Thursday, December 3, 2015

Man Gives Reluctant Account Of Bigfoot Sighting In 2004


Why would someone make up a story that they didn't want to tell anyone? That's the case with a lot of bigfoot sightings. People don't want to talk about it. It seems strange that someone would be making up a story only to be very reluctant to tell people about it. Here's a video of a bigfoot witness from 2004 telling his own story.


35 comments:

  1. The Turdfoot Diaries. Volume II: A Steaming Pile on Joes Face

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. new word for all you zombies
      workplace jihad

      Delete
  2. Booooooooo! Sahn and Matt! Booooooooo!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The best Bigfoot hunting methods, that will insure you will never see one.
    1. Looking for them at night.
    2. Screaming and Howling.
    3. Tree knocks
    4. Standing out in the open.
    5. Being 100 yards from a road
    6 Drenched in hair spray and deodorant
    7. Looking for them from late spring through september

    I could list many more, but you should get the drift. It's been over 60 years of searching with no results, with the above listing!

    Cliff Barackman, of FINDING BIGFOOT fame is known in the Bigfoot community, as a "Bigfoot Expert". Why/ He's been searching for over 30 years, and admitted he never even saw one!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and MATT and BOBO now are 1%ers and they need to pay their fair share $$$

      Delete
    2. Looks like Joe made a new account for troll special pleading

      Delete
    3. Good to see ya John!! Hope you're well brother!!

      Delete
    4. Can you please respond to yourself now Joe?

      Delete
    5. How to ensure that you will never see a bigfoot... search every inch of the planet.

      Delete
  4. Oh, and Shawn, i hardly ever comment on here anymore, I just visit your site just once in a while. It has really gone Down hill! Your letting on to many childish, immature basement, mommy's boy/Girly boy nerds! I remember when you had 200+ comments, now you average 25 or so. You better make some changes quick!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AHHH HAHAHA. Look how desperate Joe is.

      Delete
    2. yep that's joe....always has been, also why not start your own blog joe you seem to have ample time on your hands to do it. then you can have whoever you want on it .just think of the possibilities..

      Delete
    3. ^ i think he's referring to you basement dwelling turds who have ruined this site

      Joe

      Delete
    4. ^you can be joe's co-author of the blog mmc between you two there are what 35 accounts?

      Delete
    5. ^ try harder with your facts next time mr troll

      Joe

      Delete
  5. Sahn is the troll herder. At this point there is no longer any doubt that the administrator is in on the trolling or at least complicit.

    Remember when the site was created, he invited trolls, stating no one would be banned here.

    He loves the trolling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and your free to go elsewhere,are you not?...nothing wrong with making a living right? always been this way and always will...you have a choice deal with it or leave

      Delete
    2. Us trolls love Shawn and Matt. Its the superfriends we all hate. How is that boycott going?

      Delete
  6. Got 2004 bigfoot sighting suit?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope but we do have real bigfoot sightings
      sorry to disappoint you chum

      Joe

      Delete
    2. do tell got any photo's or evidence perhaps?.....or is it second hand drivel?

      Delete
    3. There is a wonderful thing called google which you can look things up and even see photos. You should try it instead of playing call of duty .
      Even if you were shown the clearest photos you'll still scream hoax so what is the point of engaging with skeptoids ?

      Joe

      Delete
    4. Nice logical fallacy, 7:52. Come up with the clearest photo and see what happens. Or are you just giving up finding the clearest photo because of the skeptics? You probably could find the clearest photo if you wanted to, huh, but you aren't going to out of spite. You are sticking it to the skeptics by withholding the clearest photo, aren't you?

      Delete
    5. it's not spite, the skeptics are the ones who refuse to believe anything if it isn't shoved in their faces . it's not like a bigfoot will sit there and pose for a photographer like it was going to be on the cover of rolling stone . They are elusive animals after all .
      Ever heard of a Bili ape - look it up. The local folk-stories of the surrounding region make note of massive ape-like creatures that kill and hunt lions, catch fish, and — the stories go — howl at the moon. With many local hunters mentioning an animal that looks something like a cross between a chimpanzee and a gorilla — an animal that apparently, according to the stories, is unaffected by poison darts, as the other apes are. People used to think it was all a bunch of hooey coming from uneducated natives til science caught up with one and it took quite a bit of time (i think over a year) in the forest . and now we know they do exist and same will apply with bigfoot if only science invest the same amount of time looking for one .
      School is done for the day

      Joe

      Delete
    6. 9:28... What logical fallacy did Joe commit exactly? Man... You're cringey when you're trying out new words and concepts! I'm afraid Joe is rather correct. Wildlife photographs are attained by professionals with professional equipment or they are in a relaxed environment (for them). I find it laughable that most 'sceptics' require photographs, when every photograph or footage has and always will be a man in a suit to them. The appliance of rhetorical arguments to make the perception of normal circumstance. Even wildlife photographers are assigned specific instructions and are allocated specific areas that would imply specific results. They are also professionals with professional equipment that usually erect little hideouts that don't do much for hiding against a creature with the wilderness awareness of five green berets, whereas the majority of this field are people from the general public who have to capture images of a far more evasive and intelligent creature than that of the projects of most wildlife biologists (the innumerable blobsquatches testify to this).

      Delete
    7. Amazing that Bigfoot can let itself be "blobsquached" countless times but never any better than that. It can walk that very fine line perfectly. Or can it?

      Delete
    8. Arrrrrgh, but better quality means you have to bust out the monkey suit excuse, doesn't it? You've had a source that's been going around for 47 years, if you didn't know.

      Delete