Friday, December 11, 2015

Bigfoot Researchers Discover Sasquatch Fortress Of Solitude


Sam from the Planet Sasquatch youtube channel was joined by fellow bigfooter Patrick Epistemon during an investigation into an area they claim has a known bigfoot clan living there. Once they get into the area they discover what they believe is a sasquatch fortress. 


116 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. tham injuns bein heers fer yeers ans thays sayin tham bigfeets bein heers shure do

      Delete
    2. Iktomi ... is a negative role model who behaves as socially inappropriately as possible by Sioux standards.

      He certainly lives up to expectations here at the blog .

      Delete
    3. it bein that thar gummint fer shure

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. What's for sure, is your Dmaker's nut shiner.

      Delete
    2. 2:45 they certainly both have an arrogant delusion about them

      Delete
    3. They certainly both attract abuse and psychopathy as a countering means to what they say.

      Telling.

      Delete
    4. Yes DWA is joes mentor. They "collaborate" with each other all the time. I remember the first time i caught Joe and DWA joerging in Leons basement. Boy oh boy was that a sight.

      Delete
    5. Iktomi is a negative role model who behaves as socially inappropriately as possible by Sioux standards...(we can insert "community" standards here)

      Delete
  3. Hello I am writing an article about american sub cultures, particularly those that involve believing in mythical things, you know aliens, bigfoot etc the usual nonsense. Anyway for my piece on "motivation" I would just like to know a couple of things. How much does a speaker at a bigfoot conference get paid and how much does a "believer" pay for a ticket to one of these conferences? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. give me 50 bucks and I'll tell ya

      Delete
    2. Ha ha ha ha ha!!!

      2:51... Not sure, but what's apparent is there are existing studies in the psychology of trolls, and it has determined they're on the psychopathy spectrum... That's a "no nonsense" idea, right there.

      Delete
    3. 2:51 I would suggest a case study on Dr Meldrum. He speaks at conferences and also sells footprint casts, some of which are from proven hoaxes. Also the conference in South Africa is a big eye opener. Yes you heard that right South Africa. Fascinating stuff.

      Delete
    4. Can you list the hoaxed castings he uses in his presentations? Also... It might be news to someone who's never worked a day in his life, but most reputable scientists are paid by the general public to discuss their research. What's fascinating, is he's manage to get an editorial board of some of the best primatologists and conservationists in the world on his online journal.

      Oh... And mythical creatures don't leave tracks.

      Delete
    5. Erectus walks among'st us. The sooner you admit to that Iktomi the sooner you will find inner peace.

      Delete
    6. But people wearing wood or rubber bigfoot stompers do leave tracks. Many tracks, many times.

      Delete
    7. Welshy, every single track in Meldrums collection is fake.

      Delete
    8. Yes... And they do that 50 miles into wilderness interiors hoping for a lottery chance find by someone walking the exact route. Stompers with dermals weren't in existence when two examples with the same traits were found States apart, decades apart.

      Not too smart are you?

      Delete
    9. 4:36... Yes, circular reasoning, Jedi mind tricks & things of the sort may work when you're trying to convince your mother of getting you another pizza, but you're with adults now... Remember?

      Delete
    10. Joe still hasnt figured it out yet. People have been making fake tracks with fake dermals for many years. Its big business, fooling these idiot footers, and it brings in the money...bigtime. Its people like Joe who believe in "fortresses of solitude" that have given bigfoot such a bad name. And after Joes racist comments earlier today, im surprised he is still allowed on this blog.

      Delete
    11. ONce again Joerg, if your going to use "mythical creatures dont leave tracks", be prepared to be made a fool of. Mythical cretures supposedly leave tons of tracks each year. Lizardman, goatman, mothman, werewolves, etc. People have been finding (making) tracks for many many years of these mythical creatures.

      Delete
    12. Ok... Let's look at it like this, you've been asked his before, so here it goes. Name me one forensic expert that's been fooled by fake dermals?

      Also... Would you like to post where I have used racism??

      Delete
    13. Now 6:28... Find three whole databases of reports that transcend native cultures' core belief systems & oral histories that mimic lizardman, mothman, etc reports... And find at least one scientist that supports the ideas that they exist, not to mention a unique species trait that can be attributed to an unclassified type of cryptid in relation to their reported traits.

      Should be easy.

      Delete
    14. You have referred to MMC as "the noble savage" several times Joe. You also frequently talk about monkey power. That is very racist and offensive. Your a biggot.

      Delete
    15. I dont need to find those things Joe. You specifically said, and love to repeat, that "mythical creatures dont leave tracks". And that statement is incorrect. They certainly do appear to leave tracks every single year. If your going to use that argument, then you better make sure its correct. Because if not, you will get called out on it again and again, and made to look a fool. You cant make an argument, and then when your argument is shown to be false, simply add on a list of qualifiers. Its pathetic.

      Delete
    16. You know what else doesn't leave tracks? My weiner.

      Delete
    17. 6:34... Quote me don't joke me, you insufferable loon. God, I can't wait for the day those hairy palms of yours disable you from keyboard access.

      6:36... No you do need to find those things if they are an alleged equivalent. You are not exempt from proving your points, you spoiled brat. Have you got a mothman or a lizardman track that has forensic experts confirming to be genuine? Can you list me one forensic expert that's been fooled by Sasquatch dermals?

      Delete
    18. Joe, can you quote me where I admitted to using anon mode to post? You said you could days ago, but have not provided the proof.

      Quote me, don't joke me. Right?

      Delete
    19. And if you can't address the two points put to you... Don't expect a response from me. I'm not contributing to clicks with a psycho anymore.

      Delete
    20. Donald... If I spent half hour sourcing it, yes. Everyone knows you're cheerleading on your own comments. Pretty ****** up considering you go around spending 99.9% of the time accusing others of multiple accounts.

      7000 BFF posts = obsessed

      Delete
    21. Krantz was fooled by fake dermals. He's a phd who published a book on sasquatch footprints.

      Delete
    22. Well then, go ahead and spend half an hour and prove me wrong. Go on now, quote me don't joke me.

      Run along now, IktoJoe and prove your point.

      Delete
    23. Dmaker just blew Joe the F#ck out!!! Not only did he name a scientist fooled by fake dermals, but he is also calling Joergs bluff. Man this is great. Joerg has painted himself into a corner that he isnt going to be able to back out of. I like how Joe is getting upset and now stating that "he wont contribute to clicks anymore". That has to be the biggest joke i have seen on this site. You still think you matter little Joergy boy. If you leave today, us trolls will still troll amongst ourselves. Your responses mean nothing to us. I mean dmaker just blew joe out, i mean blew him way out the water. Cmon Joe, put up the proof dmaker is making the posts anonymously. Unless of course you were lying as usual.

      Delete
    24. "not contributing clicks anymore".. This is Joes language for, i got caught in another lie. He keeps claiming mythical creatures dont leave tracks. Yet each time he says that, it gets pointed out to him, that apparently they do. Because people keep finding what they call lizardman tracks, goatman tracks, werewolf tracks, etc. So your statements are incorrect. Dont get mad at people pointing out that you are lying Joe.

      Delete
    25. Krantz isn't a forensic expert... Donald. You were told this when you were using the same argument among your ambiguity claims with your Boy Joerg account.

      You're a slow learner, but that's just plain dense to use the same argument across two accounts you've got obliterated on... And I'm going to source those threads for you just fine.

      Delete
    26. I don't care if you think him not being a forensic expert matters, Joe. I rather think his phd, and his area of expertise, trumps any investigator.

      Delete
    27. Duuuuuuuuuh, it does Don-Donz, because otherwise there is no dermals that fool scientific analysis. And who's talking about an investigator, you rhetorical twat. I've got a list of forensic experts to quote, I've mind bent you too many times before to count about them.

      Here;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/man-claims-to-have-knowledge-of-ape-man.html?m=0
      ... You will notice in the Boy Joerg comments, Donald using the exact tactic of claiming ambiguity of evidences, you will see him use the Krantz face fall argument (he isn't a forensic expert) and you will notice the exact same writing style and monotonous insults. Here another one;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/are-bigfoot-normal-or-paranormal-thom.html?m=0
      ... You'll also notice that as soon as Boy Joerg disappears, Dmaker appears, the chances of that eh? Now... To the others...

      Delete
    28. Don's the type who'd take a track casting to a geologist and celebrate his opinion calling it fake.

      Ha ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
    29. I believe most of your forensic experts are law enforcement, are they not?

      How is that proof of me admitting to using anon mode coming? I could not care less if you think someone used a similar argument or point to me. I don't have a copyright on the English language, Joe.

      Now go get the proof you claimed you have.

      Oh, one other question. Iktomi, are you the same person that used to post as Joe Fitz g erald?

      Delete
    30. I believe most of your forensic experts are law enforcement, are they not?

      How is that proof of me admitting to using anon mode coming? I could not care less if you think someone used a similar argument or point to me. I don't have a copyright on the English language, Joe.

      Now go get the proof you claimed you have.

      Oh, one other question. Iktomi, are you the same person that used to post as Joe Fit z g era ld?

      Delete
    31. Yes... Forensic experts tend to work with law enforcement, Donald.

      (Sigh)

      ... Donald, that is TEN TIMES MORE evidence than what you have to show for me being the ten other people you claim I am... What's the matter, rattled?

      Who's Joe?

      Delete
    32. According to Krantz, quite a few forensic experts were fooled by the Mill Creek fake tracks:

      "Krantz (1983: 71-72) writes: "Thus far, every specialist who has examined these casts [Mill Creek] agrees that their detailed anatomy has all the characteristics and appearance of being derived from an imprint of primate skin. These include thirty police fingerprint workers, ... six physical anthropologists ... four pathologists and two zoologists."

      Delete
    33. Joe, you don't need ten times whatever evidence, you just need ONE. The one you claimed existed but are unable to produce.

      Do you ever tire of being wrong?

      Delete
    34. Donald... The Mill Creek casts were verified to be authentic, and it just so happens that they were of the hoaxer, regardless. That's different from having species traits of an unclassified primate.

      Delete
    35. ^ What is that mumble supposed to mean?

      You asked for an example of even one forensic expert being fooled by fake dermals. And according to Krantz, quite a few were fooled by known fake tracks. You then brush it off as "regardless"? LOL. Nice.

      Where is that quote of me admitting to using anon mode? We're waiting for it, Joerktomi.

      Delete
    36. What's the matter, Joe? Are you getting upset? Can't find the evidence you claimed to have and your silly challenge is met easily to boot. Bad day for you, Joergy. Don't cry too hard.

      I notice up top you said DWA is your lover. He told me you are a bad kisser and you smell like kippers.

      Delete
    37. Donald... That "mumble" was me ruining your best argument... The dermals were genuine, the hoaxers... In a fake impression.

      Duuuuuuh???

      Donald... Do you live with your nutshiner? You both access his & her's desktops and never further than a couple of feet to hold hands?

      Delete
    38. Ruining what argument? Dermals in fake tracks fooled multiple forensic experts. What are you trying to say that the dermals were genuine in a fake track?

      Delete
    39. "Can you list me one forensic expert that's been fooled by Sasquatch dermals?"

      ^^ That was your claim. According to Krantz, at least 30 police prints experts alone were fooled, nevermind the anthropologists, pathologists and zoologists.

      Delete
    40. Why so cranky, Joe. Did you and DWA have a lovers quarrel? Did you catch him fapping to pics of Bindernagle again?

      Delete
    41. Ok, fine. I guess I was wrong. Sorry.

      Now leave me alone!

      Delete
    42. "After an eight-month effort, I was able to talk with Parker, then living on the East Coast. He told me the footprint was a fake. He knew this because he had made the imprint and the cast! Originally he had intended only to see if Krantz could, as he bragged, "differentiate between [a track] made artificially or naturally." Parker said he now feels the thing has gone too far and regrets he made the [Bloomington] track. I asked how it had been made. "It took about twenty minutes to form the print in the mud," he said. The dermal ridges came from his foot and hands, placed in areas where the "least amount of wear or abrasion would occur."
      ... Donald, you're either clinging on to this or typically being stupid. The dermals in those casts are real, they are of a genuine, living, breathing entity. So who's been fooled? The only thing they've been fooled on is the track shape and impression... Sorry Donald, you'll have to come again.

      That's funny... Where's your nutshiner? Did you forget to sign in with that account whilst getting all excited about dermals??

      Delete
    43. Why are you always picking on me?? It's not fair! I just want to talk about bigfoot, why is that so bad?

      Delete
    44. Argh there he is! That was quick Donald! Ha ha!!

      Delete
    45. That only destroys your own argument, Joe. What an idiot. You present a case where dermals were deliberately placed into a fake bigfoot track. At the same time, multiple times, you argue how dermals are the hallmark of a genuine bigfoot track.

      How stupid can you be? Honestly. Thanks for making my point.

      Delete
    46. And the dermals in the Mill Creek example were not from an "unknown primate", were they? I bet you plenty of experts thought they were.

      Now are you finally starting to get the point?

      Joe, don't cry like a little girl. It's unbecoming.

      Delete
    47. Luckily for you, I have somewhere I have to be for the rest of the morning and afternoon. I guess your trouncing will have to be put on hold on Monday.

      Enjoy your weekend, wanker. Don't be too hard on DWA, he can't help his man crush on Bindernagle.

      Delete
    48. Great Donald... So where is the replicated example of those traits? Might I empahises, the casts that I endorse have traits that transcend States and decades. To hoax convincing biological dermals, one would have to have a knowledge of primate dermals (that not many do), have a lottery win's chance of faking the same biological idea, and then fool multiple forensic experts. No... The experts were fooled because they were looking at genuine human primate dermals. These being found, seemingly in a foot shape not classified to science, would account for an unknown primate.

      Now... You will be asked again... Show me one example of fake dermals fooling a forensic expert. Crying?? Donald... I'm not the one coming across remotely emotional, or flogging a dead horse for that matter.

      : )

      Delete
    49. Lucky for me?! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!

      Delete
    50. joe has been decimated by dmaker. joes lies finally caught up to him.

      Delete
    51. personally i dont think Joe has ever taken such a beating where he was called out over his lies and aired out for the world to see. I mean not only did he get caught in lying about dmaker and anon mode, but he got nailed on his forensics argument. Not just nailed, blown out the water. Its times like this when we are proud to be trolls. To watch as Joergy gets aired out for the world to see. Thanks for the laughs dmaker, i dont think anyone could have done better making him look the liar he is.

      Delete
    52. Two of pathological liar Alaskabushpilot's most loyal ladies (dmaker,Resume) are questioning the credentials of a poster on the BFF...lol This is why the ISF clowns are referred to as pretend skeptics folks.

      Delete
    53. Um... (Cough, cough)... (Whispers)...

      Where are the forensic experts that have been fooled by fake dermals??

      : )

      Delete
    54. @9:21
      I thought Drewbot was his main lady. His claws come out anytime anyone even remotely question ABP's lies.

      Delete
    55. One set of fake tracks does not mean you throw out the whole concept of bigfoot being real. Unless every sighting has been of a three legged bear or a man in a monkey suit spanning hundreds of years you can't discount it all and say it doesn't exist mr Dwanker . People fake tracks because just like you they have nothing better to do with their pathetic lives and instead of adding something productive to this world they resort to fooling people or playing their halo 4 game
      Speaking of halo 4 is it hard to play when you only have fins ?

      Joe

      Delete
    56. Dmaker already showed you Joerg. Krantz and what he termed "several forensic experts" were fooled by them. You didnt expect dmaker to bring that up, and now you are scrambling to make up for you lie. Its over for you Joerg, dmaker put the final nail in your coffin today. Even the superfriends have to be sitting back shaking their heads at the beating you took, and the lies of yours that were exposed. BTFO!!!

      :)

      Delete
    57. Um... (Cough, cough)... (Whispers)...

      Where are the forensic experts that have been fooled by fake dermals?? The dermals in question were made by a living, breathing human primate. Where is the example of fake, artificial casting artefacts fooling forensic experts as being genuinely biolgical?

      Oops!!

      : p

      Delete

    58. IktomiFriday, December 11, 2015 at 6:28:00 AM PST
      Ok... Let's look at it like this, you've been asked his before, so here it goes. Name me one forensic expert that's been fooled by fake dermals?

      Delete
    59. Joe is trying desperately to gain back some shred of dignity after dmaker humiliated him and called him out on his forensic lies. Forensic experts were produced that were fooled by fake dermals. You now try and add qualifiers to your original blanket statement, and you are looking like a fool. Everyone is laughing at you Joerg. How does that make you feel?

      :)

      Delete
    60. Also...

      Regarding Krantz, all dermals are said to be authentic, the Parker track AND the others... Though you would have to prove that the other casts were faked by someone else using their own dermals, this merely confirms that all three are biological. Now... If all three of those casts had the same traits as the Parker casting, then we might be able to use this as a means of dismissing Chilcutt's casts (that have consistent traits across samples), but there is no mention of this. The experts merely state that all casts analysed are that of genuine biological tissue which they are, the hoaxed one included.

      The species traits I reference are what were uncovered by Jimmy Chilcutt, and these transcend decades and States. Chulcutt states that these are traits of a currently unclassified bipedal primate. So... Where is the example of fake dermals, for example casting artefacts, fooling forensic experts?

      Adios people!!

      Delete
    61. "Forensic experts were produced that were fooled by fake dermals."

      12:06... Again, where are here "fake dermals"? Would you like to point them out for me, ha ha ha ha!! It's pretty simple. The dermals verified were in fact genuine biological dermals of a hoaxer. This merely reinforces how difficult it is to fake biological traits; impossible via "fake dermals"; casting artefacts.

      : p

      Delete
    62. Your arguments keep getting dismantled joketomi. They were hoaxed tracks that contain dermals. Dermals that fooled experts. As i said, evven the superfriends are laughing at you and the trouble your lies got you in.

      :)

      Delete
    63. No... My arguments haven't even been addressed, allow me to TRY and put these into perspective for you (I do realise I'm speaking to a sub-human with inferior mental capacity)... They were fake tracks that had genuine biological dermals in them. The whole focus is the dermals, regardless of whether they came from a Sasquatch or normal human.

      Still with me? Sure?? Ok...

      If dermals can be artificially manufactured to which in turn fools forensic experts, then it calls out the process and can't be relied upon. There are no manufactured dermal ridges that have fooled experts, only real ones... And you have to go to some lengths to show that the other examples were indeed hoaxed this way. The major snag that rules this out, is Chilcutt's casts that have species traits decades and States apart. Now go get Dmaker... You're in need of another cruddy argument.

      Delete
    64. Your not going to be able to backpeddle your way out of this Joerg. It fooled the professionals, that is what your argument was based on, and it now has been blown out of the water. But it is funny watching you dig your hole deeper. But lets humor you. Someone take real dermals and put them on a fake track. That right there dismantles your entire dermal argument once again. For it proves that a knowledgeable person could make impressions of real dermals, mishmash them into a unique pattern, and put them on a set of wooden stompers. And there you go. You have a unique dermal pattern of hoaxed footprints. Or you could just copy a human set of dermals completely, stick them on the stompers and there you have it once more. Stupid footers, incompetent researchers, and publicity hounds would quickly deem it authentic, and simply state that it has human dermals because bigfoot is a human. I mean that is the argument you would have Joergtomi. But you know this, you are just trolling. You know there is no bigfoot. But thats straying away from your originial arguement that no experts have been fooled by fake dermals. And they were. They were put on fake tracks, and a FAKE impression was made. And it fooled the crazies. Dmaker thoroughly destroyed you today and you are sore over it. Dont worry, it wont get any better. Poor little Joergy

      :)

      Delete
    65. Humour me? (My word, what a nut job)...

      Um... No... Sorry to p*ss on your parade, weirdo. The professionals verifying dermals in Krantz's study didn't have Sasquatch in mind. They're only verifying what's in front of their eyes. You put what is alleged to be dermal ridges in front of them, they're gonna tell you if they're genuine or not; simples. For one set of biological traits in one sample that are from a known human, does not mean the biological traits in others aren't... It just verifies them as all being biologically genuine and your argument is futile, and Sasquatch are human. Also... There is nothing "unique" about the dermals found in the Parker hoax. In fact, they were verified to be exactly that of a human. Try reading a source instead of simply hanging on the word of someone else, you silly twat.

      Again... This is not the case with Chulcutt's samples, to which your nonsense is even more futile. To hoax these biological dermals, one would have to have a knowledge of primate dermals (that not many on the planet do), have a lottery win's chance of faking the EXACT same biological idea, and then fool multiple forensic experts. These are unique enough to not be imitated by "stompers", which I might add there is also no known method of putting dermals on stompers, you insufferable loon.

      So... Pray tell... Where are the forensic experts that have been fooled by fake dermals, considering your best argument has actual biological dermals in them?

      Delete
    66. Joe, do you have examples of forensic experts exposing faked dermals?

      Also, Chilcutt admitted that the dermal ridges in the Onion Mtn casts could be replicated.

      "Although Chilcutt admits Crowley’s work duplicated the friction ridges on the Onion Mountain cast, he maintains that the impression is of the foot of a real animal."

      So if he admits that what he thinks is authentic can, in fact, be replicated, then why would replicated dermals not fool him, or any other expert, in the future? How would we know if that did happen unless the track was conclusively proven to be a fake at some point? There are probably plenty of "authenticated" dermals in fake tracks out there. I ask again, do you have examples of forensic experts not being fooled by faked dermals?

      Delete
    67. No... You have forensic experts that are exposed to fake tracks that have genuine biological dermals in them. You have yet to demonstrate where casting artefacts can be interpreted as genuine biological traits by forensic experts. It's really quite simple.

      No Donald... Chulcutt is very adamant about the prints that he has verified, and though they are from different locations, they still have the same texture and ridge flow pattern, like a humans however twice the size. Chilcutt stated as plain as day that even Crowley (who's far more enthusiastic than what psuedosceptics would prefer) has stated that even he feels that Walla Walla casts are genuine (25mins in the link below). "He's made me think of being more careful", is all that Chilcutt states, I'm not sure of any source where Chilcutt states that the casting process can accidentally accurately make what are considered convincing biological dermals. On the 36mins, Chilcutt explains that the faked dermals that Crowley sent him was covered in artificial ridge artefacts from the pouring process. The three casts in question that Chilcutt examined, they didn't have this... This is because when you are walking barefoot on the forest floor, the foot comes in contact with both fallen leaves and the soil in making an impression. Therefore, these artefacts would be present in consistency right across the different soil areas of the foot fall and they're not. The delta ridges on prints change directions over 45 degrees; they converge and deviate. This is a major indicator that the dermals are biological and as Chulcutt states, these do not appear on any of the artefacts.
      http://www.skeptic.com/podcasts/monstertalk/10/02/03/

      ... That's actually the reality of the situation, Donald.

      Delete
    68. joe just got humiliated by dmaker !

      Delete
    69. You seem like you're trying to convince someone?

      Night Donald!

      Delete
    70. " I'm not sure of any source where Chilcutt states that the casting process can accidentally accurately make what are considered convincing biological dermals."

      Well, allow me to help you with that:

      "Although Chilcutt admits Crowley’s work duplicated the friction ridges on the Onion Mountain cast, he maintains that the impression is of the foot of a real animal"

      http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/experiments_cast_doubt_on_bigfoot_evidence/

      He admits that Crowleys work duplicated the ridges on the Onion Mtn casts.

      Delete
    71. Didn't fool him though, did it Donald? And in a later interview, he blows the CSICOP wishful thinking away by explaining just why. Like I said... You'll get something that looks like dermals to the untrained and uneducated eye (Crowely and the other million pseudosceptics), but you won't get something that accurately mimics biological traits.

      Anyway!! Night night!!

      Delete
    72. dmaker is cleaning house once again!

      Delete
    73. Still no fake dermals fooling experts though???

      : (

      Delete
    74. Here's how dmaker is either dishonest or stupid...

      dmakerFriday, December 11, 2015 at 7:39:00 AM PST
      According to Krantz, quite a few forensic experts were fooled by the Mill Creek fake tracks:
      "Krantz (1983: 71-72) writes: "Thus far, every specialist who has examined these casts [Mill Creek] agrees that their detailed anatomy has all the characteristics and appearance of being derived from an imprint of primate skin. These include thirty police fingerprint workers, ... six physical anthropologists ... four pathologists and two zoologists."

      But if you actually read the source to which dmaker has quoted;
      http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/skeptical.htm
      ... It is in no context what so ever to the Mill Creek tracks being faked, and thus not fooling any of the forensic experts listed in Krantz' paper;
      http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints

      ... The only track that has been shown to be faked, was the Bloomington track by a J W Parker by allegedly using his own dermals pressed into the dirt, but were recognised immediately to be authentic human dermals, thus fooling no expert.

      Delete
  4. Thank you so much sharing nice link. This is very useful.

    ReplyDelete
  5. what an amazing find. i would have loved to have been with them when they go out looking. it only could have been an intelligent creature who left those there for us to find and that creature is a bigfoot for sure

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that or ol yellow turd. Fresh off a joerging spree of middle aged boys. I believe this is his fortress of solitude, where he "solitudes" all over himself.

      Delete
    2. Jeorgy Peorgy, puddin and pie,
      Kissed the girls and made them cry,
      When the boys came out to play,
      Jeorgy Peorgy ran away.

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha!

      Delete
    3. ^ YES YES YES!!!!! AHHH HAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    4. Why is "monkey power" racist? explain!. xx

      Delete
    5. It's because he sees black people as "monkeys", Eva... He's been raised by tramps, obviously.

      Delete
    6. And that goes for the psycho-nerd, not FFS. FFS obviously is referring to Sasquatch.

      Delete
    7. No thats not true, FFS is obvioiusly referring to black people. Hes racist.

      Delete
    8. anon 6:24 gets all excited when talking about doing something all over himself. I think he's got plenty of experience

      Joe

      Delete
    9. FFS! Mr.Anonymous you are really a stupid child...and I could care less of what you think :) MONKEY POWER FFS!

      Delete
    10. wes amurkins gits reedin that thar constitushun fer tham guns ritely so

      Delete
    11. Lookout! FFS claws have come out M-E-O-W!

      The Monkey Power is strong with that one.

      Delete
    12. It's only racist to little minds who see something that isn't there xx

      Delete
    13. looks outs fer tham jihadist in da boosh shure is

      Delete
    14. FFS!!! MEOW!!!! MEOW LADY!!!! RACIST MONKEY POWER!!!! FFS!!! HARRY BANDINI!!!! THE WIFE!!!!! MEOW!!!!.........DERP DERP DERP DERP

      Delete
  6. FFS! There are a lot of really tough keyboard warriors that are anonymous :) The possibility is there for a small group of relic hominid / viable hybrids to exist, it's also possible that they don't...But one thing that is true! Mr.Anonymous is a chump and a disgrace to any real troll FFS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hows the wife and dildo collection Harry?

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. FFS and Eva are seriously racist. FFS!!! MEOW!!!FFFS!!!! MEOW!!!!

      DERP DERP HARRYS WIFE DERP DERP DERP

      Delete
  8. This has got to be one of the most subjective (in terms of so called evidence) Bigfoot videos I've ever seen. You're right, not "coincidence"; it's called the natural consequence of storms. I've spent years in the woods and seen these kinds of "blow downs" including the X's. Conjecture is the best I can say for all of this....admire your passion though; and at least you're out there having fun and trying. Please just be a bit more objective in your analysis...it will garner much more respect, guaranteed!

    Good luck in the future,
    Greg

    ReplyDelete
  9. Laughing my ass off, watching this video showing two people who know nothing about forestry or how to look at evidence! Private Patrick is breaking all the rules about examining evidence, never assume and always keep a neutral position until the evidence is confirmed pro or con for said position. No wonder Matthew Johnson has Private Patrick on the team, a real investigator would see right through the bullshit and call Johnson out...

    ReplyDelete