if nothing else. It's kind of a sorry existence though.

      Delete
    43. >>can use your wonderful grammar skills (>>>)

      I use that to differicient myself. No I will not use a name or register. Deal with it.

      >> I'd love to read where I've been shot down?

      More evidence you are nothing but a troll and possible mental case. I took you apart not a week or so ago. You well remember it. So do the others reading this.

      Delete
    44. >> It's kind of a sorry existence though.

      Very. It is why I suspect mental illness. He/she is far to involved in this game. To the point of talking to themself to spark conversation.

      Delete
    45. >>Sorry kid, you didn't enter my mind when I posted that.

      Right. I am so in your head its hilarious. I love watching you lash out at me for days when I don't even post. You are a clueless fool.

      Delete
    46. "11:32... Get an adult to help."

      You claim to be one.

      The real truth is you simply throw out insults with no basis. When you get called on it, you deflect like a mofo. You indeed are a weasel.

      Delete
    47. 11:51... You'd have no problem in finding me quotes then... Would you not? I mean... There's LOADS of comment section for you to choose from, right? Here's a tip... It's not a conspiracy if its publicly known (duh?) and if the government REALLY wanted to keep the Army Corpse Altas away from the public eye, then... Um... A freedom of information act wouldn't have worked?

      (Cringe)

      There are plenty of very valid reasons for the economy to be effected should Sasquatch become a recon fused species, you don't have to be enthusiastic about this topic to understand that... One merely has to look at a particular owl that was discovered in the PNW to which ruined the logging economy in those parts. Myself? I personally think that the government can't draw attention to a creature that itself can't capture... If it can't capture it, then how can it make it public? How's that for you kid?

      11:56... "Challenged" me with what? Asking me to "admit" that I don't believe in the existence of Sasquatch? What a silly little narcissist you are.
      12:00... I think you need to go back to Google and understand that actions of trolls. If I was to trot on over to psuedosceptical blogs and attack people from anonimaty, seemingly out of fear for what other people think... Then I would be a cyber Nazi, not a troll.
      12:00#2... No... I think the reality of the situation is that you've just got poor grammar. A ten year old knows how to use quotation marks. And you "took me apart" just how exactly? By missunderstanding what the word "peer" means and then getting listed the best conservationists and primatologists who are a part of Meldrum's editorial board? By using the lame argument that he gets paid for his work, when, that's what all scientists who publish books do? Oh please... You make me cringe at the best of times, but patting yourself on the back when after all that silliness, you didn't actually present even one argument against Meldrum's work is seriously embarrassing.

      (Sigh)

      12:06... Still struggling? Surely there's an adult at hand to help?? You can't be left unsupervised on the desktop for this long, surely??

      Delete
    48. 12:03, 12:05... Sorry chump... Nobody cares who you are. That might in fact actually hurt considering how much you go on about it... It's a bit weird. Maybe one day you can bring a substantial argument and someone might wonder, eh? I can confidently vouch for EVERYONE who comes here that not one person would care who you are.

      Does that upset you?
      "If anonymity is one factor, psychological and emotional issues are another, according to Suler, who says many trolls likely have problems with depression, low self-esteem, and anger."
      ... That sound like you to a T, mate. No, you're just another archetype nobody-troll off the street that I use to demonstrate how backward people think in his day and age.

      : )

      Delete
    49. >>Does that upset you?

      Not in the least.

      Delete
    50. It appears that you have a desire to be noticed... You yourself claimed to use those arrows to "stand out", right? Come on kid... Keep track of your own vomit piles! Here it is again... Just for full effect...

      NOBODY CARES WHO YOU ARE.

      ... Ouch!

      Delete
    51. "11:51... You'd have no problem in finding me quotes then... Would you not? I mean... There's LOADS of comment section for you to choose from, right? Here's a tip... It's not a conspiracy if its publicly known (duh?) and if the government REALLY wanted to keep the Army Corpse Altas away from the public eye, then... Um... A freedom of information act wouldn't have worked?"

      To spell this out Iktomi/Joe do you deny my claims that you have espoused these beliefs or are you simply running an end around by requesting quotes?

      As to the atlas, you seem to be the only one who holds to idea that anything was disclosed. Any rational person would have seen for it what it was- a lighthearted attempt at acknowledging the phenomena. Jacksh*t was admitted. Besides it's not like it gained any ground and it isn't known by anyone outside desperate Bigfooters.

      Delete
    52. >>NOBODY CARES WHO YOU ARE.

      I see that. Least of all you. I have not asked that question in about a week now.

      Delete
    53. 12:06... Still struggling? Surely there's an adult at hand to help?? You can't be left unsupervised on the desktop for this long, surely??

      So on the one hand you want quotes from possibly months or years ago and yet you are so lazy you cant go up the page? Your intellectual honesty sure is taking a beating

      Delete
    54. Hey pal! So far I don't have to deny anything! You don't seem to be able to show us what's allegedly so obvious! Ha ha ha!!

      From what I noticed being objective, was the American government putting Sasquatch sightings in an Atlas, alluding to the FBI testing hair samples, is as much recognition as is possible without a body on a slab, finding it important enough to use $200,000 of tax payers' money to make it. The focus was to inform the public of what they might expect in the wilderness of Washington. It in fact included satire as to the average person suggesting "Bigfoot" had no place in a Washington Atlas. If you don't think a government document that lists sightings and hair samples is significant, I would suggest you're either trying too hard to play it down, or another silly little denialist.

      : )

      Delete
    55. I think it's telling that Iktomi is the only one resorting to name calling and insults.

      Delete
    56. >>So on the one hand you want quotes from possibly months or years ago

      Check the new thread.

      Delete
    57. Hey pal! So far I don't have to deny anything! You don't seem to be able to show us what's allegedly so obvious! Ha ha ha!!

      You sure do like to deflect. I'm asking a simple question before spending my time looking for quotes, although I have a feeling I'm wasting it right now.

      Delete
    58. 1:22... I expect you to reinforce your claims, anybody would I'm adult exchanges. Guess you haven't the goods, eh?

      1:26... I have no issue giving someone like you the occasional insult, ha ha ha!!

      1:26#2... Just did; schooled.

      Delete
    59. 1:32... I'm not deflecting anything kid, you claim I adhere to conspiracies, I deny it and you can't present one single quote where I allegedly do.

      It's looking pretty grim for you to be honest pal?

      Delete
    60. Others can judge for themselves whether the beliefs can be considered conspiracies. Right know I'm asking if you believe the things I mentioned to be true or not. It's not difficult. And yes you have been deflecting.

      Will you finally address the question?

      Delete
    61. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!! Trot on up a few comments to my biggest comment posted. You've been given my answer on my stance regarding that! Ha ha ha ha!! **** me, you're dense! Ha ha ha ha ha!!! That's the second time you've demonstrated the literary skills of a small child!

      Oh dear...

      Delete
    62. Ok... I've stooped low enough, long enough... You're on the last chance to present evidence that I believe in conspiracies...

      Chop, chop!

      Delete
    63. Is there a village in Wales that is missing it's idiot? I know that you are dishonest but I am wondering about your intelligence now.

      The whole "ha ha ha" thing is not very mature but then again we are talking about a 38 year old virgin who claims to be married and have a job.

      Delete
    64. Oh wow! I see that you're lacking some creativity in your insults, dear boy... That can happen when you're flustered.

      It's just so hilarious watching you blithering away and failing at putting together at least ONE quote that supports your accusations... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!

      Delete
    65. Quotes,(ha,ha,ha) quotes give me quotes... I bet your parents are real proud of what you have become.

      Delete
    66. ... Ha ha ha ha ha ha!! Yeah... Laters... Ha ha ha ha ha... !!

      Delete
    67. >>... Ha ha ha ha ha ha!! Yeah... Laters... Ha ha ha ha ha... !!


      LAST WORD!!!HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!MY AUTISM IS SHOWING!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
  19. The forest people aren't violent, don't you pay any attention to my informative videos, they are love,love

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You foolish lying fool,if they existed they would be violent


      Delete
    2. Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization...
      locked and ready to take down that Bigfoot and get the JOB DONE

      Delete
    3. .22 long rifle for all your Bigfooting needs

      Delete
    4. AK47 30 round mags takin down tham hawgs ans coyots reel quik lackd sos shootin bigfeets jist anuther critter

      Delete
    5. 12:06... Still struggling? Surely there's an adult at hand to help?? You can't be left unsupervised on the desktop for this long, surely??

      So on the one hand you want quotes from possibly months or years ago and yet you are so lazy you cant go up the page? Your intellectual honesty sure is taking a beating.

      Delete
    6. When you get all panicy, do you fumble where you're meant to put your responding comments?

      Relax bro... Don't get so flustered!

      Delete
    7. Well if you have to know I am using chrome and noticed that it was the wrong thread. I copied the text and went to a different page. I can back and pasted on the correct thread but it still posted here.

      My only frustration was that and you still don't have the courage to address the question. I guess I shouldn't be surprised about the latter.

      Delete
    8. Don't be so flustered bro! It might help if you relax a little when trying to absorb the information you seek.

      (That's been posted comments prior... Cringe!)

      Delete
    9. Out of context words explanation?

      If you are talking about conspiracies, whether it is secret or not is immaterial. It is possible for governments to conspire and that is what you are expressing.

      Delete
    10. "Cringe" is a code word, isn't it iktomi? You're actually doing something else.

      Delete
    11. Ok... Allow me to hold your hand through this one, again... The word out of context would be "pareidolia". This was totally out of context for the exchange, and one thinks that it's the only thing the anon has any confidence on that he should drop it in when the exchange incolves what it obviously something that DOES not inspire confidence... One can deduce that by the way they epically failed to provide anything of substance.

      Where are all the ******* adults gone?

      I am not the not the one who abides to the premise that for thousands of years, there has been a culture hopping secret society of gorilla suit wearing conspirators all out to get your money. These people, though finding each others customs undesirable, and spanning from a time when they didn't even know what an ape looked like, have in fact managed to cheat the best experts with fake biological species traits that span decades and States, in lottery win fashion too.

      Now that's kooky.

      Delete
    12. I see where the confusion comes from regarding the pareidolia usage. You were replying to the wrong person. My bad for not realizing that but if you would have simply restated what you were talking about without all the dancing around it would have been a lot easier.

      I don't think there is a secret society of gorilla suit conspirators. However in the last 50 years there has been an inordinate amount of hoaxing. I contend that there have always been boogie men and the traits you seen in common are merely superficial.

      Delete
    13. AnonymousFriday, January 8, 2016 at 9:59:00 AM PST
      "Cringey" is such a tinny word. I do prefer a good woody word. "Pareidolia" is a splendid woody word, don't you think?

      IktomiFriday, January 8, 2016 at 10:04:00 AM PST
      Nargh! Watching someone pretending to be clever is what it is... And using a term like "pareidolia" out of context for the immediate discussion, isn't helping that to be honest.
      (Cringe)

      ... Around 8 hours and well over 55 comments later, and you still didn't get it? Please stop putting your literary shortcomings off on others, I'm stooping low enough responding to you as it is.

      When the manufacturing of scientific evidence brings down social pillars such as the judiciary system and the peer review process (which has occurred and both still stand all he same), then your straw man argument might take hold.

      Delete
    14. Uh, I haven't been looking at this thread for eight hour jackass. Furthermore the guy appears to be doing a takeoff of a Monty Python bit, so why the hell are you making any issue of it whatsoever? Perhaps you are more comfortable (wrongly) calling people out on irrelevant things like spelling. I'm beginning to think you are indeed autistic.

      Delete
    15. Oh yes you have, you twonk... And we're almost going into our tenth hour and you still don't get it, ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
  20. What if a clever man can't understand the stupid man because the stupid man thinks he's the most clever one but his thinking is really wacko?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here's Layman's terms;

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    2. Patterson apparently had a decent one.

      Delete
    3. Yes... Trumping 47 years of SFX and 100 years of known fur cloth techniques in the process...

      Magic, proportion defying monkey suits must be easy for broke cowboys to slam together.

      Delete
  21. catterwallin heers thar be bigfoot afoot fer shure

    ReplyDelete
  22. Who's hiding the bones in the Smithsonian, Joe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure if he responds he won't give you a straight answer or go off on a tangent about the peer review system.

      Delete
    2. I was only asking because he is claiming that he is not a conspiracy theory fan.

      Delete
    3. Conspiracy appears to be a dirty word to Joe.

      Delete
    4. It's not a conspiracy if you have written confirmation from the anthropological authority of the day that remains that don't fit the paradigm will not be endorsed;
      http://www.scienceviews.com/lostcivilizations/powelldoctrine.html
      ... The Smithsonian is sometimes referred to as "the nation's attic" for its holdings of 138 million items, the Institution's Washington, D.C., nucleus of nineteen museums, nine research centres, and zoo, many of them historical or architectural landmarks, is the largest such complex in the world. Additional facilities are located in Arizona, Maryland, New York City, Virginia, Panama and elsewhere, and 168 other museums are Smithsonian affiliates... After many of the bones may have been handed back over to Native Anericans in the Repatriation Act.. They could be anywhere!!

      Delete
    5. 6:20... As I have said many times before, I love turning the psuedosceptical mantras on the psuedosceptics.

      Delete
    6. You like to see yourself as an intellectual. With that contention you don't like negative labels, regardless if they are true or not.

      Delete
    7. So you think the bones were just misplaced, and no one is trying to cover up anything?

      Delete
    8. 8:01... Sticks and stones, it's the subject matter you'll upset me about.

      8:08... Like I said, when you have written confirmation from the anthropological elite that finds that bring into question the subject of Human Antiquity won't be acknowledged, then there is no conspiracy and nobody is covering anything up.

      Delete
  23. Get a real content management system.

    ReplyDelete